The The Principle Of Patent As An Intangible Asset As Collateral Objects In Indonesia

Sofyan Arief; M Fadli; Yuliati; Hanif Nur Widhiyanti; Mochd Hakimi bin Ahmad Zainudin

doi:10.22219/ilrej.v5i1.40092

Authors

Sofyan Arief Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
M Fadli Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Brawijaya
Yuliati Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Brawijaya
Hanif Nur Widhiyanti Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Brawijaya
Mochd Hakimi bin Ahmad Zainudin Tempat Pemindahan Tekhnologi dan Pengkomersialan University Pertahanan Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v5i1.40092

Keywords:

Patent, colateral, Valuation, Fiduciary, Mortgage Right

Abstract

This study examines the legal status of patents as intangible assets with economic value and their potential as collateral in financial transactions. The issue arises from the classification of patents as intangible movable property under Indonesian law, which limits their treatment as collateral to fiduciary guarantees. This classification poses legal and practical challenges, especially as patents increasingly serve as valuable assets in the industrial and technological sectors. Using doctrinal legal research methods and a combination of statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, the study analyzes how different jurisdictions treat patents in the context of property rights and secured transactions. The findings indicate that in Indonesia, patents are currently recognized as collateral through fiduciary arrangements, leveraging their status as exclusive rights granted by the state. However, the research also identifies legal discourse and international practices that support the classification of patents as immovable property, which would enable their use in mortgage-based guarantees. The analysis reveals that, while patent valuation is critical to unlocking access to credit, it must be supported by legal certainty to protect creditors in cases of debtor default. Therefore, the study recommends regulatory reform that reclassifies patents as immovable property for collateral purposes and suggests the formulation of clearer legal norms to strengthen the enforceability of patent-based securities, thereby enhancing the role of intellectual property in economic development and financial inclusion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alhidayah, M., Permata, R. R., & Muchtar, H. N. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Pelindungan Paten atas Produk Artificial Intelligence: Studi Komparatif antara Jepang dan Indonesia. COMSERVA : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, 3(5), 1474–1486. https://doi.org/10.59141/comserva.v3i5.940

Arnanda, R., Ardhan, D. T., & Khoirunnisa, R. (2023). Analisis Terhadap Risiko Hukum Pemberian Kredit Perbankan dengan Jaminan Personal Guarantee tanpa Penyertaan Agunan Fixed Asset. Account, 10(1), 1836–1845. https://doi.org/10.32722/account.v10i1.5574

Atmaja, Y. S., Santoso, B., & Irawati, I. (2021). Pelindungan Hukum Terhadap Paten Produk Farmasi Atas Pelaksanaan Paten Oleh Pemerintah (Government Use). Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 50(2), 196–208. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.50.2.2021.196-208

Beydogan, O. B. (2020). From intangible assets to intellectual property: delineating the intellectual property commercialization from the legal perspective. LESIJ-Lex ET Scientia International Journal, 27(2), 14–31.

Bracht, F., & Czarnitzki, D. (2022). Patent Collateral and Access to Debt. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4217986

Darusman, Y. M. (2016). Kedudukan Serta Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Hak Paten Dalam Kerangka Hukum Nasional Indonesia Dan Hukum Internasional. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v5i1.8732

Diptarina, D. (2013). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemberian Hak Paten Atas Mesin Pemanen Padi Merek Chandue. Universitas Hasanuddin.

Dwi Ardiada, I. M., Wida Gunawan, P., & Feoh, G. (2022). Pengembangan Skema Paten Pada Sistem Informasi Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Lppm Universitas Dhyana Pura. Jurnal Informasi Dan Komputer, 10(2), 236–245. https://doi.org/10.35959/jik.v10i2.282

Fadli, M. (2001). Peraturan Delegasi di Indonesia. Universitas Brawijaya Press.

Febriani, K. A., & Sarjana, I. M. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Kekayaan Intelektual yang Dibebankan Sebagai Jaminan Fidusia Dari Perspektif Ekonomi Kreatif. Ethics and Law Journal: Business and Notary, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.61292/eljbn.234

Hapsari, D. R. I., Hidayah, N. P., Fajrin, Y. A., & Anggraeny, I. (2021). Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions as Intellectual Property in Indonesia: A Juridical-Sociological Review BT - Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law Reform (INCLAR 2021). 84–88. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211102.172

Hasbullah, F. H. (2002). Hukum kebendaan perdata: Hak-hak yang memberi kenikmatan. Ind Hill-Company.

Hidayah, N. P., Anggraeny, I., & Hapsari, D. R. I. (2020). Credit Dispute Resolution with Mortgage Right Warranties on Conventional Banking. Proceedings of the International Conference on Law Reform (INCLAR 2019). https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200226.005

Kaufer, E. (2012). The economics of the patent system. Routledge.

Kawato, U. (2009). Patent mortage. PLC Cross-border Finance Handbook 2009/10.

Khuchua, T. (2024). The future perspectives of the European Unified Patent Court in the light of the existing intellectual property courts in the United States and Japan. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 27(3), 488–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12314

Lestari, K. C. D., Budiartha, I. N. P., & Ujianti, N. M. P. (2020). Hilangnya Objek Jaminan Fidusia yang Tidak Didaftarkan. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 2(3), 383–387. https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.2.3.2502.383-387

Lindsey, T., Damian, E., Butt, S., & Utomo, T. S. (2006). Hak kekayaan intelektual suatu pengantar. Bandung: Alumni, 252.

Marzuki, P. M. (2007). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.

Masjchoen, S. S. (1981). Hukum Perdata: Hukum Benda. Liberty, Yogyakarta.

Mitchell, C. (1998). Peter Drahos, a Philosophy of Intellectual Property. HeinOnline.

Muchtar, H. N., Chandrawulan, A. A., Risang Ayu, M., & Amirullloh, M. (2021). Urgensi Pengaturan Valuasi Paten Untuk Start Up Dalam Rangka Meningkatkan Perekonomian Di Era Industri 4.0. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 6(1), 84–102. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v6i1.170

Plomer, A. (2019). The EPO as patent law‐maker in Europe. European Law Journal, 25(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12304

Poticha, D., & Duncan, M. W. (2019). Intellectual property—The Foundation of Innovation: A scientist’s guide to intellectual property. Journal of Mass Spectrometry, 54(3), 288–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/jms.4331

R Subekti, S. H. (2021). Pokok-pokok hukum perdata. PT. Intermasa.

Raz, J. (1988). The Morality of Freedom. Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198248075.001.0001

Saly, J. N., Lie, G., Tampi, M. M., Rahmatiar, Y., Sanjaya, S., & Tirayo, A. M. (2019). Juridical Study of the Execution of Patent Objects as Fiduciary Guarantee. Saudi Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 04(09), 601–606. https://doi.org/10.36348/SJHSS.2019.v04i09.005

Sari, D. L. (2022). Global Governance dan Bioteknologi: Monopoli Benih Transgenik oleh Monsanto dan Posisi World Trade Organization. Paradigma: Jurnal Masalah Sosial, Politik, Dan Kebijakan, 26(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.31315/paradigma.v26i2.7331

Setiyo, M., Aman, M., & Hakim, H. A. (2023). Technical note: Tips for drafting a mechanical patent. Community Empowerment, 8(5), 756–764. https://doi.org/10.31603/ce.9270

Tjoanda, M. (2020). Karakteristik Hak Cipta Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia. Batulis Civil Law Review, 1(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.424

Tutik, T. T. (2008). Hukum perdata dalam sistem hukum nasional/Titik Triwulan Titik.

Węgrzak, M. (2022). Intellectual Property Law in Japan. Contemporary trends and challenges. Gdańskie Studia Azji Wschodniej, 21, 27–40. https://doi.org/10.4467/23538724GS.22.020.16136

Widhiyanti, H. N., & Hussien, S. M. (2014). Gambaran keseluruhan undang-undang nomor 5 tahun 1999 tentang larangan praktek monopoli dan persaingan usaha tidak sehat di Indonesia. Jurnal Undang-Undang Dan Masyarakat, 18, 45–58.

Yuliandari, S. (2022). Jaminan Pembiayaan Berbasis Kekayaan Intelektual: Analisis Peraturan Pemerintah Tentang Ekonomi Kreatif. Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum, 11(2), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.14421/sh.v11i2.2800

Zhang, Y. A., Chen, Z. E., & Wang, Y. (2021). Which patents to use as loan collaterals? The role of newness of patents’ external technology linkage. Strategic Management Journal, 42(10), 1822–1849. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3316