Criticisms toward the job creation bill and ethical reconstruction of legislators based on prophetic values
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v29i1.14991Keywords:
Job creation bill, legislators ethics, PropheticAbstract
Post the issuance of Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation, the public paid more attention by continuing to protest and criticize. This response occurred due to various legislative deviations noticed during the legislative process of the Job Creation Bill by not adhering to the principles and procedures for the formation of laws and regulations. The main cause for this deviation is due to the ethics of the legislators who are not thoroughly compliant and obedient toward the statutory regulations and social ethics. Legislators’ understanding of law and life tends to be influenced by materialistic-positivistic views that bring forth consumptive, hedonistic, and secular demeanors and behaviors. On this basis, this paper tries to criticize and reconstruct the legislators’ ethics in law-making. This study is using a normative juridical method and is supported by a philosophical approach. The outcomes of this research show that the process in the making of the Job Creation Bill tends to override the principle of transparency and public participation with a closed and hasty pattern so that it is a complete ulterior hasty agenda that prioritizes the concept of regulating and monitoring only (top-down). A work ethic based on prophetic values that are supported by the ground principles of a prophetic paradigm that includes humanization, liberation, and transcendence into a new form of construction to be able to create a better and just legislative process.
Downloads
References
Absori, Kelik Wardiono, S. Rrochman. (2015). Hukum Profetik: Kritik Terhadap Paradigma Hukum Non-Sistematik. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 12.
Absori. (2017). Pemikiran Hukum Transendental Dalam Konteks Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum Indonesia. In Transendensi Hukum: Prospek dan Implementasi, Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing in collaboration with Program Doktor (S3) Ilmu Hukum Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, 7–19. http://eprints.ums.ac.id/57714/1/Transenden Lengkap.pdf
Ahimsa-Putra, H. Heddy Shri. (2013). Paradigma Profetik: Sebuah Konsepsi. In Syamsudin (ed.), Ilmu Hukum Profetik: Gagasan Awal, Landasan Kefilsafatan dan Kemungkinan Pengembangannya di Era Postmodern, Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 62.
Akib, Muhammad. (2014). Pergeseran Paradigma Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan: dari Mekanistik-reduksionis ke Holistik-ekologi. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 43 (1), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.43.1.2014.125-131
Harefa, Mandala. & Alhusaim, Avhmad Sani. (2020). Pembentukan Omnibus Law dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Investasi. Parliamentary Review, II (1), 15. https://berkas.dpr.go.id/puslit/files/parliamentary_review/Parliamentary Review-II-1-M-2020.pdf
Ali, Zainuddin. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 24.
Anggono, Bayu Dwi. (2014). Perkembangan Pembentukan Undang-Undang Di Indonesia. Jakarta, Konstitusi Press, 23.
Azhary, M. Tahari. (1992). Negara Hukum (Ke-1). Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 26.
Bedner, Adriaan. (2017). Amalgamating Environmental Law in Indonesia. In J. Arnscheidt & & J. M. O. B. Van Rooij (Eds.), Lawmaking for Development: Explorations into the Theory and Practice of International Legislative Projects (Vol. 4, Issue 2, pp. 447–471). Leiden University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2017.21
Busroh, Firman Freaddy. (2017). Konseptualisasi Omnibus Law Dalam Menyelesaikan Permasalahan Regulasi Pertanahan. Arena Hukum, 10 (2), 227–250. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2017.01002.4
Capra, Fritjof. (2009). The Turning Point: Titik Balik Peradaban Sains, Masyarakat, dan Kebangkitan Kebudayaa (M. Thoyib (ed.)). Yogyakarta: Jejak, 1-39
Coase, Roland. (1960). The Problem of Social Cost. Law & Economics, Vol. III, 1–44.
Darmawan, Agus. (2020). Politik Hukum Omnibus Law Dalam Konteks Pembangunan Ekonomi Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies, 1 (1), 13. https://doi.org/10.31000/ijlp.v1i1.2655
Dimyati, Khudzaifah. (2014). Pemikiran Hukum: Konstruksi Epistemologis Berbasis Budaya Hukum Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, vi.
Dimyati, K., & Kelik Wardiono, Ridwan, S. R. (2015). Pemikiran Transendental Model Profetik. In Hukum Transendental: Pengembangan dan Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing in collaboration with Program Doktor (S3) Ilmu Hukum Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta 2 (20), 71–85.. https://publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id/bitstream/handle/11617/9683/5. Khudzaifah.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Dinata, Ari Wiryana. (2019). Mekanisme Partisipasi Publik dalam Proses Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. In Menggagas Arah Kebijakan Reformasi Regulasi di Indonesia: Prosiding Forum Akademik Kebijakan Reformasi Regulasi 2019. Yayasan Studi Hukum dan Kebijakan Indonesia (YSHK), 68. www.pshk.or.id
Feby Ivalerina, et. al., (2020). Hukum Dan Kebijakan Lingkungan dalam Poros Percepatan Investasi: Hukum dan Kebijakan Lingkungan Dalam Poros Percepatan Investasi, 1. https://icel.or.id/kertas-kebijakan/hukum-dan-kebijakan-lingkungan-dalam-poros-percepatan-investasi-catatan-terhadap-wacana-omnibus-law-cipta-lapangan-kerja/
Habibi, Nur. (2014). Praktik Pengawasan Etika Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonsia. Jurnal Cita Hukum, Vol. II No. 1, 40. http://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/citahukum
Hardiman, F. Budi. (2009). Demokrasi Deliberatif: Menimbang Negara Hukum dan Ruang Publik dalam Teori Diskursus Jürgen Habermas. Kanisius, 66.
Hutchinson, Allan. C. (2010). Critical Legal Studies In Awaludin Marwan, Teori Hukum Kontemporer: Suatu Pengantar Postmodernisme Hukum. Yogyakarta: Rangkang Education, 28.
Iqbal, Muhammad. (2018). The Reconstruction Of Religious Thought In Islam. California: Stanford University Press, 385. http://www.archipress.org/docs/pdf/iqbalreconstruction.pdf
Jayanuarto, Rangga.. (2018). Hukum Dan Keadilan Berparadigma Profetik. In (Absori, et) Pemikiran Hukum Profetik: Ragam Paradigma Menuju Hukum Berketuhanan. Yogyakarta: Ruas Media, 35. https://publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id/bitstream/handle/11617/10301/PEMIKIRAN HUKUM PROFETIK.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Kuntowijoyo. (1991). Paradigma Islam: Interpretasi Untuk Aksi (Priyono (ed.)). Bandung: Mizan, 168, 289.
Kuntowijoyo. (2018). Muslim Tanpa Masjid Idi Subandy Ibrahim (ed.)). Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD, 112, 388-391.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. (2009). Penelitian Hukum (ke-5). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 35..
Massicotte, Louis. (2013). Omnibus Bills in Theory and Practice. Canadian Parliamentary Review, 36 (1), 16–17.
MD, Moh. Mahfud. (2014). Politik Hukum Di Indonesia, (ke-6). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 22..
Muhammad, Rusli. (2013). Remarks inside In Syamsudin (ed.), Ilmu Hukum Profetik: Gagasan Awal, Landasan Kefilsafatan dan Kemungkinan Pengembangannya di Era Postmodern. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, vi.
Nasr, Sayyed Husein. (1989). Knowladge and Sacred. New York: State University of New York Press, 33-34. http://traditionalhikma.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Knowledge-and-the-Sacred-The-Gifford-Lectures.pdf
PSKH, Admin. (2020). Proses Legislasi Serampangan Hasilkan Cacat Formil UU Cipta Kerja. https://pshk.or.id/publikasi/siaran-pers/proses-legislasi-serampangan-hasilkan-cacat-formil-uu-cipta-kerja/
Rahardjo, Satjipto. (2010). Sosiologi Hukum: Perkembangan Metode Dan Pilihan Masalah (Cetakan II). Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 140, 137.
Safitri, Dini. (2020). Omnibus Law RUU Cipta Lapangan Kerja dalam Perspektif Komunikasi Pembangunan Partisipatif. Jurnal Dialog Kebijakan Publik, 32(July), 39–49. file:///C:/Users/ASUS/Downloads/JurnalDialogKebijakanPublikNo.32_Kemkominfo.PDF
Sigit Riyanto, et. al., (2020). Kertas Kebijakan: Catatan Kritis Terhadap Uu No 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja. In Sell Journal (Vol. 5, Issue 1) 1, 25. https://rispub.law.ugm.ac.id/wpcontent/uploads/sites/1049/2020/11/Kertas-kebijakan-analisis-UU-Cipta-Kerja-FH-UGM-5-November-2020-rev-1.pdf
Suteki. (2011). Rekam Jejak Pemikiran Hukum Progresif Satjipto Rahardjo In (Myrna A. Safitri (ed.)) Satjipto Rahardjo dan Hukum Progresif: Urgensi dan Kritik. Jakarta: Epistema Institute dan HuMa, 30.
Suteki. (2018). Hukum Progresif: Hukum Berdimensi Transendental dalam Konteks Keindonesiaan. In Hukum Transendental: Pengembangan dan Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing in collaboration with Program Doktor (S3) Ilmu Hukum Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, 3. https://publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id/bitstream/handle/11617/9667/1. Suteki.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Yuliandri, et.al. (2014). Laporan Akhir Pengkajian Hukum Tentang Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Penentuan Arah Kebijakan Prioritas Penyusunan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan, Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sistem Hukum Nasional Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia, 7-8. https://www.google.co.id/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjsqJ3msqLjAhUKQo8KHeK2BrgQFjABegQIAxAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bphn.go.id%2Fdata%2Fdocuments%2Flap.akhir_pengkajian_hukum_prioritas_perundang-undangan.pdf&usg=AOvVaw
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Ilham Dwi Rafiqi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
