Students' clarification stages in analyzing mathematical problems in the implementation of the OBE curriculum

Authors

  • Moh. Mahfud Effendi Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher and Training Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia
  • Alfiani Athma Putri Rosyadi Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher and Training Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/raden.v4i1.32519

Keywords:

analyzing mathematics problems, clarification stage, OBE curriculum

Abstract

Solving mathematical problems is an important aspect of the learning process, but in reality, many students experience difficulty in solving them. The aim of this research is to explain the stages of student qualifications in analyzing mathematical problems, especially in implementing the OBE curriculum. This qualitative descriptive research uses an interactive model, with a sample size of 40 students taking the Euclidean Geometry course. Data collection uses questionnaires, tests and interviews which have been declared valid with a score of 90% and reliable with a score of 87%. Data collection stages include; (1) differentiating, (2) organizing, and (3) connecting aspects. Students' clarification stages in the analytical process of solving mathematical problems consist of differentiating, organizing and connecting. Analysis of research data uses descriptive, namely percentages. Based on the results of the analysis, it is known that the level of clarity of students in analyzing mathematical problems is 66.67%, and only 20% of students have a level of conformity of 100%. The organizing stage had the lowest score (60%) compared to the differentiating (66.67%) and connecting (73.33%) stages. The advice that can be given is that at the deconstruction stage, it can be studied if there are differences of opinion, while in the exploration process, it can be explained using HOTS.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Altun, S. D. G., & Konyalioglu, A. C. (2019). The influence of mistake-handling activities on mathematics education: An example of definitions. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(2), 467–476. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.2.467

Arana, A., & Stafford, W. (2023). On the difficulty of discovering mathematical proofs. Synthese, 202(2), 38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04184-5

Arisoy, B., & Aybek, B. (2021). The effects of subject-based critical thinking education in mathematics on students’ critical thinking skills and virtues. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 21(92), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2021.92.6

Arwanto, M., Budayasa, I. K., & Budiarto, M. T. (2019). Students’ intuition in mathematical problem solving at the stage of understanding the polya problem. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Advanced Multidisciplinary Research (ICAMR 2018), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.2991/icamr-18.2019.13

Bregant, J. (2014). Critical thinking in education : why to avoid logical fallacies? Philosophy of Mind and Cognitive Modelling in Education, 61, 18–27. https://www.proquest.com/openview/1e5381904536009da81e855658bdef10/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=4477239

Drastiawati, N. S., Adiwibowo, P. H., Siregar, I. H., & Iskandar. (2022). Developing module handbook in outcome based education (OBE) curriculum for undergraduate mechanical engineering. Proceeding Series of International Conference on Arts and Humanities, 1(2), 72–77. https://proceeding.unesa.ac.id/index.php/picah/article/view/21

Effendi, K. N. S., & Sitompul, M. T. (2023). Students’ difficulties in solving mathematical problems. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2706, 020099. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0120257

Effendi, M., M., & Sutomo, E. (2020). Development of mathematics curriculum of Madrasah Aliyah Negeri 2 Malang for special intelligent students. Multidisciplinary Peer Reviewed Journal ISSN, 6(6), 634–639. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/336802-development-of-mathematics-curriculum-of-bb8c5167.pdf

EL-Shaer, A., & Gaber, H. (2014). Impact of problem-based learning on student critical thinking dispositions, knowledge acquisition and retention. Journal of Education and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1021/ol1022257

Gerring, J. (2017). Case study research: Principles and practices, strategies for social inquiry. In Cambridge University Press (p. 362).

Hidayah, I. N., Sa’dijah, C., Subanji, S., & Sudirman, S. (2020). Characteristics of students’ abductive reasoning in solving algebra problems. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(3), 347–362. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.3.11869.347-362

Isyam, Y. A. N., & Hidayati, K. (2022). Students’ mathematical representation in solving mathematical problems. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2575, 080026. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0108386

Junaidi, A. (2020). Panduan penyusunan kurikulum pendidikan tinggi di era industri 4.0 untuk mendukung merdeka belajar - kampus merdeka. https://dikti.kemdikbud.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/BUKU-PANDUAN-PENYUSUNAN-KURIKULUM-PENDIDIKAN-TINGGI-MBKM.pdf

Permadi, A. E., Cholily, Y. M., & Putri, A. A. (2018). Cooperative models practice type teams games tournaments (TGT) with a saintific approach on material opportunity. Mathematics Education Journal, 2(2), 127. https://doi.org/10.22219/mej.v2i2.6498

Rahayuningsih, S., Nurhusain, M., & Sirajuddin, S. (2023). Exploring students’ imaginative process: Analysis, evaluation, and creation in mathematical problem-solving. Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 16(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.20414/betajtm.v16i1.537

Relaford-Doyle, J., & Núñez, R. (2021). Characterizing students’ conceptual difficulties with mathematical induction using visual proofs. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 7(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-020-00119-4

Rosyadi, A. A. P., Sa’dijah, C., Susiswo, & Rahardjo, S. (2022). High order thinking skills: Can it arise when a prospective teacher solves a controversial mathematics problem? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2157(1), 012038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2157/1/012038

Rosyadi, A. A. P., Sadijah, C., Susiswo, S., & Rahardjo, S. (2021). Berpikir kritis calon guru dalam menyelesaikan masalah kontroversial matematika dengan menggunakan high order thinking skills. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(4), 1973. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i4.4082

Rott, B. (2021). Problem solving in mathematics education. Research in Mathematics Education, 23(2), 230–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2020.1731577

Saputri, A. C., Sajidan, S., Rinanto, Y., Afandi, A., & Prasetyanti, N. M. (2019). Improving students’ critical thinking skills in cell-metabolism learning using stimulating higher order thinking skills model. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12122a

Septriansyah, A., Imamuddin, M., Apriyanti, D., & Pelitawaty, M. D. (2022). Students’ mathematical problem solving skills in solving HOTS problems. Edumatika : Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.32939/ejrpm.v5i2.1604

Setiawan, E. D., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Nurhasanah, F. (2022). Characteristics of students’ sensory mathematical imagination in HOTS-based problem solving. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2566, 020028. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0117195

Seventika, S. Y., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., & Mariani, S. (2018). Critical thinking analysis based on Facione (2015) – Angelo (1995) logical mathematics material of vocational high school (VHS). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983, 012067. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012067

Sugiyono. (2020). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=MGOs5rkAAAAJ&citation_for_view=MGOs5rkAAAAJ:f2IySw72cVMC

Tanjung, H. S., Nababan, S. A., Sa’dijah, C., & Subanji. (2020). Development of assessment tools of critical thinking in mathematics in the context of hots. Advances in Mathematics: Scientific Journal, 9(10), 8659–8667. https://doi.org/10.37418/amsj.9.10.91

Toya, H., Okano, K., Takasu, K., Ihara, M., Takahashi, A., Tanaka, H., & Tokuyama, H. (2010). Enantioselective total synthesis of (−)- and (+)-petrosin. Organic Letters, 12(22), 5196–5199. https://doi.org/10.1021/ol1022257

Ulger, K. (2018). The effect of problem-based learning on the creative thinking and critical thinking disposition of students in visual arts education. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 12(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1649

Uyen, B. P. (2021). Using analogy in solving problems: A case study of teaching the radical inequalities. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(5), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i5.3715

Valeyeva, N. S., Kupriyanov, R. V., & Valeyeva, E. R. (2020). Assessment, testing, and measurement strategies in global higher education. In Metacognition and critical thinking: Assessment methods (pp. 132–152). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2314-8.ch007

Wibowo, T., Sutawidjaja, A., As’ari, A. R., & Sulandra, I. M. (2017). Characteristics of students sensory mathematical imagination in solving mathematics problem. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(3), 609–619. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/637

Widana, I. W., Parwata, I. M. Y., Parmithi, N. N., Jayantika, I. G. A. T., Sukendra, K., & Sumandya, I. W. (2018). Higher order thinking skills assessment towards critical thinking on mathematics lesson. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (IJSSH), 2(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v2n1.74

Yin, R. K. (2016). Case study research design and methods (5th ed.). The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 30(1), 282. https://doi.org/10.3138/CJPE.BR-240

Yuan, R., & Stapleton, P. (2020). Student teachers’ perceptions of critical thinking and its teaching. ELT Journal, 74(1), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccz044

Downloads

Published

2024-06-07

How to Cite

Effendi, M. M., & Rosyadi, A. A. P. (2024). Students’ clarification stages in analyzing mathematical problems in the implementation of the OBE curriculum. Research and Development in Education (RaDEn), 4(1), 592–601. https://doi.org/10.22219/raden.v4i1.32519

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): July

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Moh. Mahfud Effendi, Alfiani Athma Putri Rosyadi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Research and Development in Education agree to the following terms:

  1. For all articles published in the Research and Development in Education, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to the automatic transfer of non-exclusive publishing rights to the publisher.
  2. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.