Developing of health literacy instrument on human kidney for senior high school student
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/raden.v4i1.32262Keywords:
health literacy, high school student, human kidney, instrumentAbstract
Health literacy plays a pivotal role in shaping an individual's adoption of a healthy lifestyle, particularly among students transitioning into adolescence and adulthood. Hence, integrating health literacy into educational curricula is imperative. For instance, the study of the human kidney excretory system, which necessitates the use of measuring instruments, can serve as a platform to enhance students' health literacy skills within the realm of biology education. This study was conducted to develop and determine the feasibility of human kidney health literacy instruments. The research method used in this study is ADDIE development research which consists of 5 stages, including (1) preliminary needs analysis (2) product design (3) Development (4) Implementation, and (5) evaluation. The trial results stated that the instrument was feasible to use with a linguist assessment of 9.8% very feasible category, and a material expert of 91% very feasible category. The empirical validity test was conducted with a limited trial to 47 students of Al-Azhar 9 Yogyakarta High School and the results showed that 92% of the items were declared valid with a high reliability value of 0.7. This study produced 16 statement items on the attitude aspect, 6 items on the knowledge aspect, and items on the skill aspect. The total question items produced in this study were 24 question items that were valid and feasible to use as a tool to improve the quality of education.
Downloads
References
Amin, K., Hadisiwi, P., & Suminar, J. R. (2022). Bagaimana terpaan media untuk informasi Covid-19 memengaruhi niat mahasiswa menerapkan perlindungan kesehatan selama pandemi. Interaksi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 11(2), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.14710/interaksi.11.2.112-125
Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=217760
Boumans, M. (2004). The reliability of an instrument. Social Epistemology, 18(2–3), 215–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/0269172042000249309
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9780387095059
Budiastuti, D., & Bandur, A. (2014). Validitas dan reliabilitas penelitian. In Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika. Mitra Wacana Media. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/187726085.pdf
Candrakusuma, G. Y., & Nurhayati, F. (2020). Survei literasi kesehatan peserta didik tingkat sekolah menengah atas dan kejuruan di Kota Surabaya. JPOK: Jurnal Pendidikan Olahraga Dan Kesehatan, 8(1), 41–45. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jurnal-pendidikan-jasmani/article/view/32445
Coughlin, S. S., Vernon, M., Hatzigeorgiou, C., & George, V. (2020). Health literacy, social determinants of health, and disease prevention and control. Journal of Environment and Health Sciences, 6(1), 2019–2022. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33604453
Damayantie, N., Rusmimpong, R., Mashudi, M., & Ditiaharman, R. (2022). Analisis faktor kualitas hidup pasien gagal ginjal kronik yang menjalani hemodialisa. Jurnal Keperawatan Silampari, 6(1), 585–592. https://doi.org/10.31539/jks.v6i1.4647
Erfan, M., Maulyda, M. A., Hidayati, V. R., Astria, F. P., & Ratu, T. (2020). Analisis kualitas soal kemampuan membedakanrangkaian seri dan paralel melalui teori tes klasik dan model Rasch. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 3(1), 11–19. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/IJERR/article/view/24080/pdf
Geldhof, G. J., Preacher, K. J., & Zyphur, M. J. (2014). Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. Psychological Methods, 19(1), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032138
Hanifah, N., Studi, P., & Konseling, B. (2014). Perbandingan tingkat kesukaran, daya pembeda butir soal dan reliabilitas tes bentuk pilihan ganda biasa dan pilihan ganda asosiasi mata pelajaran ekonomi. Perbandingan Tingkat Kesukaran, Daya Pembeda Butir Soal Dan Reliabilitas Tes Bentuk Pilihan Ganda Biasa Dan Pilihan Ganda Asosiasi Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi, 6(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.30998/sosioekons.v6i1.1715
Hidayah, M. A., Retnawati, H., & Yusron, E. (2022). Characteristics of national standardized school examination test items on biology subject in high school. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 6(3), 397–406. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v6i3.42656
Jankowski, J., Floege, J., Fliser, D., Böhm, M., & Marx, N. (2021). Cardiovascular disease in chronic kidney disease pathophysiological insights and therapeutic options. Circulation, 143(11), 1157–1172. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050686
Kasmawati, Zibar, C., Sisi, L., Juwairiyah, A., & Sasmin, S. (2023). Development and validation of digital-based preliminary reading media instruments. Kependidikan Dan Kajian Kepustakaan, 9(2), 719–728. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v9i2.7146
Kiuchi, M. G., & Mion, D. (2016). Chronic kidney disease and risk factors responsible for sudden cardiac death: A whiff of hope? Kidney Research and Clinical Practice, 35(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.krcp.2015.11.003
Kovesdy, C. P. (2022). Epidemiology of chronic kidney disease: an update 2022. Kidney International Supplements, 12(1), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kisu.2021.11.003
Kühn, L., Bachert, P., Hildebrand, C., Kunkel, J., Reitermayer, J., Wäsche, H., & Woll, A. (2022). Health literacy among university students: A systematic review of cross-sectional studies. Frontiers in Public Health, 9(January). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.680999
Liu, C., Wang, D., Liu, C., Jiang, J., Wang, X., Chen, H., Ju, X., & Zhang, X. (2020). What is the meaning of health literacy? A systematic review and qualitative synthesis. Family Medicine and Community Health, 8(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2020-000351
Manganello, J. A., Colvin, K. F., Chisolm, D. J., Arnold, C., Hancock, J., & Davis, T. (2017). Validation of the rapid estimate for adolescent literacy in medicine short form (REALM-TeenS). Pediatrics, 139(5). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-3286
Mohajan, H. K. (2017). Two criteria for good measurements in research: Validity and reliability. Annals of “Spiru Haret”. Economic Series, 17(4), 59. https://doi.org/10.26458/1746
Munirah, M., & Hardian, H. (2016). Pengaruh kemampuan kosakata dan struktur kalimat terhadap kemampuan menulis paragraf deskripsi siswa sma. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 16(1), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.17509/bs_jpbsp.v16i1.3064
OECD. (2019). Programme for international student assessment (PISA) results from PISA 2018. In Oecd. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/pisa-2018-results.htm
Pantiwati, Y., Sari, T. N. I., & Nurkanti, M. (2022). Learning assessment model in biology education during the COVID-19 pandemic. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 8(3), 265–274. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v8i3.22992
Parker, R. M., Baker, D. W., Williams, M. V., & Nurss, J. R. (1995). The test of functional health literacy in adults. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 10(10), 537–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02640361
Parker, R., & Ratzan, S. C. (2010). Health literacy: A second decade of distinction for Americans. Journal of Health Communication, 15(SUPPL. 2), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2010.501094
Pelikan, J. M., Ganahl, K., VBroucke, S. an den, & Sørensen, K. (2023). Measuring health literacy in Europe: Introducing the european health literacy survey questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q). International Handbook of Health Literacy, 2006, 115–138. https://doi.org/10.56687/9781447344520-011
Puger, I. G. N. (2017). Standar tes seleksi mahasiswa baru. Prosiding Seminar: Revitalisasi Tata Kelola Perguruan Tinggi J, 133–147. https://fkip.unipas.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/20171126045011_i-gusti-ngurah-puger-prosiding-revitalisasi-tata-kelola-perguruan-tinggi-2017_2.pdf
Restiyawati, R., Suama, I. W., & Sappaile, P. (2020). Analisis tingkat kesukaran dan daya pembeda soal ulangan biologi jurusan MIA MAN 1 Buton Selatan. AMPIBI: Jurnal Alumni Pendidikan Biologi, 5(3), 248–253. https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/ampibi/article/view/26285
Rojas, Y. E. U., Leiton-Espinoza, Z. E., López-González, A., Rabanales-Sotos, J., Silva, A. R. F., & Fhon, J. R. S. (2022). Development and semantic validation of an instrument for the assessment of knowledge and attitudes towards cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adolescents. Investigacion y Educacion En Enfermeria, 40(1). https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v40n1e15
Rönkkö, M., & Cho, E. (2022). An updated guideline for assessing discriminant validity. In Organizational Research Methods (Vol. 25, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120968614
Sand-Jecklin, K., & Coyle, S. (2014). Efficiently assessing patient health literacy: The BHLS instrument. Clinical Nursing Research, 23(6), 581–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/1054773813488417
Sayekti, A., & Nurhayati, F. (2020). Perbandingan perilaku kesehatan antara siswa jurusan IPA dan IPS SMA Negeri di Kota Surabaya. Jurnal Pendidikan Olahraga Dan Kesehatan, 8(1), 215–220. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jurnal-pendidikan-jasmani/article/download/34183/30449
Shahid, R., Shoker, M., Chu, L. M., Frehlick, R., Ward, H., & Pahwa, P. (2022). Impact of low health literacy on patients’ health outcomes: a multicenter cohort study. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08527-9
Solichin, M. (2017). Analisis daya beda soal, taraf kesukaran, validitas butir tes, interpretasi hasil tes dan validitas ramalan dalam evaluasi pendidikan. Dirasat: Jurnal Manajemen & Pendidikan Islam, 2(2), 192–213. https://doi.org/10.26594/dirasat.v2i2.879
Sugiyono, S. (2017). Metode penelitian & pengembangan. Alfabeta. https://inlislite.uin-suska.ac.id/opac/detail-opac?id=22678
Suhartini, R., Ekohariadi, E., Nurlaela, L., Wahyuningsih, U., Yulistiana, Y., & Prihatina, Y. I. (2022). Validity, Reliability, Intra-rater Instrument Parameter Teaching Factory and Learning Outcomes of Industrial Clothing. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Arts and Humanities 2021 (IJCAH 2021), 618(Ijcah), 1230–1239. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211223.214
Suwarto, S. (2016). Daya Beda , Tingkat Kesulitan , dan Tebaan Tes Biologi Kelas 8 Semester Gasal Discrimination , Difficulty , and Guessing The Biology Test 8 th Grade By The Period Of The Odd Term. Proceeding Biology Education Conference (ISSN: 2528-5742), 13(1), 151–158. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosbi/article/view/5680
Urstad, K. H., Andersen, M. H., Larsen, M. H., Borge, C. R., Helseth, S., & Wahl, A. K. (2022). Definitions and measurement of health literacy in health and medicine research: a systematic review. BMJ Open, 12(2), e056294. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056294
Velasco, V., Gragnano, A., & Vecchio, L. P. (2021). Health literacy levels among Italian students: Monitoring and promotion at school. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(19), 9943. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18199943
Weiss, B. D. (2005). Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: The newest vital sign. The Annals of Family Medicine, 3(6), 514–522. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.405
Wood, H., Brand, G., Clifford, R., Kado, S., Lee, K., & Seubert, L. (2023). Student health and social care professionals’ health literacy knowledge: An exploratory study. Pharmacy, 11(2), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy11020040
Zopcuk, E., Cavuslu, I., Erten, B., Yalcinkaya, N., & Pehlivan, E. (2022). Health literacy level and related factors of students in a health vocational high school. Medicine Science | International Medical Journal, 11(3), 1502. https://doi.org/10.5455/medscience.2022.04.100
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rindi Wahyuni, Agung Wijaya Subiantoro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Research and Development in Education agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in the Research and Development in Education, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to the automatic transfer of non-exclusive publishing rights to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
