Persiapan dan performa guru matematika profesional: Studi kasus penggunaan SPADA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jppg.v1i2.12512Keywords:
Guru Profesional Persiapan Performa SPADA PPGAbstract
Pendidikan Profesi Guru (PPG) menuntut guru menjadi profesional yang kreatif, logis, dan inovatif dalam mengembangkan desain pembelajaran matematika dan soal berbasis HOTS. Hal ini bertolak belakang dengan pembelajaran di sekolah dimana tidak semua guru mampu mendesain pembelajaran inovatif, soal matematika yang masih bersifat prosedural, dan pengelolaan bahan ajar matematika yang monoton. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan persiapan dan performa guru setelah mengikuti program PPG melalui penggunaan SPADA. Metode yang digunakan adalah studi kasus di Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang (UMM) Tahun 2019 dengan melibatkan 40 mahasiswa Program PPG kelas dalam jabatan dan prajabatan. Data berupa persiapan dan performa yang diperoleh dari kuisioner terbuka dianalisis secara deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan profesionalitas guru matematika yang ditinjau dari persiapan dan performa guru yaitu persiapan guru meningkat meliputi kegiatan pembuatan perangkat pembelajaran, pemanfaatan sumber belajar internet, strategi pembelajaran, dan asesmen pembelajaran matematika. Performa guru di kelas juga mengalami peningkatan efektivitasnya ditinjau dari kemampuan mengelola kelas berbasis internet, penguasaan konten matematika dan menggunakan instrumen asesmen pembelajaran.Downloads
References
Akiba, M., & Liang, G. (2016). Effects of teacher professional learning activities on student achievement growth. The Journal of Educational Research, 109(1), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.924470 Alonso, F., López, G., Manrique, D., & Viñes, J. M. (2005). An instructional model for web‐based e‐learning education with a blended learning process approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 217–235. Althauser, K. (2015). Job-embedded professional development: Its impact on teacher self-efficacy and student performance. Teacher Development, 19(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2015.1011346 Anjarwati, D., Winarno, A., & Churiyah, M. (2016). Improving Learning Outcomes by Developing Instructional Media-Based Adobe Flash Professional CS 5 . 5 on Principles of Business Subject. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 6(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0605010106 Anyichie, A. C., & Onyedike, C. C. (2012). Effects of Self-Instructional Learning Strategy on Secondary Schools Students‟ Academic Achievement in Solving Mathematical Word Problems in Nigeria. African Research Review, 6(4), 302–323. https://doi.org/10.4314/afrrev.v6i4.21 Balgalmış, E. (2013). An investigation of pre-service elementary mathematics teachers’ techno-pedagogical content knowledge within the context of their teaching practices. Basuki, W. A., & Wijaya, A. (2018). The Development of Student Worksheet Based on Realistic Mathematics Education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097, 12112. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012112 Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M., & Tsai, Y.-M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102%2F0002831209345157 Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., & Neubrand, M. (2013). Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers: Results from the COACTIV project. In Cognitive Activation in the Mathematics Classroom and Professional Competence of Teachers: Results from the COACTIV Project. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5149-5 Borba, M. C., Askar, P., Engelbrecht, J., Gadanidis, G., Llinares, S., & Aguilar, M. S. (2016). Blended learning, e-learning and mobile learning in mathematics education. ZDM - Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0798-4 Bray, A., & Tangney, B. (2016). Enhancing student engagement through the affordances of mobile technology: a 21st century learning perspective on Realistic Mathematics Education. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28(1), 173–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-015-0158-7 Carney, M. B., Brendefur, J. L., Thiede, K., Hughes, G., & Sutton, J. (2016). Statewide mathematics professional development: Teacher knowledge, self-efficacy, and beliefs. Educational Policy, 30(4), 539–572. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0895904814550075 Chang, Y.-L. (2015). Examining relationships among elementary mathematics teacher efficacy and their students’ mathematics self-efficacy and achievement. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(6), 1307–1320. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1387a Council, N. R. (2012). Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century (J. W. Pellegrino & M. L. Hilton (eds.)). The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13398 Döhrmann, M., Kaiser, G., & Blömeke, S. (2014). The conceptualisation of mathematics competencies in the international teacher education study TEDS-M. In International perspectives on teacher knowledge, beliefs and opportunities to learn (pp. 431–456). Springer. Duff, J. (2012). Cooperative learning vs. direct instruction: Using two instructional models to determine their impact on student learning in a middle school math classroom. http://scholar.valpo.edu/sarp/5?utm_source=scholar.valpo.edu%2Fsarp%2F5&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001 Firdayati, L. (2019). Penggunaan Model Elpsa Dengan Bantuan Alat Peraga Geoboard Pada Materi Bangun Datar Segi Empat. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v8i1.1767 Hadullo, K., Oboko, R., & Omwenga, E. (2017). A model for evaluating e-learning systems quality in higher education in developing countries. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 13(2), 185–204. https://doi.org/http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu/viewarticle.php?id=2311 Imms, W., & Byers, T. (2017). Impact of classroom design on teacher pedagogy and student engagement and performance in mathematics. Learning Environments Research, 20(1), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-016-9210-0 Kemristekdikti, D. B. (2018). Penyelenggaraan program pendidikan profesi guru. Kiplagat, P., Role, E., & Makewa, L. N. (2012). Teacher commitment and mathematics performance in primary schools: A meeting point! International Society for Development and Sustainability , 1(2), 286–304. http://isdsnet.com/ijds-v1n2-18.pdf Kurniasih, R., Sujadi, I., & Subanti, S. (2016). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Dengan Edmodo Untuk Meningkatkan Level Berpikir Probabilistik Siswa Kelas Viii Smp Negeri 12 Surakarta. Jurnal Elektrik Pembelajaran Matematika, 4(10), 961–972. Kusuma, M. D., Rosidin, U., Abdurrahman, A., & Suyatna, A. (2017). The Development of Higher Order Thinking Skill (Hots) Instrument Assessment In Physics Study. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSRJRME), 07(01), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0701052632 Lase, D. (2019). Education and Industrial Revolution 4.0. Handayani Journal PGSD FIP Unimed, 10(1), 48–62. https://doi.org/10.24114/jh.v10i1.14138 Lin, C. P., & Md.Yunus, M. (2012). ESL Teacher and ICT:Teachers’ Perception. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 3(1), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.3n.1p.119 Lin, Y. W., Tseng, C. L., & Chiang, P. J. (2017). The effect of blended learning in mathematics course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 741–770. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00641a Linder, R. A., Post, G., & Calabrese, K. (2012). Professional learning communities: Practices for successful implementation. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 78(3), 13. Marchis, I. (2012). Non-Routine Problems in Primary Mathematics Workbooks from Romania. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 5(3), 49–56. https://doi.org/https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1054358 Muklis, Y. M., Subanti, S., & Sujadi, I. (2018). Development of Mathematical Skill Assessment Instruments In Secondary School Based On Bloom’s Taxonomy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1028(1), 12147. Mutakin, T. Z. (2015). Pengaruh kompetensi, kompensasi, dan latar belakang terhadap kinerja guru. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 3(2). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v3i2.122 Nadelson, L. S., Callahan, J., Pyke, P., Hay, A., Dance, M., & Pfiester, J. (2013). Teacher STEM Perception and Preparation: Inquiry-Based STEM Professional Development for Elementary Teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(2), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2012.667014 Permendikbud. (2016). Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar Dan Menengah. In Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar Dan Menengah. Purwaningrum, J. P. (2016). The Efforts to Increase Mathematical Performance and Motivation of Underachiever Student through Quantum Learning. Proceeding of ICMSE, 3(1), M–127. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/icmse/article/view/13396 Richardo, R. (2016). Program Guru Pembelajar: Upaya Peningkatan Profesionalisme Guru di Abad 21. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika. Roschelle, J., Shechtman, N., Tatar, D., Hegedus, S., Hopkins, B., Empson, S., Knudsen, J., & Gallagher, L. P. (2010). Integration of Technology, Curriculum, and Professional Development for Advancing Middle School Mathematics: Three Large-Scale Studies. American Educational Research Journal, 47(4), 833–878. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210367426 Samo, D. D. (2017). PRE-SERVICE MATHEMATICS TEACHERS’CONCEPTION OF HIGHER-ORDER THINKING LEVEL IN BLOOM’S TAXONOMY. Infinity Journal, 6(2), 121–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v6i2.p121-136 Sergis, S., Sampson, D. G., & Pelliccione, L. (2018). Investigating the impact of Flipped Classroom on students’ learning experiences: A Self-Determination Theory approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.011 Swackhamer, L. E., Koellner, K., Basile, C., & Kimbrough, D. (2009). Increasing the self-efficacy of inservice teachers through content knowledge. Teacher Education Quarterly, 36(2), 63–78. Tezer, M., & Cumhur, M. (2017). Mathematics through the 5E instructional model and mathematical modelling: The geometrical objects. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 4789–4804. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00965a Wasserman, N. H., Quint, C., Norris, S. A., & Carr, T. (2017). Exploring Flipped Classroom Instruction in Calculus III. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(3), 545–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9704-8 Wutchana, U., & Emarat, N. (2017). A Worksheet to Enhance Students’ Conceptual Understanding in Vector Components. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 901, 12127. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/901/1/012127 Yaniawati, R. P. (2013). E-Learning to Improve Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) of Students. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn). https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v7i2.225 Yuliani, T., Noer, S. H., & Rosidin, U. (2018). Guided Discovery Worksheet for Increasing Mathematical Creative Thinking and Self-Efficacy. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 1(1), 30–34. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v1i1.6 Yusra, D., & Saragih, S. (2016). The Profile of Communication Mathematics and Students’ Motivation by Joyful Learning-based Learning Context Malay Culture. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 15(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJESBS/2016/25521 Zamzami Zainuddin, C. M. K. (2018). Blended Learning Method Within Indonesian Higher Education Institutions. JPH - Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 6(1), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.17977/jph.v6i1.10604
Published
Versions
- 2020-08-31 (2)
- 2020-08-14 (1)
