The Role of Continuous Assessment Learning Activities (CALA) in Enhancing Mathematics Competency and Proficiency in Secondary School Learners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/mej.v7i1.24017Abstract
This paper examines the significance and contribution of CALA to the mathematics knowledge of students. It focuses on the instruments and methods used in CALA to teach mathematics effectively in Zimbabwe. Learners’ failure to implement what they learn in mathematics has been worrisome to the Ministry of Education whose focus is to promote industrialisation through effective teaching and learning of STEM subjects. It is believed that most learners memorise mathematics with little understanding in order to pass an examination. Inappropriate and ill-suited assessment methods of mathematics are regarded as the principal causes of this rote learning approach by learners. The educational policy makers came up with the concept of CALA, which was effected in 2021, to all levels of education in Zimbabwe. According to the curriculum framework, learners are expected to demonstrate their knowledge of mathematics through CALA. However, whilst the intended goal of CALA is prudent, the concern is whether teachers are knowledgeable about how this model of assessment can be implemented effectively. Ten secondary school mathematics teachers were interviewed to examine their views and practices in the classroom implementation of the CALA component. In this study, the findings established that the incorporation of the component in the teaching and learning of mathematics has come with limited benefits that were marred by teachers’ knowledge deficiency to operationalise CALA. This study recommends thorough support and developmental programmes which can equip teachers with the appropriate skills to implement CALA.
Downloads
References
Ajinomoh, V.E. & Eze, C.A. (2017). Cumulative and guidance-oriented characteristics of continuous assessment and students’ career choice in public secondary schools in Uyo Local Government. Equatorial Journal of Education and Curriculum Studies, 2(1), 1-8.
Aldabbus, S. (2018). Project-based learning: Implementation and challenges. International Journal of Education, Learning and Development, 6(3), 71-79.
Association of Teachers of mathematics (ATM) (2007). Retrieved from www.atm.org.uk, info@atm.org.uk
Camargo, (2015). Teachers' perceptions and use of assessment information: an exploratory study of mathematics teachers in Brazil. International Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 5, 73-94.
Chigonga, B. (2020). Formative assessment in mathematics education in the twenty-first century. In Theorizing STEM education in the 21st century. IntechOpen. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88996
Chytry, V. & Kubiatko, M. (2021). Pupils’ summative assessments in mathematics as dependent on selected factors. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(8).
Cooper, P. & McIntyre, D. (1998). Effective teaching and learning: Teachers and students’ perspectives. UK: Open University Press.
Dambudzo, I.I. (2015). Teaching and learning for sustainable development in developing Countries: Zimbabwe Case Study. Journal of Education and Learning, 4(1), 11-24. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v4n1p11
Hammond, C.D. (2018). Corruption in the classroom: The dilemma of public school teachers in Cambodia providing private tutoring to their own students. The Journal of Rikkyo University Language Center, 39, 3-13.
Hancock, D.R. (2007). Effects of performance assessment on the achievement and motivation of graduate students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8(3), 219-231.
Keller, J.M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of motivational design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2-10.
Kilpatrick, J. (1993). The chain and the arrow: From the history of mathematics assessment. In M. Niss. (Ed.), Investigations into assessment in mathematics education. An ICMI Study (pp. 31-46). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kusure, L.P. & Basira, K. (2012). Instruction in science and mathematics for the 21st century. Bindura, Zimbabwe: Bindura University of Science Education.
Makamure, C. (2018). Evoking motivation for achievement in Ó’ level mathematics in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Education (IJE), 6(4), 13-21.
Marchetti, C. Project-based learning in the secondary mathematics classroom? Retrieved from https://blog.definedlearning.com/tag/project-based-learning
Meshack, E.O. (2013). The role of school and motivational factors in mathematics achievement and self-efficacy: A multi-level analysis. ETD Archive. Paper 203.
Muzawazi, P. (2021). Chief Director (Secondary and Non-Formal education) in the Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education. Continuous Assessment Learning Activity (CALA). Retrieved from https://www.pindula.co.zw/Continuous_Assessment_Learning_Activity_ (CALA)
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
Niss, M. (1993). Assessment in mathematics education and its effects: An introduction. In M. Niss. (Ed.), Investigations into assessment in mathematics education: An ICMI Study (pp. 1-30). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Popkova, E.M. (2018). Continuous cumulative assessment in higher education: Coming to grips with test enhanced learning. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62884-4_16.
Schulman, L. (1996). New assessment practices in mathematics, The Journal of Education, 178(1), 61-71.
Simpson, E.J. (1972). The classification of educational objectives in the psychomotor domain. Washington DC.: Gryphon House.
Stronge, J.H., Tucker, P.D., & Hindman, J.L. (2004). Handbook for qualities of effective teachers. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Chipo Makamure, Jojo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with MEJ (Mathematics Education Journal) agree to the following terms:
For all articles published in MEJ, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
