The Implementation Of Other Legal Measures By State Attorneys To Recover State Finances

Authors

  • Andy Sasongko Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University
  • Abdul Madjid Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University
  • Yuliati Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University
  • Fachrizal Afandi Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v5i1.38951

Keywords:

State Attorney, Recovery of State Finance

Abstract

This study examines the jurisdiction of the State Attorney in restoring state finances as part of efforts to protect state assets and enforce government authority. In practice, the State Attorney performs civil and state administrative functions with the authority to settle cases out of court and take legal actions to recover state finances. The main issue addressed in this study is the extent of the State Attorney’s authority in state financial recovery and its implementation within Indonesia’s legal system. This research employs a juridical-normative method with a legislative and conceptual approach. Data were obtained through a literature review of relevant legislation and an analysis of the practices carried out by the prosecution office in handling cases related to state financial recovery. The findings indicate that the State Attorney plays a crucial role in resolving civil and state administrative cases, including providing legal assistance to government institutions, filing civil lawsuits, and negotiating out-of-court settlements. Additionally, the State Attorney’s authority extends to providing legal opinions and taking necessary legal actions to protect state assets. The analysis of these findings suggests that despite the broad authority of the State Attorney, its effectiveness faces several challenges, such as limited resources, coordination mechanisms between institutions, and regulatory constraints that may hinder the optimization of its role in state financial recovery. Based on these findings, it is recommended to strengthen the institutional capacity of the State Attorney through regulatory improvements, enhancement of prosecutors’ competencies, and optimization of civil and state administrative case resolution mechanisms to accelerate state financial recovery more effectively and efficiently.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdulkadir, M. (2004). Hukum dan penelitian hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Abdusalimovich, M. A. (2024). The role of the prosecutor’s office in the system of state power. The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology, 6(12), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.37547/TAJPSLC/VOLUME06ISSUE12-08

Agung, K. (1985). Lima Windu Sejarah Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia/1945-1985. Jakarta: Kejaksaan Agung.

Albatul, F. (2014). Kewenangan Jaksa dalam Memulihkan Kekayaan Negara. Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Perundangan Islam, 4(01), 45–70. https://doi.org/10.15642/ad.2014.4.01.45-70

Al-Fatih, S., & Siboy, A. (2021). Menulis Artikel Karya Ilmiah Hukum di Jurnal Nasional dan Internasional Bereputasi. Inteligensia Media.

Amri, A. I., & Anggono, B. D. (2024). Implementasi Perbandingan Asas Equality Before The Law Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia Dengan Negara Lain. Al-Syakhsiyyah: Journal of Law & Family Studies, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.21154/syakhsiyyah.v6i1.8958

Arifin, R. (2018). Law Enforcement in Banking Criminal Act Involving Insiders. Jambe Law Journal, 1(1), 55–90. https://doi.org/10.22437/jlj.1.1.55-90

Asshiddiqie, J. (2020). Penegakan Hukum yang Menjamin Kepastian Hukum dan Rasa Keadilan Masyarakat, Suatu sumbangan pemikiran.

Enonchong, L. S. (2022). Public prosecutors and the right to personal liberty: An analysis of the jurisprudence of the UN Human Rights Committee and the European Court of Human Rights. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/09240519221115280, 40(3), 222–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/09240519221115280

Holahan, T. (2022). Where Has All the Justice Gone? A Review of Societal Justice Versus Individual Justice. Caring for The Ages, 23(1), 13–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CARAGE.2021.12.002

Husaini, H., & Askar, M. A. (2020). Kedudukan Kejaksaan dan Pengisian Jabatan Jaksa Agung Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Bertuah Jurnal Syariah Dan Ekonomi Islam, 1(2), 160–171. https://doi.org/10.56633/jsie.v1i2.167

Iswardhana, M. R. (2023). Meninjau Kembali Kasus Suap Jaksa Pinangki Berdasarkan Penegakan Hukum Yang Berkeadilan dan Keadilan Sosial. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 7(1), 1080–1090. https://doi.org/10.31316/jk.v7i1.5180

Januar, F. R. (2023). Konstruksi Hukum Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Oleh Jaksa Pengacara Negara Terhadap Terdakwa Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Dijatuhkan Putusan Bebas. Lex LATA, 4(3), 362–383. https://doi.org/10.28946/lexl.v4i3.2219

Kejaksaan Agung Republik Indonesia. (2011). Jaksa Agung Muda Bidang Perdata dan Tata Usaha Negara Sebagai Kantor Pengacara Negara.

Kim, B. J. (2024). A study on the determinants and differences of citizens’ perception of the police. Han-Gukgong-Anhaengjeonghakoebo, 33(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.21181/KJPC.2024.33.1.1

Lvova, O. (2024). Valuable dimension of law-making: fundamental principles. Pravova Deržava, 35, 207–216. https://doi.org/10.33663/0869-2491-2024-35-207-216

Mahmud, A. (2018). Problematika Asset Recovery Dalam Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Akibat Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Yudisial, 11(3), 347. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v11i3.262

Maringka, J. S. (2022). Reformasi kejaksaan dalam sistem hukum nasional. Sinar Grafika.

Mertokusumo, M. S., & Pitlo, A. (1993). Bab-bab tentang penemuan hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Moho, H. (2019). Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia Menurut Aspek Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan dan Kemanfaatan. Warta Dharmawangsa, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.46576/wdw.v0i59.349

Negara, T. A. S. (2023). Normative Legal Research in Indonesia: Its Originis and Approaches. Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ), 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v4i1.24855

Polontalo, R. S. D. (2018). Independensi Jaksa Sebagai Penuntut Umum dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia. Lex Crimen, 7(6).

Pradikta, H. Y., & Juliana, A. (2024). Tugas Dan Fungsi Jaksa Pengacara Negara Perspektif Fiqh Siyasah. YUSTISI, 11(2), 446–461. https://doi.org/10.32832/YUSTISI.V11I2.16991

Raharjo, S. (1986). Ilmu Hukum. Alumni, Bandung.

Sasongko, A., Abdul Madjid, Yuliati, & Fachrizal Afandi. (2025). Do Prosecutors Have The Authority To Realize The Restorative Justice? An Indonesian Case. Audito Comparative Law Journal, 6(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.22219/ACLJ.V6I1.38457

Simanjuntak, J. (2018). Kajian Yuridis Pemberian Bantuan Hukum Jaksa Pengacara Negara dalam Perkara Perdata dan Tata Usaha Negara (TUN). Lex Administratum, 6(1).

Soerjono, Soekanto, A. S. M. (2014). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-26

How to Cite

Sasongko, A., Abdul Madjid, Yuliati, & Fachrizal Afandi. (2025). The Implementation Of Other Legal Measures By State Attorneys To Recover State Finances. Indonesia Law Reform Journal, 5(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v5i1.38951

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): March, 2025

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Andy Sasongko, Abdul Madjid, Yuliati, Fachrizal Afandi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.