The Analysis of Students’ Mathematical Reasoning Ability in Completing Mathematicalproblems on Geometry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/mej.v3i1.8423Keywords:
Mathematical Reasoning, Problem solving, GeometryAbstract
This study aimed to describe the level of students' reasoning ability to solve the problems on flat sides of Geometry with the level of mathematical reasoning ability of high, moderate and low. The types and the research approaches used were descriptive qualitative and quantitative research design. The research subjectswere 6 students from class VIIIF. The form of data collection included 4 items ofwritten questions test and interview on the subject selected. Based on the analysis, the average value of the entire instrument about the mathematical reasoning abilities gained 71.5% for the indicators that carried out the calculations based on mathematical formulas or rules applicable. While 73.33% and 71.5% for the indicator of conclusions and 66.67% for the indicator ofestimation, that ifsummedup and averaged the percentage was 69%. The ability of class VIIIF students’ mathematical reasoning was fair.Downloads
References
Depdiknas. (2006) PERMENDIKNAS No. 22 Th. 2006 tentang Standar Isi untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar Dan Menengah. [Online] Tersedia: https://asefts63.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/permendiknas-no-22-tahun-2006-standar-isi.pdf. Diakses dari laman web tanggal 10 Januari 2017
Iqbal. (2015) Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa Dalam Menemukan Rumus Barisan Aritmatika Berbantuan Alat Peraga Sederhana.USU CONFERENCE SYSTEMS,
Linola D., Marsitin, R., & Wulandari, T. (2017).Analisis Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Peserta Didik dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita di SMAN 6 Malang. Pi: Mathematics Education Journal, volume1 Nomor1 pp. 27-33
Mikrayanti.(2016) Meningkatkan Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis melalui Pembelajaran berbasis Masalah Suska Journal of Mathematics Education. Volume 02 Nomor 2 pp 97-102
Ministry of Singapore Education (2009) [ Online ] http://www.aps.sg/files/speeches/Speech-by Dr%20Ng%20Eng%20Hen,%2017%20Sep%202009.pdfdownload on 20 November 2017.
NCTM. (2000). Executive Summary Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. [Online]. Available on :https://asefts63.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/permendiknas-no-22-tahun2006-standard-isi.pdf. Accessible from a web page dated January 10, 2017
Puspendik (Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan). (2012). Kemampuan Matematika Siswa SMP Indonesia Menurut Bechmark Internasional TIMSS 2011. Jakarta: Balitbang Kemendikbud.
Puspendik (Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan). (2016). Kemampuan Matematika Siswa SMP Indonesia Menurut Bechmark Internasional TIMSS 2015. Jakarta: Balitbang Kemendikbud.
Ruseffendi.(2006). Pengantar Kepada Membantu Guru Mengembangkan Kompetensinya dalam Pengajaran Matematika. Bandung: Tarsito
Shadiq, F. (2004).Penalaran, Pemecahan Masalah dan Komunikasi dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Depdiknas Dirjen Dikdasmen PPPG Matematika, Yogyakarta.
Soedjadi.(2000). Kiat Pendidikan Matematika di Indonesia.Bandung: Dirjen Dikti Depdiknas.
Wahyudin.(2008). Pembelajaran &Model-model pembelajaran:Pelengkap untuk meningkatkankompetensi pedagogis para guru dan calon guru profesional.Bandung: Mandiri.
Puspendik (Center for Educational Assessment). (2012). The Mathematics Ability of Junior High Schoolin Indonesia According to the International BechmarkTIMSS 2011. Jakarta: BalitbangKemendikbud.
Puspendik (Center for Educational Assessment). (2016). The Mathematics Ability of Junior High Schoolin Indonesia According to the International BechmarkTIMSS2015. According to the International Bechmark Jakarta BalitbangKemendikbud.
Ruseffendi. (2006). Introduction to Help Teachers for Developing Competence in Teaching Mathematics. Bandung: Tarsito
Sadiq, F. (2004). Reasoning, Problem Solving and Communication inlearning Mathematics, Education Ministry Director General Dikdasmen PPPGMathematics, Yogyakarta.
Soedjadi.(2000). Tips on Mathematics Education in Indonesia. Bandung: Directorate General of Higher Education.
Wahyudin,(2008). Education & Learning Models: Complementary to improve the competencies of pedagogical teachers and professional prospective teachers.Bandung: Mandiri.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with MEJ (Mathematics Education Journal) agree to the following terms:
For all articles published in MEJ, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
