Legal Consequences of Marriage Agreement to Interested Third Parties

Rhesita Ayu Sophia Dewi; Herwastoeti; Dwi Ratna Indri Hapsari

doi:10.22219/ilrej.v3i1.25362

Authors

Rhesita Ayu Sophia Dewi Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang
Herwastoeti Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang
Dwi Ratna Indri Hapsari Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v3i1.25362

Keywords:

deed, Marriage Agreement, Notary

Abstract

Marriage is a bond that forms a family within society and the state. With the existence of marriage can realize the welfare and happiness between humans. In a marriage, the husband or wife certainly brings assets called innate assets. So, before the marriage takes place, the prospective husband and wife make a marriage agreement which is a form of agreement made between one party and another and there is no coercion from any party. This study aims to find out how the process of making a marriage agreement deed and to find out whether the marriage agreement has legal consequences for third parties. The type of research used is empirical juridical with primary data and secondary data. Data collection techniques with interviews and observation. The results of the study show that in Law No. 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, what is unanimously mixed are assets acquired during marriage. As for inherited assets, they remain under the authority of each unless mutually agreed upon by the husband and wife to be united in joint property. In the marriage agreement besides binding the husband and wife, the marriage agreement is also binding on third parties. So, this is a third party is very interested.

Abstrak

Perkawinan merupakan ikatan yang membentuk suatu keluarga di dalam lingkungan masyarakat dan negara. Dengan adanya perkawinan dapat mewujudkan kesejahteraan dan kebahagiaan antar manusia. Dalam suatu perkawinan suami atau istri tentunya membawa harta yang disebut harta bawaan. Maka sebelum perkawinan berlangsung para calon suami dan isteri membuat perjanjian perkawinan yang merupakan salah satu wujud dari perjanjian yang dibuat antara satu pihak dengan pihak yang lain dan tidak ada paksaan dari pihak manapun. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana proses dalam pembuatan akta perjanjian perkawinan serta untuk mengetahui apakah perjanjian perkawinan memiliki akibat hukum bagi pihak ketiga. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis empiris dengan data perimer dan data skunder. Teknik pengumpulan data dengan wawancara dan observasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dalam Undang – Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan, yang dicampurkan secara bulat adalah harta yang diperoleh selama perkawinan. Sedangkan untuk harta bawaan tetap di bawah kekuasaan masing-masing kecuali disepakati bersama oleh suami dan istri untuk disatukan dalam harta bersama. Dalam perjanjian pernikahan selain mengikat pasangan suami-istri tersebut, perjanjian perkawinan juga mengikat terhadap pihak ketiga. Maka hal ini pihak ketiga sangat berkepentingan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aisyiah, Cahyani, and Diah Aju Wisnuwardhani. “Notary, Public Official or Public Official: Implications for the Position of Notary.” Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum 13, no. 3 (December 28, 2022): 242–52. https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v13i3.9012.

Arwinilita, Bella, Siti Anggraini, Dwi Wisnu Wardana, Asep Hermawan, and Setiawan Widiyoko. “Separation Agreement Asset For Indonesian Citizens Married Abroad.” Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum 8, no. 1 (February 22, 2021): 1. https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v8i1.13734.

Awaliyah, Robiah, and Wahyudin Darmalaksana. “Perceraian Akibat Dampak Covid-19 Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam Dan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia.” Khazanah Hukum 3, no. 2 (2021): 87–97. https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v3i2.12018.

Azizah, Linda. “Analisis Perceraian Dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam.” AL-‘ADALAH Vol. X, no. 4 (2012): 415–22. https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v10i2.295.

Bastomi, Hasan. “Pernikahan Dini Dan Dampaknya (Tinjauan Batas Umur Perkawinan Menurut Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Perkawinan Indonesia).” Yudisia 7, no. 2 (2016): 354–84. https://doi.org/10.21043/yudisia.v7i2.2160.

Christiani, Theresia Anita. “Normative and Empirical Research Methods: Their Usefulness and Relevance in the Study of Law as an Object.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 219 (May 2016): 201–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2016.05.006.

Cui, Can, Shan Yu, and Youqin Huang. “His House, Her House? Gender Inequality and Homeownership among Married Couples in Urban China.” Cities 134 (March 2023): 104187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.104187.

Dahwadin, Dahwadin, Enceng Iip Syaripudin, Eva Sofiawati, and Muhamad Dani Somantri. “Hakikat Perceraian Berdasarkan Ketentuan Hukum Islam Di Indonesia.” YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Dan Hukum Islam 11, no. 1 (June 5, 2020): 87. https://doi.org/10.21043/yudisia.v11i1.3622.

Erwinsyahbana, Tengku. “Sistem Hukum Perkawinan Pada Negara Hukum Berdasarkan Pancasila.” Journal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 1 (2019): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.30652/jih.v3i01.1027.

Fauza, Nilna, and Moh Afandi. “Perjanjian Perkawinan Dalam Menjamin Hak-Hak Perempuan.” Al-Manhaj: Journal of Indonesian Islamic Family Law 2, no. 1 (2020): 1. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-manhaj.v2i1.3116.

Haagsma, Juanita A, Nicholas Graetz, Ian Bolliger, Mohsen Naghavi, Hideki Higashi, Erin C Mullany, Semaw Ferede Abera, et al. “The Global Burden of Injury: Incidence, Mortality, Disability-Adjusted Life Years and Time Trends from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.” Injury Prevention : Journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention 22, no. 1 (February 2016): 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2015-041616.

Immanuella, Chrisya Nadine, and Siti Hajati Hoesin. “Akibat Hukum Terhadap Notaris/Ppat Terkait Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Oleh Pegawai Notaris/Ppat (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Blitar Nomor 10/Pdt.G/2020/PN Blt).” PALAR | PAKUAN LAW REVIEW 8, no. 1 (January 1, 2022): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v8i1.4584.

Imron, Ali. “Memahami Konsep Perceraian Dalam Hukum Keluarga.” BUANA GENDER : Jurnal Studi Gender Dan Anak 1, no. 1 (2016): 15–27. https://doi.org/10.22515/bg.v1i1.66.

Kurniawan, Puji. “Perjanjian Perkawinan; Asas Keseimbangan Dalam Perkawinan.” Jurnal El-Qanuniy: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Kesyariahan Dan Pranata Sosial 6, no. 1 (July 8, 2020): 125–37. https://doi.org/10.24952/el-qanuniy.v6i1.2548.

Masri, Esther, and Sri Wahyuni. “Implementasi Perjanjian Perkawinan Sebelum, Saat Dan Sesudah Perkawinan.” Jurnal Kajian Ilmiah 21, no. 1 (2021): 111–20. https://doi.org/10.31599/jki.v21i1.310.

Matondang, Armansyah. “Faktor-Faktor Yang Mengakibatkan Perceraian Dalam Perkawinan.” JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance and Political Social UMA) 2, no. 2 (2014): 141–50. https://doi.org/10.31289/jppuma.v2i2.919.

Nasution, Muhammad Arsad. “Analisis Terhadap Al-Qur’an Dan Hadist Tentang Perlindungan Pekerja Menurut Hukum Islam.” Yurisprudentia: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi 5, no. 2 (2019): 129. https://doi.org/10.24952/yurisprudentia.v5i2.1875.

Ningsih, Natalia, I Made Arya Utama, and I Made Sarjana. “Kekuatan Mengikat Akta Notariil Perjanjian Perkawinan Terkait Harta Bersama Yang Dibuat Pasca Pencatatan Perkawinan.” Acta Comitas 1, no. 1 (April 3, 2017): 12. https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2017.v02.i01.p02.

Prihandini, Yudiana Dewi. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pihak Ketiga Atas Perjanjian Perkawinan Yang Dibuat Setelah Perkawinan.” Jurnal Lex Renaissance 4, no. 2 (2019): 354–66. https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol4.iss2.art9.

Rokhim, Abdul. “Kedudukan Hukum Perjanjian Perkawinan Sebagai Alasan Perceraian.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 41, no. 1 (2012): 59–64. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.41.1.2012.59-64.

Septiawan, Aislie Anantama. “Perjanjian Perkawinan Pada Perkawinan Campuran Dalam Kepemilikan Tanah Di Indonesia.” LamLaj 2, no. 1 (2017): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.32801/lamlaj.v2i1.32.

Sriono, Sriono. “Perjanjian Kawin Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Terhadap Harta Kekayaan Dalam Perkawinan.” Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi 4, no. 2 (2016): 69–80. https://doi.org/10.36987/jiad.v4i2.336.

Stutzer, Alois, and Bruno S Frey. “Does Marriage Make People Happy, or Do Happy People Get Married?” The Journal of Socio-Economics 35, no. 2 (April 2006): 326–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2005.11.043.

Suryati, Suryati, Arif Awaludin, and Bing Waluyo. “Perlindungan Hukum Atas Harta Perkawinan Melalui Akta Perjanjian Kawin.” Cakrawala Hukum: Majalah Ilmiah Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wijayakusuma 25, no. 1 (March 10, 2023): 22–32. https://doi.org/10.51921/chk.v25i1.225.

Tektona, Rahmadi Indra. “Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Perlindungan Hak Anak Korban Perceraian.” Muwazah 4, no. 1 (May 17, 2013): 42–57. https://doi.org/10.28918/muwazah.v4i1.148.

Thariq Godal, Moh., Syarif Hasyim, and Musyahidah Musyahidah. “Method of Sharing Marriage Properties in the Religious Court, Palu.” International Journal of Contemporary Islamic Law and Society 2, no. 2 (2020): 58–70. https://doi.org/10.24239/ijcils.vol2.iss2.22.

Yulies, Tiena Masriani. “Perjanjian Perkawinan Dalam Pandangan Hukum Islam.” Serat Acitya – Jurnal Ilmiah UNTAG Semarang 5 (2017): 128–49. https://doi.org/10.56444/sa.v2i3.115.

Yuvens, Damian Agata. “Analisis Kritis Terhadap Perjanjian Perkawinan Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015.” Jurnal Konstitusi 14, no. 4 (2018): 799. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1445.