Regional Head Election post-MK Decision Number 60/PUU-XXII/2024 in the constitutional law landscape

Authors

  • Hufron Hufron Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Sultoni Fikri Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Syofyan Hadi Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Baharuddin Riqiey Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v33i1.39064

Keywords:

Constitutional Court Decision, Regional Head Elections, Legal Pragmatism

Abstract

This article aims to analyse the implications of the Constitutional Court's decision on the regional head election system in Indonesia and evaluate its impact on political participation and diversity within local democracy. The Constitutional Court, as the interpreter of the constitution, particularly in the context of regional head elections, plays a pivotal role in shaping the landscape of constitutional law. Constitutional Court Decision No. 60/PUU-XXII/2024, which controversially alters the candidacy requirements for regional heads from being based on seat or vote share to being based on population size, reflects the need to align the law with evolving socio-political dynamics. This legal research employs statutory, conceptual, and case study approaches. This decision is expected to broaden access for smaller parties and independent candidates, thereby enhancing political diversity and voter choice. However, there is a risk that the changes might induce political instability or lead to dominance by large parties. Thus, ongoing monitoring and evaluation of the impact of these changes are crucial to ensure that constitutional law reforms achieve their intended goals of justice and representation. This article contributes to understanding how the law can adapt to societal needs and the challenges faced in the democratisation process. By emphasising the importance of legal pragmatism, the article illustrates that the law should function as a theoretical norm and an effective tool for addressing the continuously evolving socio-political dynamics. The research is intended to serve as a reference for policymakers and academics in comprehending and implementing constitutional law reform in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aburaera, S., Muhadar, & Maskun. (2013). Filsafat Hukum: Teori Dan Praktek. Kencana.

Al-Fatih, S. (2023). Perkembangan Metode Penelitian Hukum di Indonesia (1st ed., Vol. 1). UMM Press. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Perkembangan_Metode_Penelitian_Hukum_di.html?id=EObiEAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

Al-Fatih, S., & Siboy, A. (2021). Menulis Artikel Karya Ilmiah Hukum di Jurnal Nasional dan Internasional Bereputasi. Inteligensia Media.

Al Fatih, S., & Nur, A. I. (2023). Does the Constitutional Court on Local Election Responsive Decisions? Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 3(3), 569–596. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v3i3.74

Alimsyah, S., & Syam, R. (2024). Constitutional Court Decision No.60/Puu-XXII/2024 Protects the Constitutional Rights of Citizens and Political Parties in Simultaneous Regional Elections in the Regions. LITERATUS, 6(2), 543–552. https://doi.org/10.37010/lit.v6i2.1712

Amin Bahri, A. M. (2020). Implikasi Yuridis Ambang Batas Terhadap Pengajuan Permohonan Sengketa Pilkada. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol5.iss3.art14

Aminah, S. (2020). The Evaluation of Regional Head Election: Developing Synergy of Regional Autonomy and Regional Head Election. Jurnal Bina Praja, 12(2), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.12.2020.137-151

Angelosanto, M. (2023). Legal Realism and the Predictability of Judicial Decisions. Interdisciplinary Studies in Society, Law, and Politics, 2(3), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.isslp.2.3.2

Argawati, U. (2024). MK Buka Peluang Parpol Tanpa Kursi Di DPRD Ajukan Calon Kepala Daerah. Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia.

Bahar, W. (2024). Tanggapi Putusan MK 60/PUU-XXII/2024, Miko Kamal: Bermanfaat Bagi Tumbuh Suburnya Demokrasi. Tribunnews.Com.

Balkin, J. M. (1987). Deconstructive Practice and Legal Theory. The Yale Law Journal, 96(4), 743. https://doi.org/10.2307/796361

Bernstein, R., & Cárcamo Aguad, R. (2023). Richard J. Bernstein: Politics and Pragmatism. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, XV(1). https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.3199

Bobrovnyk, S. V. (2021). Judicial interpretation: features and practical significance. Alʹmanah Prava, 12, 50–57. https://doi.org/10.33663/2524-017X-2021-12-8

Budahu, M. A. S., Kasim, A., Lasatu, A., & Palilingan, T. N. (2022). Pemenuhan Hak Dipilih dan Hak Memilih sebagai Hak Konstitusional: Studi Komparatif Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Tumou Tou Law Review. https://doi.org/10.35801/tourev.v1i2.44641

Culler, J. (2015). Deconstruction. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 927–932). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.64016-3

DERRIDA, J. (2020). Deconstruction in a Nutshell. In J. D. Caputo (Ed.), Deconstruction in a Nutshell. Fordham University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1198zt6

Direk, Z. (2014). Law, Justice, and Politics: Derrida on Deconstruction and Democracy to Come. CR: The New Centennial Review, 14(2), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.14321/crnewcentrevi.14.2.0111

Fajar Dwiranda, I., & Alkohir Anggoro, S. (2020). Kandidat Problematik dalam Pilkada Serentak 2015-2018: Celah Hukum Pilkada Hingga Pragmatisme Partai Politik. Jurnal Transformative, 6(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.transformative.2020.006.02.5

Fecondo, A. (2020). Derrida: Deconstruction of the Ethical-Legal-Political. Methodological Clarification. Siberian Journal of Philosophy, 18(1), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2020-18-1-155-170

Fikri, S. (2024). Keputusan MK Soal UU Pilkada, Menguatkan Demokrasi Dengan Pendekatan Pragmatis. Kempalan.Com.

Fikri, S., Riqiey, B., Iffatul, M., & Janah, M. (2022). Problematika Konstitusionalitas Presidential Threshold di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Positum, 7(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35706/positum.v7i1.6643

Fisch, M. H. (1942). Justice Holmes, the Prediction Theory of Law, and Pragmatism. The Journal of Philosophy, 39(4), 85. https://doi.org/10.2307/2018835

Fisher, W. W. (1997). Interpreting Holmes. Harvard Law Review, 110(5), 1010. https://doi.org/10.2307/1342109

Frohlich, M. F., Jacobson, C., Fidelman, P., & Smith, T. F. (2018). The relationship between adaptive management of social-ecological systems and law: a systematic review. Ecology and Society, 23(2), art23. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10060-230223

Grey, T. C. (1989). Holmes and Legal Pragmatism. Stanford Law Review, 41(4), 787. https://doi.org/10.2307/1228740

Guinier, L. (1994). The tyranny of the majority: fundamental fairness in representative democracy. Choice Reviews Online, 31(11), 31-6309-31–6309. https://doi.org/10.5860/CHOICE.31-6309

Hernando Nieto, E. (2022). Deconstruyendo la legalidad: ensayos de teoría legal y teoría política. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. https://doi.org/10.18800/9972423832

Kansil, C. S. ., & Nadilatasya, P. M. (2024). Dampak Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Dinamika Politik dan Kepercayaan Publik di Indonesia: Analisis Implikasi Hukum dan Etika. UNES Law Review, 6(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2039

Kharisma, B., & Satria, I. G. S. (2024). Towards Achieving Substantive Justice: The Importance of Extending the Time Limit for Resolving Presidential Election Disputes. Mimbar Keadilan, 17(2), 98–114. https://doi.org/10.30996/mk.v17i2.10924

Ladeur, V. K.-H. (2021). Recht und Gerechtigkeit bei Derrida und Luhmann. In Luhmann and Law (pp. 417–470). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003075103-21

Lescrauwaet, L., Wagner, H., Yoon, C., & Shukla, S. (2022). Adaptive Legal Frameworks and Economic Dynamics in Emerging Tech-nologies: Navigating the Intersection for Responsible Innovation. Law and Economics, 16(3), 202–220. https://doi.org/10.35335/laweco.v16i3.61

Lestari, E. P., & Risnain, M. (2020). Evaluasi Norma Kedaulatan Rakyat Dalam Konstitusi Dan Pelaksanaannya Dalam Kerangka Negara Hukum Demokratis. Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies, 1(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.31000/ijlp.v1i1.2633

Mallarangeng, A. B., Ruslan, A., Saidi, M. D., & Ilyas, A. (2019). The Essence of the Regional Head Election System in Realizing Clean Government in Indonesia. Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization. https://doi.org/10.7176/JLPG/85-26

Milovanovic, D. (2014). An Introduction to The Sociology of Law. Criminal Justice Press.

Mochtar, Z. A., & Hiariej, E. O. . (2023). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum: Memahami Kaidah, Teori, Asas, dan Filsafat Hukum. Rajawali Pers.

Muhammad Anwar Soleh, & Durohim Amnan. (2024). Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 60/PUU-XXII/2024 terhadap Demokratisasi Pemilihan Kepala Daerah. Presidensial: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, Dan Kebijakan Publik, 1(3), 116–127. https://doi.org/10.62383/presidensial.v1i3.85

Naharuddin, N., & Imran, I. (2024). Deregulating the Nomination Threshold for Regional Head Elections and Local Oligarchy. Amsir Law Journal, 6(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.36746/alj.v6i1.588

Negara, T. A. S. (2023). Normative Legal Research in Indonesia: Its Originis and Approaches. Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ), 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v4i1.24855

Nuraisyah, R. A., Susanti, E., Puteri, F. A., Pratama, D. M., Setiawati, E., & Pratama, R. I. S. (2024). Pemilu yang Berkualitas: Memahami Hak Pilih dan Dipilih Sebagai Warga Negara. JALAKOTEK: Journal of Accounting Law Communication and Technology, 1(2), 822–831. https://doi.org/10.57235/jalakotek.v1i2.2659

Posner, R. A. (2004). Legal Pragmatism. Metaphilosophy, 35(1–2), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2004.00310.x

Prihatiningtyas, W. (2018). Konstitusionalitas Model Pengisian Jabatan Wakil Kepala Daerah Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemilihan Kepala Daerah (Pilkada). Media Iuris, 1(2), 373. https://doi.org/10.20473/mi.v1i2.8836

Putri, F. D., & Purwanti, A. (2018). Legal Politics In The Amendment Of Regional Head Electoral Law. Diponegoro Law Review, 3(1), 122. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.3.1.2018.122-131

Rachbi, M., & Slamet, S. M. I. (2020). Analisis Yuridis Perihal Syarat-Syarat Pencalonan Kepala Daerah Melalui Jalur Independent. Jurnal Dialektika Hukum, 2(2), 97–128. https://doi.org/10.36859/jdh.v2i2.512

Ramadhani, R., Kotijah, S., Hidayah, R. Al, & Ventyrina, I. (2023). Pemberlakuan Ambang Batas Suara Dalam Permohonan Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum Kepala Daerah Dan Wakil Kepala Daerah/ Gubenur, Bupati Dan Wakil Walikota Di Mahkamah Konstitusi. DEDIKASI, 24(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.31293/ddk.v24i1.7046

Ren, J. (2024). The Role of Law Under the Social Structure. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 42, 710–715. https://doi.org/10.54097/a5535h97

Rizqika, F., & Firdaus, S. U. (2023). Analisis Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2020 Tentang Pemilihan Gubernur, Bupati, Dan Walikota Terkait Ambang Batas Pencalonan Kepala Daerah Untuk Mewujudkan Demokrasi Lokal Yang Berkualitas. Res Publica: Jurnal Hukum Kebijakan Publik, 7(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.20961/respublica.v7i1.50702

Saleha, D., R.Saragih, B., & Sulistyowati, T. (2024). Reconstruction of the Threshold Setting for Regional Head Candidacy in the Perspective of Electoral Democracy in Indonesia. International Journal of Social and Human, 1(3), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.59613/0bk7w887

Saragih, G. M. (2024). A Judges’ Role in Pursuing Justice: Oliver Wendell Holmes’ Sociological Jurisprudence Perspective. International Journal of Law Society Services, 3(2), 58. https://doi.org/10.26532/ijlss.v3i2.34990

Sery, J. (2022). The Rhetorical Roots of Legal Pragmatism. Journal for the History of Rhetoric, 25(3), 303–328. https://doi.org/10.5325/jhistrhetoric.25.3.0303

Sokoloff, W. W. (2005). Between Justice and Legality: Derrida on Decision. Political Research Quarterly, 58(2), 341. https://doi.org/10.2307/3595634

Soleh, M. A., & Amnan, D. (2024). Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 60/PUU-XXII/2024 terhadap Demokratisasi Pemilihan Kepala Daerah. Presidensial : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, Dan Kebijakan Publik, 1(3).

Solum, L. B. (2011). Legal Theory Lexicon 057: Realist Deconstruction of Formal Legal Categories. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1931608

Steuer, M. (2024). Understanding the reservoirs of Constitutional Court resilience. Oñati Socio-Legal Series. https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1897

Turner, C. (2013). Deconstructing Transitional Justice. Law and Critique, 24(2), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-013-9119-z

Tushnet, M. (1984). Critical Legal Studies and Constitutional Law: An Essay in Deconstruction. Stanford Law Review, 36(1/2), 623. https://doi.org/10.2307/1228693

Tusseau, G. (Ed.). (2020). Debating Legal Pluralism and Constitutionalism (Vol. 41). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34432-0

Watts, J. H., & Roberson, C. (2014). Law and Society: An Introduction. CRC Press.

Widodo, A. (2022). Sistem Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Yang Ideal Menurut UUD 1945. Awasia: Jurnal Pemilu Dan Demokrasi, 2(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.55108/awasia.v2i1.115

Yanto, A., & Bariki, Y. (2024). Antara Degradasi dan Ekspektasi: Menuju Pesta Demokrasi Pemilukada Tahun 2024 di Indonesia. Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara Dan Politik Islam, 11(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.32505/politica.v11i1.6246

Zuckert, C. (1991). The Politics of Derridean Deconstruction. Polity, 23(3), 335–356. https://doi.org/10.2307/3235130

Downloads

Published

2025-04-10

How to Cite

Hufron, H., Fikri, S., Hadi, S., & Riqiey, B. (2025). Regional Head Election post-MK Decision Number 60/PUU-XXII/2024 in the constitutional law landscape. Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 33(1), 224–243. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v33i1.39064

Issue

Section

Journal's Articles