Settlement of Brand Rights Disputes Through the Commercial Court in Indonesia: Study of Surabaya Court Decision

I Gede Mahatma Yogiswara; Lesza Leonardo Lombok; Asrul Ibrahim Nur; I Gusti Bagus Indra Kumara; Ni Nyoman Sri Purnama Sutianti

doi:10.22219/ilrej.v2i3.23754

Authors

I Gede Mahatma Yogiswara Faculty of Law, University of Ngurah Rai, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia.
Lesza Leonardo Lombok Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Manado, Indonesia
Asrul Ibrahim Nur University of Debrecen, Géza-Marton Doctoral School of Legal Studies, Hungary
I Gusti Bagus Indra Kumara Faculty of Law, University of Ngurah Rai, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia.
Ni Nyoman Sri Purnama Sutianti Faculty of Law, University of Ngurah Rai, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v2i3.23754

Keywords:

Keywords: Brand; Gudang Garan; Gudang Baru

Abstract

Brands play a significant role in economic development because they help consumers identify the origin of a product or service. Brand ownership is acknowledged at the time of brand registration with the Directorate General of Intellectual Property. The first prerequisite for registering a brand is ensuring that it possesses all of its attributes. Therefore, some characteristics distinguish it from other brands. Despite these regulations, brand infringements still occur. One of them is the disagreement between PT. Gudang Garan and PT. Gudang Baru, whose brands are comparable. Therefore, a study on Indonesian law enforcement in resolving brand issues is required. The current study employed normative legal research and normative juridical methodologies. Using descriptive qualitative data analysis, the study focused on laws and regulations. The Surabaya Commercial Court determined, based on a dispute between PT. Gudang Garan and PT Gudang Baru, that PT. Gudang Baru breached Article 21 Paragraph 1 of Law No. 20 of 2016, declaring the Gudang Baru brand comparable to the well-known Gudang Garan brand. As a result, the Gudang Baru brand was revoked, and to ensure a deterrent effect, DGKI ordered any application for registration of a brand that resembles PT. Gudang Garan be denied.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Admin, Admin. “PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP MEREK TERKENAL (WELL-KNOWN) DI INDONESIA.” Reformasi Hukum 23, no. 1 (November 27, 2019): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v23i1.54.

Arifin, Zaenal, and Muhammad Iqbal. “PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP MEREK YANG TERDAFTAR.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 5, no. 1 (May 13, 2020): 47. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v5i1.2117.

Balqis, Wizna Gania, and Budi Santoso. “Arti Penting Perlindungan Merek Terdaftar Bagi Komunitas Penghasil Produk Ekonomi Kreatif.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 2, no. 2 (May 10, 2020): 205–21. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v2i2.205-221.

Benuf, Kornelius, and Muhamad Azhar. “Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer.” Gema Keadilan 7, no. 1 (April 1, 2020): 20–33. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2020.7504.

Betlehn, Andrew, and Prisca Oktaviani Samosir. “UPAYA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP MEREK INDUSTRI UMKM DI INDONESIA.” Law and Justice 3, no. 1 (November 2, 2018): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.23917/laj.v3i1.6080.

Egia Nuansa Pinem, Lompoh, and Ni Luh Dwik Suryacahyani Gunadi. “Analisis Penyelesaian Sengketa Terhadap Hak Merek Atas Putusan Geprek Bensu Melawan I Am Geprek Bensu.” Jurnal Pacta Sunt Servanda 2, no. 1 (July 1, 2021): 24–35. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpss.v2i1.452.

Jaya, Dedi, and Hari Sutra Disemadi. “Prospects of Trademark Registration To Recover The Economic of MSMEs Actors in Service Sector after The Pandemic.” Widya Yuridika 5, no. 2 (September 1, 2022): 265. https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v5i2.3504.

Jotyka, Gossain, and I Gusti Ketut Riski Suputra. “PROSEDUR PENDAFTARAN DAN PENGALIHAN MEREK SERTA UPAYA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP MEREK TERKENAL MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 15 TAHUN 2001.” Ganesha Law Review 3, no. 2 (July 1, 2021): 125–39. https://doi.org/10.23887/glr.v3i2.447.

Made Dwipayani, Desak, and Nurul Fazriyah. “PERKARA PENOLAKAN PEMBATALAN MEREK TERDAFTAR DALAM GUGATAN PERDATA ANALISIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NIAGA JAKARTA PUSAT NOMOR 02/MEREK/2002/PN.NIAGA.JKT.PST.” Ganesha Law Review 3, no. 2 (July 7, 2021): 97–110. https://doi.org/10.23887/glr.v3i2.445.

Mathar, Mudassir. “ASPEK HUKUM USAHA WARALABA DI INDONESIA.” Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah 4, no. 1 (August 26, 2016). https://doi.org/10.30984/as.v4i1.211.

Nertivia, Nertivia, Octa Villa, Febrin Theresya V Lingga, Asmin Patros, and Rufinus Hotmaulana Hutauruk. “Polemik Warkopi vs. Warkop DKI: Apa Yang Salah?” Journal of Judicial Review 24, no. 1 (June 14, 2022): 149. https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v24i1.6736.

Njatrijani, Rinitami. “PERLINDUNGAN MERK BAGI PENGUSAHA UMKM DI KECAMATAN JUWANA KABUPATEN PATI.” Gema Keadilan 8, no. 1 (May 12, 2021): 50–62. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2021.11002.

Permata, Rika Ratna, Tasya Safiranita, and Biondy Utama. “Tinjauan Kasus Tentang Dilusi Merek Di Indonesia Dan Thailand.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 26, no. 1 (April 24, 2019): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss1.art1.

Rafianti, Laina. “Perkembangan Hukum Merek Di Indonesia.” FIAT JUSTISIA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 7, no. 1 (October 26, 2015). https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v7no1.364.

Sari, Indah. “KEUNGGULAN ARBITRASE SEBAGAI FORUM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA DI LUAR PENGADILAN.” JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DIRGANTARA 9, no. 2 (June 3, 2014). https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v9i2.354.

Usanti, Trisadini Prasastinah. “GADAI ATAS JAMINAN SERTIFIKAT MEREK PADA BANK SYARIAH.” Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 29, no. 3 (January 12, 2018): 413. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.26795.

Widiantoro, Rouf Fajrin. “Pendaftaran Merek Sebagai Sarana Perlindungan Hukum.” Jurnal Lex Renaissance 7, no. 2 (April 1, 2022): 416–26. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol7.iss2.art14.

Wijayanti, Rena Feri, Tri Yulistyawati Evelina, and Lina Budiarti. “ANALISIS PENGARUH PERSEPSI HARGA DAN PERSEPSI KUALITAS TERHADAP MINAT PEMBELIAN PRODUK PRIVATE LABEL.” Adbis: Jurnal Administrasi Dan Bisnis 11, no. 2 (December 31, 2017): 161. https://doi.org/10.33795/j-adbis.v11i2.26.