The meaning of “strength executive" in the Constitutional Court decision for the execution of fiduciary securities

Authors

  • Shohib Muslim State Polytechnic of Malang, Indonesia
  • Shinta Hadiyantina Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
  • Hudriyah Mundzir State Polytechnic of Malang, Indonesia
  • Zainal Amin Ayub School of Law, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v31i1.23244

Keywords:

Meaning, Decision, Fiduciary, Execution

Abstract

Judicial decisions must have legal implications for relevant parties. PMK No. 2/PUU-XIX/2021 remains debatable between creditors and debtors because it seemingly weakens the protection of creditors' rights. Creditors cannot immediately carry out enforcement procedures that cut off the creditor's business flow because the position of the subject of fiduciary obligations is in the debtor's control, making it possible for disputes between debtors and creditors. This normative legal research was conducted using a philosophical, juridical approach covering statutory policies, conceptual and case approaches. PMK No. 2/PUU-XIX/2021 does not regulate creditor legal provisions in enforcing fiduciary securities, making it difficult for creditors to execute them. The Constitutional Court should decide to guarantee justice for all parties and provide a decision with clear content and sentence structure, so multiple interpretations will not occur. The execution of fiduciary securities during the Covid-19 pandemic should not be immediately carried out because the creditor had to follow the predetermined procedures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adisti, F. (2020). Pelaksanaan Parate Eksekusi Pada PT. Mandiri Tunas Finance Menurut Undang-Undang Jaminan Fidusia. Zaaken Journal of Civil and Business Law, 1(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22437/zaaken.v1i1.8284

Al-Fatih, S., & Siboy, A. (2021). Menulis Artikel Karya Ilmiah Hukum di Jurnal Nasional dan Internasional Bereputasi. Malang: Inteligensia Media.

Aldyan, A., & Negi, A. (2022). The Model of Law Enforcement Based on Pancasila Justice. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 2(3), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.53955/JHCLS.V2I3.51

Anggraeny, I., & Al-Fatih, S. (2020). Kata Sepakat Dalam Perjanjian Dan Relevansinya Sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Wanprestasi. DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.30596/dll.v5i1.3446

Asti, N. P. M. D. P. (2019). Upaya Hukum Otoritas Jasa Keuangan dalam Mengatasi Layanan Pinjam Online Ilegal. Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2020.v05.i01.p10

Asyhadic, Z., & Kusumawati, R. (2018). Hukum Jaminan Di Indonesia. Depok: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Azhary, M. T. (2019). Negara Hukum: Suatu Studi Tentang Prinsip-Prinsipnya Dilihat Dari Segi Hukum Islam, Implementasinya Pada Periode Negara Madinah Dan Masa Kini. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang.

Bachrudin, G., & Soponyono, E. (2019). Hukum Kenotariatan: Membangun Sistem Kenotariatan Indonesia Berkeadilan. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Bahsan, M. (2018). Hukum Jaminan dan Jaminan Kredit Perbankan di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo.

Butarbutar, E. N. (2022). Constitutional Issue of the Executional Power of Fiduciary Certificates as Equal to Court Decision. Jurnal Konstitusi, 19(3), 606–622. https://doi.org/10.31078/JK1935

Carè, R., & Weber, O. (2023). How much finance is in climate finance? A bibliometric review, critiques, and future research directions. Research in International Business and Finance, 64, 101886. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RIBAF.2023.101886

Djia, M., & Tan, D. (2022). Keabsahan Dari Akta Surat Kuasa Membebankan Hak Tanggungan Yang Dibuat Oleh Notaris. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.28946/Rpt.V11i1.1714

Hasani, J. E. (2021). Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU- XVII/2019 Terhadap Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Yang Berobjek Jaminan Fidusia. Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus, 3(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30996/jhmo.v3i2.3630

Hidayah, N. P., Anggraeny, I., & Hapsari, D. R. I. (2020). Credit Dispute Resolution with Mortgage Right Warranties on Conventional Banking. Advance in Economics, Business and Management Research, 121(Inclar 2019), 24–28. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200226.005

Hidayah, N. P., & Komariah, K. (2022). Upaya Peningkatan Literasi Hukum Masyarakat Tentang Peer to Peer Lending. Jurnal Dedikasi Hukum, 2(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.22219/JDH.V2I1.20914

Horga, A., Rezine, A., Chattopadhyay, S., Eles, P., & Peng, Z. (2022). Symbolic identification of shared memory based bank conflicts for GPUs. Journal of Systems Architecture, 127, 102518. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SYSARC.2022.102518

Hutabarat, S. (2020). Penawaran Penerimaan Hukum Perjanjian. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.

Kafa, R. K., & Sacipto, R. (2019). Tinjauan Hukum Terhadapa eksekusi obyek jaminan Fidusia Tanpa Titel Eksekutorial Yang Sah Refleksi Hukum. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2019.v4.i1.p21-40

Kasim, C. (2020). COVID-19 and Labour Law Turkey. Italian Labour Law E-Journal, 13(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1561-8048/10806

Kasmir. (2018). Dasar-Dasar Perbankan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo.

Khairini, N., & Bustamam, K. (2018). Perjanjian dan Jaminan Fidusia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perudangan-Undangan Dan Pranata Sosial, 3(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22373/justisia.v3i2.5935

Kosasih, A., Henny, A. S., Afrida, R., & Zulkifli, S. (2019). Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Pembiayaan Konsumen dalam Jual Beli Kendaraan Bermotor (Stusi Pada PT Sinar Mitra Sepadan Finance Medan). Junal Darma Agung, 27(1), 797–806. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.46930/ojsuda.v27i1.134

Li, T., Lu, C., & Chen, Z. (2022). The unintended consequence of collateral-based financing: Evidence from corporate cost behavior. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 100338. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCAE.2022.100338

Li, W., & Dissanaike, S. (2022). Jury verdicts, outcomes, and tort reform features of malpractice cases involving thoracic outlet syndrome. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 75(3), 962–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVS.2021.08.098

Mahendra, L., Murni, R. . R., & Putu, G. A. S. (2017). Perlindungan Hak-Hak Kreditur dalam Hal Adanya Pengalihan Benda Jaminan Oleh Pihak Debitur. Acta Comitas, 2(1), 267–280. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2016.v01.i02.p13

Mao, Y. (2021). Managing innovation: The role of collateral. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 72(1), 101419. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JACCECO.2021.101419

Meilaputri, I. G. A. D., Suryani, L. P., & Saputra, P. G. (2019). Kekeuatan Hukum Sertifikat Jaminan Fidusia Yang Didaftarkan Setelah Terjadinya Wanprestasi. Jurnal Kertha Wicaksana, 3(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22225/kw.13.2.2019.69-72

Mgaiwa, S. J., & Ishengoma, J. M. (2023). Financing higher education in Tanzania through students’ loans scheme and its impact on equitable access. Heliyon, 9(3), e13943. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2023.E13943

Mochtar, Z. A., & Afkar, K. (2022). President’s Power, Transition, and Good Governance. BESTUUR, 10(1), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.20961/BESTUUR.V10I1.59098

Muslih, M., & Supeno, S. (2022). Financial technology: digital legal challenges and Indonesia’s economic prospects after Covid-19 outbreak. Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 30(2), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.22219/LJIH.V30I2.22784

Muslim, S. (2022). Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia dan Parate Executie. (Sebuah Kajian Perlindungan Hukum Bagi kreditur). Malang: Pustaka Aksara.

Muslim, S., Hadiwinata, K., & Mundzir, H. (2021). Legal Protection for Winners of Dependent Rights Execution Auctions Through Parate Executie. Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, 114. https://doi.org/10.7176/JLPG/114-05

Osler, C., & Savaser, T. (2022). Shrouding and the FX trades of global custody bank. Journal of Banking & Finance, 136, 106414. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBANKFIN.2022.106414

Peni, J. S. (2021). Akibat Hukum Pandemi Covid-19 sebagai Bencana NonAlam Medis dalam Menetapkan Force Majeure di Indonesia. Kosmik Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, 21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30595/kosmikhukum.v21i1.9407

Prajitno, & Andi, A. A. (2020). Hukum Fidusia. Malang: Selaras.

Purbawisesa, B. P. (2018). Legal Protection For The Creditor Related To The Deed Of Unregistered Mortgage Rights. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science, 23(2), 43–46. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2302014346

Purnamasari, I. D. (2021). Hukum Jaminan Perbankan. Yogyakarta: PT Mizan.

Putra, H., Ardhansyah, & Dwi, S. (2020). Bank Dan Lembaga Keuangan Lainnya. Surabaya: CV Jakad Media Publishing.

Putri Hidayah, N., & . K. (2022). The Urgency of Strengthening Creditor Legal Protection in Fiduciary Guarantee Agreements. KnE Social Sciences, 2022(1), 492–504. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i15.12123

Rachmadi, U. (2021). Keabsahan Kuasa Membebankan Hak Tanggungan Dengan Surat Kuasa Membebankan Hak Tanggungan Yang Dibuat Oleh Notaris. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 17(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v17i1.567

Rio, E., & Husni, T. (2021). Pembiayaan Murabahah Di PT Federal International Finance Syariah Pekanbaru. Jurnal Tabarru’:Islamic Banking Dan Finance, 4(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25299/jtb.2021.vol4(1).6057

Rizki, M. J. (2020). Penjelasan Prof Mahfud Soal Force Majeure Akibat Pandemi Corona.

Sandra, K., & Kelib, A. (2019). Eksekusi Obyek Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Akad Murabahah Pada Perbankan Syariah. Jurnal Notarius, 12(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v12i1.27734

Sanusi, S. (2017). Legal Protection of The Creditor on Fiduciary Guarantee Objects Unlisted in The Fiduciary Registration Office. International Journal of Law Reconstruction, 1(1), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.26532/IJLR.V1I1.1636

Saputra, I. (2021). Kekuatan Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18 /PUU-XVII-2019 tentang Jaminan Fidusia. Jurnal Ilmiah Nasional Mahasiswa Hukum, 4(1), 104–124. https://doi.org/10.36085/jpk.v4i1.1280

Subagiyo, D. T. (2018). Hukum Jaminan Dalam Perspektif Undang- Undang Jaminan Fidusia (Suatu Pengantar). Surabaya: UWKS Press.

Suhantri, Y. P., Anis, F. H., & Deasy, S. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Dengan Objek Hak Guna Bangunan Yang Akan Berakhir Masa Berlakunya Sebelum Perjanjian Kredit Jatuh Tempo Dilihat Dari Aspek Hukum Hak Tanggungan. Lex Et Societatis, 8(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35796/les.v8i3.29506

Supianto, S., & Rumawi, R. (2022). Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 terhadap Pelaksaan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia. DIVERSI : Jurnal Hukum, 8(1), 78–110. https://doi.org/10.32503/DIVERSI.V8I1.1181

Tan, D. (2021). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Mengupas dan Mengulas Metodologi dalam Menyelenggarakan Penelitian Hukum. Nusantara: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 8(8), 2463–2478.

Usman, R. (2021). Aspek-Aspek Hukum Perbankan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedika Pustaka Utama.

Xu, B. (2019). Permissible collateral and access to finance: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. China Economic Review, 54, 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHIECO.2018.11.006

Yasin, J. (2021). Hak Azasi Manusia Dan Hak Serta Kewajiban Warga Negara Dalam Hukum Positif Indonesia. Jurnal Syiar Hukum, 1. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29313/sh.v11i2.541

Yurizal. (2019). Aspek pidana dalam Undang-undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia. Malang: Media Nusa Creative.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-19

How to Cite

Muslim, S., Hadiyantina, S., Mundzir, H., & Ayub, Z. A. (2023). The meaning of “strength executive" in the Constitutional Court decision for the execution of fiduciary securities. Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 31(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v31i1.23244

Issue

Vol. 31 No. 1 (2023): March

Section

Journal's Articles

License

Copyright (c) 1970 Shohib Muslim, Shinta Hadiyantina, Hudriyah Mundzir, Zainal Amin Ayub

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.