Dynamics of Regional Government Policy Determination in Preparing Spatial Planning: Case in Banjarmasin City

Muhammad Noor; Taufik Arbain; Muhammad Riyandi Firdaus; Budi Setiawati

doi:10.22219/logos.v8i1.37561

Authors

Muhammad Noor Study Program in Public Administration, Administrative Sciences College of Tabalong, Indonesia
Taufik Arbain Master of Public Administration Study Program, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences Lambung Mangkurat University, Indonesia
Muhammad Riyandi Firdaus Study Program in Public Administration, Administrative Sciences College of Tabalong, Indonesia
Budi Setiawati Master of Public Administration Study Program, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari Islamic University of Kalimantan Banjarmasin, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/logos.v8i1.37561

Keywords:

Decision Making, Deliberative, Consencus, Public Policy, Regional Government

Abstract

This study analyzes the dynamics of local government policies that prioritize deliberative processes among various stakeholders to reach consensus in spatial planning in Banjarmasin City. This research collected and analyzed data using qualitative methodology. As this research shows, Banjarmasin City's spatial policy has experienced many dynamics. There are stakeholders who support and oppose local government policies. These stakeholder groups have interests that contribute to the failure of Banjarmasin City's spatial planning policies. This research definitely helps policy makers make better decisions. Among the stakeholders involved in decision-making, there are many perspectives to consider. Then, to avoid horizontal conflicts that are detrimental to the development process of an autonomous region, good cooperation among the various participating parties is required.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aboutorabi, M. (2018). Culture, Space, and Place: An Inquiry into the Urban Landscape of Multicultural Cities. Journal Of Engineering and Architecture, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.15640/jea.v6n2a2

Afdholy, A. R. (2017). Tipomorfologi Permukiman Tepian Sungai Martapura Kota Banjarmasin. Local Wisdom: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Kearifan Lokal, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.26905/lw.v9i1.1865

Alfiyah, N. I., & Tini, D. L. R. (2021). The Role of Women Village Heads in Decision Making Process in Lembung Timur Village. Journal of Local Government Issues, 4(2), 90–105. https://doi.org/10.22219/logos.v4i2.15413

Allmendinger, P., Morphet, J., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2005). Devolution and the modernization of local government: Prospects for spatial planning. European Planning Studies, 13(3), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310500089324

Annas, A., & Rusnaedy, Z. (2019). Evaluasi Kebijakan Tata Ruang dan Bangunan Reklamasi Pantai Metro Tanjung Bunga Kota Makassar. Journal of Government and Civil Society, 3(2), 117. https://doi.org/10.31000/jgcs.v3i2.1948

Arnstein, S. R. (2019). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 85(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2018.1559388

Berg, B. L. (Bruce L., & Lune, H. (2017). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences.

Brown, S. G., & Daus, C. S. (2024). Decision Rife with Emotions: Understanding Police Decision Making. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 39(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-023-09591-5

David Harvey. (2012). Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to The Urban Revolution. London: Verso

Demazière, C. (2018). Strategic Spatial Planning in a Situation of Fragmented Local Government: The Case of France. DisP - The Planning Review, 54(2), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2018.1487645

Dryzek, J. S., & Braithwaite, V. (2000). On the Prospects for Democratic Deliberation: Values Analysis Applied to AustralianPolitics. Political Psychology, 21(2), 241–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00186

Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Collaborative governance regimes. In Collaborative Governance Regimes. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12278

Friberg-Fernros, H., & Schaffer, J. K. (2014). The Consensus Paradox: Does Deliberative Agreement Impede Rational Discourse? Political Studies, 62(1_suppl), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12103

Garnham, N. (2007). Habermas and the public sphere. Global Media and Communication, Sage Journal, 3(2), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766507078417

Gil Martín, M., & Blasco López, F. (2019). Typology and decision-making process of cinema audiences in theaters: Actors and Directors. Harvard Deusto Business Research, 8(1), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.3926/hdbr.181

Hakim, L., Rochima, E., & Wyantuti, S. (2021). Implementasi Kebijakan dan Realisasi Rencana Tata Ruang Kec. Garut Kota di Kab. Garut: Studi Analisis Kebijakan. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Kebijakan Publik, 12(2), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.22212/jekp.v12i2.1938

Hardiman, B. (2009). Demokrasi deliberatif : menimbang negara hukum dan ruang publik dalam teori diskursus Jurgen Habermas. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Hasniati, H., Indriasari, D. P., Sirajuddin, A., & Karim, A. (2022). The Decision of Women in Makassar City to Be Entrepreneurs. Binus Business Review, 14(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v14i1.8936

Hendriks, C. M., & Kay, A. (2019). From ‘Opening Up’ to Democratic Renewal: Deepening Public Engagement in Legislative Committees. Government and Opposition, 54(1), 25–51. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2017.20

Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2020). Qualitative research methods. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Hermans, L. M., & Thissen, W. A. H. (2019). Actor analysis methods and their use for public policy analysts. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(2), 808–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.03.040

Hersperger, A. M., Oliveira, E., Pagliarin, S., Palka, G., Verburg, P., Bolliger, J., & Grădinaru, S. (2018). Urban land-use change: The role of strategic spatial planning. Global Environmental Change, 51, 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.05.001

Hudalah, D., Zulfahmi, F., & Firman, T. (2013). Regional Governance in Decentralizing Indonesia: Learning from the Success of Urban-Rural Cooperation in Metropolitan Yogyakarta. In Cleavage, Connection and Conflict in Rural, Urban and Contemporary Asia (pp. 65–82). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5482-9_5

John W. Creswell. (2012). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design, Choosing Among Five Traditions. In Psychology Applied to Work: An Introduction to Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Tenth Edition Paul (Vol. 53, Issue 9).

Kurniati, P. S. (2016). Implementasi Kebijakan Penataan Ruang Di Kota Bandung. In Jurnal Ilmu Politik dan Komunikasi, 6(2), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.34010/jipsi.v6i2.326

Laurian, L. (2009). Trust in Planning: Theoretical and Practical Considerations for Participatory and Deliberative Planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 10(3), 369–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350903229810

Liu, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2021). Territory spatial planning and national governance system in China. Land Use Policy, 102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105288

Ma, Y., Zhang, P., Zhao, K., Zhou, Y., & Zhao, S. (2022). A Dynamic Performance and Differentiation Management Policy for Urban Construction Land Use Change in Gansu, China. Land, 11(6), 942. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11060942

Mack, Natasha., & Woodsong, C. (2005). Qualitative research methods : a data collector’s field guide. Noth Carolina: Family Health Internasional.

Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosda Karya.

NÆss, P. (2001). Urban planning and sustainable development. European Planning Studies, 9(4), 503–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/713666490

Neuman, W. L. (2011). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. London: Pearson Education.

Nikolić, D. S., Pantić, M. D., & Jokić, V. T. (2021). Urban and Spatial Planning: Pragmatic Considerations for Plan Implementation Improvements (A Case Study of the City of Bor). SAGE Open, 11(1), 215824402199455. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244021994554

Nogués, S., González-González, E., & Cordera, R. (2019). Planning regional sustainability: An index-based framework to assess spatial plans. Application to the region of Cantabria (Spain). Journal of Cleaner Production, 225, 510–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.328

Noor, M., Suaedi, F., & Mardiyanta, A. (2023). Strengths and Interests Between Actors in Collaborative Governance: Review of the Riverside Settlement Revitalization Policy in Banjarmasin City. JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik), 27(2), 93. https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.83437

Noring, L., Ohler, L. P., & Struthers, D. (2021). City Government Capacity and Patterns in Urban Development Project Governance. Urban Affairs Review, 57(5), 1343–1371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087419897808

Ofem, O. E., & Wang, Y. (2023). Decision Making. In Organizational Behavior (pp. 131–156). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31356-1_5

O’Flynn, J., & Wanna, J. (2008). Collaborative Governance : A new era of public policy in Australia? In Collaborative Governance : A new era of public policy in Australia? https://doi.org/10.26530/oapen_458884

Oliveira, E., & Hersperger, A. M. (2018). Governance arrangements, funding mechanisms and power configurations in current practices of strategic spatial plan implementation. Land Use Policy, 76, 623–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.042

Robertson, P. J., & Choi, T. (2012). Deliberation, Consensus, and Stakeholder Satisfaction: A simulation of collaborative governance. Public Management Review, 14(1), 83–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2011.589619

Rond In Elli, D. A. (1973). Urban planning as policy analysis: Management of urban change. Journal of the American Planning Association, 39(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944367308977650

Savini, F. (2013). The Governability of National Spatial Planning: Light Instruments and Logics of Governmental Action in Strategic Urban Development. Urban Studies, 50(8), 1592–1607. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012465131

Segura, S., & Pedregal, B. (2017). Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for Spatial Plans: A Spanish Case Study. Sustainability, 9(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101706

Suciaty. (2006). Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Penyusunan Rencana Umum Tata Ruang Kota Pati. Thesis: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Diponegoro.

Tan, J., Gu, K., & Zheng, Y. (2024). Peri-urban planning: A landscape perspective. Planning Theory, 23(1), 42–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/14730952231178203

Utoyo, B. (2017). Analisis kebijakan prinsip governance dan aktor melalui analytical hierarchy process (AHP) dalam perencanaan kota. Spirit Publik, 12(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.20961/sp.v12i1.11740

Wahyudin, (2021). Kajian Pemanfaatan Tepian Sungai 2021. Skripsi: Universitas Andalas.

Widianingsih, I., & Morrell, E. (2007). Participatory Planning in Indonesia. Policy Studies, 28(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442870601121320

Wong, C. (2022). Spatial thinking and policymaking in the UK: a spatial planning perspective. Space and Polity, 26(2), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2022.2090060

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.) (Vol. 06). Sage Publication, Inc.

Yudha Hadinata, I., & Bani Noor Muchamad. (2017). Studi Penyusunan Dan Penentuan Sempadan Sungai di Kota Banjarmasin. Jurnal Kebijakan Pembangunan, 13(1), 1-7. Retrieved from https://jkpjournal.com/index.php/menu/article/view/86

Zhou, Z. (2018). Bridging theory and practice: participatory planning in China. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 22(3), 334–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2017.1342558