Juridical analysis of policy concerning oil palm estate management in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v29i1.14376Keywords:
CPO, Deforestation, Good Governance, Indonesia, Renewable Energy Directive.Abstract
The development of the palm oil industry (CPO) in Indonesia is often confronted by challenges coming from the international community, one of which is the rejection of Indonesian CPO exports declared by the European Union on the grounds of deforestation and land clearing, specifically forest burning, that are aimed to convert the forest areas to oil palm estates. In an attempt to clean such a bad name in palm oil industries in the world and to avert the label ‘unsustainable’ given by European Union, President Joko Widodo issued Presidential Instruction Number 8/2018. However, the implementation of the Presidential Instruction is not without hurdles like the absence of specific guidelines to help to implement the policy at the regional level and the lack of opportunities to involve civilians to guard this policy. Juridical analysis of the policy aimed to improve palm oil management and to hamper deforestation is, thus, required. With the normative-juridical method, this research is aimed to recommend the government to grow the potential of CPO-based biofuel in Indonesia and the application of a one-map policy over the potential of oil palm estates to allow the implementation of transparency principle in the structure of good governance. All these recommendations are mainly aimed to give more opportunities to the members of the public to have meaningful participation as well as sustainable and enviro-friendly in improving the management of palm oil cultivation.
Downloads
References
Arya Hadi Dharmawan, et al. (2018). Pengembangan bioenergi di Indonesia: Peluang dan tantangan kebijakan industri biodiesel. Pengembangan Bioenergi Di Indonesia: Peluang Dan Tantangan Kebijakan Industri Biodiesel. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/006975
Badan Pengelola Dana Perkebunan Sawit. (2018). Industri Kelapa Sawit Indonesia Serap 16,2 Juta Pekerja. https://www.bpdp.or.id/Industri-Kelapa-Sawit-Indonesia-Serap-16-2-Juta-Pekerja
Center for Area Studies Indonesia Institute of Sciences (P2W-LIPI). (2020). Potensi Dampak Penerapan RED II Terhadap Perekenomian Indonesia. http://psdr.lipi.go.id/news-and-events/opinions/potensi-dampak-penerapan-red-ii-terhadap-perekenomian-indonesia.html
Chakravarty, S., K., S., P., C., N., A., & Shukl, G. (2012). Deforestation: Causes, Effects and Control Strategies. Global Perspectives on Sustainable Forest Management. https://doi.org/10.5772/33342
Databoks. (2019). Produksi Minyak Sawit Memenuhi 37% Minyak Nabati Dunia. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2019/12/07/produksi-minyak-sawit-memenuhi-37-minyak-nabati-dunia
Directorate General of Estate Crops. (2020). Tree Crop Estate Statistics of Indonesia. Tree Crop Estate Statistics of Indonesia 2018-2020, 1–82. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FVxpBNihnuB3ayAALBi-FtsBShIUxMTD/view
Douglas Sheil, et al. (2009). The impacts and opportunities of oil palm in Southeast Asia: What do we know and what do we need to know? In The impacts and opportunities of oil palm in Southeast Asia: What do we know and what do we need to know? https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/002792
European Parliament. (2017). on palm oil and deforestation of rainforests (2016/2222(INI)). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0066_EN.html?redirect#title1
Flach, B., Lieberz, S., Rondon, M., Williams, B., & Teiken, C. (2015). EU Biofuels Annual 2015. Global Agricultural Information Network, 42. http://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent GAIN Publications/Biofuels Annual_The Hague_EU-28_7-15-2015.pdf
Forest Watch Indonesia. (2017). 6 Tahun ISPO.
Forest Watch Indonesia. (2018). Roadmap Masyarakat Sipil untuk Reforma Perkebunan Sawit Indonesia Berkeadilan.
Forest Watch Indonesia. (2020). Menelisik Angka Deforestasi Pemerintah. https://fwi.or.id/menelisik-angka-deforestasi-pemerintah/#:~:text=Berdasarkan hasil pembahasan diatas%2C pada,angka 650 ribu hektare pertahun.
Giuntoli, J., Agostini, A., Edwards, R., Marelli, L., European Commission, Broeren, M. L. M., Molenveld, K., van den Oever, M. J. A., Patel, M. K. M. K., Worrell, E., Shen, L., Tsiropoulos, I., Faaij, A. P. C., Lundquist, L., Schenker, U., Briois, J. F., Patel, M. K. M. K., Galloway, J. N., Dentener, F. J., … IPCC. (2010). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliamant, the Council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. A European Strategy for plastics in a Circular Economy. https://doi.org/10.2779/822269
Indra Nugraha. (2020). Empat Tahun BRG: Daya dan Upaya Pulihkan Gambut Negeri. Mongabay.Co.Id. https://www.mongabay.co.id/2020/01/28/empat-tahun-brg-daya-dan-upaya-pulihkan-gambut-negeri/
Johnny Ibrahim. (2007). Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang, Bayumedia.
Jones, D. S. (2006). ASEAN and transboundary haze pollution in Southeast Asia. Asia Europe Journal, 4(3), 431–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-006-0067-1
KPK. (2016). Kajian sistem pengelolaan komoditas kelapa sawit. 65.
Lembaga Studi dan Advokasi Masyarakat (ELSAM). (2020). Identifikasi Modalitas dan Hambatan Kepatuhan Pertamina sebagai Aktor Pemajuan Hak Asasi Manusia dan Produk Berkelanjutan.
Listiningrum, P. (2019). Transboundary civil litigation for victims of Southeast Asian Haze pollution: Access to justice and the non-discrimination principle. Transnational Environmental Law, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102518000298
Listiningrum, Prischa, & Bachtiar, R. (2018). The Emergence of Access to Environmental Justice in Indonesia (A Case Study on Mining for Cement in Kendeng Mountains). 59(December 2012), 236–240. https://doi.org/10.2991/iceml-18.2018.52
Maryadi, H. L. P., Dewi, Elizabeth Diana Purwaning, H. L. A., Dewi, A. R., Fitri, W., Putro, R. A., Priyantari, Y. R., & Abdullah, Hudzaifah Kurniawan, H. (2019). “ Peran Diplomasi dalam Mendukung Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan : Tinjauan terhadap Pengelolaan Industri Minyak Nabati .”
Meijaard, E., Garcia-Ulloa, J., Sheil, D., Wich, S. A., Carlson, K. M., Juffe-Bignoli, D., & Brooks, T. (2018). Kelapa sawit dan Keanekaragaman Hayati.
Moh Nazir. (2005). Metode Penelitian. Jakarta, Ghalia Indonesia
Othman, J. (2003). Linking Agricultural Trade, Land Demand, and Environmental Externalities: Case of Oil Palm in Southeast Asia. Asean Economic Bulletin, 20(3), 244–255.
Peat Restoration Agency. (2019). Laporan 3 Tahun Restorasi Gambut. Laporan, Badan Restorasi Gambut
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2007). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta, Kencana.
Rachmad Safa’at, et. al. (2017). Analisis Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi atas Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam. Laporan Penelitian, Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Pengelolaan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi Sekeretariat Jenderal Mahkamah Konstitusi.
Roni Hanitijo Soemitro. (1998). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri. Jakarta: Penerbit Ghalia.
Sawit Watch. (2018). Membumikan Moratorium Dan Evaluasi Perkebunan Sawit. Policy Brief, Koalisi Masyarakat Sipil untuk Moratorium Kelapa Sawit Indonesia.
Sawit Watch. (2019). Shadow Report: Kemana Arah Implementasi Inpres No. 8 Tahun 2018 Berjalan? In Sawit Watch. Shadow Report, Koalisi Masyarakat Sipil.
Suharsono, A., et al. (2019). Getting to 23 Per Cent: Strategies to scale up renewables in Indonesia. Report, International Institute for Sustainable Development.
Susanti, A., & Burgers, P. (2011). Oil palm expansion in Riau province , Indonesia : serving people , planet , profit ? Report. European Union.
Tan, A. (2005). The ASEAN agreement on transboundary haze pollution: Prospects for compliance and effectiveness in post-Suharto Indonesia. New York University Environmental Law Journal, 1, 647–721.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Prischa Listiningrum, Rizqi Bachtiar, Dararida Fandra Mahira, Rumi Suwardiyati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
