Reform of corporate criminal liability arrangements in Indonesia and types of sanctions that can be implemented
Keywords:
Corporate, criminal liability, SanctionAbstract
Individuals who commit criminal acts will receive criminal sanctions for them. However, criminal sanctions for corporations that commit criminal acts are not regulated in the Criminal Code. This research uses normative legal research methods. This study aims to examine the criminal liability arrangements by corporations as well as what sanctions can be applied. In Indonesia, criminal liability by corporations has been regulated in several statutory regulations that are outside the Criminal Code. Sanctions that can be applied to corporations include basic crimes such as criminal fines, additional crimes, and corporate confiscation.Downloads
References
Butarbutar, R. (2015). Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa Pemerintah Di Bidang Konstruksi. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas, 9(1), 51–66.
Disemadi, H. S., & Jaya, N. S. P. (2019). Perkembangan Pengaturan Korporasi Sebagai Subjek Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Media Bhakti, 3(2), 118–127.
Disemadi, H. S., & Roisah, K. (2019). Urgency of the Contempt of Court Criminalization Policy to Overcome Harassment Against the Status and Dignity of Courts. Brawijaya Law Journal, 6(2), 24–233.
Jaya, N. S. P. (2017). Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana. Semarang: PT. Pustaka Rizki Putra.
Jaya, N. S. P. (2018). Hukum Dan Hukum Pidana Di Bidang Ekonomi. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Krismen, Y. (2014). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Kejahatan Ekonomi. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(2), 133–160.
Kristian. (2017). Jenis-Jenis Sanksi Pidana Yang Dapat Diterapkan Terhadap Korporasi. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 43(2), 270–288.
Lasmadi, S. (2004). Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dalam Perspektif Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Universitas Airlangga Surabaya.
Pradjonggo, T. S. (2010). Alternatif Sanksi Pidana Dalam Kejahatan Korporasi. Yustisia, 8(1), 70–78.
Qudus, M. A., & Pujiyono. (2019). Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Terhadap Tindak Pidana Human Trafficking Di Indonesi. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (Jkh), 5(2), 26–39.
Rofiq, A., Disemadi, H. S., & Jaya, N. S. P. (2019). Criminal Objectives Integrality in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System. Al-Risalah, 19(2), 179–190.
Runtuwene, V. E., Massie, J. D. ., & Tumewu, F. (2017). Quality Control Analysis Using Statistical Quality Control At PT Massindo Sinar Pratama Manado. Jurnal EMBA, 5(2), 2516–2525.
Sintung, L. (2015). Penuntutan Terhadap Korporasi Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Suap. Lex Crimen, 4(1), 199–207.
Suhariyanto, B. (2016a). Progresivitas Putusan Pemidanaan Terhadap Korporasi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 16(2), 201–213.
Suhariyanto, B. (2016b). Restoratif Justice Dalam Pemidanaan Korporasi Pelaku Korupasi Demi Optimalisasi Pengembalian Kerugian Negara. Jurnal Rechts Vinding, 5(3), 421–438.
Suhariyanto, B. (2017). Putusan Pemidanaan Terhadap Korporasi Tanpa Didakwakan Dalam Perspektif Vicarious Liability. Jurnal Yudisial, 10(1), 17–38.
Sularman, A., & Ma’ruf, U. (2017). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Kepada Korban Tindak Pidana. Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, 12(2), 387–396.
Tawalujan, J. (2012). Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Terhadap Korban Kejahatan. Lex Crimen, 1(3), 5–22.
Toruan, H. D. L. (2014). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korupsi Korporasi. Jurnal Rechts Vinding, 3(3), 397–416.
Widowaty, Y. (2012). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Terhadap Korban Dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup. Jurnal Yudisial, 5(2), 154–169.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Rya Elita Br Sembiring, Pujiyono Pujiyono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
