ANALISIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO.2871K/PDT/2017 DALAM KASUS PENGINGKARAN AKTA PERJANJIAN PERDAMAIAN NO.04/PDT.G/2000/PN.PROB

Risma Puspita Ningrum; Sofyan Arief; Herwastoeti

doi:10.22219/ilrej.v1i1.16126

Authors

Risma Puspita Ningrum Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
Sofyan Arief Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
Herwastoeti Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v1i1.16126

Keywords:

Peace Deed, Legal Strength, Judge's Decision

Abstract

This study aims to determine the legal strength of the Peace Agreement Deed No.04/Pdt.G/2000/PN.Prob and to analyze the Supreme Court Decision N0.2871K/Pdt.G/PN.Prob in the case of denial of the peace agreement deed No.04/Pdt.G /2000/PN.Prob in a Legal Perspective, this research uses the Normative Juridical method. The result of this research is that Peace Decision No.04/Pdt.G/2000/PN.Prob has permanent legal force as well as the judge's decision at the final level. in accordance with the provisions of Article 1858 paragraph (1) of the Civil Code Jo. Article 130 paragraph (2) and (3) HIR, and the peace deed, have 3 legal powers, namely binding and final, perfect proof, and executorial power. The District Court's decision was appropriate because the defendant's actions were categorized as illegal actions based on Article 1365 of the Civil Code, this was because the plaintiffs were the legal owners of the disputed land based on the peace decision No.04/Pdt.G/2000/PN/Prob. The Court of Appeal's decision was inaccurate, because it had canceled the peace decision Deed No.4/Pdt.G/2000/PN.Prob in which the peace decision No.4/Pdt.G/2000/PN.Prob had permanent legal force as stipulated in Article 130 HIR, Jo. Article 1858 of the Civil Code, judges of the High Court in passing decisions exceed their authority because the High Court as Judex facti does not have the authority to judge or overturn the final decision, and if the Appellants find new evidence then the legal remedy that can be taken is legal. Article 67 letter b Law No.14 of 1985 concerning the Supreme Court. Furthermore, the Supreme Court's decision was appropriate, because according to the Supreme Court the Judex facti the High Court had wrongly applied the law because it had canceled the Peace Deed No.4/Pdt.G/2000.PN.Prob which had permanent legal force. So that in this case the legal conflict lies in the decision of the High Court

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agung, Proyek Yurisprudensi Mahkamah. Rangkuman Yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung Indonesia II Hukum Perdata Dan Acara Perdata. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung, 1977.

Amarini, Indriati. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Yang Efektif Dan Efisien Melalui Optimalisasi Mediasi Di Pengadilan.” Kosmik Hukum, no. 2 (2016).

Arkiang, Tri Yanty Sukanty. “Kedudukan Akta Notaris Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Proses Pemeriksaan Perkara Pidana.” KEADILAN PROGRESIF 2, no. 2 (September 2011).

Irwansyah. Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Edited by Ahsan Yunus. Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media, 2020.

Khotibul, Umam. Penyelesaian Sengketa DiLuar Pengadilan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Yustisia, 2010.

Kusumasar, Diana. “Apakah Penggugat Boleh Memilih Siapa Yang Hendak Digugatnya.” hukumonline.com, 2020.

Margono, Suyud. ADR Dan Arbitrase. 2nd ed. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2004.

Mulyana, Dedy. “Kekuatan Hukum Hasil Media Di Luar Pengadilan Menurut Hukum Positif.” Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika 3, no. 2 (2019).

Peter MA Marzuki. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2014.

Rifqi Hidayat, Muhammad, and Parman Komarudin. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Wakaf Melalui Jalur Litigasi Dan Non-Litigasi.” Al-Adl: Jurnal Hukum 11, no. 2 (2019).

Rosita, Intan, and Endang Pandamdari. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Phak Dalam Hal Terjadi Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Terkait Sengketa Jual Beli Tanah (Studi Putusan No. 121/PDT.G/2017/PN.BDG).” Jurnal Hukum Adigama 2, no. 2 (2019).

Usman, Rachmadi. Mediasi Di Pengadilan Dalam Teori Dan Praktik. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012.

Yesak, Erik. “Daya Kekuatan Mengikat Putusan Pasca Keluarnya Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI No. 2 Taun 2003 Jo. PERMA No. 1 Thn 2016 Tentang Prosedur Mediasi Di Pengadilan.” Lex Administratum 6, no. 3 (2018).