Pop-up question on educational physics video: Effect on the learning performance of students

Alif Syaiful Adam

doi:10.22219/raden.v2i1.20271

Authors

Alif Syaiful Adam Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Universitas Negeri Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/raden.v2i1.20271

Keywords:

cognitive load, pop-up question video, students’ motivation

Abstract

Pop-up question video has been developed in oscillation physics concept to support the student’s learning objection in a Junior High School level. This video use as learning source to support the information gaining in particular use of learning design. This study aimed to analyzes the effect of physics pop-up question video relating to oscillation to the student’s learning performance. Furthermore, this video developed based on the recommendation of previous research to decrease the students’ cognitive load. Besides, this particular research aimed to measure the students’ learning performance on 100 students in junior high school level. Learning performance consists of the concept attainment of oscillation concept, students’ motivation and students’ cognitive load atter pass the learning process with pop-up question video. As results, the students’ concept attainment in a percentage of 74% and stated in a good category. Then, the students’ motivation has the percentage of 84% and state in a good category while the cognitive load percentage on 38% and stated in a less category. It means, the pop-up question video has good impact on students’ motivation and has a less cognitive load simultaneously. However, for gaining the better result, pop-up question video can be integrating to the innovative learning model.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Albus, P., Vogt, A., & Seufert, T. (2021). Signaling in virtual reality influences learning outcome and cognitive load. Computers & Education, 166, 104154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104154

Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It’s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.006

Bao, L., & Koenig, K. (2019). Physics education research for 21st century learning. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0007-8

Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 1–18. https://peer.asee.org/the-flipped-classroom-a-survey-of-the-research

Cummins, S., Beresford, A. R., & Rice, A. (2016). Investigating Engagement with In-Video Quiz Questions in a Programming Course. In IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies (Vol. 9, Issue 1, pp. 57–66). https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2015.2444374

de Jong, T. (2010). Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: Some food for thought. Instructional Science, 38(2), 105–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9110-0

Diyanahesa, N. E.-H., Kusairi, S., & Latifah, E. (2017). Development of misconception diagnostic test in momentum and impulse using isomorphic problem. Journal of Physics: Theories and Applications, 1(2), 145. https://doi.org/10.20961/jphystheor-appl.v1i2.19314

Garrett, S. L. (2020). The simple harmonic oscillator. In S. L. Garrett (Ed.), Understanding Acoustics: An Experimentalist’s View of Sound and Vibration (pp. 59–131). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44787-8_2

Haagsman, M. E., Scager, K., Boonstra, J., & Koster, M. C. (2020). Pop-up questions within educational videos: Effects on students’ learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(6), 713–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09847-3

Herreid, C. F., & Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case Studies and the Flipped Classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62–66. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43631584

Hwang, G.-J., Yang, L.-H., & Wang, S.-Y. (2013). A concept map-embedded educational computer game for improving students’ learning performance in natural science courses. Computers & Education, 69, 121–130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.008

Ibrahim, M. (2011). Implications of designing instructional video using cognitive theory of multimedia learning. Critical Questions in Education, 3(2), 83–104. http://ts.isil.westga.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eft&AN=90486720&site=eds-live&scope=site

Kalyuga, S., & Plass, and J. L. (2019). Cognitive load as a local characteristic of cognitive processes implications for measurement approaches. Cognitive Load Measurement and Application, 0(0), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315296258-5

Lavigne, E., & Risko, E. F. (2018). Optimizing the use of interpolated tests: The influence of interpolated test lag. In Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology (Vol. 4, Issue 4, pp. 211–221). https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000118

Lax, N., Morris, J., & Kolber, B. J. (2017). A partial flip classroom exercise in a large introductory general biology course increases performance at multiple levels. Journal of Biological Education, 51(4), 412–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2016.1257503

Li, J., Zhang, X., & Hu, Z. (2018). The design and application of flip classroom teaching based on computer technology. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(10), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i10.9453

Limniou, M., Schermbrucker, I., & Lyons, M. (2018). Traditional and flipped classroom approaches delivered by two different teachers: The student perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 797–817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9636-8

Lin, Y. W., Tseng, C. L., & Chiang, P. J. (2017). The effect of blended learning in mathematics course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 741–770. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00641a

Lodge, J. M., Kennedy, G., Lockyer, L., Arguel, A., & Pachman, M. (2018). Understanding difficulties and resulting confusion in learning: An integrative review. Frontiers in Education, 3(June), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00049

Millar, R., & Manoharan, S. (2021). Repeat individualized assessment using isomorphic questions: a novel approach to increase peer discussion and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(22), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00257-y

Minkley, N., Xu, K. M., & Krell, M. (2021). Analyzing relationships between causal and assessment factors of cognitive load: Associations between objective and subjective measures of cognitive load, stress, interest, and self-concept. Frontiers in Education, 6(April), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.632907

Mishra, L., Gupta, T., & Shree, A. (2020). Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, 100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012

Pastötter, B., & Bäuml, K. H. T. (2014). Retrieval practice enhances new learning: The forward effect of testing. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(APR), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00286

Paul, J., & Jefferson, F. (2019). A comparative analysis of student performance in an online vs. face-to-face environmental science course from 2009 to 2016. Frontiers in Computer Science, 1, 7. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fcomp.2019.00007

Puspitarini, Y. D., & Hanif, M. (2019). Using learning media to increase learning motivation in elementary school. Anatolian Journal of Education, 4(2), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2019.426a

Reid, C., Keighrey, C., Murray, N., Dunbar, R., & Buckley, J. (2020). A novel mixed methods approach to synthesize EDA data with behavioral data to gain educational insight. Sensors, 20(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/s20236857

Riduwan, R. (2018). Skala pengukuran variabel-variabel penelitian (p. 288). Alfabeta. https://cvalfabeta.com/product/cskala-pengukuran-variabel-variabel-penelitian/

Roberts, T., Jackson, C., Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., Bush, S. B., Maiorca, C., Cavalcanti, M., Craig Schroeder, D., Delaney, A., Putnam, L., & Cremeans, C. (2018). Students’ perceptions of STEM learning after participating in a summer informal learning experience. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0133-4

Scheiter, K., Ackerman, R., & Hoogerheide, V. (2020). Looking at mental effort appraisals through a metacognitive lens: Are they biased? Educational Psychology Review, 32(4), 1003–1027. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09555-9

Schmutz, P., Heinz, S., Métrailler, Y., & Opwis, K. (2009). Cognitive load in ecommerce applications—Measurement and effects on user satisfaction. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2009(121494), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/121494

Schnaubert, L., & Schneider, S. (2022). Analysing the relationship between mental load or mental effort and metacomprehension under different conditions of multimedia design. Frontiers in Education, 6(January), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.648319

Seufert, T. (2018). The interplay between self-regulation in learning and cognitive load. Educational Research Review, 24, 116–129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.03.004

Shabiralyani, G., Hasan, K. S., Hamad, N., & Iqbal, N. (2015). Impact of visual aids in enhancing the learning process case research: District Dera Ghazi Khan. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(19), 226–233.

Szpunar, K. K., Jing, H. G., & Schacter, D. L. (2014). Overcoming overconfidence in learning from video-recorded lectures: Implications of interpolated testing for online education. In Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition (Vol. 3, Issue 3, pp. 161–164). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.02.001

Szpunar, K. K., Khan, N. Y., & Schacter, D. L. (2013). Interpolated memory tests reduce mind wandering and improve learning of online lectures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(16), 6313–6317. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1221764110

Vural, O. F. (2013). The impact of a question-embedded video-based learning tool on e-learning. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(2), 1315–1323. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1017292.pdf

Yang, D. (2017). Instructional strategies and course design for teaching statistics online: perspectives from online students. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0096-x

Zalat, M. M., Hamed, M. S., & Bolbol, S. A. (2021). The experiences, challenges, and acceptance of e-learning as a tool for teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic among university medical staff. PLoS ONE, 16(3 March), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248758

Zheng, H., Jung, E., Li, T., & Yoon, M. (2022). Effects of segmentation and self-explanation designs on cognitive load in instructional videos. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(2), 11522. https://doi.org/10.30935/CEDTECH/11522

Zu, T., Munsell, J., & Rebello, N. S. (2021). Subjective measure of cognitive load depends on participants’ content knowledge level. Frontiers in Education, 6(May), 647097. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.647097