In Search of Forfeited Fiduciary Assurance: A Justice Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v33i2.42371Keywords:
Assurance, Fiduciary, Forfeited, JusticeAbstract
This study examines the legal consequences and proposes a fair model of confiscation that balances the interests of creditors, debtors, and the state. The research employs a normative legal approach, integrating John Rawls’ theory of justice and progressive legal theory, and applies descriptive methods and deductive syllogistic analysis to examine relevant doctrines, legal principles, and judicial practices. The findings reveal significant gaps in current fiduciary regulations, particularly the absence of mechanisms to address the consequences of state confiscation, to provide compensation to affected parties, and to protect receivables rights in cases of loss or damage. In response, the study proposes a reconstructed legal framework that introduces a sanctioning scheme coupled with proportional compensation, explicitly incorporated into court judgments. This model upholds procedural justice and equality among parties, aligning with Rawls’ difference principle. The study concludes that revising fiduciary regulations to include explicit provisions for state confiscation and associated compensation mechanisms should enhance legal certainty, ensure proportional protection of all parties, and promote a fair and effective enforcement system.
Downloads
References
Aditya, Z. F., & Al-Fatih, S. (2023a). Redesign of Positive Fictitious Efforts After the Job Creation Law: Redesain Upaya Fiktif Positif Pasca Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja. Jurnal Konstitusi, 20(2), 340–357. https://doi.org/10.31078/JK2029
Aditya, Z. F., & Al-Fatih, S. (2023b). The legal protection system of indigenous peoples in Southeast Asia. Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 31(2), 285–309. https://doi.org/10.22219/LJIH.V31I2.27619
Afra, F., Purba, F. N., Adilla, S., & G, F. N. Z. (2022). Analisis Hukum Konsep Jaminan Dalam Penyelesaian Kasus Kredit Jaminan Fidusia. Diponegoro Private Law Review, 9(1), 59–72.
Aidonojie, P. A., Hassan, I., Obieshi, E., & Ikpotokin, O. O. (2025). Examining Human Rights Abuses on Religious, Cultural, and Political Intolerance in Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues (JSDERI), 3(1), 78–94. https://doi.org/10.53955/JSDERI.V3I1.55
Al Fatih, S., & Nur, A. I. (2023). Does the Constitutional Court on Local Election Responsive Decisions? Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 3(3), 569–596. https://doi.org/10.53955/JHCLS.V3I3.74
Alam, S., Fajrin, Y. A., Al-Fatih, S., & Borsa, M. O. (2022). Islamic Criminal Law Study on The Seizure of Corruptor Assets as an Indonesian’s Criminal Sanction in The Future. JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah), 21(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.31958/JURIS.V21I2.6722
Al-Fatih, S., & Aditya, Z. F. (2024). The Beginning of the Human Rights 5th Generation: A Lesson from Covid-19 Outbreak in Indonesia. Jambe Law Journal, 7(1), 59–90. https://doi.org/10.22437/HOME.V7I1.339
Al-Fatih, S., Roziqin, A., Asyari, M. D., & Ezzerouali, S. (2025). Legal Reform in Village Law-Making Process Using Artificial Intelligence: Is It Necessary? Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 6(2), 757–782. https://doi.org/10.15294/JLLR.V6I2.21116
Al-Fatih, S., Safaat, M. A., Widiarto, A. E., Al Uyun, D., & Nur, M. (2023). Understanding Delegated Legislation in The Natural Resources Sector. BESTUUR, 11(2), 290–311. https://doi.org/10.20961/BESTUUR.V11I2.78125
Al-Fatih, S., Safaat, M. A., Widiarto, A. E., Al Uyun, D., & Rahmat, A. F. (2023). Rethinking Delegated Legislation in Indonesian Legal System. Jurnal Hukum Novelty, 14(2), 240–251. https://doi.org/10.26555/NOVELTY.V14I2.A27517
Al-Fatih, S., Safaat, M. A., Widiarto, A. E., Uyun, D. Al, & Nur, M. (2023). The Hierarchical Model of Delegated Legislation in Indonesia. Lex Scientia Law Review, 7(2), 629–658. https://doi.org/10.15294/LESREV.V7I2.74651
Al-Fatih, S., & Shahzad, S. K. (2025). Rethinking How Laws Are Made: Indonesia’s Legal Method Dilemma. Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues (JSDERI), 3(2), 170–190. https://doi.org/10.53955/JSDERI.V3I2.32
Andini, O. G., Nilasari, & Eurian, A. A. (2023). Restorative justice in Indonesia corruption crime: a utopia. Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 31(1), 72–90. https://doi.org/10.22219/LJIH.V31I1.24247
Aneta Indriya Sari, G. D. (2021). Kepastian Hukum atas suatu kepemilikan objek jaminan fidusia yang btelah dinyatakan dirampas oleh negara berdasarkan putusan pengadilan. Syntax Literate, 6(7), 3157.
Arifin, R., Riyanto, S., & Putra, A. K. (2023). Collaborative efforts in ASEAN for global asset recovery frameworks to combat corruption in the digital era. Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 31(2), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.22219/LJIH.V31I2.29381
Asmaniar, F. J. S. (2022). Pendaftaran Objek Fidusia Sebagai Jaminan Utang. Justice Voice, 1(1). 11-21. https://doi.org/10.37893/jv.v1i1.32
Cassela, S. D. (2015). Criminal Forfeiture Procedure in 2015: An Annual Survey of Developments in the Case Law. Criminal Law Bulletin, 2–3. https://assetforfeiturelaw.us/?p=283
Dewi, C. I. D. L. (2019). Pengikatan Jaminan Kebendaan dengan Fidusia. Yustitia, 13(1). 1-10. https://doi.org/10.62279/yustitia.v13i1.265
Disemadi, H. S., Al-Fatih, S., Silviani, N. Z., Rusdiana, S., & Febriyani, E. (2024). Revitalizing Intellectual Property Rights in Indonesia: A Maqasid al-Sharia Perspective on Communal Ownership. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 9(2), 625–648. https://doi.org/10.29240/JHI.V9I2.11039
Fatih, S. A., Nur, A. I., & Hermanto, B. (2025). Understanding Regulations Of Online Gambling In Indonesia: Is It Forbidden? Jurisdictie: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syariah, 16(1), 55–76. https://doi.org/10.18860/J.V16I1.31101
Fatkhurohman, Sirajuddin, & Al-Fatih, S. (2025). Facing Digital Age: Should the Regional Regulation Be Made Digitally? Jambura Law Review, 7(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.33756/JLR.V7I1.27111
Hafid, I. (2021). Perampasan Aset Tanpa Pemidanaan Dalam Perspektif Economic Analysis of Law. Lex Renaissan, 1(6). 465-480. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol6.iss3.art3
Hasanah, L. (2021). Upaya Pengembalian Aset Negara Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi dan Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2006). JURNAL ANTI KORUPSI, 11(2), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.19184/JAK.V3I2.28922
Hayati, N. (2016). Aspek Hukum Pendaftaran Jaminan Fidusia Berdasarkan Undang- Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia. Lex Jurnalica, 13(2).
Hidayah, N. P., & Al-Fatih, S. (2019). Recognition and Strengthening the Customary Land Ownership in Central Borneo Province. Jurnal Hukum Novelty, 10(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.26555/NOVELTY.V10I1.A12980
Hidayah, N. P., Komariah, Prakasa, S. U. W., & Zulhuda, S. (2023). Modeling the Contract and Execution Fiduciary on Constitutional Court Decision. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 3(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.53955/JHCLS.V3I1.76
Hidayat, M. F. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Jaminan Fidusia Atas Dirampasnya Objek Jaminan Yang Digunakan Sebagai Alat Kejahatan. Panitera :Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(2). 179-194. https://panitera.amiin.or.id/index.php/panitera/article/view/25
Hufron, & Fikri, S. (2024). The urgency of regulating forfeiture of assets gained from corruption in Indonesia. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 32(2), 292–310. https://doi.org/10.22219/LJIH.V32I2.35243
I Wayan Kharismawan, I. W. N. P. (2019). Kewajiban Pemberi Fidusia Dalam Hal Obyek Jaminan Fidusia Dirampas untuk Negara. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum.
Iksan, M., Surbakti, N., Kurnianingsih, M., Budiono, A., Al-Fatih, S., & Ramon, T. M. (2023). Fulfilling the Restitution Rights of Crime Victims: The Legal Practice in Indonesia. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 12(4), 152. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2023-0101
Ilma, H. A. (2024). Tantangan Mekanisme Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture dalam Rancangan Undang-Undang Perampasan Aset di Indonesia. Ma’mal: Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah Dan Hukum, 5(4), 321–344. https://doi.org/10.15642/MAL.V5I4.373
Juliani, R. D., & Lubis, S. (n.d.). Pengembalian aset hasil korupsi dan penanggulangan korupsi melalui penyitaan non-conviction based asset forfeiture: tinjauan hukum Indonesia dan united nations convention against corruption (UNCAC) 2003. Jurnal Educatio : Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29210/1202322846
Kamello, T. (2014). Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Suatu Kebutuhan Yang Didambakan, 2nd ed. PT. Alumni.
Kamelo, T. (2014). Hukum Jaminan Fidusia: Suatu Kebutuhan yang Didambakan. PT. Alumni.
Korompot, M. I. S., Al-Fatih, S., & Pradhan, D. (2021). The Principle of Equality Before the Law in Indonesian Corruption Case: Is It Relevant? Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 1(3), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.53955/JHCLS.V1I3.13
Latukau, F. (2019). Pengadopsian UNCAC Mengenai Pengembalian Aset Hasil Korupsi Yang Dibawa Atau Disimpan Ke Luar Negeri Dalam Penegakan Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Belo, 5(1), 10–31. https://doi.org/10.30598/BELOVOL5ISSUE1PAGE10-31
Lukito, A. S. (2020). Revealing the unexplained wealth in Indonesian corporationA revolutionary pattern in non-conviction-based asset forfeiture. Journal of Financial Crime, 27(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2018-0116
Marzuki, P. M. (2010). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Muhtarom, M. (2014). Asas-asas Hukum Perjanjian: Suatu Landasan dalam Pembuatan Kontrak. SUHUF, 26(1), 54.
Nugraha, A. W. A. (2018). Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Jaminan Fidusia dalam prespektif Undang-Undang Nomor 42 tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia. Lex Privatum, VI(10), 116.
Putri, W. (2020). Alasan Mengapa Bezit Dapat Perlindungan Hukum. Jurnal Gema Keadilan, 7(1), 2.
Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2113K/Pid, Sus/2023 Dengan Terdakwa Henry Surya (2023).
Risky, S., Al-Fatih, S., Azizah, M., Negeri, I., Kiai, P., Saifuddin, H., & Purwokerto, Z. (2023). Political Configuration of Electoral System Law in Indonesia from State Administration Perspective. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 6(1), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.24090/VOLKSGEIST.V6I1.7940
Rusdiana, E., Zaman, N., Darnela, L., & Hasanah, U. (2025). Preventing the politicisation of corruption crime law enforcement based on local wisdom. Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 33(1), 110–131. https://doi.org/10.22219/LJIH.V33I1.37429
Rustamovich, B. I., Khoshim Ugli, M. F., & Al-Fatih, S. (2025). Right to Privacy in the Development of Digital Technologies. International Journal of Law and Society (IJLS), 4(1), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.59683/IJLS.V4I1.171
Setiyono, J., Quiko, E., Putri, A. K., & Hartono, D. (2024). Enhancing Cross-Border Justice: Facilitating Asset Recovery from Corruption Between Indonesia and Australia Through Mutual Legal Assistance. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 9(2), 537–570. https://doi.org/10.15294/JILS.V9I2.877
Siboy, A., & Al-Fatih, S. (2025). The Design of Preventive Control on Local Delegated Legislation: A Case Study of Regional Head Regulations. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 8(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.24090/VOLKSGEIST.V8I1.12862
Siboy, A., Al-Fatih, S., Efendi, V. D., & Hidayah, N. P. (2022). The Effectiveness of Administrative Efforts in Reducing State Administration Disputes. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 2(1), 14–30. https://doi.org/10.53955/JHCLS.V2I1.23
Siboy, A., Al-Fatih, S., Nur, A. I., & Hidayah, N. P. (2022). Judicial Review in Indonesia: A Simplification Model. Lex Scientia Law Review, 6(2), 359–390. https://doi.org/10.15294/LESREV.V6I2.54848
Siboy, A., Al-Fatih, S., Triasari, D., & Tegnan, H. (2023). Legal Social Justice in Appointment Non-Definitive Regional Heads toward Welfare State. BESTUUR, 11(1), 144–170. https://doi.org/10.20961/BESTUUR.V11I1.71055
Simamora, J., & Manik, R. E. E. (2025). Legal Politics in Combating Corruption During Indonesia’s Era of Regional Autonomy. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 10(1), 135–164. https://doi.org/10.15294/JILS.V10I1.3885
Sinaga, A. (2018). Peranan Asas-Asas Hukum Perjanjian Dalam Mewujudkan Tujuan Perjanjian. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 7(2). 107-120. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v7i2.318
Sobko, G., Chenshova, N., Viunyk, M., Duiunova, T., & Palii, E. (2023). Characteristics of punishment for property embezzlement and appropriation by military personnel through abuse of office. Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 31(1), 157–180. https://doi.org/10.22219/LJIH.V31I1.25933
Soedirjo, A. T., Santiago, F., & Jaya, S. (2023). Reform Of Corruption Criminal Law: A Study of Corruptor Asset Application Law in Indonesia. Journal of Social Research, 2(9).
Soegianto, Sulistiyani, D., & Junaidi, M. (2019). Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Kajian Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 4(2), 210.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2003). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sofwan, S. S. M. (1997). Beberapa Masalah Pelaksanaan Jaminan Khususnya Fidusia di dalam Praktek dan Perkembangannya di Indonesia. Fakultas Hukum UGM.
Suharnoko. (2004). Hukum Perjanjian: Teori dan Analisa Kasus. Kencana.
Sunaryo, S., & Al-Fatih, S. (2022). How Corruptor Should Be Punished? A Comparative Study Between Criminal Law, Islamic Law, and Customary Law. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 17(2), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4756112
Sunaryo, S., Purnamawati, S. A., Jihadi, M., & Al-Fatih, S. (2025). Narasi Ontologi Moralitas Hukum Korupsi Di Indonesia Berdasarkan Nilai Islam. Jurnal Hukum Unissula. https://doi.org/10.26532 / jh.v41i1.37154
Tantimin, T. (2023). Penyitaan Hasil Korupsi Melalui Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Negara. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 5(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.14710/JPHI.V5I1.85-102
Tegnan, H., Karjoko, L., Barkhuizen, J., & Bajrektarevic, A. H. (2021). Mining Corruption and Environmental Degradation in Indonesia: Critical Legal Issues. Bestuur, 9(2), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.20961/BESTUUR.V9I2.55219
Wangga, M. S. E., Ahmad, N., Puluhulawa, J., & Swarianata, V. (2024). Periscope of Ideas Selective Criteria for the Application of Restorative Justice in Corruption Crimes. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 9(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.15294/JILS.VOL9I1.4530
Warsito, H. (1997). Pengantar Metodelogi Penelitian Buku Panduan Mahasiswa. Gramedia.
Zulfikar, R. (2022a). Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Jaminan Fidusia Atas Dirampasnya Objek Jaminan Dalam Perkara Korupsi. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 29(1), 47–67.
Zulfikar, R. (2022b). Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Jaminan Fidusia Atas Dirampasnya Objek Jaminan Dalam Perkara Korupsi. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 29(1), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.20885/IUSTUM.VOL29.ISS1.ART3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Novi Rizka Permatasari, Hartiwiningsih Hartiwiningsih, Pujiyono Suwadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
