The integration of the authority of judicial institutions in solving general election problems in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v29i2.15608Keywords:
Authority, general election, integration, judicial institutionAbstract
The authority to adjudicate general election problems/ disputes scattered in various judicial institutions has made the resolution process drawn out and, complicated, creating overlapping powers and the potential for conflicting decisions between judicial institutions. This study examines how the judiciary's authority is regulated in adjudicating election problems, why it is necessary to integrate judicial authority, and how the concept of the judiciary's power is in judging all general election problems. This research aims to map the judiciary's power and find the judicial institution's design with an authority to adjudicate all general election problems. This study used juridical-normative research with a statutory approach, conceptual and case approaches. The results show that the authority to judge general election problems is given to the Constitutional Court, Supreme Court, State Administrative Court, and District Courts of Appeal. The large number of judicial institutions authorized to judge has been proven to be incompatible with general election administration and judicial power administration principles. The authority to adjudicate all election issues must be exercised in one judicial institution. The judiciary that can exercise this authority refers to the Constitutional Court, the Supreme Court, or the exercise can be performed by establishing a remarkable judicial institution.
Downloads
References
Al-Fatih, S. (2020). Electoral Regulation in Indonesia : Is It Modern Law ? Unnes Law Journal, 6(2), 205–216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/ulj.v6i2.41627
Al-Fatih, S. (2018). Model Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Satu Atap Melalui Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY, 25(2), 247. https://doi.org/10.22219/jihl.v25i2.6005
Al-Fatih, S. (2019). Akibat Hukum Regulasi tentang Threshold dalamPemilihan Umum Legislatif dan Pemilihan Presiden: Kajian Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 52/PUU-X/2012 dan Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013. Jurnal Yudisial, 12(1), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v12i1.258
Al-Fatih, S., Safaat, M. A., & Dahlan, M. (2014). Reformulasi Parliamentary Threshold Yang Berkeadilan Dalam Pemilu Legislatif Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum, 20. http://hukum.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/1018/1007
Amalia, R. A., Wibowo, G. D. H., & Kaharudin. (2019). Konflik Asas Ius Curia Novit Dengan Asas Nemo Judex in. Education and Development, 7(3), 224–227. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37081/ed.v7i3.1240
Asshiddiqie, J. (2013). Pengadilan Khusus , Dalam Hitam Putih Pengadilan Khusus. Sekretariat Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia.
Assistance, E. (2011). Strengthening the roles of political parties in public accountability.
Cahyandari, D., Siboy, A., & Sudarsono, S. (2020). Urgensi Pemisahan Kewenangan Mengadili Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum Serentak. Arena Hukum, 13(01), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2020.01301.4
Elliott, R., & Timulak, L. (2015). Descriptive and interpretive approaches to qualitative research. In J. M. and P. Gilbert (Ed.), A Handbook of Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology (pp. 147–157). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780198527565.001.0001
Esfandiari, F., & Fatih, S. Al. (2020). Initiating a Permanent Electoral Body To Resolve Dignified Election Disputes: Assessing the Effectiveness of Gakkumdu. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 9(3), 333. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v9i3.44437
Fitryantica, A. (2019). Harmonisasi Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Indonesia melalui Konsep Omnibus Law. Gema Keadilan, 6(3), 300–316. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.6.3.300-316
Harun, R. (2015). Rekonstruksi Kewenangan Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum. Jurnal Konstitusi, 13(1), 1–24.
Leuprecht, C., & Skillicorn, D. B. (2016). Incumbency effects in U.S. presidential campaigns: Language patterns matter. Electoral Studies, 43, 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.05.008
Liany, L. (2016). Desain Hubungan Kelembagaan Penyelenggara Pemilu. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 4(1), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v4i1.3198
Luttig, M. D., & Motta, M. (2017). President Obama on the ballot : Referendum voting and racial spillover in the 2014 midterm elections. Electoral Studies, 50, 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2017.09.009
MKRI. (2019). Rekapitulasi Perkara Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum. Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia.
Momeni, N. (2012). Linguistic recontextualization of police interrogation : a new approach in Forensic Linguistics. 5(1), 796–807.
Olsson, A., & Meek, L. (2013). Effectiveness of Research and Innovation Management at Policy and Institutional Levels. In Innovation, Higher Education and Research for Development: Vol. interconti.
Pal, J., & Gonawela, A. (2017). Studying political communication on Twitter: the case for small data. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 18, 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.09.009
Pennisi, G. A. (2016). Legislative drafting and language: Legal language in context. Statute Law Review, 37(2), 97–100. https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmw024
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2014). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
republik indonesia. (2017). Undang-Undang nomor 7 tahun 2017 Tentang Pemilu. Undang-Undang Pemilu.
Ridwan. (2009). Tiga Dimensi Hukum Administrasi dan Peradilan Administrasi. FH UII Press.
Schane, S. (2002). Ambiguity and Misunderstanding in the Law. Thomas Jefferson Law Review, 25(1960), 167–182.
Siahaan, M. (2009). Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Penegakan Hukum Konstitusi. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 16(3), 357–378.
Siahaan, M. (2011). Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Sinha, S. (2015). Forensic linguistics and forensic phonetics: An introduction. Journal of Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary Research, 2(6), 153–157.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2010). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Soemaryono, & Erliyana, A. (1999). Tuntutan Praktek Beracara di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. PT. Pramedya Pustaka.
Spaltani, B. G. (2018). Urgensi Pengadilan Khusus Dalam Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan Di Indonesia. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Wiyono, R. (2008). Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Penerbit Sinar Grafika.
Yuslim. (2015). Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Sinar Grafika.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Ahmad Siboy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
