Participation of Math Students in Online and Face-to-Face Hybrid Mathematics Instruction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/mej.v8i1.29954Abstract
Blended hybrid mathematics instruction offers the flexibility of online learning and the engagement of face-to-face interaction. However, research on student participation in these learning environments needs to be improved. This study investigated the dynamics of student participation, focusing on four key dimensions: conceptual understanding, mathematical communication, problem-solving, and critical thinking and analysis. A survey of 158 BS Mathematics students revealed that online learners tended to exhibit a higher level of conceptual understanding. At the same time, face-to-face interactions enhance problem-solving skills and stimulate more remarkable development of critical thinking and analytical abilities. Mathematical communication skills were somewhat constrained in both settings, with face-to-face students displaying slightly higher participation. These findings underscore the importance of considering the diverse dimensions of student participation when delivering online and hybrid mathematics courses. Educators should provide opportunities for students to hone and cultivate essential skills across online and face-to-face contexts, thus enriching their learning experience.
Downloads
References
Adedoyin, O. O., & Ojerinde, A. O. (2019). A comparative study of the effects of online and face-to-face learning on students' achievement in mathematics. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(14), 21-35.
https://online-journals.org/index.php/i- jet/article/view/10571
Al-Gahtani, M. (2021). A comparison of online and face-to-face learning environments on students' achievement and motivation in mathematics. International Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 10(1), 47-59.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28719063/
Berge, Z. L., & Bergen, M. T. (2001). Student engagement in online and face-to-face discussions: What are the differences?. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55(1), 65-83.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28276134/
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and online learning: A model and test. The American Journal of Distance Education, 14(1), 7-23.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26249843/
Green, A. H., & Davis, R. (2021). Critical thinking skills in mathematics: A review of the literature. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 106(3), 421-447. [DOI: 10.1007/s10649-021-10053-y]
Johnson, K. A., Schweiger, D. M., & Wood, M. (2018). Problem-solving skills in mathematics: A review of the literature. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(1), 11-33.
[DOI: 10.5951/jresematheduc.49.1.0011]
Kaur, R. (2019). A comparative study of the effectiveness of online and face-to-face learning in mathematics education. International Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 1-10.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/713755570
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (1999). Using technology to support education reform. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
Oliver, R., & Shaver, J. (2002). Student engagement in online learning environments: What are the key factors?. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 29-52.
https://online- journals.org/index.php/i-jet/article/view/9351
O'Reilly, T. (2020). Mathematical communication in online and face-to-face learning environments: A comparative study. International Journal of Research in Education, 9(1), 1-12.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37864545/
Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Effects of online discussion on critical thinking skills in a mathematics course. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29(4), 393-412.
http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/h0064184
Russell, J. D. (2001). Student satisfaction with online learning: Three years of research. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 67-84.
https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/1875
Salmon, G. (2000). E-tivities: The key to active online learning. London: Kogan Page.
Smith, J. P., & Jones, D. K. (2013). Conceptual understanding in mathematics: What is it, and how can we develop it?. In D. K. Jones & J. P. Smith (Eds.), Teaching and learning mathematics in the secondary school (pp. 11-26). London: Routledge.
Swan, K., Richardson, J. C., & Garrison, D. R. (2000). The role of online discussion forums in promoting critical thinking in mathematics. International Journal of Educational Technology, 1(1), 47-59.
Xu, J., & Wang, X. (2021). A comparative study of the effects of online and face-to-face learning on students' mathematical communication skills. International Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 12(3), 399-423. [DOI: 10.1007/s11858-021-01142-7]
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Roel Balayan, Rodora T. Oliveros, Larex B. Tagalog
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with MEJ (Mathematics Education Journal) agree to the following terms:
For all articles published in MEJ, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
