Inovasi pembelajaran berbasis digital melalui Liveworksheet untuk membudayakan keterampilan digital peserta didik

Authors

  • Trisakti Handayani Program Studi Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Jl. Raya Tlogomas, No. 246 Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
  • Fahdian Rahmandani Program Studi Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Jl. Raya Tlogomas, No. 246 Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
  • Achmad Muzzaki Sekolah Dasar 07 Rojopolo 07, Lumajang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/jinop.v9i1.26276

Keywords:

Digital Learning, LMS, Liveworksheet

Abstract

Technological transformation in education challenges teachers' pedagogical thinking. Teachers are required to be experts in learning technology in working with students. This present study aims to develop a Liveworksheet-based LMS; and investigate the functions and practicality of the LMS Liveworksheet for Science lesson in the 6th grade. The employed methodology was Research and Development (R&D) using the ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation) stage model. The data were obtained through questionnaires, observations, interviews, and documentation. The results indicate that the developed Liveworksheet LMS was validated by both material and media experts with the feasibility and practical validation tests of 90%. Meanwhile, the functional and substance validation tests were 85%, qualified as highly valid. Based on the questionnaire responses, 80% students scored valid, indicating that and the LMS was suitable for use. The post-test results were averagely 87%, showing a very good (effective) criteria. This finding reveals that the resulting LMS Liveworksheet is feasible, practical, functional, and substantial for learning, and is effective to improve student learning outcomes. It is implied that the development of the LMS Liveworksheet is important generate interactive content, such as open discussion forums where students can be more enthusiastic and active in learning through the LMS

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2020). Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: the challenges and opportunities. In Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180

Andriani, R., Andriany, D. A., & Lailia, S. K. (2021). Meningkatkan Kualitas Guru Dalam Menguasai TIK Melalui Program Microsoft Partner in Learning (PiL) dan Aplikasi Moodle. Conference Series Journal, 01(01).

Balkaya, S., & Akkucuk, U. (2021). Adoption and use of learning management systems in education: The role of playfulness and self-management. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(3), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031127

Buckingham Shum, S., & Deakin Crick, R. (2016). Learning Analytics for 21st Century Competencies. Journal of Learning Analytics. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.32.2

Burnett, C. (2014). Investigating pupils’ interactions around digital texts: A spatial perspective on the “classroom-ness” of digital literacy practices in schools. Educational Review, 66(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2013.768959

Ceylan, B. ., Türk, M. ., Yaman, F., & Kabakçı-Yurdakul, I. (2013). Determining the Changes of Information and Communication Technology Guidance Teacher Candidates’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Competency, Information and Communication Technology Usage Stages and Levels / Bilişim Teknolojileri Rehber Öğretm. Determining the Changes of Information and Communication Technology Guidance Teacher Candidates’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Competency, Information and Communication Technology Usage Stages and Levels / Bilişim Teknolojileri Rehber Öğretm, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.17244/eku.86899

Derakhshandeh, Z. & Esmaeili, B. (2020). Active-Learning in the Online Environment. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 29((4)), 299–311. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/217506/

Erol, K., & Danyal, T. (2020). Analysis of distance education activities conducted during COVID-19 pandemic. Educational Research and Reviews. https://doi.org/10.5897/err2020.4033

Ersanli, C. Y. (2016). Improving Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) of Pre-Service English Language Teachers. International Education Studies. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n5p18

Faulkner, J. (2018). THE CLASS: LIVING AND LEARNING IN THE DIGITAL AGE. TESOL in Context, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.21153/tesol2018vol27no1art773773

Gustiana, I., Wahyuni, W., & Hasti, N. (2019). Society 5.0: Optimization of Socio-Technical System in Poverty Reduction. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 662(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/662/2/022019

Hardisky, M. (2013). Tpack: Technology Integration and Teacher Perceptions. 日本畜産学会報, 84(March).

Hariyati, D. P., & Rachmadyanti, D. (2022). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berbasis Liveworksheet Untuk Siswa Sekolah Dasar Kelas V. Ejournal.Unesa.Ac.Id.

Johnston, N. (2020). The Shift towards Digital Literacy in Australian University Libraries: Developing a Digital Literacy Framework. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 69(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2020.1712638

Khan, S. H. (2014). A model for integrating ICT into teacher training programs in Bangladesh based on TPCK Shahadat Hossain Khan University of Sydney , Australia. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology.

Koh, J. H. L. (2019). TPACK design scaffolds for supporting teacher pedagogical change. Educational Technology Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9627-5

Koh, J. H. L., Woo, H. L., & Lim, W. Y. (2013). Understanding the relationship between Singapore preservice teachers’ ICT course experiences and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) through ICT course evaluation. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9165-y

Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2015). Digital Literacy and Digital Literacies: Policy, Pedagogy and Research Considerations for Education. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 2015(4). https://doi.org/10.18261/issn1891-943x-2015-jubileumsnummer-02

Lwande, C., Muchemi, L., & Oboko, R. (2021). Identifying learning styles and cognitive traits in a learning management system. Heliyon, 7(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07701

McDougall, J., Readman, M., & Wilkinson, P. (2018). The uses of (digital) literacy. Learning, Media and Technology, 43(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1462206

Potter, J. (2012). Digital Media and Learner Identity. In Digital Media and Learner Identity. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137004864

Potter, J., & McDougall, J. (2017). Digital Media, Culture and Education: Theorising Third Space Literacies. In Digital Media, Culture and Education: Theorising Third Space Literacies. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55315-7

Riel, J., & Christian, S. (2016). Charting Digital Literacy: A Framework for Information Technology and Digital Skills Education in the Community College. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2781161

Rodriguez-Hevía, L. F., Navío-Marco, J., & Ruiz-Gómez, L. M. (2020). Citizens’ involvement in e-government in the European Union: The rising importance of the digital skills. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12176807

Santos, A. I., & Serpa, S. (2020). Literacy: Promoting Sustainability in a Digital Society. Journal of Education, Teaching and Social Studies, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.22158/jetss.v2n1p1

Saraceni, G. (2020). DIGITAL DIVIDE AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS. HUMANITIES AND RIGHTS | GLOBAL NETWORK JOURNAL, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.24861/2675-1038.v2i1.27

Soukup, P., & Glader, P. (2020). A debate between Paul Soukup, SJ and Paul Glader on how digital culture is affecting media education on religion. Church, Communication and Culture, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/23753234.2020.1765698

Valtonen, T., Leppänen, U., Hyypiä, M., Sointu, E., Smits, A., & Tondeur, J. (2020). Fresh perspectives on TPACK: pre-service teachers’ own appraisal of their challenging and confident TPACK areas. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10092-4

Wen, H., & Shinas, V. H. (2020). Using a multidimensional approach to examine TPACK among teacher candidates. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2020.1804493

Widiyani, A., & Pramudiani, P. (2021). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik (LKPD) Berbasis Software Liveworksheet pada Materi PPKn. DWIJA CENDEKIA: Jurnal Riset Pedagogik, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.20961/jdc.v5i1.53176

Yamada-Rice, D. (2011). New media, evolving multimodal literacy practices and the potential impact of increased use of the visual mode in the urban environment on young children’s learning. Literacy, 45(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4369.2011.00578.x

Yazon, A. D., Ang-Manaig, K., Buama, C. A. C., & Tesoro, J. F. B. (2019). Digital literacy, digital competence and research productivity of educators. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(8). https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070812

Zahra, C. J., & Sulistyorini, S. (2021). Media Teknologi Untuk Teaching Assessment: Live Worksheet Dan Gform. Universitas Islam Indonesia. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350515591_Media_Teknologi_Untuk_Teaching_Assessment_Live_Worksheet_Dan_Gform

Downloads

Published

05/31/2023

How to Cite

Handayani, T., Rahmandani, F., & Muzzaki, A. (2023). Inovasi pembelajaran berbasis digital melalui Liveworksheet untuk membudayakan keterampilan digital peserta didik. JINoP (Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran), 9(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.22219/jinop.v9i1.26276

Issue

Section

Articles