Formal genus of the value of justice in Indonesia

Authors

  • Sidik Sunaryo Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v29i2.16609

Keywords:

Genus, justice, formality

Abstract

This research aimed to find the formal genus of the value of justice in Indonesia. As known, justice that holds the sense of plurality universally transcends the boundary of formality of narrative texts in a normative way. The plurality of the value of justice that is laden with universality transforms to the genus of the school of thoughts vis-à-vis justice throughout history. Reduced meaning of justice in the perspective and the process of legislation is not powerful enough to negate the genus of justice that inherently represents the fundamental characteristics of justice. The look of the legislative process attractively reflects the genus of hunger for power intended to justify ambitions among factions in the domain of democracy. The formality in the legislation no longer represents the principle of the definition of the legislation and it is getting further away from the reach of the definition of aspiration, let alone to become an inspiration of the objectives of the state as mandated in the constitution. Holistic approach used in this research to find out the formal genus of justice in Indonesia. This research found that religious matters in the legislation-related authorities have become an acceptable ornament among the piles of the works of morality. The integrity that has become the genus of justice morality has transformed into a collection of texts hanging all over the wall of the national parliament. Religions are used as tools of negotiation in the formulation and the making of narrative texts before they are further transformed into legislation. Religions and powers in legislation are competing to find their point of the genus of normativization as expected by each faction. Law came into existence earlier than expected, leaving behind its umbilical cord like a prematurely born soul, the cord through which the values of justice are transferred from its mother, and these values have the dimension of plurality. Law is born, but since it is separable from its genus, it does not carry much of the meaning of birth.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, M. D. (1991). Asas-asas Hukum Islam (Hukum Islam I), Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Islam di Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Arif, B. N. (2008). Interest of Criminal Law Policies, The Development of the Drafting of the New Criminal Code (KUHP). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Bedner, A. W., Irianto, S., Otto, J. M., & Wirastri, T. D. (2012). Kajian Socio Legal ; Seri Unsur-Unsur Penyusun Bangunan Negara Hukum. Denpasar: Pustaka Larasan.

Bertens, K. (1999). Sejarah Filsafat Yunani. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Dimyati, K. (2010). Teorisasi Hukum Studi Tentang Perkembangan Pemikiran Hukum di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.

Erdianti, R. N., & Al-Fatih, S. (2019). Fostering as an Alternative Sanction for Juveniles in the Perspective of Child Protection in Indonesia. JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies), 4(1), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.15294/JILS.V4I01.29315

Foreword, E. J. L., & Tollison, R. D. (2010). In The Pursuit Of Justice Law And Economics Of Legal Institutions. United States: Palgrave MacMillan.

Habermas, J. (2003). Truth and Justification. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Hamka. (1981). Sejarah Umat Islam. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang.

Hegel, G. W. F. (2001). Philosophy of Right. Ontario: Street South Kitchener.

Hudson, B. (2003). Justice in the Risk Society Challenging and Re-affirming Justice in Late Modernity. New Delhi: SAGE Publications London.

Irianto, S. (2009). Hukum Yang Bergerak Tinjauan Antropologi Hukum. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Irwansyah. (2020). Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel (A. Yunus, ed.). Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media.

Johnny Ibrahim. (2007). Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia.

K.Lubis, S., & Simanjutak, K. (n.d.). Hukum Waris Islam. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Kant, I. (2002). The Critique Of Practical Reason Translated Thomass Kingsmill Abbott. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

L.Tanya, B. (2011). Penegakan Hukum Dalam Terang Etika. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.

Meyer, L. R. (2010). The Justice of Mercy. Street Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Raharjo, S. (2010a). Progressive Law Enforcement. Jakarta: PT. Kompas Media Nusantara.

Raharjo, S. (2010b). Sosiologi Hukum Perkembangan Metode dan Pilihan Maslah.Genta. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.

Rakowski, E. (1993). Equal Justice. Clarendon Press.

Schmidtz, D. (2006). Elements of Justice. Cambridge: University of Arizona. Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building.

Unger, R. M. (1999). Gerakan Studi Hukum Kritis. Jakarta: ELSAM.

White, G. E. (1993). Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Law and The Inner Self. New York: Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-25

How to Cite

Sunaryo, S. (2021). Formal genus of the value of justice in Indonesia . Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 29(2), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v29i2.16609

Issue

Section

Journal's Articles