The Myth of Kaomu in Local Election of Muna Regency: The Politic of Language and the Emergence of Local Oligarchy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/logos.v8i2.35367Keywords:
Kaomu, myth, Local election, local oligarchyAbstract
This research examines kaomu as a political myth that continues to be reproduced in the post-reformation era in Muna Regency, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia. Kaomu is a group of people who have been narrated as leaders since the beginning of the founding of the Muna kingdom. It is produced as a political myth in era of Muna ancient kingdom and reproduced through language politics until the post-reformation era in Indonesia. As a result, the descendants of the Kaomu group have received social and cultural legitimacy to be chosen as leaders compared to other candidates; Walaka or Maradika social classes. Data was collected through historical documents, oral traditions, and interviews. This study suggested that kaomu myth in the post-reformation era on regional elections has become an instrument of political power in Muna. The myth of kaomu as collective knowledge directs society to elect someone based on a knowledge regime that has been established for hundreds of years. On the other hand, candidates from the kaomu group are also increasingly develop their capital not only in political arena but also economic and sociocultural ones. By this way, their existence is strengthened both in the party and in strategic positions in the local and national axis.
Downloads
References
Adi, I. R. (2008). Mitos dalam Film Laga Amerika. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Aisyah, A. S. (2019). Eksistensi Kaum Bangsawan Bone dalam Birokrasi. Jurnal Kajian Sosial dan Budaya, 3(2), 83-91.: https://ejournal.tebarscience.com/index.php/JKSB/article/view/58
Alcantud, J. C. R. (2020). Simple Majorities with Voice but No Vote. Group Decision and Negotiation, 29(5), 803–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10726-020-09663-5
Aristotle. (2006). Politics (E. Barker, Trans.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Aspinall, E., & Sukmajati, M. (2015). Klinetalisme Pada Pemilu Legislatif 2014. Yogyakarta: Polgov, UGM.
Baier, C. (2017). Homer's Cultural Children: The Myth of Troy and European Identity. History and Memory, 29(2), 35-62. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/histmemo.29.2.03
Bilu, L. (2020). Political Myth: Instruments of Achieving of Political PowerL in the Reformation Era 2005-2015 Election in Muna, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia. ICOSOPH Proceeding(pp. 86-100). Bangka Belitung: University of Bangka Belitung.
Bilu, L. (2021). Produksi and Reproduksi Mitos sebagai Instrumen Meraih dan Mempertahankan Kekuasaan Politik dalam Proses Elektorasi: Studi Pilkada Langsung Era Reformasi Di Kabupaten Muna. Yogyakarta: Dissertation Gadjah Mada University.
Bonoan, C. R., & Dressel, B. (2025). Constitutional Change and Oligarchic Politics in the Philippines, 1987–2024. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034251367455
Bottici, C. (2007). A Philosophy Of Political Myth. New York & London: Cambridge University Press.
Ceglarska, A. (2018). The Role of Myth in Political Thought. Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa, 11(3), 343–355. https://doi.org/10.4467/20844131KS.18.023.9049
Couvreur, J. (2001). Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Kerajaan Muna. Kupang: Artha Wacana Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Penelitian Kualitatif dan Desain Riset Memilih di Antara Lima Pendekatan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Davis, A. (2022). The Myth of Global Populism. Perspectives on Politics, 20(3), 20(3), 999–1011. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592720003552
Digeser, P. E., LeMoine, R., Frank, J., Williams, D. L., Abolafia, J., & Tae-Yeoun Keum. (2022). Plato and the mythic tradition in political thought. Contemporary Political Theory, 21(4), 611–639. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-021-00536-3
Doehne, M., Geweke, J., & Rost, K. (2023). Aleatoric governance: using lotteries to break the iron law of oligarchy. European Sociological Review, 39(4), 646–662. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcac070
Ernawati. (2019). Pasang Surut Kuasa Bangsawan dalam Proses Demokratisasi di Bone. Government: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 12(1), 1-14).
Encyclopædia Britannica. (2025, January 3). Structuralism (anthropology). In Encyclopædia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/science/structuralism-anthropology
Frye, N. (1990). Myth and Methaphor: Selected Essays. Charlottesville & London: University of Virginia.
George, A. (2020). The Mythology of America’s Seasonal Holidays: The Dance of the Horae. California: Palgrave McMillan.
George, A. (2022, May 8). "Myth in Contemporary Society and Politics": The Short Version. Retrieved from https://mythologymatters.wordpress.com/2014/06/19/the-mythical-serpent-in-the-garden-of-eden/
Güldeniz, K. (2019). Political myths as tools for nationalist propaganda. Abant Journal of Cultural Studies, 4(7), 1-15.
Hadiz, V. R. (2007). Dinamika Kekuasaan; Ekonomi Politik Indonesia Pasca Soeharto. Jakarta: LP3ES.
Hariyanto. (2014). Klanisasi Demokrasi dalam Politik Lokal di Indonesia: Studi Kasus: Qahhar Mudzakkar dan Politik Klan di Sulawesi Selatan. Yogyakarta: PolGov Universitas Gadjah Mada.
John T. Evans. (1974). The Decline of Oligarchy in Seventeenth-Century Norwich. Journal of British Studies, 14(1), 46-76. https://doi.org/10.1086/385666
Labov, W. A. (2006). Narrative Analysis: Oral Versions of Personal Experience. In P. A. (eds), Sage Benchmarks in Social Research Methods—Narrative Methods (Vol. 1). London, UK: Sage Publication.
Lara, M. (2017). Carl Schmitt;s Contribution to A Theory of Political Myth. History and Theory, 56(3), 379-388. https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.12026
Niampe, L. (2014). Nasihat Leluhur untuk Masyarakat Buton-Muna. Bandung: Dapur Buku Publishing.
Niampe, L., Syahrun, & Aso, L. (2018). Wuna Anaghaini (Muna in the Past). Yogyakarta: Oceania Press.
Nordholt, H. S., & Gerry , v. (2014). Politik lokal di Indonesia. Jakarta: KITLV dan Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Pitigoi, D. (2021). Political Myths in The Context of Political Symbolism: A Case Study on the Social Media Discourses of Three Romanian Politicians. Perspective Politice 14(1-2), 87-104. https://doi.org/10.25019/perspol/21.14.7
Rasiah, R. (2017). Civilizing the Old South through Margaret Mitchel's Gone with the Wind. Lingua, 8(1), 77-88.
Rasiah, R., & Bilu, L. (2021). Black Images in Contemporary Slavery-Themed Novel Written by Whites American: Reflecting the Persistence of White Supremacy. Humanus, 20(2), 233-248. https://doi.org/10.24036/humanus.v20i2.112267
Regilme, S. S. F. (2024). Europe’s Super‐Rich: Towards Oligarchic Constitutional Order. Journal of Common Market Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13702
Rere, L. O. (2017). Sejarah Dinasti Kerajaan Muna. Jakarta: Jaya Sakti Pratama.
Robison, R., & Hadiz, V. R. (2004). Reorganizing Power in Indonesia: the politics of oligarchy in an age of markets. London & New York: Rotledge Curzon.
Roland, B. (1996). Mitologi (trans. Nurhadi). Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana.
Sahoo, R. &. (2022). Interrelations of Myths and Motifs: A Socio-Cultural Viewpoint. Lakhomi Journal: Scientific Journal of Culture, 3(4), 147-157. https://doi.org/10.33258/lakhomi.v3i4.838
Segal, R. (2002). Myth and Politics: A Response to Robert Ellwood. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 70(3), 611-620. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1466526
Schenoni, L, L., Ribeiro, P. F., Lopes, D. B., & Casaroes, G. (2022). Myths of Multipolarity: The Sources of Brazil’s Foreign Policy Overstretch. Foreign Policy Analysis, 18(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orab037
Shri Ahimsa-Putra, H. (2014). Demokrasi To-Manurung falsafah Politik Dari Bantaeng, Sulawesi Selatan. Jurnal Masyarakat Indonesia, 40(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.14203/jmi.v40i1.100
Shirinyants, A. (2019). O RUS, Where are Thou? Politeja, 16(5-62), 223-235. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.16.2019.62.13
Singer, T. (2000). The Vision of Things: Myth, Politics, and Psyche in the World. London and New York: Routledge.
Spradley, J. &. Evans (1975). Anthropology: The Cultural Perspective. New York, London, Sydney & Toronto: Harpers and Rows Publishers.
Suryati, N. (2013). Penggolongan Masyarakt Muna Dalam Perspektif Sejarah dan Agama, .Kendari: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Halu Oleo (Thesis unpublished).
Suwignyo, A. (2018). Rekayasa Bahasa dalam diskursus sosial-politik. Retrieved from Kompas: https://www.kompas.id/baca/opini/2018/10/30/rekayasa-bahasa-dalam-diskursus-sosial-politik
Storey, J. (2015). Cultural theory and popular culture: An introduction (7th ed.). London, England: Routledge.
Syamsuddin, D. (2001). Antara yang berkuasa dan yang Dikuasai: Refleksi atas Pemikiran dan Praktek Politik Islam. Jurnal Kajian dan Pemikiran Pendidikan Islam, 1(2), 1-5.
Tambunan, D. (2023). The intervention of oligarchy in the Indonesian legislative Process. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 8(2), 637–653. https://doi.org/10.1177/20578911231159395
Thychkin, P. (2015). Myth as an anthropological phenomenon in the context of modern. Procedia: Social and Behavioral sciences, 166, 460-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.554
Tudor, H. (1984). Political Myth. London and Basingstoke: The Macmillan Press Ltd.
Wadiji. (2011). Akulturasi Budaya Banjar di Banua Halat. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Winters, J. A. (2011). Oligarchy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 La Bilu, Rasiah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
