The Younger and The Deliberative Budgeting Process at Village Level
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/logos.v8i1.37849Keywords:
The Younger, Deliberative, village budgetingAbstract
The village community has the prospect of embroiling in the budgeting process more than just being the target group or beneficiaries. Still, as a subject, it is deliberative budgeting. The study aims to explain how the deliberative budgeting process at the village level can be realized or optimized. This study operationalizes three main variables: perception, attitude, and commitment, controlled by the respondent's characteristics. By using an experimental approach in a village to determine changes in understanding after treatment and correlational analysis, it turns out that there are two things found. First, the post-test score is higher than the pre-test score, and second, the age associated with the commitment to participate was a negative correlation, both pre-test and post-test. This shows that changes in understanding or perception will result in changes in commitment to participate. Then, increasing knowledge of budgeting in the village is much more effective for the younger age group to be more involved in the budgeting process. Therefore, in conclusion, increasing understanding through socialization, training, or education on various matters, especially budgeting, will impact the commitment to be more involved for the younger age group compared to the older one. These results can complement the explanation of various findings on community participation in village policy formulation, especially budgeting.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, N.N. & Rahman, M.F.A. (2015). The Use of Deliberative Democracy in Public Policy Making Process. Public Policy and Administration Research, 5(3), 221-229. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2769105
Abelson, J., Forest, P. G., Eyles, J., Smith, P., Martin, E., & Gauvin, F. P. (2003). Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in designing and evaluating public participation processes. Social Science and Medicine, 57(2), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00343-X
Alisson, G. T. (1971). Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Antaranews. (2019). ICW: kasus korupsi Dana Desa terbanyak sepanjang 2018. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/796085/icw-kasus-korupsi-dana-desa-terbanyak-sepanjang-2018), accessed on 1 May 2019.
Arnstein, Sherry R.(1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4), 216 — 224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225.
Asmawati, Ika & Prayino Basuki. (2019). Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Dana Desa. Jurnal Studi Akuntansi dan Keuangan,2(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.29303/akurasi.v2i1.15
Bem, D. J. (1967). Self-Perception: An Alternative Interpretation of Cognitive Dissonance Phenomena. Psychological Review, 74 (3), 183–200. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0024835
Boeke, J.H., (1932). Rural credit in the Dutch East Indies. London:sn.
Cabannes, Y., & Cecilia, D. (2015). Another City Is Possible with Participatory Budgeting. Montreal:Black Rose Books.
Cabannes, Y. (2019). Another City is Possible with Participatory Budgeting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press Economics Books, 9781551646923.
Caparas, M.V.G., & Agrawal, A. (2016). Why Citizens Participate in Local Governance: A Case of Two Philippine LGUs. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(12).1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1064444
Chirenje, L.I., Richard A.G. & Musamba, E.B. (2013). Local communities’ participation in decision-making processes through planning and budgeting in African countries. Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment, 11(1), 10-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10042857.2013.777198
Demuth, Andrej (2013). Perception Theory, Filozoficka. Fakulta Trnavskej Univerzity, v. Trnave.
Dye, T. R. (1980). Introduction to Public Policy. Toronto: McGraw-Hill.
Easton, D. (1965). A Framework for Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Fitzgerald, C., McCarthy, S., Carton, F., O’Connor, Y., Lynch, L., & Frederic Adam (2016). Citizen participation in decision making: Can one make a difference? Journal of Decision Systems, 25(1), 248-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2016.1187395
Fearon, J. D. (1998). Deliberation as discussion. In J. Elster (Ed.), Deliberative Democracy (44–68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gauvin, Francois-Piere. (2009). What is a Deliberative Process? National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy. retieved on May 3rd, 2019.
Gordon, Struwig J, Roberts B, Mchunu N, Mtyingizane S, Radebe T (2019) What drives citizen participation in political gatherings in modern South Africa? a quantitative analysis of self-reported behaviour. Soc Indic Res, 141(2),791–808.
Gordon, V., Osgood Jr., J.L., & Boden, D. (2016). The Role of Citizen Participation and the Use of Social Media Platforms in the Participatory Budgeting Process. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(1),1-12 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1072215
Hanafie, H., Agus Nugraha, Masrul Huda. (2019). Dana Desa (Kajian Tentang Akuntabilitas Dana Desa Di Kecamatan Masalembu, Kabupaten Sumenep). Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan: Kajian Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Politik Daerah, 4(1), 39-46. https://doi.org/10.24905/jip.4.1.2019.39-46
Hanifah, S. I. & Praptoyo, S. (2015). Akuntabilitas dan Transparansi Pertanggungjawaban Anggaran Pendapatan Belanja Desa (APBDes). Jurnal dan Riset Ilmu Akuntansi, 4 (8), 1-15.
Hasniati (2016). Model Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Dana Desa. Jurnal Analisis dan Pelayanan Publik 2(1),15-30. https://doi.org/10.31947/jakpp.v2i1.1519
Knobloch, K. & Gastil, J., (2022). “How Deliberative Experiences Shape Subjective Outcomes: A Study of Fifteen Minipublics from 2010-2018”. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 18(1), 16-39. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.942
Lindblom, C.E. (1976). Study Public Policy. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Lindblom, C.E. (1984). The policy-making process, 2nd edition, Englewood Cliffs. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Linder, S. H., & Peters, B. G. (1990). An Institutional Approach to the Theory of Policy-Making: The Role of Guidance Mechanisms in Policy Formulation. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2(1), 59–83. https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jothpo/v2y1990i1p59-83.html
Lorsuwannarat, Tippawan (2016). Public Participation in Budgeting: The New Path of Budget Reform in Thailand. International Journal of Public Administration, 40 (5), 385-400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1126730
Maguire, S. (2021). Age Matters: Political Participation. https://www.agemattersnow.org/politics/. Retrieved March 31th 2025.
Manaf, H.A., Mohamed, A.M., & Lawton, A. (2016). Assessing Public Participation Initiatives in Local Government Decision-Making in Malaysia. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(11), 812-820 https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1035788
Mannarini, T., Talò, C., Ntzani, E. et al. (2018). Sense of Community and the Perception of the Socio-Physical Environment: A Comparison Between Urban Centers of Different Sizes Across Europe. Social Indicators Research,137,965-977. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1647-8
Mannarini, T. & Fedi. (2018). Using Quali-Quantitative Indicators for Assessing the Quality of Citizen Participation: A Study on Three Citizen Juries. Social Indicators Research, 139, 473-490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1735-9
Michels, A. (2012). Citizen Participation in Local Policy Making: Design and Democracy. International Journal of Public Administration, 35, 285–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2012.661301
Michels, A. & Graaf, L.D. (2010). Examining Citizen Participation: Local Participatory Policy Making and Democracy. Local Government Studies, 36(4), 477-491. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2010.494101
Mizrahi, S., & Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2009). Citizens' Learning, Involvement, and Participation in Decision-Making Under the Democratic Ethos: A Theoretical Framework and the Israeli Experience. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(5), 438-460, https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690802528254
Mustofa, S. (2022). Kebijakan Dana Desa & Korupsi Dana Desa Dari Sabang Sampai Merauke. Bogor: Guepedia
Nain, U. (2020). The Supra-Village Government’s Elite Domination In Village Development Planning In Bulukumbu South Sulawesi Indonesia. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24 (2),3811–3820. https://doi.org/10.61841/f8dq9q64
National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy. (2019). What is a Deliberative Process? retrieved on May 3rd, 2019.
Nguyen-Hoang, P., & Schroeder, L. (2010). An Analysis of Quasi-Decentralized Budgeting in Vietnam. International Journal of Public Administration, 33(12-13), 698–709. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2010.514449
Rakhmat, Jalaluddin. (2007). Psikologi Komunikasi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Raharjo, T. P., Suminar, S., Winarti, S. E., & Saptaningtyas, H. (2021). Musyawarah Rencana Pembangunan Desa Formalistik di Desa Guwosari dan Sendangsari Kecamatan Pajangan Kabupaten Bantul. Jurnal Masyarakat Dan Desa, 1(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.47431/jmd.v1i1.127
Riggs, F. W. (1964). Administration in Developing Countries: The Theory of Prismatic Society. California: Houghton Mifflin.
Ripley, R. B. (1985). Policy Analysis in Political Science. Chicago: Nelson-Hall Publisher.
Roucek, J.S. & Warren, R.L. (1979). Sociology: An Introduction. Littlefield: Adams & Co.
Schneider, S.H., & Busse, S. (2018). Participatory Budgeting in Germany – A Review of Empirical Findings. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(3), 259-273 https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1426601
Shin, J. (2019). How Can we Achieve a Sustainable Redistributive Policy? Rethinking the Relationship Between Civic. Soc Indic Res, 142,343–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1922-3
Straussman, J.D. (2012). Legislative Participation in Budgetary Systems: Is there Evidence of Convergence?. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(10), 667-676, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2012.661187
Talò, C. Soc Indic Res (2018). Community-Based Determinants of Community Engagement: A Meta-Analysis Research. Social Indicators Research, 140, 571–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1778-y
Weimer, D.L. & Vining, A.R. (2017). Policy Analysis: Concepts And Practice. Newyork: Routledge.
Widyastuti, R. S., Wisanggeni, S. P., Rejeki, S., & Herin, F. P. (2025). Who is Behind the Village Fund Corruption? Kompas.Id. https://www.kompas.id/artikel/en-siapa-saja-di-balik-pusaran-korupsi-dana-desa
Wirtz, B.W., Daiser, P. & Binkowska, B. (2016). E-participation: A Strategic Framework, Internasional. Journal of Public Administration, 41(1),1-12 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1242620
Zakariya, R. (2020). Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pencegahan Korupsi Dana Desa: Mengenali Modus Operandi. Jurnal Anti Korupsi, 6(2), 263–282. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v6i2.670
Zhang, J. (2019). How Community Participation Promotes the Relocation Adjustment of Older Women: A Moderated Mediation Analysis. Social Indicators Research, 143(2), 637–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-2006-0
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sukarso Sukarso, Niken P. Dasuki

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




