Financial Risk Determinants in Islamic Rural Banks: Static and Dynamic Models
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jep.v22i01.33404Keywords:
Islamic Rural Bank, Financial Risk, Funding Liquidity, Capital Structure, ProfitabilityAbstract
This study aims to determine the effect of financial performance on the financial risk of the Islamic Rural Bank (IRB) in Indonesia. The data period used from 2012 to 2019 on 65 IRBs using static and dynamic panels. The static panel test uses the common, fixed, and random effects, while the static panel uses the SYS-GMM test. The test results of 8 models on the static panel show that the best model is to use the random effect. The dynamic panel test shows the results of the AB test, Sargan test, PLS test, and FE test; it can be seen that the equation model has a consistent estimator. The data processing results show that the activities of the IRB, profitability, and economic growth have a negative relationship to the financial risk of the IRB. Then, the efficiency level of the IRB and inflation did not affect its financial risk. Finally, the policy implications of IRB management should adopt a cautious approach to financial risk management by recognising the inherent dangers in funding and financing policies.
Downloads
References
Abdul-Rahman, A., Sulaiman, A. A., & Mohd Said, N. L. H. (2018). Does financing structure affect bank liquidity risk? Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 52, 26-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2017.04.004
Acharya, V., & Naqvi. H. (2012). The seeds of a crisis: A theory of bank liquidity and risk over the business cycle. Journal of Financial Economics 106(2), 349-366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.05.014
Agarwal, S., Chang, Y., & Yavas, A. (2012). Adverse selection in mortgage securitisation. Journal of Financial Economics 10(5), 640-660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.05.004
Akins, B., Li, L., Ng, J., & Rusticus, T.O. (2016). Bank competition and financial stability: Evidence from the financial crisis. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 51(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109016000090.
Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics 68(1), 29-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D
Ashraf, D., Rizwan, M.S., & L’Huillier, B. (2016). A net stable funding ratio for Islamic banks and its impact on financial stability: An international investigation. Journal of Financial Stability 25(3): 47-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2016.06.010
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2010). Basel III: A global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking system. Bank for International Settlements. Retrieved from https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs189.pdf
Bouslama, G., & Lahrichi. Y (2017). Uncertainty and risk management from an Islamic perspective. Research in International Business and Finance, 39, 718-726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2015.11.018
Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A. & Merrouche, O. (2013). Islamic vs conventional banking: business model, efficiency and stability. Journal of Banking and Finance 37(2) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.09.016
Berger, A. N., & Bouwman, C.H. (2009). Bank liquidity creation. Review of Financial Studies 22(9), 3779-3837. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn104
Berger, A. N., Klapper, L.F., & R. Turk-Ariss, R. (2009). Bank competition and financial stability. Journal of Financial Services Research. 35(2): 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10693-008-0050-7.
Bhagat, S., Bolton, B.J., & Lu, J. (2012). Size, leverage, and risk-taking of financial institutions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 59. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2122727
Black, L.K., & Hazelwood, L.N. (2012). The effect of TARP on bank risk-taking. Journal of Financial Stability (29), 1153-1184. https://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/ifdp/2012/1043/ifdp1043.pdf
Bougatef, K., & Mgadmi, N. (2016). The impact of prudential regulation on bank capital and risk-taking: The case of MENA countries. The Spanish Review of Financial Economics 14(2), 51-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srfe.2015.11.001
Chiaramonte, L., Dreassi, A., Goodell, J. W., Paltrinieri, A. & Piserà, S. (2024). Banks’ environmental policies and financial stability, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 91(C). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2023.101927
Daher, H., Masih, M., & M. Ibrahim. 2015. The unique risk exposures of Islamic banks’ capital buffers: A dynamic panel data analysis. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money 36(2), 36-52. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2015.02.012
Dahir, A.M., Mahat, F.B., & Ali. N.A.B. (2018). Funding liquidity risk and bank risk-taking in BRICS countries. International Journal of Emerging Market 13(1), 231- 248. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJoEM-03-2017-0086
De Young, R. & Jang, K.Y. (2016). Do banks actively manage their liquidity? Journal of Banking & Finance 66(2), 143-161. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2581665
Hafez, H. M. & El-Ansary, O.A. (2015). Determinants of capital adequacy ratio: An empirical study on Egyptian banks. Corporate Ownership and Control. 3(1), 1166-1176. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i1c10p4
Harkati, R., Alhabshi, S.M., & Kassim. S. (2019). Influence of economics freedom and its subcomponents on risk-taking behaviour: Evidence from the dual banking system of Malaysia, Review of Behavioral Finance, https://doi.org/10.1108/RBF-09-2019-0119
Harris, M.N. & Mátyás, L. (2004). A comparative analysis of different IV and GMM estimators of dynamic panel data models. International Statistical Review 72(3), 397-408. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2004.tb00244.x
Hassan, M.K., Khan, A., & Paltrinieri, A. (2019). Liquidity risk, credit risk and stability in Islamic and conventional banks. Research in International Business and Finance, 48, 17-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2018.10.006
Hong, H., Huang, J.Z., & Wu. D. (2014). The information content of Basel III liquidity risk measures. Journal of Financial Stability 15(6), 91-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2014.09.003
Horváth, R., J. Seidler, & Weill, L. (2014). Bank capital and liquidity creation: Granger-causality evidence. Journal of Financial Services Research 45(3), 341-361. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp1497.pdf
Jokipii, T, & P. Monnin. (2013). The impact of banking sector stability on the real economy. Journal of International Money and Finance 32(2), 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2012.02.008
Kasri, R.A., Azzahra, C. (2020). Are Islamic banks more stable than conventional banks? Evidence from Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Islam 6(2), 149-164. https://doi.org/10.20885/jeki.vol6.iss2.art6
Khan, M.S., H. Scheule, & E. Wu. (2016). Funding liquidity and bank risk-taking. Journal of Banking & Finance 82(3), 203-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.09.005
King, M.R. (2013). The Basel III net stable funding ratio and bank net interest margins. Journal of Banking & Finance 37(11), 4144-4156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.07.017
Laeven, L., & Levine, R. (2009). Bank governance, regulation and risk-taking. Journal of Financial Economics 93(2), 259-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.09.003
Laeven, L., L. Ratnovski., & H. Tong. (2016). Bank size, capital, and systemic risk: some international evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance 69(1), S25-S34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.06.022
Lei, A.C., & Z. Song. (2013). Liquidity creation and bank capital structure in China. Global Finance Journal 24(3), 188-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2013.10.004
Lepetit, L., & F. Strobel. (2013). Bank insolvency risk and time-varying Z-score measures. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money 25(3),73-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2013.01.004
Mahdi, I.B.S., & Abbes. M.B. (2018). The behavioural explanation for risk Islamic and conventional banks. Research in International Business and Finance, 45, 577-587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.111
Mateev, M., Sahyouni, A., Moudud-Ul-Huq, S. & Nair, K. (2024), Bank performance and financial stability during the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons from the MENA region, EuroMed Journal of Business, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-07-2023-0182
Meutia, I., & Adam, M. (2021). A new Sharia governance framework for Islamic banks in Indonesia. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 56(2), 198-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.56.2.16
Mokni, R. B. S., & Rajhi, M.T. (2016). Bank risk-taking in the MENA region: A comparison between Islamic and conventional banks. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 43(12), 1367-1385 https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-03-2015-0050
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2020). Perbankan syariah dan kelembagaaanya. Retrieved from https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/syariah/tentang-syariah/Pages/PBS-dan-Kelembagaan.aspx
Rhanoui, S., & Belkhoutour, K. (2019). Risk faced by Islamic banks: A study on the compliance between theory and practice. International Journal of Financial Research, 10(2): 137-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v10n2p137
Saif-Alyousfi, A.Y.H. & Saha, A. (2021). Determinants of banks’ risk-taking behaviour, stability and profitability: evidence from GCC countries. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 14(5), 874-907. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-03-2019-0129
Sarkar, S., & Sensarma, R. (2015). The relationship between competition and risk-taking behaviour of Indian banks. Journal of Financial Economic Policy 8(1), 95–119. https://doi.org/10.11086/JFEP-05-2015-0030.
Srairi, S. (2013). Ownership structure and risk-taking behaviour in conventional and Islamic banks: Evidence for MENA countries. Borsa Istanbul Review, 13(4), 115-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2013.10.010
Sudarsono, H., Sholihin, M. & Susamto, A.A. (2024), Bank ownership and credit risk: An empirical study of Indonesian Islamic local banks. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-02-2023-0069
Sudarsono, H., & Ash Shidiqie, J. S. (2021). Equity financing, debt financing, and financial performance in Islamic banks. Muqtasid, 12(2), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.18326/muqtasid.v12i2.89-104
Sudarsono, H., Afriadi, F., & Suciningtias, S. A. (2021). Do stability and size affect the profitability of Islamic rural banks in Indonesia? Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Islam, 7(2), 161-174. https://doi.org/10.20885/JEKI.vol7.iss 2.art5
Vazquez, F., & Federico, P. (2015). Bank funding structures and risk: Evidence from the global financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 61(6), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.08.023
Wibowo I.G.B. E. & Wibowo, B. (2017). The effect of competition levels and banking concentration in systemic risks: Indonesia’s case. Indonesian Capital Market Review 9(2), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2849726.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Heri Sudarsono, Mohammad Hendrie Anto, Andika Perdana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan (JEP) agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan (JEP), copyright is retained by the authors. Authors permit the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to the publishing right's automatic transfer to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
