A comparative assessment of digital platform worker protection in the EU and ASEAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v31i2.29823Keywords:
Platform Worker, Digital Labor, EU, ASEAN, ProtectionAbstract
The rapid rise of the digital platform economy, connecting workers with employers, has transformed labor markets globally. This paper explores the regulatory approaches and policies safeguarding digital platform workers in the European Union (EU) and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). While the EU demonstrates comprehensive labor protections, ASEAN's diverse economies present a tapestry of approaches. This analysis aims to provide valuable insights for policymakers, scholars, and stakeholders, shedding light on the evolving landscape of labor rights and the future of work in the digital age. This study uses a comparative research design to assess digital platform worker protection in the EU and ASEAN, highlighting differences, similarities, and emerging trends. It involves reviewing official documents and legislative texts from both regions to identify relevant policies and initiatives. This paper found that "digital labor" extends beyond the vast digital landscape, impacting various activities and transforming traditional tasks into digital processes managed by algorithms and automation. Platform workers in regions like the EU and ASEAN face challenges, including extended unpaid waiting times, lack of social security access, unpredictable earnings, and the downside of flexibility. The EU addresses these issues through comprehensive legislative efforts, emphasizing transparency, algorithmic oversight, and clear employment status definitions. In contrast, ASEAN's structure, based on consensus and voluntary cooperation, poses challenges. A binding regional agreement is challenging due to diverse socio-economic and cultural landscapes. Therefore, a non-binding declaration, supported by comprehensive guidelines, may offer a more practical approach. This declaration, symbolizing collective commitment, along with guidelines on best practices, could guide member states in tailoring their national policies to protect platform workers better.
Downloads
References
Abd Samad, K., Abd Rahman, N. H., Ismail, S., & Marmaya, N. H. (2023). Is the Well-being of Gig Workers in Malaysia Better? The Reality of Pain and Gain. International Review of Applied Economics, 37(4), 518–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2023.2240243
Aditya, Z. F., & Al-Fatih, S. (2021). Indonesian constitutional rights: expressing and purposing opinions on the internet. The International Journal of Human Rights, 25(9), 1395–1419. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2020.1826450
Acemoglu, D., Autor, D., Hazell, J., & Restrepo, P. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and Jobs: Evidence from Online Vacancies. Journal of Labor Economics, 40(S1), S293–S340. https://doi.org/10.1086/718327
Aleksynska, M. (2021). Digital Work in Eastern Europe: Overview of Trends, Outcomes and Policy Responses (32; ILO Working Paper).
Aleksynska, M., Bastrakova, A., & Kharchenko, N. (2019). Working Conditions on Digital Labour Platforms: Evidence from a Leading Labour Supply Economy (IZA DP No. 12245; Discussion Paper Series). https://docs.iza.org/dp12245.pdf
Aloisi, A. (2022). Platform Work in Europe: Lessons Learned, Legal Developments and Challenges Ahead. European Labour Law Journal, 13(1), 4–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525211062557
ASEAN Secretariat. (2023). ASEAN Employment Outlook, the Quest for Decent Work in Platform Economy: Issues, Opportunities and Ways Forward. In ASEAN. ASEAN. https://asean.org/book/asean-employment-outlook-the-quest-for-decent-work-in-platform-economy-issues-opportunities-and-ways-forward/
Au-Yeung, T. C., & Qiu, J. (2022). Institutions, Occupations and Connectivity: The Embeddedness of Gig Work and Platform-Mediated Labour Market in Hong Kong. Critical Sociology, 48(7–8), 1169–1187. https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205221090581
Bahri, M. T. (2022). Understanding The Pattern of International Migration: Challenges in Human Rights Protection. Jurnal Hukum Unissula, 38(2), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.26532/jh.v38i2.21337
Barton, R., Béthoux, É., Dupuy, C., Ilsøe, A., Jalette, P., Laroche, M., Navrbjerg, S. E., & Larsen, T. P. (2021). Understanding the Dynamics of Inequity in Collective Bargaining: Evidence from Australia, Canada, Denmark and France. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 27(1), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258920981827
Boudreau, J. W., Jesuthasan, R., & Creelman, D. (2015). Lead the Work: Navigating a World Beyond Employment. Wiley.
Caballero-Anthony, M. (2022). The ASEAN way and the changing security environment: navigating challenges to informality and centrality. International Politics, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1057/S41311-022-00400-0/METRICS
Cameron, L. D., & Rahman, H. (2022). Expanding the Locus of Resistance: Understanding the Co-constitution of Control and Resistance in the Gig Economy. Organization Science, 33(1), 38–58. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1557
Ching, W. K., Yen, R. L. K., & Sidhu, S. S. (2022). Gig Workers in Malaysia: Protection under New Law. Zul Rafique & Partners, April, 1–5.
Chinoracký, R., & Čorejová, T. (2019). Impact of Digital Technologies on Labor Market and the Transport Sector. Transportation Research Procedia, 40, 994–1001. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2019.07.139
Chivot, E. (2021). The New EU Rulebook for Online Platforms: How to Get It Right, Who Will It Impact and What Else is Needed? European View, 20(2), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/17816858211050159
Cini, L. (2023). How Algorithms are Reshaping the Exploitation of Labour-power: Insights into the Process of Labour Invisibilization in the Platform Economy. Theory and Society, 52(5), 885–911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-023-09520-9
Council of the EU. (2019, June 13). New Forms of Work: Council Conclusions. Council of the EU and the European Council Website. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2019/06/13/new-forms-of-work-council-conclusions/
Council of the EU, & European Council. (2022). Infographic - Spotlight on Digital Platform Workers in the EU.
Curchod, C., Patriotta, G., Cohen, L., & Neysen, N. (2020). Working for an Algorithm: Power Asymmetries and Agency in Online Work Settings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 65(3), 644–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839219867024
De Ruyter, A., & Rachmawati, R. (2020). Understanding the Working Conditions of Gig Workers and Decent Work: Evidence from Indonesia’s online Ojek Riders. Sozialpolitik.Ch, 2/2020. https://doi.org/10.18753/2297-8224-159
De Stefano, V. (2015). The Rise of the “Just-in-Time Workforce”: On-Demand Work, Crowd Work and Labour Protection in the “Gig-Economy.” SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2682602
Dorschel, R. (2022). Reconsidering Digital Labour: Bringing Tech Workers into the Debate. New Technology, Work and Employment, 37(2), 288–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12225
Dunn, M. (2020). Making Gigs Work: Digital Platforms, Job Quality and Worker Motivations. New Technology, Work and Employment, 35(2), 232–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12167
Durri, I. (2023). The Intersection of Casual Work and Platform Work: Lessons Learned from the Casual Work Agenda for the Labour Protection of Platform Workers. European Labour Law Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525231194269
European Commission. (2021a). Commission Proposals to Improve the Working Conditions of People Working Through Digital Labour Platforms.
European Commission. (2021b). Proposals to Improve the Working Conditions of People Working through Digital Labour Platforms. https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-14450-2021-INIT/en/pdf
European Commission, & Directorate-General for Employment, S. A. and I. (2021). Digital Labour Platforms in the EU – Mapping and Business Models – Final Report. European Commission. https://doi.org/doi/10.2767/224624
Fairwork. (2021). Fairwork Indonesia Ratings 2021: Labour Standards in the Gig Economy.
Fuchs, C., & Mosco, V. (2015). Marx in the Age of Digital Capitalism. Brill.
Fuchs, C., & Sevignani, S. (2013). What Is Digital Labour? What Is Digital Work? What’s their Difference? And Why Do These Questions Matter for Understanding Social Media? TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 11(2), 237–293. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v11i2.461
Gal, U., Jensen, T. B., & Stein, M.-K. (2020). Breaking the Vicious Cycle of Algorithmic Management: A Virtue Ethics Approach to People Analytics. Information and Organization, 30(2), 100301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2020.100301
Graham, M., Hjorth, I., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2017). Digital Labour and Development: Impacts of Global Digital Labour Platforms and the Gig Economy on Worker Livelihoods. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23(2), 135–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258916687250
Gruszka, K., & Böhm, M. (2020). Out of Sight, Out of Mind? (In)visibility of/in Platform-mediated Work. New Media & Society, 24(8), 1852–1871. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820977209
Heeks, R. (2017). Digital Economy and Digital Labour Terminology: Making Sense of the “Gig Economy”, “Online Labour” , “Crowd Work” , “Microwork” , “Platform Labour”, Etc (Paper No. 70; Development Informatics Working Paper Series).
Hidayah, N. P., & Anggraeny, I. (2023). Fulfillment of workers’ rights in remote working: the perspective of labor development principle in Indonesia. Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 31(1), 124–137. https://doi.org/10.22219/LJIH.V31I1.25338
Huseynli, B., & Huseynli, N. (2022). Digitalisation and Transformation in Labour Market. TURAN : Stratejik Arastirmalar Merkezi, 14(Special Issue), 210–217. https://doi.org/10.15189/1308-8041
ILO. (2021). World Employment and Social Outlook 2021: The Role of Digital Labour Platforms in Transforming the World of Work. www.ilo.org/publns.
Izzati, N. R. (2022). Ketidakseimbangan Kewajiban Para Pihak dalam Regulasi Ojek Online: Distorsi Logika Hubungan Kemitraan Ekonomi Gig. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 5(2), 325–356. https://doi.org/10.22437/UJH.5.2.325-356
Kahancová, M., Meszmann, T. T., & Sedláková, M. (2020). Precarization via Digitalization? Work Arrangements in the On-Demand Platform Economy in Hungary and Slovakia. Frontiers in Sociology, 5. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsoc.2020.00003
Karanović, J., Berends, H., & Engel, Y. (2021). Regulated Dependence: Platform Workers’ Responses to New Forms of Organizing. Journal of Management Studies, 58(4), 1070–1106. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12577
Katsabian, T., & Davidov, G. (2023). Flexibility, Choice, and Labour Law: The Challenge of On-demand Platforms. University of Toronto Law Journal, 73(3), 348–379. https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj-2021-0113
Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 366–410. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0174
Kim, P., Cheon, E., & Sawyer, S. (2023). Online Freelancing on Digital Labor Platforms: A Scoping Review. Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 259–266. https://doi.org/10.1145/3584931.3607011
Koos, S. (2022). Digital Globalization and Law. Lex Scientia Law Review, 6(1), 33–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v6i1.55092
Kurniawati, D. E., & Khoirina, R. Z. (2020). Online-Based Transportation Business Competition Model of Gojek and Grab. Proceedings of the 1st Borobudur International Symposium on Humanities, Economics and Social Sciences (BIS-HESS 2019), 1054–1057. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200529.220
Lakhani, K. R., Garvin, D. A., & Lonstein, E. (2010). TopCoder (A): Developing Software through Crowdsourcing. Harvard Business School Case 610-032, 1–19. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:109620019
Larsson, A., & Teigland, R. (2019). The Digital Transformation of Labor. Routledge. k k https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429317866
Lee, S.-H. (2022). ASEAN’s Economic Security and Regional Economic Cooperation: Past, Present, and Future. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 7(1), 10–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/20578911211032135
Leonard, T., & Simarmata, N. D. (2023). Legal Dynamics Of Land Digitalization In The Electronic Land Registration System. Jurnal Hukum Unissula, 39(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.26532/jh.v39i1.30576
Lin, L. (2022). Power Resources and Workplace Collective Bargaining: Evidence from China. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 9(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-022-00178-x
Mahfud, M. A., Cahya, K., Wibawa, S., Alw, L. T., & Saraswati, R. (2022). The Fulfillment of Rights to Citizenship for Migrant Worker Deportees in Nunukan District. Law Reform, 18(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v18i1.44655
Makhtar, M., Ariff Abd Ghadas, Z., & Haque, M. (2022). Due Diligence for the Protection of Platform Workers in Malaysia: A Human Rights Analysis. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research, 4((S)), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.37534/bp.jhssr.2022.v4.nS.id1196.p5
Manggali, A., Putra, A., Isrok, M., & Hidayah, N. P. (2023). Legal Protection of Remote Working Workers in Particular Time Employment Agreements. Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ), 4(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.22219/ACLJ.V4I1.24033
Mäntymäki, M., Baiyere, A., & Islam, A. K. M. N. (2019). Digital Platforms and the Changing Nature of Physical Work: Insights from Ride-hailing. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 452–460. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.007
Möhlmann, M., Zalmanson, L., Henfridsson, O., & Gregory, R. W. (2021). Algorithmic Management of Work on Online Labor Platforms: When Matching Meets Control. MIS Quarterly, 45(4), 1999–2022. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/15333
Möhlmannn, M., Salge, C. A. de L., & Marabelli, M. (2023). Algorithm Sensemaking: How Platform Workers Make Sense of Algorithmic Management. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 24(1), 35–64. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00774
Mutawalli, M., Ayub, Z. A., Maskun, & Napang, M. (2023). The Conference of Parties - 27 (COP-27) Agreement As an Instrument of State Policy in Handling Deforestation: A Comparative Study of Sweden and Indonesian Governments. LAW REFORM, 19(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.14710/LR.V19I1.52926
Newlands, G. (2021). Lifting the Curtain: Strategic Visibility of Human Labour in AI-as-a-Service. Big Data & Society, 8(1), 20539517211016024. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211016026
O’Sullivan, M. (2017). Law on Collective Bargaining Rights. Revue de Droit Comparé Du Travail et de La Sécurité Sociale, 4, 254–257. https://doi.org/10.4000/rdctss.2538
Park, S., & Ryoo, S. (2023). How Does Algorithm Control Affect Platform Workers’ Responses? Algorithm as a Digital Taylorism. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 18(1), 273–288. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer18010015
Robert, L. P., Pierce, C., Marquis, L., Kim, S., & Alahmad, R. (2020). Designing Fair AI for Managing Employees in Organizations: A Review, Critique, and Design Agenda. Human–Computer Interaction, 35(5–6), 545–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2020.1735391
Rosenblat, A., & Stark, L. (2016). Algorithmic Labor and Information Asymmetries: A Case Study of Uber’s Drivers. International Journal of Communication, 10, 3758–3784. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/4892
Sanz de Miguel, P., Bazzani, T., & Arasanz, J. (2021). The Definition of Worker in the Platform Economy: Exploring Workers’ Risks and Regulatory Solutions.
Sieker, F. (2022). Platform Work and Access to Social Protection Across Major European Countries. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 38(3), 193–207. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/ics.2022.13
Silberman, M. ‘Six,’ & Johnston, H. (2020). Using GDPR to Improve Legal Clarity and Working Conditions on Digital Labour Platforms (2020.05; Working Paper). https://www.etui.org/sites/default/files/2020-06/WP%202020.05%20GDPR%20Working%20conditions%20digital%20labour%20platforms%20Silberman%20Johnston%20web.pdf
Soriano, C. R. R., & Cabañes, J. V. A. (2020). Entrepreneurial Solidarities: Social Media Collectives and Filipino Digital Platform Workers. Social Media + Society, 6(2), 2056305120926484. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120926484
Sulaimán, W. N. N. B., & Susila, M. E. (2023). Legal Scope of Human Cloning: Comparative Analysis Between the United Kingdom and France. Yuridika, 38(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v38i1.38773
Sutherland, W., Jarrahi, M. H., Dunn, M., & Nelson, S. B. (2019). Work Precarity and Gig Literacies in Online Freelancing. Work, Employment and Society, 34(3), 457–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017019886511
Tan, L. (2022, April 14). Over 60,000 Foodpanda Delivery Partners to be Protected under PERKESO’s Self-Employment Social Security Scheme. Humanresourcesonline.Net. https://www.humanresourcesonline.net/over-60-000-foodpanda-delivery-partners-to-be-protected-under-perkeso-s-self-employment-social-security-scheme
Viajar, V. D. Q. (2022, September 18). Gig Delivery Riders: Workers or Independent Contractors? Labor Education and Research Network. https://learn.org.ph/gig-delivery-riders-workers-or-independent-contractors/#
Wiener, M., Cram, W. A., & Benlian, A. (2023). Algorithmic control and gig workers: a legitimacy perspective of Uber drivers. European Journal of Information Systems, 32(3), 485–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2021.1977729
Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2018). Good Gig, Bad Gig: Autonomy and Algorithmic Control in the Global Gig Economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616
Woodside, J., Vinodrai, T., & Moos, M. (2021). Bottom-up Strategies, Platform Worker Power and Local Action: Learning from Ridehailing Drivers. Local Economy, 36(4), 325–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/02690942211040170
Zubaidi, N., Pratamab, R. G., & Al-Fatih, S. (2020). Legal Perspective on Effectiveness of Pre-Work Cards for Indonesian People. BESTUUR, 8(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.20961/BESTUUR.V8I1.42722
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Muhammad Nur, Anom Wahyu Asmorojati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
