Developing STEM students’ worksheet to improve students' creative thinking ability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/raden.v3i2.25331Keywords:
Creative thinking ability, STEM, students’ worksheetAbstract
Changes in the learning paradigm that prioritizes the optimization of creative thinking skills require a lot of consistent innovation and development. This study aims to develop students' worksheets based on STEM on viruses. This development research uses a 4D model by Thiagarajan. The instruments used in this study included interview sheets, validation sheets for content experts and media experts, questionnaires for biology teacher responses, and questionnaires for student responses, as well as tests. Product effectiveness on students' creative thinking skills was carried out using a pretest-posttest design and analyzed using the N-gain calculation. The results showed that the STEM-based students' worksheets on the Virus material that was developed received an assessment of 98% from content experts and 87% from media experts with very valid criteria. The responses of teachers and students were 93.3% and 90% respectively with very practical criteria. The developed STEM-based students' worksheets are also effective in increasing students' creative thinking skills by 0.75 with moderate criteria. These results indicate that STEM-based students' worksheets are appropriate for use in learning to improve students' creative thinking abilities.
Downloads
References
Abdi, H. (2010). Guttman scaling. In Encyclopedia of Research Design (pp. 1–5). https://doi.org/10.4135 /9781506326139.n298
Abosalem, Y. (2016). Assessment techniques and students’ higher-order thinking skills. International Journal of Secondary Education, 4(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20160401.11
Bahri, S., Syamsuri, I., & Mahanal, S. (2016). Pengembangan modul keanekaragaman hayati dan virus berbasis model inkuiri terbimbing untuk siswa kelas X MAN 1 Malang. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 1(2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.17977 /jp.v1i2.6113
Council, N. R. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st Century (J. W. Pellegrino & M. L. Hilton (eds.)). The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13398
Davidsen, J., Ryberg, T., & Bernhard, J. (2020). “Everything comes together”: Students’ collaborative development of a professional dialogic practice in architecture and design education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37(June), 100678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100678
English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1
Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2016). Teaching and Learning Resource: a Practical Guide. Jossey-Bass A Wiley Brand.
Fujii, T. (2016). Designing and adapting tasks in lesson planning: a critical process of Lesson Study. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 48(4), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0770-3
Haavind, S. (2019). An interpretative model of key heuristics that promote collaborative dialogue among online learners. Online Learning, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v11i3.1720
Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (2014). STEM Integration in K-12 Education. In STEM Integration in K-12 Education. https://doi.org/10.17226/18612
Hua, J., & Shaw, R. (2020). Corona virus (COVID-19) “Infodemic” and emerging issues through a data lens: The case of China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(2309), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072309
Jandrić, P. (2020). Postdigital research in the time of Covid-19. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(2), 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00113-8
Kambeyo, L., & Csapo, B. (2018). Scientific reasoning skills: A theoretical background on science education. Reform Forum, 26(1), 27–36. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329196813_ scientific_reasoning_skills_a_theoretical_background_on_science_education
Kencana, M. A., Musri, & Syukri, M. (2020). The effect of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) on students’ creative thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1460(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012141
Kennedy, T. J., & Odell, M. R. L. (2014). Engaging students in STEM education. Science Education International, 25(3), 246–258. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1044508
Kuhn, D. (2011). What is scientific thinking and how does it develop? In The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development, 2nd ed. (pp. 497–523). Wiley-Blackwell. https://onlinelibrary. wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781444325485.ch19
Larson, H. J. (2018). The biggest pandemic risk? Viral misinformation. Nature, 562(7727), 309. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-07034-4
Lestari, D. A. B., Astuti, B., & Darsono, T. (2018). Implementasi LKS dengan pendekatan STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 4(2), 202. https://doi.org/10.29303/ jpft.v4i2.809
Lin, Q., Zhao, S., Gao, D., Lou, Y., Yang, S., Musa, S. S., Wang, M. H., Cai, Y., Wang, W., Yang, L., & He, D. (2020). A conceptual model for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in Wuhan, China with individual reaction and governmental action. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 93, 211–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.02.058
Lin, Y.S. (2011). Fostering creativity through education – A conceptual framework of creative pedagogy. Creative Education, 02(03), 149–155. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2011.23021
Linh, N. Q., Duc, N. M., & Yuenyong, C. (2019). Developing critical thinking of students through STEM educational orientation program in Vietnam. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1340(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1340/1/012025
Loes, C. N., Culver, K. C., & Trolian, T. L. (2018). How collaborative learning enhances students’ openness to diversity. Journal of Higher Education, 89(6), 935–960. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00221546.2018.1442638
Maniotes, L. K., & Kuhlthau, C. C. (2014). Making the shift: From traditional research to guiding inquiry learning. Knowledge Quest, 43(2), 8–17. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1045936.pdf
Mascola, J. R., & Fauci, A. S. (2020). Novel vaccine technologies for the 21st century. Nature Reviews Immunology, 20(2), 87–88. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-019-0243-3
Miharja, F. J., Hindun, I., & Fauzi, A. (2019). Pemberdayaan keterampilan bertanya siswa melalui pembelajaran inovatif berbasis lesson study. JINoP (Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran), 5(1), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.22219/jinop.v5i1.7187
Ngabekti, S., Prasetyo, A. P. B., Hardianti, R. D., & Teampanpong, J. (2019). The development of stem mobile learning package ecosystem. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(1), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i1.16905
Opara, J. A., & Oguzor, N. S. (2011). Inquiry instructional method and the school science currículum. Current Research Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3), 188–198. https://maxwellsci.com/print/crjss/v3-188-198.pdf
Osborne, M. (2012). Innovative learning environments. Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, 45, 1571–1571. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_4375
Pollard, V., Hains-Wesson, R., & Young, K. (2018). Creative teaching in STEM. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(2), 178–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1379487
Pressman, A. (2019). Design thinking: A guide to creative problem solving for everyone (Vol. 86, Issue 6). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315561936
Putri, A., Lengkana, D., & Jalmo, T. (2022). Teacher ’ s Perceptions of Electronic Multi Representation STEM based Worksheet to Improve Student ’ s Metacognitive Ability. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 10(3), 606–622. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v10i3.25052
Radulović, L., & Stančić, M. (2017). What is needed to develop critical thinking in schools? Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 7(3). https://doi.org/https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext /EJ1156618.pdf
Rahman, M. M. (2019). 21st Century skill “problem solving”: Defining the concept. Asian Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 2(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.34256/ajir1917
Riduwan, R. (2013). Dasar-dasar statistika. cv alfabeta.
Rothan, H. A., & Byrareddy, S. N. (2020). The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. Journal of Autoimmunity, February, 102433. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102433
Sada, A. M., Mohd, Z. A., Adnan, A., & Yusri, K. (2016). Prospects of problem-based learning in building critical thinking skills among technical college students in Nigeria. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(3), 356–365. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2016.v7n3p356
Sahin, A., Ayar, M. C., & Adiguzel, T. (2014). STEM related after-school program activities and associated outcomes on student learning. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 14(1), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.1.1876
Santangelo, J., Cadieux, M., & Zapata, S. (2021). Developing student metacognitive skills using active learning with embedded metacognition instruction. Journal of STEM Education, 22(2), 51–63. https://www.jstem.org/jstem/index.php/JSTEM/article/view/2475
Schallert, S., Lavicza, Z., & Vandervieren, E. (2021). Towards inquiry-based flipped classroom scenarios: A design heuristic and principles for lesson planning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(2), 277–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10167-0
Schlake, T., Thess, A., Fotin-Mleczek, M., & Kallen, K. J. (2012). Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies. RNA Biology, 9(11), 1319–1330. https://doi.org/10.4161/rna.22269
Shanmugavelu, G., Parasuraman, B., Ariffin, K., Kannan, B., & Vadivelu, M. (2020). Inquiry Method in the Teaching and Learning Process. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 8(3), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v8i3.2396
Siew, N. M., & Ambo, N. (2018). Development and evaluation of an integrated project-based and stem teaching and learning module on enhancing scientific creativity among fifth graders. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(6), 1017–1033. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.1017
Siew, N. M., Goh, H., & Sulaiman, F. (2016). Integrating STEM in an engineering design process: The learning experience of rural secondary school students in an outreach challenge program. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(4), 477–493. http://journals.indexcopernicus.com/abstract. php?icid=1217790
Simatupang, H., Sianturi, A., & Alwardah, N. (2020). Pengembangan LKPD berbasis pendekatan science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) untuk menumbuhkan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa. Jurnal Pelita Pendidikan, 7(4), 170–177. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpp.v7i4.16727
Sutarto, Prihatin, J., Hariyadi, S., & Wicaksono, I. (2021). Development of student worksheets based on STEM approach to improve students’ critical thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2104(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2104/1/012009
Syafii, W., & Yasin, R. M. (2013). Problem solving skills and learning achievements through problem-based module in teaching and learning biology in high school. Asian Social Science, 9(12 SPL ISSUE), 220–228. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n12p220
Tan, A. L., Teo, T. W., Choy, B. H., & Ong, Y. S. (2019). The S ‑ T ‑ E ‑ M Quartet. Innovation and Education, 1(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42862-019-0005-x
Teo, T. W., Tan, A. L., Ong, Y. S., & Choy, B. H. (2021). Centricities of STEM curriculum frameworks: Variations of the S-T-E-M Quartet. STEM Education, 1(3), 141. https://doi.org/10.3934/ steme.2021011
Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1976). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook. Indiana University Bloomington. https://files.eric.ed.gov/ fulltext/ED090725.pdf
Thuneberg, H. M., Salmi, H. S., & Bogner, F. X. (2018). How creativity, autonomy and visual reasoning contribute to cognitive learning in a STEAM hands-on inquiry-based math module. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.07.003
Wahyuni, A. L. E., Arrohman, D. A., Wilujeng, I., & ... (2022). Application of integrated STEM-based student worksheet local potential of Pagar Alam Tea Plantation to improve students’ environmental literacy. Jurnal Penelitian …, 8(3), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.29303/jp pipa.v8i3.1260
Wang, H. H., Lin, H. shyang, Chen, Y. C., Pan, Y. T., & Hong, Z. R. (2021). Modelling relationships among students’ inquiry-related learning activities, enjoyment of learning, and their intended choice of a future STEM career. International Journal of Science Education, 43(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1860266
West, D. M. (2015). Connected learning: How mobile technology can imporve education. Center for Technology Innovation at Brookings, December, 1–8. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/west_connected-learning_v11.pdf
Widya, Rifandi, R., & Laila Rahmi, Y. (2019). STEM education to fulfil the 21st century demand: A literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1317(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012208
Wood, K. (2018). The many faces of lesson study and learning study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 7(1), 2–7. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-10-2017-0047
Zulkarnaen, Z., Supardi, Z. . I., & Jatmiko, B. (2017). Feasibility of creative exploration, creative elaboration, creative modeling, practice scientific creativity, discussion, reflection (C3PDR) teaching model to improve students’ scientific creativity of junior high school. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(6), 1020–1034. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/17.16.1020
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Khairunnisa Pasaribu, K. Khairuna, Miza Nina Adlini, Fadhlan Muchlas Abrori
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Research and Development in Education agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in the Research and Development in Education, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to the automatic transfer of non-exclusive publishing rights to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
