Humanitarian Assistance in 21 Century: Between Humanity and Sovereignty

Authors

  • Elisabeth Septin Puspoayu Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Hukum
  • sigit riyanto Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Keanu Abinuno Wattimena University College London

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v3i2.29702

Keywords:

humanitarian assistance, humanity, law of war

Abstract

Humanitarian assistance is one of the actions that can be taken to limit and reduce the impact of armed conflict. Humanitarian assistance is aimed at civilians during armed conflicts. The purpose of this study is to analyze the position of humanitarian assistance in the 21st century. This research was conducted through conceptual and comparative approaches, as well as using normative legal research methods, also using prescription analysis techniques.  The results showed that the principle of distinction is the basic principle of humanitarian assistance, which means that this assistance is mandatory. State sovereignty must still be recognized and upheld in the context of providing humanitarian assistance. States have the primary responsibility to provide assistance to their peoples in the midst of armed conflict as one of the parties responsible for armed conflict, external humanitarian actors must respect the agreement and cooperation of States affected by armed conflict.

Abstrak

 

Bantuan kemanusiaan merupakan salah satu Tindakan yang dapat dilakukan untuk membatasi dan mengurangi dampak dari adanya konflik bersenjata. Bantuan kemanusiaan ditujukan kepada masyarakat sipil selama konflik bersenjata. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk menganalisi kedudukan humanitarian assistance di abad 21. Penelitian ini dilakukan melalui pendekatan konseptual dan komparatif, serta  menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif, juga menggunakan teknik analisis preskripsi. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa prinsip pembedaan adalah prinsip dasar bantuan kemanusiaan yang artinya bantuan ini merupakan hal yang wajib. Kedaulatan negara harus tetap diakui dan dijunjung tinggi dalam rangka pemberian bantuan kemanusiaan. Negara mempunyai tanggung jawab utama untuk memberikan bantuan kepada masyarakatnya yang sedang dilanda konflik bersenjata sebagai salah satu pihak yang bertanggung jawab pada konflik bersenjata, aktor kemanusiaan eksternal harus menghormati persetujuan dan kerja sama negara-negara yang terkena dampak dari konflik bersenjata

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, Mark, Kristin Becknell, and Joanna Taliano. “History of Humanitarian Emergencies.” In Health in Humanitarian Emergencies: Principles and Practice for Public Health and Healthcare Practitioners, 9–24. Cambridge: cambridge University Press, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107477261.003.

Ansari, Tunggul, and Setia Negara. “Normative Legal Research in Indonesia: Its Originis and Approaches.” Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) 4, no. 1 (February 2, 2023): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.22219/ACLJ.V4I1.24855.

Aviv, Itzhak, and Uri Ferri. “Russian-Ukraine Armed Conflict: Lessons Learned on the Digital Ecosystem.” International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection 43 (December 1, 2023): 100637. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJCIP.2023.100637.

Barakat, Sultan, Logan Cochrane, and Iana Vasekha. “The Humanitarian-Development-Peace Nexus for Global Food Security: Responding to the Climate Crisis, Conflict, and Supply Chain Disruptions.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, November 7, 2023, 104106. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJDRR.2023.104106.

Besson, Samantha. “Sovereignty.” Oxford Public International law, 2023.

Danial. “Efektifitas Konsep Prinsip Pembedaan Hukum Humaniter Internasional Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Korban Dalam Konflik Bersenjata Modern.” Jurnal Media Hukum 23, no. 2 (2016): 200–208. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.2016.0080.200-208.

Eliza, Emi, Heryandi Heryandi, and Ahmad Syofyan. “Intervensi Kemanusiaan (Humanitarian Intervention) Menurut Hukum Internasional Dan Implementasinya Dalam Konflik Bersenjata.” FIAT JUSTISIA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 4 (2015): 629–41. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v8no4.316.

Elkahlout, Ghassan, Sansom Milton, Taha Yaseen, and Elham Raweh. “Localisation of Humanitarian Action in War-Torn Countries: The Experience of Local NGOs in Yemen.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 75 (June 1, 2022): 102921. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJDRR.2022.102921.

geneva graduate institute. “Classification of Armed Conflict.” Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights, 2022.

Gordon, Michael. “Referendums in the UK Constitution: Authority, Sovereignty and Democracy after Brexit.” European Constitutional Law Review 16, no. 2 (2020): 213–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019620000152.

Grotius, Hugo. De Iure Belli Ac Pacis (The Rights of War and Peace), 1625.

Hill-Cawthorne, Lawrence. “Humanitarian Law, Human Rights Law and the Bifurcation of Armed Conflict.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 64, no. 2 (2015): 293–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002058931500010X.

hugh Breakey. “The Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict.” In Norms of Protection: Responsibility to Protect, Protection of Civilians and Their Interaction, 40–61. UNUP, 2012.

Kavanagh, Matthew M, Clare Wenham, Elize Massard da Fonseca, Lawrence R Helfer, Elvin Nyukuri, Allan Maleche, Sam F Halabi, Adi Radhakrishnan, and Attiya Waris. “Increasing Compliance with International Pandemic Law: International Relations and New Global Health Agreements.” The Lancet 402, no. 10407 (September 23, 2023): 1097–1106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01527-1.

Kolb, Robert. “Military Objectives in International Humanitarian Law.” Leiden Journal of International Law 28, no. 3 (2015): 691–700. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156515000369.

Kuijt, Emilie Ellen. “Humanitarian Assistance and State Sovereignty in International Law : Towards a Comprehensive Framework.” universiteit leiden, 2020.

Kumbaro, Dajena. “The Kosovo Crisis in an International Law Perspective: Self-Determination, Territorial Integrity and the Nato Intervention.” NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANISATION Office of Information and Press, 2001, 75.

Manggali, Arsyi, Arya Putra, and Nur Putri Hidayah. “Implementation of Business and Human Rights Principles (UNGPs) in the Protection given to Indonesian Laborers: Gender Perspective.” Jurnal Cita Hukum 11, no. 1 (April 30, 2023): 163–76. https://doi.org/10.15408/JCH.V11I1.29022.

Marelli, Massimo. “The Law and Practice of International Organizations’ Interactions with Personal Data Protection Domestic Regulation: At the Crossroads between the International and Domestic Legal Orders.” Computer Law & Security Review 50 (September 1, 2023): 105849. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CLSR.2023.105849.

Neff, Stephen C. Hugo Grotius on the Law of War and Peace. Hugo Grotius on the Law of War and Peace, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139031233.

Pace, Scott. “U.S. Space Policy and Theories of International Relations: The Case for Analytical Eclecticism.” Space Policy 65 (August 1, 2023): 101538. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SPACEPOL.2022.101538.

Putri, Ria Wierma, Yunita Maya Putri, Febryani Sabatira, Orima Melati Davey, and Himal C Arya. “The Paradox of the International Law Development: A Lesson from Covid-19 Pandemic Management.” Lex Scientia Law Review 7, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v7i1.61999.

Richard Louis Lara. “THE PROBLEM OF SOVEREIGNTY , INTELLECTUAL CONSCIENCE.” Journal of the Philosophy of International Law 5, no. 1 (2014): 1–26.

Schenk, Christine G., and Shalul Hasbullah. “Informal Sovereignties and Multiple Muslim Feminisms: Feminist Geo-Legality in Sri Lanka.” Political Geography 94 (April 1, 2022): 102527. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.POLGEO.2021.102527.

Sharpe, Marina. “It’s All Relative: The Origins, Legal Character and Normative Content of the Humanitarian Principles.” International Review of the Red Cross, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383123000292.

Stephen D. Krasner. “Abiding Soverignty’.” International Political Science Review 22, no. 3 (2001): 243.

Stoffels, Ruth Abril. “Legal Regulation of Humanitarian Assistance in Armed Conflict: Achievements and Gaps.” Revue Internationale de La Croix-Rouge/International Review of the Red Cross 86, no. 855 (2004): 515. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1560775500181027.

the norwegian refugee council. “Humanitarian Principles,” 2016.

united nations. “General Assembly Resolution 46/182 (On Strengthening of the Coordination of Humanitarian Emergency Assistance of the United Nations) (19 December 1991).” UN. General Assembly, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1163/ilwo-iiiu14.

———. un charter, UN Charter § (1945).

UNOCHA. “United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs,” 2021.

Willmot, Haidi, and Scott Sheeran. “The Protection of Civilians Mandate in Un Peacekeeping Operations: Reconciling Protection Concepts and Practices.” International Review of the Red Cross 95 (2014): 517–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383114000095.

Zu, Liulong, Desheng Wu, and Shoujun Lyu. “How to Move from Conflict to Opportunity in the Not-in-My-Backyard Dilemma: A Case Study of the Asuwei Waste Incineration Plant in Beijing.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 104 (January 1, 2024): 107326. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EIAR.2023.107326.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-30

How to Cite

Puspoayu, E. S., riyanto, sigit, & Wattimena, K. A. (2023). Humanitarian Assistance in 21 Century: Between Humanity and Sovereignty. Indonesia Law Reform Journal, 3(2), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v3i2.29702

Issue

Section

Articles