Artificial intelligence is important! A mini systematic literature review of bioethics in science learning

Atok Miftachul Hudha; H. Husamah; Intan Kristina Permatasari; Mella Anggi Puspitasari; S. Silvia

doi:10.22219/raden.v4i1.32405

Authors

Atok Miftachul Hudha Department of Biology Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia
H. Husamah Department of Biology Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia
Intan Kristina Permatasari Department of Biology Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia
Mella Anggi Puspitasari Department of Biology Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia
S. Silvia Department of Biology Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/raden.v4i1.32405

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, bioethics, science, systematic literature review

Abstract

The focus and concern of researchers on the theme of bioethics and its relationship with science learning is highly expected, as evidenced by publications in reputable journals. The purpose of this systematic literature review (SLR) was to review and compare investigations of researches on article published by scopus indexed journals. We used the phrase "bioethics+learning+science" in the search menu of the scopus database, and found 138 articles. Furthermore, 15 articles met the criteria to be analyzed. The inclusion and exclusion model used is PRISMA. The publication of "bioethics" in the scopus database is likely to increase in 2012. Although in 2013-2022 there were fluctuations. This theme can be approached through qualitative or quantitative and even mix-method. Almost all types of populations/samples have been used as subjects, showing that this theme is broad in dimension and involves all parties. Leonora Kaldaras is the most dominant researcher in reference. Bioethics specs are related to artificial intelligence. The keyword artificial intelligence is related to student, teaching, engineering education, computer science education, education computing, and education. Interesting things on the theme of artificial intelligence related to learning systems and computer aided instruction. The theme of "bioethics" is the focus of researchers from all continents and is generally written in groups. There are four institutions in the world that fund research and publications on bioethics, while the others are not mentioned. Most publications have fulfilled one of the ethics in publication, which is to clearly mention the name of the institution / institution that funds their research and publication. We formulate and discuss all aspects of the trend. The alignment of researchers continues to increase regarding "bioethics", which can be seen based on distribution year, research types / methods, instruments, aspects of study, author, keywords, author's internationality, and collaboration. This information or findings gives us new insights to think clearly about research and the relationship between bioethics, science learning and artificial intelligence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alexander, G. C., & Wynia, M. K. (2007). Survey research in bioethics. In Empirical Methods for Bioethics: A Primer (Advances in Bioethics) (Vol. 11, pp. 139–160). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3709(07)11007-4

Allen, M., Bergmann, J., Best, D., Birks, J., Bountra, C., Buchan, A., Collins, G., Faulkner, S., Ford, G., Geddes, J., Gray, A., Locock, L., Noble, A., Pugh, C., Sheehan, M., Smith, J., Stoten, A., Vincent, C., Wells, G., … Kiparoglou, V. (2017). Maximising value from a united kingdom biomedical research centre: Study protocol. Health Research Policy and Systems, 15(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0237-1

Antara, M., & Sumarniasih, M. S. (2023). Ethics in the development of biosciences and biotechnology. Research Advances in Microbiology and Biotechnology, 6, 17–38. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/ramb/v6/19243d

Ashcroft, R. (2003). Constructing empirical bioethics: Foucauldian reflections on the empirical turn in bioethics research. Health Care Analysis, 11(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025329811812

Azariah, J. (2009). Bioethics science: Is it? Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, 2, 18. http://jmehm.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jmehm/article/download/47/32

Azizah, S. N. (2021). Pelatihan penyusunan hibah penelitian agar lolos pendanaan. JCSE: Journal of Community Service and …, 2(2), 112–115.

Baihakki, M. A., & Qutayan, S. M. S. B. (2023). Ethical issues of artificial intelligence (AI) in the healthcare. Journal of Science, Technology and Innovation Policy, 9(1), 32–37. https://doi.org/10.11113/jostip.v9n1.129

Bhardwaj, A., Kishore, S., & Pandey, D. K. (2022). Artificial intelligence in biological sciences. Life (Basel, Switzerland), 12(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/life12091430

Bhatt, P., & Muduli, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence in learning and development: a systematic literature review. European Journal of Training and Development, 47(7–8), 677–694. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-09-2021-0143

Boch, A., Ryan, S., Kriebitz, A., Amugongo, L. M., & Lütge, C. (2023). Beyond the metal flesh: understanding the intersection between bio- and ai ethics for robotics in healthcare. Robotics, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics12040110

Bylieva, D. S. (2022). Ethics of artificial intelligence through the concepts of love and freedom. Semiotic Studies, 2(4), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.18287/2782-2966-2022-2-4-8-14

Caballe, A., & Bardelli, M. (2022). Building blocks of virtuous science communication: Grant funding, policy making, and public engagement. DNA and Cell Biology, 41(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1089/dna.2021.0523

Cambra-Badii, I., Guardiola, E., & Baños, J. E. (2021). Frankenstein; or, the modern Prometheus: a classic novel to stimulate the analysis of complex contemporary issues in biomedical sciences. BMC Medical Ethics, 22(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00586-7

Chao, C.-H. (2019). Ethics issues in artificial intelligence. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAAI48200.2019.8959925

Chastonay, P., Vu, N. V., Humair, J. P., Mpinga, E. K., & Bernheim, L. (2012). Design, implementation and evaluation of a community health training program in an integrated problem-based medical curriculum: A fifteen-year experience at the University of Geneva Faculty of Medicine. Medical Education Online, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v17i0.16741

Chen, X., Xie, H., Zou, D., & Hwang, G.-J. (2020). Application and theory gaps during the rise of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100002

Chinthapalli, K. (2013). Bioethics researchers support use of cognitive enhancers. BMJ, 346. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.F1743

Chowning, J. T., Griswold, J. C., Kovarik, D. N., & Collins, L. J. (2012). Fostering critical thinking, reasoning, and argumentation skills through bioethics education. PLoS ONE, 7(5), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036791

Corrêa, N. K., Galvão, C., Santos, J. W., Del Pino, C., Pinto, E. P., Barbosa, C., Massmann, D., Mambrini, R., Galvão, L., Terem, E., & de Oliveira, N. (2023). Worldwide AI ethics: A review of 200 guidelines and recommendations for AI governance. Patterns (New York, N.Y.), 4(10), 100857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2023.100857

Cranston, I., Jamdade, V. S., Liao, B., & Newson, R. S. (2023). Clinical, economic, and patient-reported benefits of connected insulin pen systems: A Systematic literature review. Advances in Therapy, 40, 2015–2037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-023-02478-1

Dias, R., & Torkamani, A. (2019). Artificial intelligence in clinical and genomic diagnostics. Genome Medicine, 11(1), 70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-019-0689-8

Díaz, F. A. G. (2022). Bioethics in the era of artificial intelligence (AI). Revista Latinoamericana de Bioética, 22(1), 8–10. https://doi.org/10.18359/rlbi.6149

Dine, C. B. (2016). Bioethics : glory to science, dream to africans (bioethics & cultural diversity). Mémoire. Rimouski, Québec, Université du Québec à Rimouski, Département de lettres et humanités.

Dixit, S., & Sadanandam, A. (2021). The 2nd Conference and Workshop of the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) in India: Towards team science for multi-omics cancer research in south asia. Ecancermedicalscience, 15, 3–5. https://doi.org/10.3332/ECANCER.2021.ED111

Draper, H., & Ives, J. (2007). An Empirical approach to bioethics: Social science “Of”, “For” and “In” bioethics research. Cognition Brain Behavior, 11(2), 319.

Dubrovsky, D. I., Efimov, A. R., & Matveev, P. M. (2022). Can an intelligent robot be able to have ethical features? Voprosy Filosofii, 9, 193–197. https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2022-9-193-197

Duran, M., Simon, S., & Blasco, F. (2020). Science education and artificial intelligence – A chatbot on magic and quantum computing as an educational tool. European Distance and E-Learning Network (EDEN) Proceedings2020 Annual Conference, 1, 137–142. https://doi.org/10.38069/EDENCONF-2020-AC0011

Edwards, B. A., Roberts, J. A., Bowen, C., Brownell, S. E., & Barnes, M. E. (2022). An exploration of how gender, political affiliation, or religious identity is associated with comfort and perceptions of controversial topics in bioethics. Advances in Physiology Education, 46(2), 268–278. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00008.2022

Eriksen, K. K. (2015). To know or not to know? Integrating ethical aspects of genomic healthcare in the education of health professionals. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 43(2), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20859

Fangerau, H., & Badura-Lotter, G. (2019). Biomedicine and bioethics. In Handbook of Popular Culture and Biomedicine (pp. 41–55). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90677-5_4

Faustino, J. P., Adriano, D., Amaro, R., Pereira, R., & Silva, M. M. da. (2022). DevOps benefits: A systematic literature review. Software - Practice and Experience, 52(9), 1905–1926. https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.3096

Fiorentino, S. (2022). Artificial intelligence as a feminist bioethics issue. In A. Ho (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Feminist Bioethics (pp. 291–307). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003016885-25

Florea, A. M., & Radu, S. (2019). Artificial Intelligence and education. 22nd International Conference on Control Systems and Computer Science (CSCS), 381–382. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCS.2019.00069

Gengler, N., & Acevedo, M. (2023). Systematic literature review benefits the professional development of undergraduate students. NACTA Journal, 67(1), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v67i1.97

Ghosh, S., & Dasgupta, R. (2022). Ethics in machine learning and artificial intelligence. In Machine Learning in Biological Sciences (pp. 85–87). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8881-2_10

Goodman, K. W. (2020). Ethics in health informatics. Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 29(1), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1701966

Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the future of education: Exploring the potential and consequences of AI and ChatGPT in Educational Settings. In Education Sciences (Vol. 13, Issue 7). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070692

Griffiths, J. O. (2021). Bioethics, the ontology of life, and the hermeneutics of biology. In Phenomenology of Bioethics: Technoethics and Lived-Experience (pp. 1–21). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65613-3_1

Guillemin, M., Barnard, E., Allen, A., Stewart, P., Walker, H., Rosenthal, D., & Gillam, L. (2018). Do research participants trust researchers or their institution? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(3), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618763253

Halkoaho, A., Matveinen, M., Leinonen, V., Luoto, K., & Keränen, T. (2013). Education of research ethics for clinical investigators with Moodle tool. BMC Medical Ethics, 14(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-14-53

Hamal, O., Faddouli, N. El, Harouni, M. H. A., & Lu, J. (2022). Artificial intelligent in education. Sustainability, 14(5), 2862. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052862

Han, R., Yoon, H., Kim, G., Lee, H., & Lee, Y. (2023). Revolutionizing medicinal chemistry: the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in early drug discovery. In Pharmaceuticals (Vol. 16, Issue 9). https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16091259

Hanney, S. R., Gonzalez-Block, M. A., Buxton, M. J., & Kogan, M. (2003). The utilisation of health research in policy-making: concepts, examples and methods of assessment. Health Research Policy and Systems, 1(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-1-2

Hernando, A., Diez-Vega, I., Lopez Del Hierro, M., Martínez-Alsina, N., Diaz-Meco, R., Busto, M. J., Martiañez, N. L., & González-Cuevas, G. (2018). Ethical values in college education: A mixed-methods pilot study to assess health sciences students’ perceptions. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1396-7

Hillner, J. (2023). Ethics of artificial intelligence, higher education, and scientific research. In Bridging human and machine: Future education with intelligence (pp. 129–144). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8641-3_10

Hołub, G. (2020). The Debate on the Concept of the Person in Bioethics. Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae, 18(5), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.21697/SEB.2020.18.5.11

Hosseini, M., Resnik, D. B., & Holmes, K. (2023). The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts. Research Ethics, 19(4), 449–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161231180449

Huang, C., Zhang, Z., Mao, B., & Yao, X. (2022). An Overview of artificial intelligence ethics. IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, 4(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1109/tai.2022.3194503

Human, S., & Watkins, R. (2023). Needs and artificial intelligence. AI and Ethics, 3(3), 811–826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00206-z

Husamah, H., Suwono, H., Nur, H., & Dharmawan, A. (2022a). Action competencies for sustainability and its implications to environmental education for prospective science teachers: A systematic literature review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(8). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12235

Husamah, H., Suwono, H., Nur, H., & Dharmawan, A. (2022b). Environmental education research in Indonesian Scopus indexed journal: A systematic literature review. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 8(2), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v8i2.21041

Husamah, H., Suwono, H., Nur, H., & Dharmawan, A. (2022c). Global trend of research and development in education in the pandemic era: A systematic literature review. Research and Development in Education (RaDEn), 2(2), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.22219/raden.v2i2.23224

Husamah, H., Suwono, H., Nur, H., Dharmawan, A., & Chang, C.-Y. (2023). The existence of environmental education in the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic literature review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(11), em2347. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13668

Ivanov, K. V. (2022). Bioethics today. Bioethics, 15(2), 66–67. https://doi.org/10.19163/2070-1586-2022-15-2-66-67

Iwazaki, A. Y., Santos, V. V. V. dos, Felizardo, K. R., Souza, É. F. de, Valentim, N. M. C., & Nakagawa, E. Y. (2022). Benefits and Challenges of a Graduate Course: An Experience Teaching Systematic Literature Review. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE56618.2022.9962446

Jones, N. L., Peiffer, A. M., Lambros, A., Guthold, M., Johnson, A. D., Tytell, M., Ronca, A. E., & Eldridge, J. C. (2010). Developing a problem-based learning (PBL) curriculum for professionalism and scientific integrity training for biomedical graduate students. Journal of Medical Ethics, 36(10), 614–619. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2009.035220

Kaldaras, L., Akaeze, H., & Krajcik, J. (2021). Developing and validating Next Generation Science Standards-aligned learning progression to track three-dimensional learning of electrical interactions in high school physical science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(4), 589–618. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21672

Kaldaras, L., & Haudek, K. C. (2022). Validation of automated scoring for learning progression-aligned Next Generation Science Standards performance assessments. Frontiers in Education, 7(December), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.968289

Kaldaras, L., & Wieman, C. (2017). Investigating blended math-science sensemaking with a diverse undergraduate population Leonora Kaldaras, Carl Wieman Stanford Graduate School of Education. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(6), 153–167.

Kaldaras, L., & Wieman, C. (2023a). Instructional model for teaching blended math-science sensemaking in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math courses using computer simulations. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(2), 20136. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020136

Kaldaras, L., & Wieman, C. (2023b). Introducing an instructional model for teaching blended math-science sensemaking in undergraduate STEM courses using computer simulations. Journal Science, 24(2), 1–31.

Kaldaras, L., Yoshida, N. R., & Haudek, K. C. (2022). Rubric development for AI-enabled scoring of three-dimensional constructed-response assessment aligned to NGSS learning progression. Frontiers in Education, 7(November), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.983055

Kamalov, F., Santandreu Calonge, D., & Gurrib, I. (2023). New era of artificial intelligence in education: Towards a sustainable multifaceted revolution. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(16), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612451

Kennedy, M.-R., Deans, Z., Ampollini, I., Breit, E., Bucchi, M., Seppel, K., Vie, K. J., & Meulen, R. ter. (2023). “It is Very Difficult for us to Separate Ourselves from this System”: Views of European researchers, research managers, administrators and governance advisors on structural and institutional influences on research integrity. Journal of Academic Ethics, 21(3), 471–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-022-09469-x

Khan, A. A., Badshah, S., Liang, P., Waseem, M., Khan, B., Ahmad, A., Fahmideh, M., Niazi, M., & Akbar, M. A. (2022). Ethics of AI: A systematic literature review of principles and challenges. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 383–392. https://doi.org/10.1145/3530019.3531329

Klugman, C. M., & Gerke, S. (2022). Rise of the bioethics AI: Curse or blessing? American Journal of Bioethics, 22(7), 35–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2022.2075056

Kraus, S., Jones, P., Kailer, N., Weinmann, A., Chaparro-Banegas, N., & Roig-Tierno, N. (2021). Digital transformation: An overview of the current state of the art of research. SAGE Open, 11(3), 21582440211047576. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211047576

Kurunayakage, A., Lakshan, D., & Kathriarachchi, R. (2022). Ruminations and bioethics on AI for humanity – A review. 6th SLAAI International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (SLAAI-ICAI). https://doi.org/10.1109/slaai-icai56923.2022.10002590

Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016). Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 69–96. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0420

Levinson, R. (2004). Teaching bioethics in science: crossing a bridge too far? Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 4(3), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150409556619

Lim, J. H., Seo, J. E., & Kwon, H. Y. (2022). The role of higher education for the ethical ai society. Proceedings of the International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, FLAIRS, 35, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.32473/flairs.v35i.130609

Long, E., Wan, P., Chen, Q., Lu, Z., & Choi, J. (2023). From function to translation: Decoding genetic susceptibility to human diseases via artificial intelligence. Cell Genomics, 3(6), 100320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xgen.2023.100320

Maldonado, L. K., Dzul, M. L., & Dzul, V. L. (2023). Learning strategies developed in the students that have an impact on the knowledge of bioethics. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 11(6), 156–162. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v11.i6.2023.5233

Manhiça, R., Santos, A., & Cravino, J. (2022). The use of artificial intelligence in learning management systems in the context of higher education Systematic literature review. In R. A., B. B., P. F.G., & G. R. (Eds.), Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, CISTI (Vols. 2022-June). IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.23919/CISTI54924.2022.9820205

Marin, F., Rebello, M. M., Mello, A. L. S. F. de, & Finkler, M. (2016). Ética e Bioética como temas de pesquisa em Odontologia: uma análise bibliométrica dos trabalhos apresentados nas reuniões da SBPqO. Revista Da ABENO, 16(4), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.30979/REV.ABENO.V16I4.339

Mertz, M., Fischer, T., Fischer, T., & Salloch, S. (2019). The value of bioethical research: A qualitative literature analysis of researchers’ statements. PLOS ONE, 14(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0220438

Meshcheryakova, T. V. (2018). Bioethics: Border Area in foundations of modern biomedical technology. Research Paradigms Transformation in Social Sciences, 1–1452. https://doi.org/10.15405/EPSBS.2018.02.104

Moorthy, R., Choy, E. A., Selvadurai, S., & Lyndon, N. (2011). Bioethics principles in the teaching of climate change ravichandran moorthy , 2 Er Ah Choy , Sivapalan Selvadurai and 2 Novel Lyndon School of History , Politics and Strategy , School of Social , Development and Environmental Studies , Faculty of Social S. 8(10), 962–966.

Moorthy, R., Lyndon, N., & Selvadurai, S. (2012). Web-facilitated learning for bioethics principles on human dignity and human rights. Journal of Computer Science, 8(2), 222–226. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2012.222.226

Mouta, A., Pinto-Llorente, A. M., & Torrecilla-Sánchez, E. M. (2023). Uncovering blind spots in education ethics: Insights from a systematic literature review on artificial intelligence in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00384-9

Murphy, K., Di Ruggiero, E., Upshur, R., Willison, D. J., Malhotra, N., Cai, J. C., Malhotra, N., Lui, V., & Gibson, J. (2021). Artificial intelligence for good health: a scoping review of the ethics literature. BMC Medical Ethics, 22(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00577-8

Nagornykh, O. S. (2022). The Evolution of the Concept “bioethics” in the Dynamics of the Soviet and Chinese History of Medicine. ISTORIYA, 13(6), 0. https://doi.org/10.18254/s207987840021761-6

Naik, N., Hameed, B. M. Z., Shetty, D. K., Swain, D., Shah, M., Paul, R., Aggarwal, K., Ibrahim, S., Patil, V., Smriti, K., Shetty, S., Rai, B. P., Chlosta, P., & Somani, B. K. (2022). Legal and ethical consideration in artificial intelligence in healthcare: Who takes responsibility? Frontiers in Surgery, 9, 862322. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.862322

Neema, S., & Chandrashekar, L. (2021). Research funding-why, when, and how? Indian Dermatology Online Journal, 12(1), 134–138. https://doi.org/10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_684_20

Nurwidodo, N., Ibrohim, I., Sueb, S., & Husamah, H. (2023). “Let’s transform!”: A systematic literature review of science learning in COVID-19 pandemic era. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(2), em224. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12875

O’Kane, C., Zhang, J. A., Haar, J., & Cunningham, J. A. (2023). How scientists interpret and address funding criteria: value creation and undesirable side effects. Small Business Economics, 61(2), 799–826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-022-00697-4

Okoye, O., Nwachukwu, D., & Maduka-Okafor, F. C. (2017). Must we remain blind to undergraduate medical ethics education in Africa? A cross-sectional study of Nigerian medical students. BMC Medical Ethics, 18(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0229-2

Pei, W., & Shah, A. (2022). A review on artificially intelligent agents for research and ethics. AUTHOREA, 517456, 613866. https://doi.org/10.22541/au.167146518.83013357/v1

Rahardjanto, A., & Husamah, H. (2022). Publication Trend of R & D in the Journal of Biological Education in Indonesia ( Sinta 2 : 2017-2021 ): A Systematic Literature Review. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 10(1), 21–35.

Rebello, M. M., Gomes, D., & Finkler, M. (2018). Ethics and Bioethics as a research topic in Dentistry: a gap in the scientific knowledge. Revista Espacios, 39(41), 1–11.

Reiter-Theil, S. (2004). Does empirical research make bioethics more relevant? “The embedded researcher” as a methodological approach. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy, 7(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MHEP.0000021846.20508.C8

Resnik, D. B. (2006). Openness versus Secrecy in Scientific Research Abstract. Episteme (Edinburgh), 2(3), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2005.2.3.135

Riaño-Moreno, J., & Clavijo-Montoya, H. A. (2023). Bioethics and artificial intelligence: between deliberation on values and rational choice theory. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 10(1140901), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2023.1140901

Ribeiro, C. D. M. (2017). Bioethics, qualitative research and reflective equilibrium. Revista Bioética, 25(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-80422017251165

Rizvi, S., Waite, J., & Sentance, S. (2023). Artificial Intelligence teaching and learning in K-12 from 2019 to 2022: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100145

Rodríguez, E. (2012). Learning qualitative aspects of the ethics of biomedical and psychosocial research program of the Interdisciplinary Center for Studies on Bioethics, University of Chile(). Acta Bioethica, 18(1), 57–62. https://doi.org/10.4067/S1726-569X2012000100003

Romanov, D. V. (2022). Specificity of using artificial intelligence in science and education. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2022.03.28

Rowland, J., Estevens, J., Krzewińska, A., Warwas, I., & Delicado, A. (2022). Trust and mistrust in sources of scientific information on climate change and vaccines: insights from Portugal and Poland. Science & Education, 31(5), 1399–1424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00304-0

Sadykova, A. R., & Levchenko, I. V. (2020). Artificial intelligence as a component of innovative content of general education: analysis of world experience and domestic prospects. Rudn Journal of Informatization in Education, 17(3), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8631-2020-17-3-201-209

Sahu, M., Gupta, R., Ambasta, R. K., & Kumar, P. (2022). Chapter three - Artificial intelligence and machine learning in precision medicine: A paradigm shift in big data analysis. In D. B. B. T.-P. in M. B. and T. S. Teplow (Ed.), Precision Medicine (Vol. 190, Issue 1, pp. 57–100). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pmbts.2022.03.002

Smit, R., & Smuts, H. (2023). Game-based learning - Teaching artificial intelligence to play minecraft: A systematic literature review. In G. A. & H. K. (Eds.), EPiC Series in Computing (Vol. 93, pp. 188–202). EasyChair. https://doi.org/10.29007/bjvn

Sousa, C. (2017). Integrating bioethics in sciences’ curricula using values in science and socio-scientific issues. Multidisciplinary Journal for Education, Social and Technological Sciences, 4(1), 122–134. https://doi.org/10.4995/MUSE.2017.6481

Stahl, B. C., & Leach, T. (2022). Assessing the ethical and social concerns of artificial intelligence in neuroinformatics research: an empirical test of the European Union Assessment List for Trustworthy AI (ALTAI). AI and Ethics, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00201-4

Steger, F. (2015). Fritz Jahr’s (1895-1953) European concept of bioethics and its application potential. Jahr - European Journal of Bioethics, 6(12), 215–222. https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/226471

Stoff, B. K. (2021). Foundations of clinical ethics. In L. Bercovitch, C. S. Perlis, B. K. Stoff, & J. M. Grant-Kels (Eds.), Dermatoethics (pp. 3–10). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56861-0_1

Subbiah, V. (2023). The next generation of evidence-based medicine. Nature Medicine, 29(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-02160-z

Thant, T., & Nussbaum, A. (2020). What you need to know about cannabis: An evidence-based crash course for mental health trainees. MedEdPORTAL : The Journal of Teaching and Learning Resources, 16, 10923. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10923

Tuomi, I. (2018). The Impact of artificial intelligence on learning, teaching, and education policies. In Science for Policy. https://doi.org/10.2760/12297

Vargas-Murillo, A. R., Pari-Bedoya, I. N. M. D. L. A., & Guevara-Soto, F. D. J. (2023). The ethics of AI assisted learning: A systematic literature review on the impacts of ChatGPT usage in education. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3606094.3606101

Vora, L. K., Gholap, A. D., Jetha, K., Thakur, R. R. S., Solanki, H. K., & Chavda, V. P. (2023). Artificial intelligence in pharmaceutical technology and drug delivery design. Pharmaceutics, 15(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15071916

Xu, A., Baysari, M. T., Stocker, S. L., Leow, L. J., Day, R. O., & Carland, J. E. (2020). Researchers’ views on, and experiences with, the requirement to obtain informed consent in research involving human participants: a qualitative study. BMC Medical Ethics, 21(1), 93. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00538-7

Xu, W., & Ouyang, F. (2022). The application of AI technologies in STEM education: a systematic review from 2011 to 2021. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00377-5

Xu, Y., Liu, X., Cao, X., Huang, C., Liu, E., Qian, S., Liu, X., Wu, Y., Dong, F., Qiu, C.-W., Qiu, J., Hua, K., Su, W., Wu, J., Xu, H., Han, Y., Fu, C., Yin, Z., Liu, M., … Zhang, J. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A powerful paradigm for scientific research. Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)), 2(4), 100179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100179

Zhan, Z., Tong, Y., Lan, X., & Zhong, B. (2022). A systematic literature review of game-based learning in Artificial Intelligence education. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2115077