Analisis Putusan No.39/Pid.B/2015/PN/Sit Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Pembalakan Liar Ditinjau Dari Aspek Keadilan

Authors

  • Aristo Arie Notoprojo Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia
  • Sholahuddin Al-Fatih Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia
  • Catur WIdo Haruni Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v2i2.22262

Keywords:

Judges decision, criminal procedure, illegal logging, justice

Abstract

The Illegal logging is an organized illegal timber use activity. This crime is usually carried out by more than two people in a certain time for the purpose of destroying forests and selling wood products illegally. In Decision No.39/Pid.B/2015/PN.Sit the defendant Asyiani was dropped by a criminal witness of illegal logging thanks to a special criminal offense. Where the defendant has carried out illegal logging on Perhutani's land. The problem with this research is What is the basis for the judge's consideration in Decision No.39/Pid.B/2015/PN.Sit regarding the crime of illegal logging and How due to the law of Decision No.39/Pid.B/2015/PN.Sit about the crime of illegal logging is reviewed from the justice aspect. The research methods used are normative legal methods that use primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, tertiary legal materials and data analysis. The results of the study show less precisely the judge's consideration in the case against the defendant and the legal consequences reviewed from the aspect of pancasila justice were less appropriate because the defendant was given a probation sentence in which the criminal act of illegal logging was one special crime. The author's advice needs to be done with fair funding according to the crime committed by the defendant and this problem can be resolved by deliberation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin, and Ahmad Siboy. Menulis Artikel Karya Ilmiah Hukum Di Jurnal Nasional Dan Internasional Bereputasi. Malang: Inteligensia Media, 2021.

Arif, Arifin. Hutan Hakekat Dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Lingkungan. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 1994.

BPUPKI. Undang-undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 (1945). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2.

Damayatanti, Prawestya Tunggul. “Upaya Pelestarian Hutan Melalui Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Hutan Bersama Masyarakat.” Komunitas 3, no. 1 (2011): 212–24. https://doi.org/10.15294/komunitas.v3i1.2296.

Herlina, Nina. “Permasalahan Lingkungan Hidup Dan Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi 3, no. 2 (2015): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.25157/jigj.v3i2.93.

Irianto, Sulistyowati. “Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Dalam Metodologi Penelitian Ilmu Hukum.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan 32, no. 2 (2002): 155–72. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol32.no2.1339.

Mufidah, N. Zakiyyatul, and Miftachur R. Habibi. “Simposium Hukum Indonesia.” Simposium Hukum Indonesia 1, no. 1 (2019): 574–86.

Palsari, Cahya. “Kajian Pengantar Ilmu Hukum: Tujuan Dan Fungsi Ilmu Hukum Sebagai Dasar FUndamentar Dalam Pemjatuhan Putusan Pengadilan.” Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia 4, no. 3 (2021): 940–50.

Rianse, Usman, and Abdi. Agroforestri: Solusi Sosial Dan Ekonomi Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Hutan. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2010.

Sitorus, Syahrul. “Upaya Hukum Dalam Perkara Perdata (Verzet, Banding, Kasasi, Peninjauan Kembali Dan Derden Verzet).” Hikmah 15, no. 1 (2019): 63–71.

Sonata, Depri Liber. “Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Empiris: Karakteristik Khas Dari Metode Meneliti Hukum.” FIAT JUSTISIA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 1 (November 2015): 15–35. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v8no1.283.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-12

How to Cite

Notoprojo, A. A., Al-Fatih, S., & Haruni, C. W. (2022). Analisis Putusan No.39/Pid.B/2015/PN/Sit Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Pembalakan Liar Ditinjau Dari Aspek Keadilan. Indonesia Law Reform Journal, 2(2), 206–221. https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v2i2.22262

Issue

Section

Articles