A Systematic Literature Review of E-Government Evaluation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/logos.v5i1.19784Abstract
The adoption of information and communication technology has had an effect on remodeling the general public service delivery system called e-government. E-government evaluation is a crucial aspect to evaluate how a long way the improvement in the quality of the public service delivery system provided by the technology. This study aim was to summarize and to decide the influencing factors in e-government evaluation by analyzing published scientific articles. This research method used a systematic literature review. The authors performed searches for scientific articles in online database Elsevier (Scopus) written in English and can be accessed in full paper. This study uses 18 articles of data to conduct a systematic literature review. The findings show that most previous studies on e-government service evaluation published in 2018 and 2020. The findings also show that developing countries are the most dominating research locations. In addition, the findings show the influencing factors in e-government evaluation are 1) user satisfaction consist of reliability/efficiency, compatibility, perceived of benefit, trust, responsiveness, overall satisfaction; 2) Site Quality consist of information quality, system quality, service quality, perceived usefulness, ease to use, accessibility, security and privacy, effectiveness, design, and content; 3) Facilitating condition consist of IT infrastructure. These twelve variables can be used as basis for future research to evaluate the quality of e-government. This study has limitations because it only uses the online database Elsevier (Scopus) as a database to obtain published scientific article data during 2014-2021.
Downloads
References
Al-Sakran, H. O., & Alsudairi, M. A. (2021). Usability and Accessibility Assessment of Saudi Arabia Mobile E-Government Websites. IEEE Access, 9, 48254–48275. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3068917
Al-Sulami, Z. A., & Hashim, H. S. (2018). Measuring the success of e-government systems: Applying the success model of the delone and mclean information system. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 96(22), 7654–7670.
Alsaeed, D., Alkhalifa, H., Alotaibi, H., Alshalan, R., Al-Mutlaq, N., Alshalan, S., Bintaleb, H. T., & Alsahow, A. M. (2020). Accessibility evaluation of saudi e-government systems for teachers: A visually impaired user’s perspective. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 10(21), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217528
Alsaif, M. (2013). Factors Affecting Citizens’ Adoption of E-government Moderated by Socio-cultural Values in Saudi Arabia. In ECEG2013 13th European Conference on EGovernment Vol 2, 578–586.
Apriliyanti, I. D., Kusumasari, B., & Pramusinto, A. (2021). Digital divide in ASEAN member states : analyzing the critical factors for successful e-government programs. Online Information Review, 25(2), 440–460. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-05-2020-0158
Bournaris, T. (2020). Evaluation of e-government web portals: The case of agricultural e-government services in Greece. Agronomy, 10(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10070932
Budding, T., Faber, B., & Gradus, R. (2018). Assessing electronic service delivery in municipalities: determinants and financial consequences of e-government implementation. Local Government Studies, 44(5), 697–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2018.1473768
Carter, L., & Bélanger, F. (2005). The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00183.x
Chang, C. H., & Almaghalsah, H. (2020). Usability evaluation of e-government websites: A case study from Taiwan. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 4(2), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2020.2.004
Chen, Y. (2015). WTO’s Transparency Principle and China’s Value Orientation of E-Government. Transnational Corporations Review, 7(2), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.5148/tncr.2015.7207
Chohan, S. R., & Hu, G. (2020). Success Factors Influencing Citizens’ Adoption of IoT Service Orchestration for Public Value Creation in Smart Government. IEEE Access, 8, 208427–208448. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3036054
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
Idoughi, D., & Abdelhakim, D. (2018). Developing countries e-government services evaluation identifying and testing antecedents of satisfaction Case of Algeria. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 14(1), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2018010104
Kawashita, I. M. S., Baptista, A. A., & Soares, D. (2020). E-government maturity models: more of the same? 2020 Seventh International Conference on EDemocracy & EGovernment (ICEDEG), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG48599.2020.9096697
Khrais, L. T., Mahmoud, M. A., & Abdelwahed, Y. M. (2019). A readiness evaluation of applying e-government in the society: Shall citizens begin to use it? International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 10(9), 55–59. https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2019.0100909
Lean, O. K., Zailani, S., Ramayah, T., & Fernando, Y. (2009). Factors influencing intention to use e-government services among citizens in Malaysia. International Journal of Information Management, 29(6), 458–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.03.012
Lupu, D., & Lazăr, C. G. (2015). Influence of e-government on the Level of Corruption in some EU and Non-EU States. Procedia Economics and Finance, 20(15), 365–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00085-4
Mensah, I. K. (2017). Citizens’ Readiness to Adopt and Use E-government Services in the City of Harbin, China. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(4), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1263658
Mensah, I. K., & Adams, S. (2019). A Comparative Analysis of the Impact of Political Trust on the Adoption of E-Government Services. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(8), 682–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1645687
Mensah, I. K., Adams, S., Adjei, J. K., & Mwakapesa, D. S. (2021). Drivers of egovernment adoption amidst COVID-19 pandemic: The Information Adoption Model (IAM) approach. Information Development, 026666692110108. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669211010872
Mensah, I. K., Zeng, G., & Luo, C. (2020). E-Government Services Adoption: An Extension of the Unified Model of Electronic Government Adoption. SAGE Open, 10(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020933593
Naswir, R. Y., Maarop, N., Hasan, M., Daud, S., Samy, G. N., & Magalingam, P. (2019). Towards a conceptual model to evaluate usability of digital government services in Malaysia. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 10(4), 313–322. https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2019.0100438
Nulhusna, R., Sandhyaduhita, P. I., Hidayanto, A. N., & Phusavat, K. (2017). The relation of e-government quality on public trust and its impact on public participation. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 11(3), 393–418. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-01-2017-0004
Osman, I. H., Anouze, A. L., Irani, Z., Al-Ayoubi, B., Lee, H., Balc, A., Medeni, T. D., & Weerakkody, V. (2014). COBRA framework to evaluate e-government services: A citizen-centric perspective. Government Information Quarterly, 31(2), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.009
Park, S., Choi, G. J., & Ko, H. (2020). Information technology–based tracing strategy in response to COVID-19 in South Korea—privacy controversies. Jama, 323(21), 2129-2130.
Pérez-Morote, R., Pontones-Rosa, C., & Núñez-Chicharro, M. (2020). The effects of e-government evaluation, trust and the digital divide in the levels of e-government use in European countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 154(July 2019), 119973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119973
Qureshi, H. A., Salman, Y., Irfan, S., & Jabeen, N. (2017). A Systematic Literature Review of E-government Evaluation. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 55(02), 327–362.
Rasyid, A., & Alfina, I. (2017). E-Service Quality Evaluation on E-Government Website: Case Study BPJS Kesehatan Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 801(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/801/1/012036
Rihandoyo. (2018). E-Government Evaluation on Electronic Procurement Service (LPSE) User Perspective. E3S Web of Conferences, 73, 5–7. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20187313015
Rotta, M. J. R., Sell, D., dos Santos Pacheco, R. C., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2019). Digital Commons and Citizen Coproduction in Smart Cities: Assessment of Brazilian Municipal E-Government Platforms. Energies, 12(14), 2813. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12142813
Rufín, R., Medina, C., & Sánchez Figueroa, J. C. (2012). Moderating Factors in Adopting Local e-Government in Spain. Local Government Studies, 38(3), 367–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2011.636035
Saengchai, S., Sriyakul, T., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2020). The impact of citizen trust, citizen disposition and favourable social characteristics on the adoption of e-government: Mediating roles of perceived behavioural control. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 12(11), 375–393.
Sarasati, R., & Madyatmadja, E. D. (2020). Evaluation of e-government LAKSA services to improve the interest of use of applications using Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 426(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/426/1/012165
Serra, L. C., Carvalho, L. P., Ferreira, L. P., Vaz, J. B. S., & Freire, A. P. (2015). Accessibility Evaluation of E-Government Mobile Applications in Brazil. Procedia Computer Science, 67(Dsai), 348–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.279
Sigwejo, A., & Pather, S. (2016). A citizen-centric framework for assessing E-government effectiveness. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 74(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2016.tb00542.x
Sorongan, E., & Hidayati, Q. (2020). Integration of eucs variables into delone and mclean models for E-government evaluation: Conceptual models. Register: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Sistem Informasi, 6(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.26594/register.v6i1.1608
The World Bank. (2015). e-Government. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/digitaldevelopment/brief/e-government#:~:text=“E-Government” refers to,and other arms of government.
Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of E-Government – A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.001
Van Der Geest, T., & Velleman, E. (2014). Easy-to-read meets accessible web in the e-government context. Procedia Computer Science, 27(Dsai 2013), 327–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.02.036
Verkijika, S. F., & De Wet, L. (2018a). A usability assessment of e-government websites in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Information Management, 39(September 2017), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.11.003
Verkijika, S. F., & De Wet, L. (2018b). Quality assessment of e-government websites in Sub-Saharan Africa: A public values perspective. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 84(2), e12015. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12015
West, D. M. (2004). E-government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 15–27.
Ziemba, E., Papaj, T., & Descours, D. (2014). Assessing the quality of e-government portals - The Polish experience. 2014 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, FedCSIS 2014, 2, 1259–1267. https://doi.org/10.15439/2014F121
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Mohammad Nurul Huda, Etry Novica Kurniasari, Siti Mas Ruroh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
