The Influence of TAP MPR's Position on The Hierarchy System of Indonesian Laws and Regulations

Briliant Gustama; Sholahuddin Al-Fatih; Sarita

doi:10.22219/ilrej.v2i1.19442

Authors

Briliant Gustama Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang
Sholahuddin Al-Fatih Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang
Sarita Migration and Diaspora Management Institute of Organisation for Diaspora Initiative

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v2i1.19442

Keywords:

TAP MPR, Hierarchy, Judicial Review, legislation

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the influence of TAP MPR in Indonesia. Placement of MPR Provisions in Law No. 12 of 2011 on the hierarchy of Legislation in Indonesia becomes one of the problematics that needs to be discussed, on the grounds of the position of MPR provisions that are under exactly the Constitution of 1945. This is based on the position of the MPR Decree itself which will automatically become a reference to the rules under it, in accordance with the theory of stairs put forward by Hans Kelsen. Although from the point of view of the position of MPR determination is still understandable if Hans Nawiasky theory is used as the basis. But in terms of testing itself of course this will raise a big question mark for all of us because in the Constitution of 1945 institutions or institutions that have the right to conduct a test of the Law is the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court, but within its own scope the Provision of MPR is outside the juridical territory of the two Institutions themselves. Therefore, there needs to be a solution if at any time the MPR Decree is not in accordance with the basis of the 1945 Constitution so that there will be no defects in one of the legal sources of the State of Indonesia.

Abstrak

Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh TAP MPR di Indonesia. Penempatan Ketentuan MPR dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Hierarki Peraturan Perundang-undangan di Indonesia menjadi salah satu problematika yang perlu dibahas, dengan alasan kedudukan ketetapan MPR yang berada di bawah UUD 1945. Hal ini berdasarkan posisi Ketetapan MPR sendiri yang secara otomatis akan menjadi acuan aturan di bawahnya, sesuai dengan teori tangga yang dikemukakan oleh Hans Kelsen. Meski dari sudut pandang posisi penentuan MPR masih bisa dimaklumi jika teori Hans Nawiasky dijadikan dasar. Namun dalam hal pengujian sendiri tentunya hal ini akan menimbulkan tanda tanya besar bagi kita semua karena dalam UUD 1945 lembaga atau lembaga yang berhak melakukan uji materi UU adalah Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Mahkamah Agung, namun dalam lingkupnya sendiri Ketentuan MPR berada di luar wilayah yuridis kedua Lembaga itu sendiri. Oleh karena itu, perlu ada solusi jika sewaktu-waktu Ketetapan MPR tidak sesuai dengan dasar UUD 1945 sehingga tidak akan terjadi cacat pada salah satu sumber hukum Negara Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aditya, Zaka Firma, and Muhammad Reza Winata. “Reconstruction Of The Hierarchy Of Legislation In Indonesia.” Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan 9, no. 1 (2018): 79–100. https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v9i1.976.

Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin. “Model Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Satu Atap Melalui Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY 25, no. 2 (2018): 247. https://doi.org/10.22219/jihl.v25i2.6005.

———. “Penerapan Threshold Dalam Pemilu Menurut Perspektif Gustav Radbruch Dan Hans Kelsen.” Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) 1, no. 2 (2020): 78–84. https://doi.org/10.22219/audito.v1i2.13973.

Atmaja, I Made Aryana Putra, and I Nyoman Suyatna. “Politik Hukum Pengaturan TAP MPR Dalam Hierarki Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.” Udayana Master Law Journal 4, no. 2 (2015): 233–40. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2015.v04.i02.p03.

Chandranegara, Ibnu Sina. “Architecture of Indonesia’s Checks and Balances.” Constitutional Review 2, no. 2 (2016): 270–91. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev226.

Esfandiari, Fitria, and Moh. Fadli. “Repositioning the Role of the Constitutional Court as Positive Legislature in Indonesia,” 2020. https://doi.org/10.5220/0009923411041111.

Fadli, Muhamad Akhsanul. “Transcendental Approach in Legal Aid Concept in Indonesia: A Philosophy of Law Perspective.” The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education 3, no. 4 (2021): 465–80. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijicle.v3i4.48293.

Gunawan, Budi, and Barito Mulyo Ratmono. “Threats to the Ideology of Pancasila In the Reform Era: Praxis Case of Regional Development Policy.” Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan 9, no. 1 (2018): 58–82. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.v9i1.4070.

Hasan, Hasanuddin. “Hierarki Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Negara Republik Indonesia Sebagai Suatu Sistem.” Madani Legal Review 1, no. 2 (2017): 120–30. https://doi.org/10.31850/malrev.v1i2.32.

Hidayah, Nur Putri, Said Noor Prasetyo, and Tongat. “Identity Theft and the Rules in Indonesia’s Criminal Law.” Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research 121, no. 1 (2019): 29–34. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200226.006.

Hutchinson, Terry, and Nigel James Duncan. “Defining and Describing What We Do: Doctrinal Legal Research.” Deakin Law Review 17, no. 1 (2012): 83–119. https://doi.org/10.21153/dlr2012vol17no1art70.

Kurniawan, Tyan Adi, and Wilda Prihatiningtyas. “Problematika Kedudukan TAP MPR Dalam Uu No. 12 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.” Yuridika 27, no. 2 (2012): 121–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v27i2.292.

Nazriyah, R. “Penguatan Peran Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat Dalam Struktur Ketatanegaraan Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan 47, no. 1 (2017): 39–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol47.no1.134.

Pasaribu, Muksana. “Kedudukan Hukum Islam Dalam Sistem Civil Law Dan Sistem Common Law.” Jurnal Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora 7, no. 1 (2020): 77–83. https://doi.org/10.31604/justitia.v7i1.77-83.

Rahmadhony, Aditya. “Ketetapan Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat Dalam Sistem Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Indonesia.” PALAR (Pakuan Law Review) 6, no. 1 (2020): 92–120. https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v6i1.1910.

Riananda, Martha. “Dinamika Kedudukan TAP MPR Di Dalam Hierarki Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.” Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 2 (2015): 295–310. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v8no2.297.

Sati, Nisrina Irbah. “Ketetapan MPR Dalam Tata Urutan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan 49, no. 4 (2020): 834–46. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol49.no4.2343.

Sonata, Depri Liber. “Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Empiris: Karakteristik Khas Dari Metode Meneliti Hukum.” FIAT JUSTISIA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 1 (November 5, 2015): 15–35. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v8no1.283.

Sulardi, and Fitria Esfandiari. “The Authority of the People’s Consultative Assembly and the Discourse of the Limited Amendment of the Constitution,” 2020. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200513.050.

Tambunan, Arifin S. “Menelusuri Eksistensi Ketetapan MPRS NO. XX/MPRS/1966.” UNISIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial 30, no. 65 (2007): 238–50. https://doi.org/10.20885/unisia.vol30.iss65.art3.