Tinjauan Pustaka Sistematis: Kreativitas Pembelajaran Matematika

Authors

  • Syifa Yuliati Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
  • Dyah Worowirastri Ekowati Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
  • Delora Jantung Amelia Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
  • Puji Sumarsono Sultan Idris Education University
  • Agustinah Rahmawati Atitik Sekolah Indonesia Bangkok

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/jp2sd.v12i2.33383

Keywords:

Tinjauan Pustaka Sistematis, Kreativitas, Pembelajaran Matematika

Abstract

Creativity has a vital role in mathematics learning; this has attracted the attention of researchers, thereby increasing publications related to student creativity in mathematics learning. This research aims to describe the trends and contributions of creativity research in Scopus-indexed journals and their opportunities in the future. This research conducted a Systematic Literature Review (SLR), which summarizes research trends and participation related to mathematical creativity published in Scopus-indexed journals. A search was conducted using the keywords "creativity," "mathematics," and "learning," which resulted in 321 articles. Of these, 21 articles were eligible for analysis. The method used is the review and meta-analysis method (PRISMA). Research on creativity in mathematics learning will increase in 2020-2022, predominantly using a Mix-method approach. Practical implications include assessing student creativity based on fluency, flexibility, and novelty. The results of these findings can be used as a reference or starting point for researchers to evaluate the theme of creativity in mathematics learning according to their individual goals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguilera, D., & Ortiz-Revilla, J. (2021). Stem vs. Steam education and student creativity: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070331

Agustina, L., Zaenuri, Z., Isnarto, I., & Dwijanto, D. (2021). Tinjauan Pustaka Sistematis Proses Berpikir Kreatif Matematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana (PROSNAMPAS), 4(1), 93–98.

Alangari, T. S. (2022). Online STEM education during COVID-19 period: A systematic review of perceptions in higher education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(5). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11986

Ananda, R. (2019). Penerapan Metode Mind Mapping Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 1(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v1i1.1

Annisa, N. (2022). Kompetensi Seorang Guru Dan Tantangan Pembelajaran Abad 21.

Asrawati, N., & Sirate, S. F. S. (2022). Improvement Of Creativity In Mathematics Students Through The Auditory Intellectual Repetition (Air) Learning Model. MaPan, 10(2), 323–333. https://doi.org/10.24252/mapan.2022v10n2a5

Aziz Marzuki, A., Norliati Fitri Md Nor, N., & Masayu Rosliah Abdul Rashid, S. (2023). Systematic Literature Review (SLR) on Community Support Among the Older Adults. Ageing International, 1–13.

Bertrand, M. G., & Namukasa, I. K. (2023). A pedagogical model for STEAM education. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching and Learning, 16(2), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-12-2021-0081

Bicer, A. (2021). A systematic literature review: Discipline-specific and general instructional practices fostering the mathematical creativity of students. In International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (Vol. 9, Issue 2, pp. 252–281). Ismail Sahin. https://doi.org/10.46328/IJEMST.1254

Bicer, A., Chamberlin, S., & Perihan, C. (2021). A Meta‐Analysis of the Relationship between Mathematics Achievement and Creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(3), 569–590. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.474

Cheng, V. M. Y. (2019). Developing individual creativity for environmental sustainability: Using an everyday theme in higher education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 100567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.05.001

Chuang, H. M., & Lee, C. C. (2021). Effects of personal construal levels and team role ambiguity on the group investigation of junior high school students’ programming ability. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910977

Coleman, C., & Lind, T. (2020). Calculating for creativity: Maths joins the circus. Waikato Journal of Education, 25(1), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.15663/wje.v25i0.717

Darwanto, D. (2019). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis:(Pengertian dan Indikatornya). Eksponen, 9(2), 20–26.

Deng, Q., Zheng, B., & Chen, J. (2020). The Relationship Between Personality Traits, Resilience, School Support, and Creative Teaching in Higher School Physical Education Teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568906

Ekowati, D. W., Nusantara, T., Muksar, M., Sudjimat, D. A., Yayuk, E., & Ismail, A. D. (2023). Semiotic Reasoning in Mathematics: A Systematic Literature Review of Future Trends and Opportunities. Migration Letters, 20(5), 971–991.

Fadlilah, C., & Siswono, T. Y. E. (2022). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Asimilasi (Assimilating) Dan Konvergen (Converging) Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Numerasi. MATHEdunesa, 11(2), 548–561. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v11n2.p548-561

Faiziyah, N., Sutama, Sholihah, I., Wulandari, S., & Yudha, D. A. (2020). Enhancing Creativity through Ethnomathematics. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(8), 3704–3710. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080850

Fatmala, E. A., & Kusno, K. (2023). Analisis Berpikir Kreatif pada Pembelajaran Matematika. Didactical Mathematics, 5(2), 117–126.

Fernández-Morante, C., Fernández-De-la-iglesia, J. D. C., Cebreiro, B., & Latorre-Ruiz, E. (2022). ATS-STEM: Global Teaching Methodology to Improve Competences of Secondary Education Students. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14126986

Fitra, R., & El Hakim, L. (2023). Systematic literature review: kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis. Maret 2023 Journal of Mathematics Education and Application, 3(1). https://mathjournal.unram.ac.id/index.php/Griya/indexGriya

Franzoni, P., & Quartieri, M. T. (2020). Mathematical investigation contributions for the financial education and economics teaching. Acta Scientiae, 22(6), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.5878

Haviz, M., & Maris, I. M. (2020). Measuring mathematics and science teachers’ perception on thinking and acting in 21st-century learning. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(4), 1319–1328. https://doi.org/10.17478/JEGYS.747395

Hetherington, L., Chappell, K., Ruck Keene, H., Wren, H., Cukurova, M., Hathaway, C., Sotiriou, S., & Bogner, F. (2020). International educators’ perspectives on the purpose of science education and the relationship between school science and creativity. Research in Science & Technological Education, 38(1), 19–41.

Hidajat, F. A. (2023). Augmented reality applications for mathematical creativity: a systematic review. Journal of Computers in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00287-7

Hidayah, L., Sudarman, S. W., & Vahlia, I. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Ditinjau dari Kemandirian Belajar. AKSIOMA Journal of Mathematics Education, 8(1), 237–247.

Huang, X., Lee, J. C.-K., & Dong, X. (2019). Mapping the factors influencing creative teaching in mainland China: An exploratory study. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 79–90.

Husamah, H., Suwono, H., Nur, H., Dharmawan, A., & Chang, C.-Y. (2023). The existence of environmental education in the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic literature review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(11), em2347.

Ishak, S. A., Din, R., Othman, N., Gabarre, S., & Hasran, U. A. (2022). Rethinking the Ideology of Using Digital Games to Increase Individual Interest in STEM. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084519

Jannati, R. P., Isnaini, M., & Afgani, M. W. (2017). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Siswa pada Materi Limas Menggunakan Pendekatan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia (Pmri). Metodik Didaktik: Jurnal Pendidikan Ke-SD-An, 12(2).

Kewalramani, S., Palaiologou, I., & Dardanou, M. (2020). Children’s engineering design thinking processes: The magic of the Robots and the power of Blocks (electronics). Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/113247

Khadka, J., Joshi, D. R., Adhikari, K. P., & Khanal, B. (2022). Learner-Centered Instruction: Teachers’ Practice in Online Class of Mathematics during Covid-19 Pandemic in Nepal. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 831–852. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15345a

Laksmi, N. P. R. A., Wiarta, I. W., & Putra, M. (2017). * Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Team Assisted Individualization Terhadap Kompetensi Pengetahuan Matematika Siswa Kelas Iv. Mimbar Pgsd Undiksha, 5(2).

Lawson‐Adams, J., & Dickinson, D. K. (2021). Building Lexical Representations With Nonverbal Supports. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(3), 603–622. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.326

Le, S. (2023). Team-based learning in online education: the development of students’ creative thinking skills in digital art. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11808-3

Mahlaba, S. C. (2020). The State of South African Mathematics Education: Situating the Hidden Promise of Multiple-solution Tasks. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9279

Malucelli, F., & Fantinati, M. (2022). First experiences of creativity in mathematics for a primary school in Italy. Education 3-13, 50(1), 70–77.

Manurung, A. S., Fahrurrozi, F., Utomo, E., & Gumelar, G. (2023). Implementasi Berpikir Kritis dalam Upaya Mengembangkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Mahasiswa. Jurnal Papeda: Jurnal Publikasi Pendidikan Dasar, 5(2), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.36232/jurnalpendidikandasar.v5i2.3965

Marchy, F., Murni, A., & Muhammad, I. (2022). The Effectiveness of Using Problem-Based Learning (PBL) in Mathematics Problem-Solving Ability for Junior High School Students. AlphaMath: Journal of Mathematics Education, 8(2), 185–198.

merdekawati, A. (2023). Griya Journal of Mathematics Education and Application Volume 3 Nomor 4, Desember 2023 Metode Jigsaw dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis matematika siswa pada materi persamaan kuadrat kelas XI multimedia SMK Negeri 3 Kota Bima. Journal of Mathematics Education and Application, 3(4), 561. https://mathjournal.unram.ac.id/index.php/Griya/indexGriya

Monteiro, L. C. S. (2022). Semiosis to Communicate Mathematics: Complementarity in the Circularity of Interpretations in Mathematics for the Development of Creativity. Mathematics Enthusiast, 19(2), 563–593. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1564

Mukumbang, F. C. (2023). Retroductive Theorizing: A Contribution of Critical Realism to Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(1), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898211049847

Mulyati, S., & Evendi, H. (2020). Pembelajaran matematika melalui media game quizizz untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar matematika SMP. GAUSS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 64–73.

Nasrulloh, M. F. (2017). Keefektifan model kooperatif tipe tps dan nht ditinjau dari prestasi belajar matematika siswa kelas xi. EDUSCOPE: Jurnal Pendidikan, Pembelajaran, Dan Teknologi, 3(1), 176–189.

Othman, O., Iksan, Z. H., & Yasin, R. M. (2022). Creative Teaching STEM Module: High School Students’ Perception. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(4), 2127–2137. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.4.2127

Rahardjanto, A., Husamah, H., Hadi, S., Lestari, N., & Fatmawati, D. (2022). The Environmental Attitude of the Prospective Biology Teachers in Indonesia. Journal of Biological Education Indonesia (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 8(3), 255–264.

Rahmazatullaili, R., Zubainur, C. M., & Munzir, S. (2017). Kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan pemecahan masalah siswa melalui penerapan model project based learning. Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 10(2), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.20414/betajtm.v10i2.104

Saidah, I., Dwijanto, D., & Iwan, J. (2020). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana (Prosnampas), 3(1), 1042–1045.

Siswono, T. Y. E., & Rosyidi, A. H. (2005). Menilai Kreativitas Siswa dalam Matematika. Proseding Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika Di Jurusan Matematika FMIPA Unesa, 28.

Sitompul, B. (2022). Kompetensi Guru Dalam Pembelajaran Di Era Digital. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 6(3), 13953–13960.

Slyamkhan, M., Ganeeva, A., & Dorel, L. (2022). Interrelation of levels of mathematical literacy in conditions of distance learning. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 14(3), 757–767. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v14i3.7212

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.

Sri Nopiani, Iin Purnamasari, Duwi Nuvitalia, & Andiani Rahmawati. (2023). Kompetensi 4c Dalam Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Di Kelas Iv Sekolah Dasar. Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 9(2), 5202–5210. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v9i2.1136

Sriraman, B. (2022). Euclidean Embodiments in the Twenty-First Century: An Allegorical Ode to Aldous Huxley (1894–1963). Interchange, 53(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-021-09443-3

Susiloningsih, W., Hanim Faizah, & Eko Sugandi. (2022). Profil Berpikir Kreatif Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika SD Kelas 4. INVENTA, 6(1), 65–69. https://doi.org/10.36456/inventa.6.1.a4955

Syafrin, Y., Kamal, M., Arifmiboy, A., & Husni, A. (2023). Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam. Educativo: Jurnal Pendidikan, 2(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.56248/educativo.v2i1.111

Taherdoost, H. (2022). What are Different Research Approaches? Comprehensive Review of Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Research, Their Applications, Types, and Limitations. Journal of Management Science & Engineering Research, 5(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.30564/jmser.v5i1.4538

Tong, D. H., Loc, N. P., Uyen, B. P., & Cuong, P. H. (2020). Applying experiential learning to teaching the equation of a circle: A case study. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.239

Ubah, I. J. A., & Ogbonnaya, U. I. (2021). Primary school pre-service teachers’ solutions to pattern problem-solving tasks based on three components of creativity. South African Journal of Education, 41(4). https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v41n4a1933

Uskoković, V. (2020). Open-Ended, Metacognitive Conception of Classes for the Advancement of Nonconformity and Creative Thought. Open Education Studies, 2(1), 82–100. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2020-0117

Uyen, B. P., Tong, D. H., & Han, N. N. (2021). Enhancing problem-solving skills of 8th-grade students in learning the first-degree equations in one unknown. International Journal of Education and Practice, 9(3), 568–587. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2021.93.568.587

Wati, S. R., & Al Hudawi, U. (2023). Profil Pelajar Pancasila dalam Pengembangan Kreativitas Pembelajaran Ppkn. Jurnal Serunai Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 12(1), 14–23.

Widayanti, E., & Siahaan, J. O. (2023). Tingkat Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Tipe Higher Order Thinking Skill Di Tingkat Sma. Prismatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Riset Matematika, 6(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.33503/prismatika.v6i1.3657

Xiong, Y., Sun, X.-Y., Liu, X.-Q., Wang, P., & Zheng, B. (2020). The Influence of Self-Efficacy and Work Input on Physical Education Teachers’ Creative Teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02856

Zubaidah, S. (2016). Keterampilan abad ke-21: Keterampilan yang diajarkan melalui pembelajaran. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan, 2(2), 1–17.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-04