ISSN |
Reviewers |
History |
|
Template |
Indexing |
Tools |
Statistics |
Article Preparation
Manuscripts should be prepared before the submission concerning the suitability to journal aims and scope, template, and publication ethics. The scope of this journal is limited to the application of science and technology in society, education, agriculture, and the small or home industry.
Furthermore, there are considerations the manuscripts required to be fulfilled.
Submitting Article
The author needs to have a username and password to upload the manuscript. Please, login or register to our site https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/scitech_media. Follow the instructions to upload the article to this journal. The following are the steps for the online submission process:
After this submission, confirmation of submission will automatically be sent to email. Furthermore, articles undergo the reviewing process. The submission tracking includes the status of the manuscript review and editorial process.
Manuscript Guidelines
1. Introduction
The Introduction should provide clear background and statements of the purpose, the best of previous research, and the main limitations of the previous research. It is for showing the author’s further achievement and showing the scientific merit or novelties of the paper. Avoid a detailed literature survey or a summary of the results proposed approach and/or research design, and the new value of research, which is an innovation. It should be understandable to colleagues from a broad range of scientific disciplines.
2. Methods
Methods must be able to guide the further authors to conduct further the experiment. Provide sufficient detail to allow the work to be reproduced. Methods already published should be indicated by a reference: only relevant modifications should be described. Do not repeat the details of established methods.
3. Result and Discussion
Results and discussion should be presented clearly. It summarizes the scientific findings rather than providing data in detail. Results or findings should show an obvious difference from the previous publications. The discussion presents the significance of the results. Avoid writing citations in this section. In the discussion, the author is demanded to describe the data without repeating to present the data.
The following components should be covered in the discussion: How do your results relate to the original question or objectives outlined in the Introduction section (what/how)? Do you provide an interpretation scientifically for each of your results or findings presented (why)? Are your results consistent with what other investigators have reported (what else)? Or are there any differences?
4. Conclusion
Conclusions should answer the research purpose. Provide a clear scientific justification for your work. You should also suggest future experiments and/or point out those that are underway. It would help the reviewer to determine whether or not this article has a contribution to the journal.
ISSN |
Reviewers |
History |
|
Template |
Indexing |
Tools |
Statistics |