THE EFFECT OF FINANCIAL CONSTRAINT MODERATION IN CASH FLOW SENSITIVITY TO EXTERNAL FINANCING OF MANUFACTURING COMPANIES

Authors

  • Abu Hasan Ahmad Faculty of Economics and Business Airlangga University
  • Maria Adventia Mentari Mayang Cardicna Faculty of Economics and Business Airlangga University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/jmb.v10i1.11836

Keywords:

financial constraint, cash flow, internal financing, external financing, debt, equity, manufacturing companies

Abstract

This study aims to test the pecking order theory by looking at the level of cash flow sensitivity as a source of internal financing for all types of external financing (debt and equity). This testing also considering the financial constraint variable as moderation. The data used are the financial statements of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2014 - 2018. The dependent variable is all types of external financing (debt and equity). Debt financing is divided into two forms, short-term debt financing and long-term debt financing. While the independent variable is cash flow. The results obtained is that cash flow does not substitute all types of external financing, and the highest cash flow sensitivity occurs in short-term debt financing. The next result is that financial constraint strengthen the sensitivity of cash flow to debt and equity financing

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Abu Hasan Ahmad, Faculty of Economics and Business Airlangga University

Faculty of Economics and Business
Airlangga University

Maria Adventia Mentari Mayang Cardicna, Faculty of Economics and Business Airlangga University

Faculty of Economics and Business
Airlangga University

References

Abe, D. J., Marno, V., Patrick, V., (2011). Firms’ debt–equity decisions when the static tradeoff theory and the pecking order theory disagree. Journal of Banking & Finance. 35, 1303–1314

Baker, M. and Wurgler, J. (2002) Market timing and capital structure, Journal of Finance. 55, 1–32.

Denis, D.J., McKeon, S.B., (2012). Debt financing and financial flexibility: evidence from proactive leverage increases. Rev. Financ. Stud. 25, 1897–1929.

Fama, E.F., French, K.R., (2002). Testing trade-off and pecking order predictions about dividends and debt. Rev. Financ. Stud. 15, 1–33.

Faulkender, M., Petersen, M.A., (2006). Does the source of capital affect capital structure? Rev. Financ. Stud. 19, 45–79.

Fazzari, S.M., Hubbard, R.G., Petersen, B.C., Blinder, A.S., Poterba, J.M., (1988). Financing constraints and corporate investment. Brook. Pap. Ecol Ac. 1, 141–206.

Hovakimian, A., Opler, T., Titman, S., (2001). The debt-equity choice. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 36, 1–24.

Hubbard, R.G., (1998). Capital-market imperfections and investment. J. Econ. Lit. 36, 193–225.

Jin-Park,(2019). Financial constraints and the cash flow sensitivities of external financing: Evidence from Korea. Research in International Business and Finance. 49, 241–250.

Kaplan, S.N., Zingales, L., (1997). Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints? Q. J. Econ. 112, 169–215.

Lemmon, M.L., Zender, J.F., (2010). Debt capacity and tests of capital structure theories. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 45, 1161–1187.

Markus, H., Jerome, G. K., Andreas, W. R., Stefan, S., (2018). Measurement matters, A meta-study of the determinants ofcorporate capital structure. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance. 68, 211–225.

Modigliani, F., Miller, M.H., (1958). The cost of capital, corporate finance and the theory of investment. Am. Econ. Rev. 48, 261–297.

Myers, S.C., Majluf, N.S., (1984). The cost of capital, corporate finance and the theory of investment. J. Financ. Econ. 13, 187–221.

Shyam-Sunder, L., Myers, S.C., (1999). Testing static tradeoff against pecking order models of capital structure. J. Financ. Econ. 51, 219–244.

Downloads

Published

2020-09-18

Issue

Section

Articles