The ambiguity of dismissal of notary over bankruptcy in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v29i2.15677Keywords:
Meaning, legal consequences, regulation, notary position, bankruptcyAbstract
A notary is a public official who has the authority to make authentic deeds and other authorities regulated in-laws and regulations. Notaries are also private legal subjects (natuurlijk persons), which have free will to carry out legal actions. According to the Law on Notarial Positions, a Notary is dishonorably dismissed when (s)he is declared bankrupt. On the other hand, the UUK and PKPU recognize the rehabilitation of bankrupt debtors if they have fulfilled their obligations. This is where there is ambiguity or a fuzzy norm (vegen norm). Legal research aims to find out how bankruptcy is regulated in the notary position, and what are the legal consequences for the position of a notary both as a person and in relation to his/her position as a notary public? This legal research is normative juridical using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The legal materials obtained are analyzed using content analysis. The results of the discussion: 1). Notary bankruptcy has been regulated in UUK and PKPU as well as in the Law on Notary Position. 2). The legal consequences for a Notary who is declared bankrupt by the Commercial Court have an impact on the notary's personality, as well as on his position. According to the Law on the Position of Notary Public, if violating Article 84 which results in losses to the parties, the notary is obliged to pay compensation. According to the UUK and PKPU, this could result in the debtor losing the right to act freely on his assets, but not losing the right to perform his/her tasks and hold a position. As a recommendation, in the Law on the Position of Notary Public, it is necessary to clearly define the separation of Notary as a person from her/his position as his profession.
Downloads
References
Adjie, H. (2008). Sanksi Perdata Dan Administrasi Terhadap Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Publik. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Anggraeny, I., & Al-Fatih, S. (2020). Kata Sepakat Dalam Perjanjian Dan Relevansinya Sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Wanprestasi. De Lega Lata: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.30596/dll.v5i1.3446
Budiono, H. (2013). Kumpulan Tulisan Hukum Perdata Di Bidang Kenotariatan. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Delines, H., Daulay, Z., & Fauzi, W. (2020). Bankruptcy as a Reason for Termination of Notary in Indonesia. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(11), 318–324. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i11.2175
García-Posada, M., & Mora-Sanguinetti, J. S. (2014). Are there alternatives to bankruptcy? A study of small business distress in Spain. SERIEs, 5(2), 287–332. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1007/s13209-014-0109-7
Hartini, R. (2017). Hukum Kepailitan (Edisi Revisi). Malang: UMM Press.
Irsan. (2008). Akibat Hukum Pernyataan Pailit Terhadap Orang Pribadi Yang Berprofesi Sebagai Notaris. University of Diponegoro.
Irwansyah. (2020). Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel (A. Yunus, Ed.). Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media.
Kahar, A. (1983). Notaris dalam Praktik Hukum. Bandung: Alumni.
Kie, T. T. (2011). Studi Notariat Dan Serba-Serbi Praktek Notaris, Cetakan Kedua. Jakarta: Ichtiar Baru van Hoeve.
Laela, F. (2021). Notary in Malang. Malang.
Lestari, K. A. I. (2020). Kadek Ayu Intan Lestari, Pemberhentian Notaris Dengan Tidak Hormat Akibat Dinyatakannya Pailit Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 8(5), 822–831.
Lubis, M. F. R. (2018). Pertanggungjawaban Direksi Disuatu Perseroan Terbatas Ketika Terjadi Kepailitan Pada Umumnya Dan Menurut Doktrin Hukum Perusahaan & Undang-Undang No.40 Tahun 2007. Jurnal Hukum Kaidah: Media Komunikasi Dan Informasi Hukum Dan Masyarakat, 17(2), 25–47. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.30743/jhk.v17i2.350
Majamaa, K., Lehtinen, A.-R., & Rantala, K. (2019). Debt Judgments as a Reflection of Consumption-Related Debt Problems. Journal of Consumer Policy, 42(1), 223–244. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1007/s10603-018-9402-3
Marzuki, P. M. (2006). Penelitian Hukum (Cetakan Kedua). Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group.
Maylaksita, A. (2019). Problematik Interpretasi Pengaturan Kepailitan Terhadap Jabatan Notaris Di Indonesia. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 4(1), 126–144.
Mulyadi, L. (2010). Perkara Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU), Teori Dan Praktik. Bandung: Alumni.
Notodisoerjo, R. S. (1993). Hukum Notariat Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.
Olabarrieta, U., Araujo, A., & San-Jose, L. (2020). Ethics of Bankruptcy Creditor. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00001-1_16-1
Omakoya, A. B., & Oluto, A. E. (2017). Bankruptcy and Insolvency: An Exploration of Relevant Theories. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(3), 706–712.
Ranggawidjaya, R. (1998). Pengantar Ilmu Perundang-Undangan Indonesia. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Retnaningsih, S., & Ikhwansyah, I. (2017). Legal Status Of Individual Bankrupt Debtors After Termination of Bankruptcy and Rehabilitation Under Indonesian Bankruptcy Law. Indonesia Law Review, 7(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v7n1.289
Shabrina, D., Fendri, A., & Adegustara, F. (2019). The Role of the Notary Regional Supervisory Board in Preventing Legal Violations Committed by Notaries in Padang City. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 6(1), 292. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i1.571
Shubhan, M. H. (2008). Hukum Kepailitan, Norma Dan Praktek Di Pengadilan,. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group.
Stef, N. (2018). Bankruptcy and the difficulty of firing. International Review of Law and Economics, 54(1), 85–94. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2017.11.002
Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. (n.d.).
Utomo, R. N., & Karjoko, L. (2018). Role of the Shareholders within the Composition of Authentic Deed by the Notary. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 5(3), 307. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v5i3.428
Wijaya, G. (2019). Legal Consequences of Making Deed Of Granting of Security Rights By Notary With a Guarantee Object Through Different Bank. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, 18(5), 91–94.
Wijayanti, R. A., Setiono, & Soehartono. (2019). Verdicts on Bankruptcy Cases Study Case on Judges’ Legal Behaviour. Journal Of Law, Policy and Globalization, 81, 82–98. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.7176/JLPG
Yuliarti, & Purnawan, A. (2018). Regional Assembly Supervisory Effectiveness of Supervision in Efforts to Increase The Professionalism of Notary in The Region of Purwokerto and Purbalingga. Jurnal Akta, 5(4), 905–912. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.30659/akta.v5i4.3731
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Rahayu Hartini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
