Porn videos as evidence of adultery: a comparative study of Indonesian criminal law and Islamic law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v30i2.20808Keywords:
Video, Evidence, Adultery, Criminal JusticeAbstract
Adultery is one of the categories of crimes that are prohibited under Indonesian law and is also categorized as a major sin according to Islamic law. With so many porn videos circulating through social media or the internet, the question of what if porn videos are used as evidence in court so that they can prosecute adulterers is raised. The purpose of this study is to find video criteria that can be used as legal evidence according to Islamic law and Indonesian Criminal Law. This study aims to find video criteria presented as legal evidence according to Indonesian criminal law and Islamic law so that it can be used as a reference for reforming Indonesian criminal law. This research was conducted by comparing Indonesian criminal law and Islamic law regarding video criteria as evidence of adultery. The results of this study found that according to Indonesian criminal law, because of the Constitutional Court's Decision No. 20/PUU-XIV/2016 there are limitations on videos that can be used as evidence in court, namely the method of acquisition must be in accordance with applicable legal rules. Meanwhile, according to Islamic criminal law, videos can be used as evidence of qorinah or instructions, but materially the content of the video contains the entry of almurd into the mikhalah. Based on these findings, the adultery video can be used as legal evidence, it can be referred to base on Islamic law by positioning it as evidence of guidance, and although qoth'i there must be four men as witnesses on charges of adultery.
Downloads
References
Abdul, M. (2017). Perubahan Hukum Dengan Sebab Berubahnya Masa, Tempat Dan Keadaan. Jurnal Hikmah, 15(1), 72–85. http://e-jurnal.staisumatera-medan.ac.id/index.php/hikmah/article/view/26
Al-Fatih, S., Hidayah, N., & Anggraeny, I. (2021, January 11). Islamic Law as A Value to Solve The Humanitarian Crisis: Lessons from Indonesia. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Indonesian Legal Studies, ICILS 2020, July 1st 2020, Semarang, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.1-7-2020.2303662
Ali, M. I. (2020). Comparative Legal Research-building a Legal Attitude for a Transnational World. Journal of Legal Studies, 26(40), 66–80. https://publicatii.uvvg.ro/index.php/jls/article/view/626
Ardiansyah, I., Handoko, D., & Sukri, B. (2022). The Indonesian Criminal Code: Unregulated Adultery (An Overview of Islamic Criminal Law). Pena Law: International Journal of Law, 1(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.56107/penalaw.v1i1.8
Aulia, F., & Al-Fatih, S. (2017). Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Common Law, Civil Law dan Islamic Law dalam Perspektif Sejarah dan Karakteristik Berpikir. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 25(1), 98–113. https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/legality/article/view/5993
Aziz, N. N. A., Yazid, Z. N. A., Tarmuji, N. H., Samsudin, M. A., & Majid, A. A. (2021). The Role of Religiosity on Work-Family Conflict, Work-Family Enrichment and Well-Being among Muslim Women Academicians in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(3), 472–497. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i3/8807
Bezoušková, L., & Lojek, A. (2015). Adultery and Fornication in Historical Perspectives. The Lawyer Quarterly, 5(4), Article 4. https://tlq.ilaw.cas.cz/index.php/tlq/article/view/168
Clinton, B. (2019). Kominfo Terima Lebih dari 244.000 Aduan Konten Pornografi di 2019. https://tekno.kompas.com/read/2020/01/10/08060037/kominfo-terima-lebih-dari-244.000-aduan-konten-pornografi-di-2019
Disemadi, H. S. (2019). Adultery Child Status in Islamic Law and in The Civil Code. Legal Standing: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(2), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.24269/ls.v3i2.1877
Djamil, F. (2017). Mencari Format Hukum Islam Yang Progresif Berkearifan Lokal: Pendekatan Socio-cultural Dan Maqashid Al Syariah. Kordinat, 16(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.15408/kordinat.v16i1.6450
Faiz, M. N. (2018). Studi Komparasi Investigasi Digital Forensik pada Tindak Kriminal. INISTA: Journal of Informatics, Information System, Software Engineering and Applications, 1(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.20895/INISTA.V1I1
Harahap, Z. A. A. (2017). Eksistensi Maqàshid Al-Syarì’ah dalam Pembaruan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Istinbath, 16(1), 22–64. https://doi.org/10.20414/ijhi.v16i1.17
Hasan, H. (2020). Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian Terhadap Tindak Pidana Al-Qadzf Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam. Al-Risalah Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum, 16–27. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.v20i1.15250
Herbert, L. (2016). Why Properly Policing a Movement Matters: A Response to Alafair Burke’s Policing, Protestors, and Discretion. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 40(3), 1023. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol40/iss3/4
Heryogi, A., Ruba’i, M., & Sugiri, B. (2017). Fungsi Bukti Elektronik Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 20/PUU-XIV/2016. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 2(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.17977/um019v2i12017p007
Husain, H. (2019). Metode Ijtihad Kontemporer Menurut Yusuf Al-Qaradawi. Sulesana: Jurnal Wawasan Keislaman, 13(2), 145–163. https://doi.org//10.24252/sulesana.v13i2.13404
Kipnis, L. (1998). Adultery. Critical Inquiry, 24(2), 289–327. https://doi.org/10.1086/448876
Kisworo, B. (2020). Tuduhan Berzina (Qazfu Al-Zina) dalam Kajian Teologis dan Sosiologis. Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam, 5(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v5i1.1433
Lahaji, L., & Muhammad, N. E. (2015). Qaul Qadim dan Qaul Jadid Imam Syafi’i: Telaah Faktor Sosiologisnya. Al-Mizan, 11(1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.30603/am.v11i1.993
Lathif, N. (2017). Teori Hukum Sebagai Sarana Alat Untuk Memperbaharui Atau Merekayasa Masyarakat. Palar | Pakuan Law Review, 3(1), 73–94. https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v3i1.402
Lukito, W. (2018). Implementasi Pelestarian Lingkungan Hidup Dalam Bidang Penegakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Kasus Illegal Logging (Studi Kasus Polres Rembang). Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, 13(1), 153–160. http://lppm-unissula.com/jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/jhku/article/view/2593
McGregor, D. (2018). Mino-Mnaamodzawin: Achieving Indigenous Environmental Justice in Canada. Environment and Society, 9(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.3167/ares.2018.090102
Meidinata, N. (2020, February 13). Kominfo Klaim Hapus 1,8 Juta Konten Esek-Esek di Twitter, Kok Masih Banyak? Solopos.com. https://www.solopos.com/kominfo-klaim-hapus-18-juta-konten-esek-esek-di-twitter-kok-masih-banyak-1046599
Nugroho, B. (2017). Peranan Alat Bukti dalam Perkara Pidana dalam Putusan Hakim Menurut KUHAP. Yuridika, 32(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v32i1.4780
Nurhayati, N., Nasution, M. S. A., Hasibuan, R. R. A., & Afendi, H. (2022). Human Trafficking in The Perspective of Maqashid Al-Sharia. Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura, 22(2), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.22373/jiif.v22i2.12304
O.S Hiariej, E. (2012). Teori Dan Hukum Pembuktian. Erlangga.
Putra, A. (2020). Perlindungan Hak Cipta Atas Potret Seseorang Yang Disebarkan Sebagai Meme. JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property, 61–80. https://doi.org/10.20885/jipro.vol3.iss1.art4
Putra, E., & Iqbal, M. (2020). Implementasi Konsep Keadilan Dengan Sistem Negatif Wettelijk Dan Asas Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Memutus Suatu Perkara Pidana Ditinjau Dari Pasal 1 Undang-Undang No 4 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman (Analisa putusan No.1054/Pid.B/2018/PN.Jkt.Sel ). Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(1), 40–58. https://doi.org/10.32493/rjih.v3i1.6619
Rumondor, J. A., Jennifer, G., & Desintha, P. K. N. (2022). The Legal Protection for Child Perpetrators and Victims of Revenge Porn in Indonesia. Law Research Review Quarterly, 8(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.15294/lrrq.v8i1.53802
Sanusi, A. (2018). Pemikiran Ushul Fiqh Imam Syafi’i. Syakhsia: Jurnal Hukum Perdata Islam, 19(2), 223–244. https://doi.org/10.37035/syakhsia.v19i2.3304
Stark, W., & McCarthy, E. D. (2020). The Sociology of Knowledge: Toward a Deeper Understanding of the History of Ideas. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351302760
Sweeten, G. (2012). Scaling Criminal Offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28(3), 533–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-011-9160-8
Taqiuddin, H. U. (2019). Penalaran Hukum (Legal Reasoning) Dalam Putusan Hakim. JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan), 1(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.36312/jisip.v1i2.343
Twining, W. (2012). Karl Llewellyn and the Realist Movement. In Cambridge University Press. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139151085
Vikaresi, E. A. C. (2020). Problematika Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 20/PUU-XIV/2016 Terkait Alat Bukti Penyadapan. Novum: Jurnal Hukum, 7(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.2674/novum.v7i1.31321
Wahyuni, S. (2020). Force Majeure Dan Notoir Feiten Atas Kebijakan PSBB Covid-19. Jurnal Hukum Sasana, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.31599/sasana.v6i1.209
Wang, T.-C., Liu, M.-Y., Zhu, J.-Y., Liu, G., Tao, A., Kautz, J., & Catanzaro, B. (2018). Video-to-Video Synthesis. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1808.06601
Widyawati, A. (2020). Criminal Policy of Adultery in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 5(1), 171. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v5i1.36786
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Kukuh Dwi Kurniawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
