Towards a structural constitution: contribution of Presidential Succession Law to the Constitution of Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v33i2.40203Keywords:
Presidential Succession Law, Structural Constitution, Vacuum of Power, President and Vice PresidentAbstract
This study examines the relatively underexplored domain of presidential succession within constitutional law, which addresses the critical scenario in which the offices of the President and Vice President simultaneously become vacant. Despite its importance, the conceptual frameworks and defining characteristics of succession regimes have not been systematically or comprehensively mapped. To fill this gap, the present article establishes a strong theoretical foundation for presidential succession by applying doctrinal methods grounded in constitutional analysis, comparative law, and conceptual inquiry. Furthermore, it synthesises and organises the salient features of succession provisions as they appear across a variety of national constitutions. Employing a comparative constitutional approach, the research aggregates these dispersed elements to illuminate common patterns and divergences. The findings suggest that a more advanced articulation of succession rules could substantially enhance the structural integrity of Indonesia’s 1945 Constitution, elevating it toward a fully automated and systematised mechanism that minimises discretionary discretion, resists political interference, and guarantees continuity of executive authority. Finally, the catalogued key features offer a fertile basis for further empirical and normative investigation aimed at identifying the optimal configuration of succession clauses for any given constitutional order.
Downloads
References
Abbott, P. (2005). Accidental Presidents: Death, Assassination, Resignation, and Democratic Succession. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 35(4), 627–645.
Agamben, G. (2004). State of Exception Translated by Kevin Attell. The University of Chicago Press.
Albert, R. (2009). The fusion of presidentialism and parliamentarism. American Journal of Comparative Law, 57(3), 531–577. https://doi.org/10.5131/ajcl.2008.0016
Albert, R. (2010). The Constitutional Politics of Presidential Succession. Hofstra L. Rev., 39(497), 497–576.
Albert, R. (2016). Quasi-Constitutional Amendments. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2844770
Al-Fatih, S. (2023). Perkembangan Metode Penelitian Hukum di Indonesia. UMMPress.
Alrasid, H. (1993). Masalah Pengisian Jabatan Presiden (Sejak Sidang Penitia Persiapan Kemerdekaan Indonesia 1945 Sampai Sidang MPR 1993). Disertasi Doktor Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.
Alrasid, H. (2017). Masalah Suksesi Presiden. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 24(6), 535. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol24.no6.1059
Altman, D. (2020). Checking Executive Personalism: Collegial Governments and the Level of Democracy. Swiss Political Science Review, 26(3), 316–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12406
Amancik, Ahmad Saifulloh, P. P., Ayub, Z. A., Barus, S. I., & Ramadhani, S. (2024).
Choices of Law for Democratic Regional Head Election Dispute Resolution Institutions in Indonesia. Jambura Law Review, 6(2), 304–338. https://doi.org/10.33756/JLR.V6I2.24792
Amar, A., & Amar, V. (1995). Is the Presidential Succession Law Constitutional? Analisa, C. P. N. 3. (n.d.). Sidang Umum MPR-RI.
Anderson, M., & Lewallen, J. (2024). Not just the nation’s hostess: First Ladies as policy actors. Policy Studies Journal, 52(4), 731–749. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12558
Anshori, A. Y., & Abdurrahman, L. T. (2024). Constitutional Contestation of the Islamic State Concept in the Indonesian Parliament 1956-1959. De Jure: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syar’iah, 16(2), 278–316. https://doi.org/10.18860/J-FSH.V16I2.29572
Batasang Pambansa BLG. 883, An Act Calling A Special Election For President and Vice President, Providing For The Manner of the Holding Thereof, Appropriating Funds Therefor, And For Other Purposes. (n.d.). Retrieved December 12, 2023, from https://lawphil.net/statutes/bataspam/bp1985/bp_883_1985.html
Baturo, A. (2022). When incumbents do not run: presidential succession and democratization. Democratization, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1957837
Belley, J.-G. (1997). Law as Terra Incognita : Constructing Legal Pluralism. Canadian Journal of Law and Society, 12(02), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0829320100005330
Bernick, E. D. (2010). The Morality of the Presidential Oath. Ohio North University Law Review, 47(1), 428–444.
Borman, M. S., Marwiyah, S., Cornelis, V. I., Lazuardi, I., & Kaewhanam, P. (2024). Model for resolving election violations through Indonesian Election Body and Constitutional Court. Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 32(2), 238–262. https://doi.org/10.22219/LJIH.V32I2.33711
Brownell, R. E. (2021). The Executive Branch’s Longstanding Embrace of Legislative Succession to the Presidency. SSRN Electronic Journal, 52(2), 281–420. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3705353
Bünte, M., & Thompson, M. R. (2018). Perilous presidentialism in Southeast Asia? Contemporary Politics, 24(3), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2017.1413501
Chaniago, JR. (1989). Pemerintahan Darurat Republik Indonesia (PDRI) dalam Khasanah Kearsipan. Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia, Penerbitan Sejarah Lisan Nomor 5.
Chervinsky, L. M., & Costello, M. R. (Eds.). (2023). Mourning the Presidents. University of Virginia Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.949059
Choesin, V. C. (1989). The Indonesian Vice-Presidency: Problems in Leadership Succession. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 11(2), 138–159.
Crompton, C., Willard, S., Herutomo, R., & Wahyu, Y. I. (2007). 100 Pertempuran Yang Berpengaruh Di Dalam Sejarah Dunia (100 Battles That Shapped World History). Karisma Publishing Group.
De Micheli, D., Sanchez-Gomez, J. T., & Roberts, K. M. (2022). Tenuous Pacts and Multi party Coalitions: The Politics of Presidential Impeachment in Latin America. Journal of Latin American Studies, 54(2), 283–311. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X22000219
Dixon, R., & Holden, R. (2011). Constitutional Amendment Rules: The Denominator Problem. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1840925
Dixon, R., & Stone, A. (2018). The Invisible Constitution in Comparative Perspective. The Invisible Constitution in Comparative Perspective, 2016, 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108277914.001
Eisgruber, C. L. (2009). Constitutional Self-Government. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1smjvb5
Ferejohn, J., & Sager, L. (2002). Commitment and Constitutionalism. Texas Law Review, 81.
Fischer, M. (2015). Dominance, Competition, Compromise or Consensus? Explaining Decision-Making Structures. In Political Decision-Making in Switzerland (pp. 98–119). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137508607_5
Gaddie, R. K., III, C. S. B., & Buchanan, S. E. (1999). What Is so Special about Special Elections? Legislative Studies Quarterly, 24(1), 103. https://doi.org/10.2307/440302
Ganghof, S. (2021). Separation of powers ≠ presidentialism. In Beyond Presidentialism and Parliamentarism (pp. 14–34). Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192897145.003.0002
Geun-hye, P. (2023). South Korea lawmakers vote to impeach leader. BBC News. Gooszen, H. (1999). A Demographic History of the Indonesian Archipelago. Brill.
Green, T. F. (1956). Presidential Succession. Dickinson Law Review, 61(4), 323–334.
Hartama, A. Y. (2023). Paradigma Model Legislasi dan Tujuan Penguatan Sistem Presidensial Republik Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 53(1). https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol53.no1.1551
Hindley, D. (1968). Indonesian Politics 1965-7: The September 30 Movement and the Fall of Sukarno. The World Today, 24(8), 345–356.
Hukumonline. (2000). Mengkumandang Bantah Ada Pelimpahan Tugas dari Presiden ke Wapres. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/menkumdang-bantah-ada-pelimpahan-tugas-dari-presiden-ke-wapres-hol346/
Jouet, M. (2008). The Failed Invigoration of Argentina’s Constitution: Presidential Omnipotence, Repression, Instability, and Lawlessness in Argentine History. The University of Miami Inter-American Law Review, 39(3), 409–462.
Kalt, B. C. (2024). A Distinct System for Presidential Succession on Inauguration Day: Getting the Most Out of Section 3 of the Twentieth Amendment. Cardozo Law Review, 46(2), 307–367.
Kim, J. W. (2018). Korean Constitutional Court and Constitutionalism in Political Dynamics: Focusing on Presidential Impeachment. Constitutional Review, 4(2), 222. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev423
Kurnia, T. (2021). Presidential Candidacy Threshold and Presidentialism Affirmation in Indonesia. PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law), 07(03), 353–379. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v7n3.a4
Law, D. S., & Versteeg, M. (2011). The Evolution and Ideology of Global Constitutionalism. California Law Review, 99(5), 1163–1257.
Linder, W. (2010). Consensus Democracy: The Swiss System of Power-Sharing. In Swiss Democracy (pp. 128–157). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230274976_4
Linz, J. (1994). Presidential or Parlementary Democracy: Does It Make Difenerence? In J. Linz & A. Valenzuela (Eds.), The Failure of Presidential Democracy: Comparative Perspective. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Linz, J. J. (1990). The Perils of Presidentialism. Journal of Democracy, 1(1), 51–69.
Mahendra, Y. I. (1998). Menelaah Formal Politik Orde Baru. In D. Thalib & M. Karmila (Eds.), Hukum dan Kekuasaan. FH UII Press.
Mahendra, Y. I. (2023). Sengketa Pemilihan Presiden dan Wakil Presiden di Mahkamah Konstitusi. Kuliah Umum Hukum Tata Negara, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.
McCarthy, D. J. (1987). James Wilson and the Creation of the Presidency. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 17(4), 689–696.
Mobius, J. M. (1966). The Japan-Korea Normalization Process and Korean Anti-Americanism. Asian Survey, 6(4), 241–248. https://doi.org/10.2307/2642122
Mochtar, Z. A., & Afkar, K. (2022). President’s Power, Transition, and Good Governance. BESTUUR, 10(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v10i1.59098
Mughan, A., Linz, J. J., & Valenzuela, A. (1995). Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Stable Democracy. Mershon International Studies Review, 39(1), 123. https://doi.org/10.2307/222696
Mukhlis, M. M., Wahab, H. A., Paidi, Z., Sastrawaty, N., & Hasan, H. (2024). Heavy Parliamentary v. Heavy Executive: Ambiguity of Power in Indonesian Constitutional Practices. Jurnal Media Hukum, 31(2), 186–205. https://doi.org/10.18196/JMH.V31I2.21703
Mulyosudarmo, S. (1999a). Dinamika Hukum Tata Negara di Era Pemerintahan Transisi. Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara Universitas Airlangga.
Mulyosudarmo, S. (1999b). Dinamika Hukum Tata Negara di Era Pemerintahan Transisi. Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara Universitas Airlangga.
Rankin, R. S. (1946). Presidential Succession in the United States. The Journal of Politics, 8(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/2125607
Roznai, Y. (2015). Unamendability and the Genetic Code of the Constitution. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2569279
Said, S. (2015). Gestapu 65: PKI, Aidit, Sukarno dan Soeharto. PT Mizan Pustaka.
Satrio, A. (2023). Restoring Indonesia’s (Un)Constitutional Constitution: Soepomo’s Authoritarian Constitution. German Law Journal, 24(2), 402–416. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2023.16
Shain, Y. (1995). Between States: Interim Governments in Democratic Transitions. Cambridge University Press.
Siboy, A., & Al-Fatih, S. (2025). The Design of Preventive Control on Local Delegated Legislation: A Case Study of Regional Head Regulations. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 111-126. https://ejournal.uinsaizu.ac.id/index.php/volksgeist/article/view/12862
Simabura, C., Arinanto, S., Indrati, M. F., Isra, S., & Arsil, F. (2023). Ministerial Authority in Formulating Regulations Related to Presidential Lawmaking Doctrine. Constitutional Review, 9(2), 297–331. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev924
Soemarmi, A., Prihatin, E. S., & Hasyim, A. (2001). Suksesi Presiden: Studi Tentang Pengaturan Hukum dan Pola Pergantian Jabatan Presiden di Indonesia. January 2001.
Steeves, J. (2023). Democracy Challenged in the 2022 Presidential Succession in Kenya: The African Imperial President. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Stenson, K. (2010). Caesar, Pompey, and the CoLLapse of the First Triumvirate. https://research.libraries.wsu.edu/
Stepan, A., & Skach, C. (1993). Constitutional Frameworks and Democratic Consolidation: Parliamentarianism versus Presidentialism. World Politics, 46(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/2950664
Sunny, I. (1986). Pergeseran Kekuasaan Eksekutif. Aksara Baru.
Suparto, S., & Santos, J. G. (2024). Regional Spatial Regulation in Riau Province: Policy Formation Problems and Solutions. Journal of Law, Environmental and Justice, 2(2), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.62264/JLEJ.V2I2.104
Theresia, M., Adiyatma, S. E., & Nadia, R. A. N. (2023). Civil Law in Indonesia and Russia: Easy and Affordable Access to Legal Aid. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 4(3), 6. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v4i2.68099
Thyne, C. L., & Powell, J. M. (2016). Coup d’état or Coup d’Autocracy? How Coups Impact Democratization, 1950–2008. Foreign Policy Analysis, 12(2), 192–213.
Tillman, S. B. (2022). A Defense of the Legislative “Officer” Succession Provisions. Fordham Law Review, 91, 23–27. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4242245
Wang, D. W. L., & Pivatto, P. (2014). Latin American Constitutionalism, 1810-2010. The Engine Room of the Constitution. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 12(1), 256–261. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mou009
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Febriansyah Ramadhan, I Gede Agus Kurniawan, I Gede Druvananda Abhiseka, Putu Wahyu Widiartana, Roqiyul Maarif Syam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
