Collaborative efforts in ASEAN for global asset recovery frameworks to combat corruption in the digital era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v31i2.29381Keywords:
Corruption, asset recovery, ASEAN, International Law framework, digital ageAbstract
In the contemporary digital age, corruption has evolved into a common enemy, transcending borders and becoming a transnational and extraordinary crime. Within the ASEAN framework, corruption is no longer perceived as the concern of a single nation but as a shared threat to all member states and the global community at large. Despite the pervasive and deeply entrenched nature of corruption, concerted efforts have been made to combat this scourge. Among these measures, asset recovery stands out as an extraordinary tool, addressing not only the prevention and enforcement aspects but also the crucial task of repatriating ill-gotten gains to their rightful country of origin. Indonesia and the ASEAN community have entered into various treaties aimed at facilitating asset recovery, with the ASEAN Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (AMLAT) serving as a pivotal legal instrument in this endeavour. Recognizing the transnational nature of corruption, interstate relations and diplomatic cooperation have assumed a vital role in supporting the success of asset recovery processes. This study explores the evolving landscape of corruption in the digital age, its transformation into a transnational concern, and the collective efforts undertaken within ASEAN to combat it. By focusing on asset recovery as an extraordinary measure, it sheds light on the multifaceted dimensions of eradicating corruption and emphasizes the importance of international collaboration in returning misappropriated assets to their rightful owners.
Downloads
References
Al-Fatih, S., & Siboy, A. (2021). Menulis Artikel Karya Ilmiah Hukum di Jurnal Nasional dan Internasional Bereputasi. Inteligensia Media.
Albanese, J. S. (2018). Countering Transnational Crime and Corruption: The Urge to Action versus the Patience to Evaluate. Justice Evaluation Journal, 1(1), 82–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/24751979.2018.1478234
Andini, O. G., Nilasari, & Eurian, A. A. (2023). Restorative Justice in Indonesia Corruption Crime: a Utopia. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 31(1), 72–90. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v31i1.24247
Anggraeny, K. D. (2020). Abuse of Authority: A Meaning Deconstruction. Jurnal Hukum Novelty, 11(2), 130–140. https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v11i2.a17697
Aninda, C. A. (2017). Pancasila Values in the Study of Corruption Cases in Indonesia. Jurnal Scientia Indonesia, 3(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.15294/jsi.v3i1.36013
Ariefulloh, A., Nugroho, H., Angkasa, A., & Ardhanariswari, R. (2023). Restorative justice-based criminal case resolution in Salatiga, Indonesia: Islamic law perspective and legal objectives. Ijtihad : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan, 23(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.18326/IJTIHAD.V23I1.19-36
Arifin, R. (2014). Empowering International Cooperation’s Role in the Follow of Assets of Corruption’s Result. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 11(3), 414–422. https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol11.3.505
Arifin, R., Faridah, S., & Naefi, M. (2019). Misdemeanor of Corruption within the Scope of International Law and the Legal Consequences. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 4(2), 299–314. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v4i2.29687
Arifin, R., Utari, I. S., & Subondo, H. (2016). Upaya Pengembalian Aset Korupsi Yang Berada di Luar Negeri (Asset Recovery) dalam Penegakan Hukum Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies, 1(1), 105–137. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v1i1.10810
Atmasasmita, R. (2010). Globalisasi Kejahatan Bisnis. Kencana Prenada Media.
Boateng, A., Wang, Y., Ntim, C., & Glaister, K. W. (2021). National Culture, Corporate Governance and Corruption: A Cross‐country Analysis. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(3), 3852–3874. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1991
Brun, J. P., Sotiropoulou, A., Gray, L., & Scott, C. (2021). Asset Recovery Handbook: A Guide for Practitioners. World Bank Publications.
Brunelle-Quraishi, O. (2011). Assessing the Relevancy and Efficacy of the United Nations Convention against Corruption: A Comparative Analysis. Notre Dame Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2(1), 101–166. https://doi.org/https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndjicl/vol2/iss1/3/
Bureni, I. F. (2016). Kekosongan Hukum Perampasan Aset Tanpa Pemidanaan dalam Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 45(4), 292–298. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.45.4.2016.292-298
Cahyandhi, I. (2019). Pengembalian Aset Negara Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi Studi Kasus Putusan Ir. H. Abdullah Puteh, M. Si. Putusan Mahkamah Agung No: 1344 KJ Pid/ 2005. Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya.
Dutcher, J. S. (2005). From the Boardroom to the Cellblock: The Justifications for Harsher Punishment of White-collar and Corporate Crime. Arizona State Law Journal, 37(4), 1295–1320.
Dzulfaroh, A. N., & Hardiyanto, S. (2020). Daftar 23 Buronan Korupsi yang Pernah Melarikan Diri ke Singapura. KOMPAS Online.
Fleming, M. H. (2005). Asset Recovery and Its Impact on Criminal Behavior an Economic Taxonomy: Draft for Comments. University College.
Fleming, M. H. (2007). Issues in Measuring the Efficacy of a Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) Regime. Amicus Curiae, 70(1), 9–12.
Fleming, M. H. (2008). An Examination of the Means of Etablishing the Efficacy of Asset Recovery and Anti-Money Lundering Policies. University of London, University College London.
Ginting, J. (2011). Perjanjian Internasional dalam Pengembalian Aset Hasil Korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 11(3), 450–459. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2011.11.3.173
Ginting, J. (2012). Roles of the Mutual Legal Assistances and Extradition Agreements in the Assets Recovery in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 9(4), 565–582. https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol9.4.360
Ginting, Jamin, & Talbot, P. (2023). Fundraising Aspect of International Terrorism Organization in ASEAN: Legal and Political Aspects. Lex Scientia Law Review, 7(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.15294/LESREV.V7I1.60074
Harris, D. J. (2004). Case and Materials on International Law. Sweet & Maxwell.
Hidayat, S. N., Karjoko, L., & Hermawan, S. (2020). Discourse on Legal Expression in Arrangements of Corruption Eradication in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 5(2), 391–418. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v5i2.40670
Hidayatulloh, H., Erdős, É., & Szabó, M. (2022). The Intricate Justice of Poverty: A Case of The Land of Gold in Papua Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 7(2), 557–584. https://doi.org/10.15294/JILS.V7I2.58030
Iqra, M., Korompot, S., Al-Fatih, S., & Pradhan, D. (2021). The Principle of Equality Before the Law in Indonesian Corruption Case: Is It Relevant? Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 1(3), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.53955/JHCLS.V1I3.13
Jancsics, D. (2019). Corruption as resource transfer: An interdisciplinary synthesis. Public Administration Review, 79(4), 523–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13024
Jaya, N. S. P. (2006). Sistem Peradilan Pidana (Criminal Justice System). Badan Penerbit UNDIP.
Le Nguyen, C. (2012). Towards the Effective ASEAN Mutual Legal Assistance in Combating Money Laundering. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 15(4), 383–395. https://doi.org/10.1108/13685201211265971
Mahmud, A. (2018). Problematika Asset Recovery dalam Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Akibat Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Yudisial, 11(3), 347–366. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v11i3.262
Manthovani, R. (2023). A Comparative Analysis of Money Laundering Crimes in Indonesia through Cryptocurrency. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 17(1), 196–210.
Marquette, H., & Peiffer, C. (2021). Corruption and Transnational Organised Crime. In Routledge Handbook of Transnational Organized Crime (pp. 465–485). Routledge.
Mulyadi, L. (2015). Asas Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia Dihubungkan dengan Konvensi Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa Anti Korupsi 2003. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 4(1), 101–132. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.4.1.2015.101-132
Obe, R. G. A., & Nay, F. A. (2022). Strategy to Suppress Corruption and Money Laundering in the Digital Age. Journal of Digital Law and Policy, 2(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.58982/jdlp.v2i1.302
Pertiwi, K. (2022). We Care about Others”: Discursive Constructions of Corruption vis-à-vis National/Cultural Identity in Indonesia’s Business-Government Relations. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 18(2), 157–177. https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-03-2019-0025
Prakasa, Satria, U. W. (2022). Reduce Corruption in Public Procurement: The Effort Towards Good Governance. Bestuur, 10(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v10i1.51339
Prakasa, S. U. (2019). Garuda Indonesia-Rolls Royce Corruption, Transnational Crime, and Eradication Measures. Lentera Hukum, 3(3), 407–424.
Prastyono, R. D. (2020). Formulasi Pengaturan Intersepsi dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi di Era Digital Oleh Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia. Lex Renaissance, 5(3), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol5.iss3.art1
Rahman, F., & Anam, M. S. (2020). Hak Asasi Manusia Mantan Narapidana Korupsi dalam Peraturan Komisi Pemilihan Umum Nomor 20 Tahun 2018 Perspektif Maqashid Syariah Jasser Auda. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 3(2), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v3i2.3905
Ramadhan, A. (2017). Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Sistem Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia (Studi di Kepolisian Daerah Kepulauan Riau). Maleo Law Journal, 1(1), 83–105.
Saputra, R. (2017). Tantangan Penerapan Perampasan Aset Tanpa Tuntutan Pidana (Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture) dalam RUU Perampasan Aset di Indonesia. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 3(1), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v3i1.158
Sigalingging, B. (2021). Bantuan Hukum Timbal Balik dalam Perampasan Aset Korupsi Antar Lintas Batas Negara. Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 2(3), 387–398. https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v2i3.152
Sobko, G., Chenshova, N., Viunyk, M., Duiunova, T., & Palii, E. (2023). Characteristics of Punishment for Property Embezzlement and Appropriation by Military Personnel through Abuse of Office. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 31(1), 157–180. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v31i1.25933
Suryosumpeno, C. (2020). Rezim Pemulihan Aset: Antara Dibenci dan Dibutuhkan! REQbook.
Suud, A. K. (2020). Optimization of the Role of Asset Recovery Center (PPA) of the Attorney-General’S Office of the Republic of Indonesia in Asset Recovery of Corruption Crime Results. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 9(2), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.9.2.2020.211-231
Utama, P. (2021). Gatekeepers’ Roles as a Fundamental Key in Money Laundering. Indonesia Law Review, 6(2), 180–206. https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v6n2.215
Wijayanto, W., Sardini, N. H., & Elsitra, G. N. (2021). Menciptakan Ruang Siber yang Kondusif bagi Pegiat Anti-Korupsi. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 7(1), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v7i1.732
Wronka, C. (2022). Cyber-laundering”: the change of money laundering in the digital age. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 25(2), 330–344. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-04-2021-0035
Wulandari, R., & Dermawan, M. K. (2022). Construction of Anti-Money Laundering Policy in Indonesia from an International Law. Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, 15(4), 1179–1199.
Yuwono, T., Kusniati, R., & Ardianto, B. (2021). Bantuan Hukum Timbal Balik dalam Penanganan Kejahatan Transnasional: Studi Kasus Indonesia-Swiss. Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law, 2(3), 268–287. https://doi.org/10.22437/up.v2i3.13042
Zolkaflil, S., Syed Mustapha Nazri, S. N. F., & Omar, N. (2023). Asset recovery practices in combating money laundering: evidence from FATF mutual evaluation report of FATF member countries of Asia pacific region. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 26(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-11-2021-0127
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ridwan Arifin, Sigit Riyanto, Akbar Kurnia Putra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
