Electronic module protist material based on ASICC learning strategies

Authors

  • Qonita Nur Rohmania Biology Education Study Program, Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri
  • Inayah Nur Afifah Biology Education Study Program, Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri
  • F. Fatnatin SMAN 1 Kediri, Mojoroto, Kediri
  • Poppy Rahmatika Primandiri Biology Education Study Program, Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri
  • Mumun Nurmilawati Biology Education Study Program, Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri
  • Agus Muji Santoso Biology Education Study Program, Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/raden.v2i1.20363

Keywords:

Scientific argumentation, Electronic module, ASICC

Abstract

The process of scientific argumentation skills in biology learning at SMAN 1 Kediri is nonoptimal yet. This study aimed at improving students’ scientific argumentation using ASICC-based electronic modules. This Research and Development employed Plomp development model. The subjects of this study were X graders of MIPA SMAN 1 Kediri which consisted of 32 students. There were three stages of the Plomp model conducted i.e., preliminary research, prototyping, and assessment. The expert validation score gained for subject matter and linguistic was 85% (valid category), the validation score for design and media professionals' validation is 81% with a valid category, the teacher validation score is 93% with a very valid category, and the small group test score is 88% with a very valid category. Implementation of the ASICC-based electronic module had results such as 25 of 32 students got the N-Gain score in the high category, 5 students in the medium category, and 2 students in the low category. The ASICC-based electronic module on protist material is valid and effective to improve the scientific argumentation skills of class X MIPA students in SMAN 1 Kediri.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afifah, I. N., Rohmania, Q. N., Primandiri, P. R., Studi, P., & Biologi, P. (2021). The importance of knowing the learning style Of SMAN 1 Kediri. INKESJAR. 380–387. https://proceeding.unpkediri.ac.id/index.php/seinkesjar/article/download/1256/1001/4696

Akbar. (2013). Instrumen perangkat pembelajaran. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Anwar, Y., Susanti, R., & Ermayanti. (2019). Analyzing scientific argumentation skills of biology education students in general biology courses. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1166(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1166/1/012001

Arip, M. A. S. M., Bakar, R. B. A., Ahmad, A. B., & Jais, S. M. (2013). The development of a group guidance module for student self-development based on Gestalt Theory. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84(June), 1310–1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.748

Astira, S., Sajidan, & Dwiastuti, S. (2019). Analysis of argumentation skills in biological learning in senior high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1338(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1338/1/012032

Deane, P., & Song, Y. (2014). A case study in principled assessment design: Designing assessments to measure and support the development of argumentative reading and writing skills. Psicologia Educativa, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pse.2014.10.001

Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores. Unpublished.[Online] URL: Http://Www. Physics. Indiana. Edu/~ Sdi/AnalyzingChange-Gain. Pdf, 16(7).

Lorenza, M. A., Budiretnani, D. W. I. A. R. I., Primandiri, P. R., & Farida, E. N. I. (2020). Mengungkap hubungan antara metakognisi dengan keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah Sekolah Menengah Atas Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri. http://repository.unpkediri.ac.id/view/creators/PRIMANDIRI=3APOPPY_RAHMATIKA=3A=3A.default.html

Nurhidayati, A., Putro, S. C., & Widiyaningtyas, T. (2018). Penerapan model PBL berbantuan e-modul berbasis flipbook dibandingkan berbantuan bahan ajar cetak pengaruhnya terhadap hasil belajar pemrograman siswa SMK. Teknologi dan Kejuruan: Jurnal Teknologi, Kejuruan, dan Pengajarannya, 41(2), 130–138. https://doi.org/10.17977/um031v41i22018p130

Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (2013). Educational design research educational design research. Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development: SLO, 1–206.

Puspitasari, A. D. (2019). Penerapan media pembelajaran fisika menggunakan modul cetak dan modul elektronik pada siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 7(1), 17–25. http://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/indeks.php/PendidikanFisika

Rohmania, Q. N., Afifah, I. N., Primandiri, P. R. (2021). Profil kesadaran metakognitif siswa di SMA Negeri 1 Kediri, perkembangan pendidikan abad 21 semakin berkembang seiring kemajuan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi. SINKESJAR, 546–553. https://doi.org/10.29407/seinkesjar.v1i1.1276

Sakti, I., Defianti, A., & Nirwana, N. (2020). Implementasi modul IPA berbasis etnosains masyarakat bengkulu materi pengukuran melalui discovery learning untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis mahasiswa. Jurnal Kumparan Fisika, 3(3), 232–238. https://doi.org/10.33369/jkf.3.3.232-238

Santoso, A. M., Primandiri, P. R., Zubaidah, S., & Amin, M. (2021). Improving student collaboration and critical thinking skills through ASICC model learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012174

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/CEPS.1994.1033

Suwono, H., Yulianingrum, E., & Sulisetijono. (2017). Peningkatan argumantasi ilmiah siswa sekolah menengah atas melalui model pembelajaran ESAR (Engage, Study, Activate, Reflect). Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 23(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.17977/jip.v23i1. 10751

Widayanti, F. D. (2013). The importance of knowing student learning styles in classroom learning activities. Erudio Journal of Educational Innovation, 2(1). https://erudio.ub.ac.id/index.php/erudio/article/view/228

Yacoubian, H. A., & Khishfe, R. (2018). Argumentation, critical thinking, nature of science and socioscientific issues: a dialogue between two researchers. International Journal of Science Education, 40(7), 796–807. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1449986

Downloads

Published

2022-07-31 — Updated on 2022-07-31

How to Cite

Rohmania, Q. N., Afifah, I. N., Fatnatin, F., Primandiri, P. R., Nurmilawati, M., & Santoso, A. M. (2022). Electronic module protist material based on ASICC learning strategies. Research and Development in Education (RaDEn), 2(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.22219/raden.v2i1.20363

Issue

Section

Articles