Recent Trends in Technology Research for Election Surveillance During 2014-2024: A Systematic Review

Authors

  • Marno Wance Department of Government Studies, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Pattimura, Indonesia
  • Muhtar Department of Government Studies, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Pattimura, Indonesia
  • Herizal Departemen of Political Science and Public Administration, Erciyes University, Turkiye
  • Pacifique Mutijima The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation-Republic of Rwanda

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/logos.v8i2.41545

Keywords:

democratic integrity, digital impact, election monitoring, surveillance technology

Abstract

This study examines trends in publications on election monitoring technology from 2014 to 2025, utilizing data from the Scopus database. The PRISMA research method is a structured research approach that analyzes data through a series of diagrams. Through the stages of identification, screening, eligibility, and verification, 181 publication documents were found to be usable in the study. The research findings show that the highest number of publications occurred in 2014 with 32 and in 2023 with 23, while a decrease in the number of publications over the 12 years occurred in 2015 with 7 documents and in 2016 with 8 publications. The aspects of publication contributions based on the most countries were, in order, the United States, Indonesia, India, and China, which were the largest contributors with the most publications. The research studies that were often conducted explored issues of the impact of technology, election fraud, and the transparency of election administration. The research findings contributed 80 documents in the field of computer science, 69 documents in social science, and 69 documents in engineering. Contributions in the field of Computer Science focus on research related to information technology and data security. Contributions in terms of document types include 67 articles, 62 conference papers, and 17 book chapters. The novelty of this research lies in reinforcing recent studies on the use of technology to enhance transparency and fairness in elections. Additionally, researchers suggest the need for studies on information technology systems that can support electronic voting processes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abraham, J., & Pane, M. M. (2014). The mediating role of social competition identity management strategy in the predictive relationship between susceptibility to social influence, internet privacy concern, and online political efficacy. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 8407 LNCS, 492–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55032-4_50

Adam, D. (2024). Misinformation might sway elections—But not in the way that you think. Nature, 630(8018), 807–809. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-01696-z

Adeiza, M., & Howard, P. N. (2016). New social media practices: Potential for development, democracy, and anti- democratic practices. In The Palgrave Handb. Of International Development (pp. 577–594). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-42724-3_32

Al Hadad, A. (2023). Keamanan data dalam proses pemilu 2024: Identifikasi dan mitigasi ancaman kebocoran data elektoral. Jurnal Keadilan Pemilu. 4(3), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.55108/jkp.v4i2.429

Allen, D. W. E., Berg, C., Lane, A. M., & Potts, J. (2017). The economics of crypto-democracy. In Poblet M., Casanovas P., Plaza E., & Casanovas P. (Eds.), CEUR Workshop Proc, 1897,63–73). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2973050

Anand, J., Lakhwani, K., & Mathur, S. (2024). A Blockchain Technology Based Voting System. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i06.32871

Amankwah, A. S., & Mbatha, B. (2019). Unlocking the Potential of New Media Technologies for Political Communication about Elections in Ghana. Communicatio, 45(4), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/02500167.2019.1639782

Aqur, M., Kumar, R., Singh, R., Umang, U., Gehlot, A., Akram, S. V., & Joshi, K. (2023). Role of Digitalization in Election Voting Through Industry 4.0 Enabling Technologies. 11(2), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.17762/ijritcc.v11i2.6136

Bah, A. B., & Arif, S. (2024). Digitalized Electoral Democracy, Subversive Politics, and Islam: Indonesia in Comparative Perspective. Comparative Sociology, 23(4), 547–582. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691330-bja10115

Bartova, B., Bína, V., & Vachova, L. (2022). A PRISMA-driven systematic review of data mining methods used for defects detection and classification in the manufacturing industry. Production Journal, 32. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20210097

Bailard, C. S., & Livingston, S. (2014). Crowdsourcing Accountability in a Nigerian Election. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 11(4), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2014.947056

Barcelo-Valenzuela, M., Leal-Pompa, C. M., & Sanchez-Schmitz, G. (2020). An IT service management methodology for an electoral public institution. Proc. - Int. Conf. Inf. Comput. Technol., ICICT, 219–223. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICT50521.2020.00041

Barojan, D. (2020). Building Digital Resilience Ahead of Elections and Beyond. In Disinformation and Fake News (pp. 61–73). Springer Singapore; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5876-4_5

Bender, S. W. (2022). Algorithmic Elections. 12(3), 489. https://doi.org/10.36644/mlr.121.3.algorithmic

Chang, C.-C., & Tsai, J. (2016). Distributed collaborative surveillance system based on leader election protocols. IET Wireless Sensor Systems, 6(6), 198–205. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-wss.2015.0030

Crump, C. (2016). Surveillance Policy Making by Procurement. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2737006

Dueñas-Cid, D., Loeber, L., Martin-Rozumiłowicz, B., & Macias, R. (2024). Trust and electoral technologies throughout the election cycle: Comparing the USA, Netherlands, Poland, and Kenya. JeDEM: eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v16i3.922

Dudchenko, O. S., & Frolova, T. Yu. (2024). Peculiarities of Improving Electoral Rights Protection in the context of Introduction of Digital Technologies. Aktualʹnye Problemy Rossijskogo Prava, 19(9), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.166.9.011-017

Gandhi, A. (2022). California County Oversight of Use Policies for Surveillance Technology. https://doi.org/10.15779/z38319s340

Garbiras-Díaz, N., & Montenegro, M. (2022). All Eyes on Them: A Field Experiment on Citizen Oversight and Electoral Integrity. American Economic Review, 112(8), 2631–2668. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.2021077

Garcia-Nunes, P. I., Rodrigues, P. A., Oliveira, K. G., & da Silva, A. E. A. (2020). A computational tool for weak signals classification – Detecting threats and opportunities on politics in the cases of the United States and Brazilian presidential elections. Futures, 123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2020.102607

Haryadi, T., Nurmandi, A., Muallidin, I., & Kurniawan, D. (2022). Implementing “SIREKAP” Application Based on Election for Improving the Integrity of Election Administrators and Increasing Public Trust. In Ahram T. & Taiar R. (Eds.), Lect. Notes Networks Syst. (Vol. 319, pp. 159–165). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85540-6_21

Hilabi, S. S., Harso Supangat, S., Hendric Spits Warnars, H. L., Prabowo, H., & Mursitama, T. N. (2020). Model Technology Service E-Participation—Voting (E-PV) for Political Communication between the Council of Regional Representatives (DPRD) and the Citizens Using the Framework Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL V.3) Transition Domain Service. Int. Conf. ICT for Smart Soc.: AIoT Smart Society, ICISS - Proceeding. 7th International Conference on ICT for Smart Society: AIoT for Smart Society, ICISS 2020 - .https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISS50791.2020.9307578

Hoke, C. (2010). Internet voting: Structural governance principles for election cyber security in democratic nations. 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1145/1920320.1920329

Howard, P. N., Woolley, S., & Calo, R. (2018). Algorithms, bots, and political communication in the US 2016 election: The challenge of automated political communication for election law and administration. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 15(2), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2018.1448735

Jain, A., Kumar, A., & Dash, M. K. (2015). Information technology revolution and transition marketing strategies of political parties: Analysis through AHP. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 20(1), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIS.2015.070903

Jasheer Shihab, T. V., & Liji, P. I. (2017). Simple and secure internet voting scheme using generalized paillier cryptosystem. Int. Conf. Intell. Comput., Instrum. Control Technol., ICICICT, 2018-January, 551–557. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICICT1.2017.8342623

Kostyuk, N., Chen, W., Liang, F., & Husain, M. M. (2017). High-Tech Governance Through Big Data Surveillance: Tracing the Global Deployment of Mass Surveillance Infrastructures, 1995 to Present. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3030347

Kumar, S. D., Vamsikrishna, P., Tyagi, A., Bommisetty, D., & Kandala, H. B. (2016). Theoretical analysis of voting systems. Proc. Int. Conf. Commun. Electron. Syst., ICCES. Proceedings of the International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems, ICCES 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/CESYS.2016.7889932

Laila, A., Tatiyana, L., Aleksey, V., Dmitriy, S., & Sergey, L. (2020). Factors and trends of increasing role of mass media in democratic elections in Kazakhstan. Media Watch, 11(2), 394–407. https://doi.org/10.15655/mw/2020/v11i2/195665

Lemos, M., & Alturas, B. (2017). The Internet and the online social networks on the 2016’s Portuguese presidential elections. In Reis L.P., Rocha A., Alturas B., Costa C., & Cota M.P. (Eds.), Iberian Conf. Inf. Syst. Technol., CISTI. IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.23919/CISTI.2017.7975896

Leonova, O. G. (2018). Information Operations of Influence: Risks and Countermeasures. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 463(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/463/4/042095

Mascaro, C., Agosto, D., & Goggins, S. P. (2016). The method to the madness: The 2012 United States presidential election twitter corpus, ACM Int. Conf. Proc. Ser. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2930971.2930987

Maschmeyer, L. (2023). Subversion, cyber operations, and reverse structural power in world politics. European Journal of International Relations, 29(1), 79–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661221117051

Micheni, E., & Murumba, J. (2018). The role of ICT in electoral processes: Case of Kenya. IST-Africa Week Conf., IST-Africa. 2018 IST-Africa Week Conference, IST-Africa 2018.

Midterm, E. (2024). Corrigendum to: Safeguarding the Peaceful Transfer of Power: Pro-Democracy Electoral Frames and Journalist Coverage of Election Deniers During the 2022 U.S. Midterm Elections. International Journal of Press/Politics. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612241249522

Narayan, B. (2014). Modi’s modus operandi in the 2014 elections. Economic and Political Weekly, 20, 12–14. https://www.epw.in/journal/2014/20/commentary/modis-modus-operandi-2014-elections.html

Ndzenyuy, E. V. (2019). Effects of ICT Incorporation Lapses in the Electoral Process of Cameroon. The International Journal of Management, 5(2), 170–175. https://doi.org/10.21522/TIJMG.2015.05.02.ART016

Pratelli, M., Petrocchi, M., Saracco, F., & De Nicola, R. (2024). Online disinformation in the 2020 U.S. election: swing vs. safe states. EPJ Data Science, 13(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-024-00461-6

Priyowidodo, G., Inggrit, I., Sari, Y. D., & Gunawan, S. (2019). Digital media technology as an instrument for promotion and political marketing in the era of industrial revolution 4.0. ACM Int. Conf. Proc. Ser., 327–331. https://doi.org/10.1145/3345120.3345171

Raharja, J., Nurmandi, A., & Subekti, D. (2023). Analysis of Information Quality and Data Security in the KPU (General Elections Commission) SIDALIH (Voter Data Information System) Application. In Moallem A. (Ed.), Lect. Notes Comput. Sci.: Vol. 14045 LNCS (pp. 90–100). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35822-7_7

Salubre, H. C., Dela Cerna, M. A., Chua, F. V. A., Buniel, G. G., & Tiu, G. D. (2022). Web-based Election Monitoring Integrating Barangay Geospatial Mapping. IEEE Glob. Conf. Adv. Technol., GCAT. 2022 IEEE 3rd Global Conference for Advancement in Technology, GCAT 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/GCAT55367.2022.9971959

Sanofi, Z., Shinta Dewi, E. A., Sjuchro, D. W., & Arifin, H. S. (2024). A bibliometric analysis of web 2.0 in election campaign. Heliyon, 10(22). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40337

Shukla, A., Mishra, D. P., Pattnaik, A., & Salkuti, S. R. (2024). Analysis and design on acceptance of blockchain based e-voting system. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 33(3), 1793–1801. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v33.i3.pp1793-1801

Sjoberg, F. M. (2014). Autocratic adaptation: The strategic use of transparency and the persistence of election fraud. Electoral Studies, 33, 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.08.004

Southern, R., & Lee, B. J. (2019). Politics as usual? Assessing the extent and content of candidate-level online campaigning at the 2015 UK general election. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 29(2), 179–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2018.1515209

Trussler, M. (2021). Get information or get in formation: The effects of high-information environments on legislative elections. British Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 1529–1549. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123419000577

Uali, B., Gabdulina, B., & Askeyeva, G. (2023). The role of social media in sustainable development and strengthening the image of a political leader: Kazakhstan experience. Rivista Di Studi Sulla Sostenibilita, 2023(1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.3280/RISS2023-001005

Wu, Y., & Kasahara, S. (2023). Smart Contract-Based E-Voting System Using Homomorphic Encryption and Zero-Knowledge Proof. In Zhou J., Batina L., Picek S., Li Z., Lin J., Losiouk E., Majumdar S., Mashima D., Meng W., Rahman M.A., Shao J., Shimaoka M., Soremekun E., Su C., Teh J.S., Udovenko A., Wang C., Zhang L., & Zhauniarovich Y. (Eds.), Lect. Notes Comput. Sci.: Vol. 13907 LNCS (pp. 67–83). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41181-6_4

Weerasekara, D. A., Manorathne, D. S., Wickramasinghe, R. G. M. N., Gamage, V. N., Gamage, N., & Panduwawala, P. (2024). Multi-Modal Biometric-based Threat Detection for Securing Electronic Voting Processes. 576–583. https://doi.org/10.1109/icacrs62842.2024.10841758

Zainol, Z., Nohuddin, P. N. E., Lee, A. S.-H., Ibrahim, N. F., Yee, L. H., & Majid, K. A. (2021). Analysing political candidates’ popularity on social media using POPularity MONitoring (POPMON). SEARCH The Journal of the South East Asia Research Centre for Communication and Humanities, December 2021, 39–55. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358275185_Analysing_political_candidates'_popularity_on_social_media_using_POPularity_MONitoring_POPMON

Zharovska, I. M. (2020). Digital technologies in the electoral process: Theoretical aspects of compliance with democratic standards. 11–15. https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2020.218559

Downloads

Published

2025-09-27

How to Cite

Wance, M., Muhtar, Herizal, & Mutijima, P. (2025). Recent Trends in Technology Research for Election Surveillance During 2014-2024: A Systematic Review. Journal of Local Government Issues, 8(2), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.22219/logos.v8i2.41545

Issue

Section

Articles