Characteristics of punishment for property embezzlement and appropriation by military personnel through abuse of office

Authors

  • Ganna Sobko Odessa State University of Internal Affairs, Ukraine
  • Natalia Chenshova Kryvyi Rih National University, Ukraine
  • Maksym Viunyk Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Ukraine
  • Tetiana Duiunova State Biotechnological University, Ukraine
  • Evgenia Palii Kryvyi Rih National University, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v31i1.25933

Keywords:

embezzlement, appropriation, military property, military personnel, corruption

Abstract

The article is focused on the analysis of legislative regulation of sentencing and exemption from punishment of persons who have committed criminal offenses connected with the appropriation and embezzlement of military property by military personnel through the abuse of official position. The variability of responsibility for the appropriation and embezzlement of military property was analyzed, beginning with the Criminal Code of 1960, the effective Criminal Code of 2001, and the draft of new criminal legislation on this criminal offense. This study employed a comparative legal analysis of responsibility according to administrative and criminal legislation, defines the level of punishment for the committed offenses, and presents. The author’s classification of disciplinary, administrative, and criminal responsibility. Criminal offenses related to corruption were also analyzed and the restrictions that cannot be applied to persons who have committed corruption offenses were investigated. This study also proposes a list of corrupt criminal offenses, explores possibilities for mitigating criminal liability for persons who have committed corruption criminal offenses that would not exceed the ban on mitigating criminal responsibility for corruption offenses, and considers the possibility of imposing additional types of punishment to persons who have committed criminal offenses in the area of the appropriation and embezzlement of military property. Statistical data on administrative and criminal proceedings on this issue were analyzed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Indonesia Military Strength. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.globalfirepower.com/country-military-strength-detail.php?country_id=Indonesia.

Achmad, R. (2017). Hakekat Keberadaan Sanksi Pidana Dan Pemidanaan Dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana. Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum, 5(2), 79–104. https://doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v5i2.98

Alon Margalit. (2018). Civilian Oversight of Military Investigations. In Investigating Civilian Casualties in Time of Armed Conflict and Belligerent Occupation (pp. 207–224). Brill | Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368217_009

Armed Forces of Indonesia. (2023). Retrieved from: https://tni.mil.id.

Armed Forces of Thailand. (2023). Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20140604082705/http://rtarf.mi.th/index_new.html.

Britchenko, I., & Saienko, V. (2017). THE PERCEPTION MOVEMENT ECONOMY OF UKRAINE TO BUSINESS. Economic Studies, 26(4), 163–181.

Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses. (2022). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/80731-10#Text.

Criminal Code of Ukraine. (2001). No. 25-26. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14#Text

Criminal Code of Ukraine (project). (2022). Control Text. https://newcriminalcode.org.ua/upload/media/2022/09/29/1-kontrolnyj-tekst-proektu-kk-29-09-2022.pdf

Effron, J. A. S., & Wroblewski, J. J. (2022). Congress Reforms Military Sentencing, Creating an Opportunity for a Productive Sentencing Reform Dialogue Between the Military and Civilian Criminal Justice Systems. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 35(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2022.35.1.73

Fesenko, E. F. & Fesenko, Y. E. (2001). Criminal Codes of Ukraine 2001 and 1960: comparative tables. Кyiv: Istyna, 272.

Gaggioli, G. (2018). International Humanitarian Law: The legal framework for humanitarian forensic action. Forensic Science International, 282, 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.10.035

Heller, K. J. (2019). International crime. In Concepts for International Law. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783474684.00038

Honcharuk, A. Z., Drobotyuk, O. V., Kiktenko, V. O., Musiichuk, V. A., & Fil, Y. S. (Eds.). (2021). Ukraine and the Countries of East, Southeast and South Asia: 2020 Results and Development Prospects. Kyiv: National Institute of Strategic Studies.

Jöbstl, H. (2020). Bridging the Accountability Gap: Armed Non-state Actors and the Investigation and Prosecution of War Crimes. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 18(3), 567–597. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqaa026

Joll, C. M. (2010). Religion and conflict in Southern Thailand: Beyond rounding up the usual suspects. Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 32(2), 258–279.

Judicial Power of Ukraine. (2021). Retrieved from https://court.gov.ua/inshe/sudova_statystyka/zvitnist_21.

Lavrentieva, O., Pererva, V., Krupskуi, O., Britchenko, I., & Shabanov, S. (2020). Issues of shaping the students’ professional and terminological competence in science area of expertise in the sustainable development era. E3S Web of Conferences, 166, 10031. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016610031

Law of Malaysia No 77 “Armed forced act 1972.” (2006). Retrieved from https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/cce7ca/pdf/.

Law of Ukraine No. 1698-VII. (2014). On the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1698-18#Text

Law of Ukraine No. 47. (2014). On the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1698-18#n336

Lee, K. Y. (2011). Singapore History: From the Third World to the First. Kyiv: Nash Format.

Levchenko, I., Dmytriieva, O., Shevchenko, I., Britchenko, I., Kruhlov, V., Avanesova, N., Kudriavtseva, O., & Solodovnik, O. (2021). Development of a method for selected financing of scientific and educational institutions through targeted capital investment in the development of innovative technologies. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3(13 (111)), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.235930

Ministry of Defense of Malaysia. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.mod.gov.my/ms/.

Notoprojo, A. A., Al-Fatih, S., & Haruni, C. Wi. (2022). Analisis Putusan No.39/Pid.B/2015/PN/Sit Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Pembalakan Liar Ditinjau Dari Aspek Keadilan. Indonesia Law Reform Journal, 2(2), 206–221. https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v2i2.22262

On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine Regarding Ensuring the Activities of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine and the National Agency for the Prevention of Corruption. (2015). The Law of Ukraine No. 17, Article 118. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/198-19#n27

On Amendments to the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses the Criminal Code of Ukraine on Improving Liability for Declaring Unreliable Information and Failure to Submit a Declaration by the Subject of the Declaration of a Person Authorized to Perfo. (2021). Law of Ukraine No. 1576-IX. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1576-20#n16

On the Disciplinary Regulations of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. (2022). Law of Ukraine No. 22-23, Article 197. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/551-14#Text

Osiejewicz, J. (2018). Audiatur et altera pars: w kwestii realizacji zadañ służby geologicznej–odpowiedź na polemikę. Przegląd Geologiczny, 66(10), 628.

Osiejewicz, J. (2020). Transnational Legal Communication: Towards Comprehensible and Consistent Law. Foundations of Science, 25(2), 441–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-020-09655-3

Saputra, F. (2020). Peranan Lembaga Pemasyarakatan dalam Proses Penegakan Hukum Pidana Dihubungkan dengan Tujuan Pemidanaan. REUSAM: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.29103/reusam.v8i1.2604

Schenck, L., & Schlueter, D. A. (2020). (American Military Justice: Retaining the Commander’s Authority to Enforce Discipline and Justice). SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3666595

Shambaugh, D. (2018). U.S.-China Rivalry in Southeast Asia: Power Shift or Competitive Coexistence? International Security, 42(4), 85–127. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00314

Shilin, A. (2022). The Military in Indonesian Politics. https://web.archive.org/web/20110806015245/http://mdb.cast.ru/mdb/5-2002/dp/mip/?form=print

Simmons, C. (2021). The Scope of Military Jurisdiction for Violations of International Humanitarian Law. Israel Law Review, 54(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223720000217

Singapore Government Agency. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.mindef.gov.sg/web/portal/mindef/home.

Zhang, S., & Liu, X. (2019). The roles of international tourism and renewable energy in environment: New evidence from Asian countries. Renewable Energy, 139, 385–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.02.046

Downloads

Published

2023-06-12

How to Cite

Sobko, G., Chenshova, N., Viunyk, M., Duiunova, T., & Palii, E. (2023). Characteristics of punishment for property embezzlement and appropriation by military personnel through abuse of office. Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 31(1), 157–180. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v31i1.25933

Issue

Section

Journal's Articles