Comparing patent protection in Indonesia with that in Singapore and Hong Kong

Authors

  • Lu Sudirman Faculty of Law, Universitas Internasional Batam, Indonesia
  • Hari Sutra Disemadi Faculty of Law, Universitas Internasional Batam, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v29i2.15680

Keywords:

protection, patent, Indonesia, Hongkong, Singapore

Abstract

The discovery of technology has a huge impact on the economy of a country, so many countries focus on developing technology and apply this technology in their respective countries. Technological inventions must register patent rights to obtain legal protection to avoid losses that will harm inventors, stimulate creativity in creating new technologies and create fair business competition among companies engaged in technology. This normative research aims to compare patent protection in Indonesia, Singapore, and Hong Kong. The benefit of this research is that it can contribute to scientific literature in the field of patent rights, can provide an overview of the form of patent rights arrangements in several countries outside Indonesia, so as to avoid disputes and/or misunderstandings with other countries. The participation of Indonesia, Singapore, and Hong Kong in ratifying the Convention on the World Trade Organization and the agreement on the Trade Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs) obliges these countries to establish regulations on patents in their respective countries. Although the application of patent law in Indonesia, Singapore, and Hong Kong is based on the terms of the TRIPs agreement, the implementation and regulations must have differences. Patent registration in Indonesia, Singapore, and Hong Kong have the same procedure, namely fulfilling the formal requirements, substantive examination, then the announcement stage. The term of patent protection in Indonesia and Singapore is similar, which is 20 years from the date of filing. However, it is different from Hong Kong, namely from the date of filing. In patent disputes, there are two ways of settlement, namely litigation and non-litigation. Patents in Indonesia, Singapore, and Hong Kong have another similarity, namely that they are transferable and can be licensed. The focus of this research is only to compare the application of patent law and not to examine its strengths and weaknesses, so it is considered important to do further research on this matter.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adnyani, K. D. A., Budiartha, I. N. P., & Ujianti, N. M. P. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Penerima Lisensi Paten dalam Alih Teknologi. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 1(1), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.1.1.2180.24-29

Al-Fatih, S., Aditya, Z., Haris, H., & Kurniawan, W. (2019). ASEAN Civil Society In The Digital Era; Are We Moving Backwards? 317(IConProCS), 266–269. https://doi.org/10.2991/iconprocs-19.2019.55

Amboro, F. Y. P. (2019). Problematika Pendaftaran Merek Untuk Usaha Mikro, Kecil dan Menengah di Kota Batam. Journal of Judicial Review, 21(1), 1–14.

Amrikasari, R. (2017a). Peran TRIPS Agreement dalam Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual.

Amrikasari, R. (2017b). Perbedaan Pengalihan Hak Paten dengan Perjanjian Lisensi.

Anonim. (2017). Perbandingan Perlindungan Paten Di Singapura Dan Di Indonesia Berdasarkan UU No 13 Tahun 2016 Tentang Paten.

Athreye, S., Piscitello, L., & Shadlen, K. C. (2020). Twenty-five years since TRIPS: Patent policy and international business. Journal of International Business Policy, 3(4), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-020-00079-1

Budi, H. S. (2019). Policy study in Indonesia patent legal system. Law Reform, 15(2), 206–224.

Chng, I. (2002). The patent system in Singapore. In World Patent Information (Vol. 24, Issue 4, pp. 297–302). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0172-2190(02)00068-6

Corporate Services. (2019). Intellectual Property Law of Singapore.

Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual - Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI. (n.d.). Paten.

Erlina B, & Safitri, M. (2020). Analisis Komparasi Antara Perlindungan Paten Biasa Dengan Paten Sederhana Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Paten. PRANATA HUKUM, 15(1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.36448/pranatahukum.v15i1.216

Hakim, L., & Kurniwan, N. (2020). Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional Ekonomi Warga Negara Melalui Hak Paten di Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 17(3), 582–604. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.31078/jk1736

Hamdan, H. (2018). Industri 4.0: Pengaruh Revolusi Industri Pada Kewirausahaan Demi Kemandirian Ekonomi. Jurnal Nusantara Aplikasi Manajemen Bisnis, 3(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.29407/nusamba.v3i2.12142

Hidayah, K. (2012). Perlindungan Hak Paten Dalam Kajian Hukum Islam Dan Peran Umat Islam Dalam Bidang IPTEK. Journal de Jure, 4(1), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v4i1.2160

Indradewi, A. A. S. N. (2018). Patent Norm Conflict on Trade-Related Aspect Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs) in Mining Perspective. Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Energy and Mining Law (ICEML 2018), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.2991/iceml-18.2018.1

Intellectual Property Department: The Government oh the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. (2004). Patents Laws.

Intellectual Property Office of Singapore. (2020). Patent Agents.

Jaelani, A. K., Kurniawan, A. A., & Indrastuti, L. (2019). Pelaksanaan Standarisasi Pemberian Paten Dalam Invensi Bidang Obat-Obatan Di Indonesia. Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 27(2), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.22219/jihl.v27i2.10173

Jazuli, A. (2018). Penyelesaian Permohonan Pendaftaran Paten dalam Rangka Peningkatan Pelayanan Publik. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 12(3), 243–257.

Koo, C., & Fitzgerald, N. (n.d.). Patent litigation in Hong Kong: overview.

Kurnia, A. J. (2018). Pendaftaran Merek di Singapura dan Malaysia.

Kurnianingrum, T. P. (2019). Pelindungan Hak Paten atas Pengetahuan Obat Tradisional Melalui Pasal 26 UU No. 13 Tahun 2016 tentang Paten (Protection of Patent Rights on Traditional Medicine Knowledge Through Article 26 of Law No. 13 of 2016 Concerning Patents). Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan, 10(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v10i1.1222

Lukito, I. (2017). Tantangan Hukum dan Peran Pemerintah dalam Pembangunan E-Commerce. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 11(3), 349–367. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2017.V11.349-367

Mak, T. (2019). Hong Kong: Hong Kong Patents – Practical Issues To Be Considered.

Mardiana, H., Amirulloh, M., & Faisal, P. (2020). Hak paten sebagai objek jaminan fidusia berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan mengenai jaminan fidusia dan paten. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 11(2), 177–186.

Masrur, D. R. (2019). Upaya Perlindungan Sumber Daya Genetik Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 Tentang Paten. Jurnal Jurisprudence, 8(2), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v8i2.6994

Matthews, D. (2020). Bryan Mercurio: Drugs, Patents and Policy. A Contextual Study of Hong Kong. IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 52(1), 93–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-020-00996-x

Mukhlishin, M. A. (2020). Ini Lho Perbedaan Paten Dan Paten Sederhana.

Nasir, R. (2016). Paten dalam Proses Produksi: Tinjauan Hak yang Melekat pada Inventor. Jurnal Hukum Positum, 1(1), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.35706/positum.v1i1.503

Ningsih, A. S., Waspiah, W., & Salsabilla, S. (2019). Indikasi Geografis Atas Carica Dieng Sebagai Strategi Penguatan Ekonomi Daerah. Jurnal Suara Hukum, 1(1), 105–120. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.26740/1.jsh.2019.1.1.4271

Novianti. (2017). Pelindungan Paten Melalui Patent Cooperation Treatydan Regulations Under The Patent Cooperation Treaty (Patent Protection Through Patent Cooperation Treaty And Regulations Under The Patent Cooperation Treaty). Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan, 8(2), 289–307. https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v8i2.1071

Novianti, R., & Garzia, M. (2020). Penggunaan Gadget pada Anak: Tantangan Baru Orang Tua Milenial. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 4(2), 1000–1010. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v4i2.490

Palupi, I. D. R. (2020). Pengaruh Media Sosial Pada Perkembangan Kecerdasan Anak Usia Dini. Urnal Edukasi Nonformal, 1(2), 127–134.

Payumo, J. G., Arasu, P., Fauzi, A. M., Siregar, I. Z., & Noviana, D. (2014). An entrepreneurial, research-based university model focused on intellectual property management for economic development in emerging economies: The case of Bogor Agricultural University, Indonesia. World Patent Information, 36, 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2013.11.009

Pramoediyanto, F. L. (2020). Essential Facilities Doctrine Untuk Membatasi Hak Eksklusif Paten. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 5(2), 389–397. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.17977/um019v5i2p389-397

Purwaningsih, E. (2020). Patent Law and Its Enforcement in Indonesia, Japan and the USA. Jurnal Media Hukum, 27(1), 1–22.

Putra, A., & Patmaningrum, D. A. (2018). Pengaruh Youtube di Smartphone Terhadap Perkembangan Kemampuan Komunikasi Interpersonal Anak. Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi, 21(3), 159–172.

Ramadhani, M., Amirulloh, M., & Faisal, P. (2021). Perlindungan terhadap inventor terkait unsur kebaruan paten yang hapus akibat tidak membayar biaya tahunan. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 12(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v12i1.4717.

Ribowo, M. B., & Raisah, K. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Paten Sederhana Dalam Sistem Hukum Paten Di Indonesia (Studi Komparasi Dengan Sistem Hukum Paten Di Negara China). Notarius, 12(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v12i1.23761

Rois, M. F., & Roisah, K. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual Kerajinan Kuningan Tumang. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 20(3), 401–419. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v20i3.11717

Roisah, K. (2018). Employee-inventor’s right to compensation in patent law system in Indonesia and some countries. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 9.7(37), 2415–2424. https://doi.org/10.14505/jarle.v9.7(37).28

Roughead, E. E., Kim, D.-S., Ong, B., & Kemp-Casey, A. (2018). Pricing policies for generic medicines in Australia, New Zealand, the Republic of Korea and Singapore: patent expiry and influence on atorvastatin price. WHO South-East Asia Journal of Public Health, 7(2), 99–106.

Sampat, B. N., & Shadlen, K. C. (2018). Indian pharmaceutical patent prosecution: The changing role of Section 3(d). PLOS ONE, 13(4), e0194714. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194714

Sidik, S. (2013). Dampak Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE) terhadap Perubahan Hukum dan Sosial dalam Masyarakat. Jurnal Ilmiah Widya, 1(1), 1–7.

Singapore Legal Advice. (2019). Patent Infringement in Singapore: What to Do If Your Patent is Infringed.

Singapore Statutes Online. (2005). Patents Act (Chapter 211)-2005.

Sun, Y. (2003). Determinants of foreign patents in China. World Patent Information, 25(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0172-2190(02)00086-8

Suputri, N. K. W. A., & Sukihana, I. A. (2020). Prinsip New And Novelty Dalam Perlindungan Paten Di Indonesia. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 8(8), 1240–1248. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.24843/KS.2020.v08.i08.p11

Suteki, & Taufani, G. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum (Filasafat, Teori dan Praktik). Rajagrafindo Persada.

Suwardi, S. (2019). Aspek Legalitas Dalam Perlindungan Hukum Paten Diindonesia. Perspektif Hukum, 18(1), 157–174. https://doi.org/10.30649/phj.v18i1.168

Syafrida. (2019). Pentingnya Perlindungan Hukum Paten Warga Negara Asing Di Wilayah Indonesia Guna Meningkatkan Investasi Asing. ADIL: Jurnal Hukum, 10(1), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.33476/ajl.v10i1.1067

Utami, S. (2019). Eksistensi Perkembangan Perekonomian Perempuan di Era Digitalisasi. AN-NISA: Jurnal Studi Gender Dan Anak, 12(1), 596–609. https://doi.org/10.30863/annisa.v12i1.454

Wang, J. (2018). Innovation and government intervention: A comparison of Singapore and Hong Kong. Research Policy, 47(2), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.12.008

Waspiah, W. (2018). The Acceleration of Simple Patent: How We Optimize Technology on Indonesian Intellectual and Property Rights Law (Study on Central Java, Indonesia). Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Indonesian Legal Studies (ICILS 2018), 205–209. https://doi.org/10.2991/icils-18.2018.39

Wicaksono, I. (2020). Politik Hukum Pelindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Di Indonesia Pasca Di Ratifikasinya Trips Agreement. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum, 18(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v18i1.1088

Wowiling, R. R. (2017). Penegakan Hukum Hak Paten Menurut Trips Agreement dan Pelaksanaanya di Indonesia. Lex Crimen, 6(10), 85–91.

Yuan, B., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Flexible environmental policy, technological innovation and sustainable development of China’s industry: The moderating effect of environment regulatory enforcement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 243, 118543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118543

Zuami, M. D. A., & Tresnawati, B. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemegang Hak Paten Akibat Dihapusnya Kepemilikan Hak Paten Dari Daftar Umum Paten. Jurnal Juristic, 1(1), 95–106.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-18

How to Cite

Sudirman, L., & Disemadi, H. S. (2021). Comparing patent protection in Indonesia with that in Singapore and Hong Kong. Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 29(2), 200–222. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v29i2.15680

Issue

Section

Journal's Articles