What can we learn from one-to-one trials in Instructional design? A case from module development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/raden.v4i2.35763Keywords:
one-to-one trial, ADDIE, instructional design, moduleAbstract
The one-to-one trial phase within the instructional design development model has frequently been neglected in prior research. This stage should provide much in-depth insight considering its nature, which is in-depth face-to-face data collection between designers and participants. In this study, we aim to analyze a particular instance of module development during the one-to-one trial phase. This study is part of the media development stage with the ADDIE model (Analyze, Design, Develop, Implement, and Evaluate) at the implementation stage. We used quantitative data collection through scoring and qualitative data through interviews with six participants involved in the one-to-one trial. The findings revealed that students provided critical feedback on two aspects of the module, particularly its design appeal and suitability for independent learning, aligning with an average participant score of 3 on a 1-5 scale. These results provide an overview that one-to-one as a foundation and initiation for a broader trial plays an essential role in providing a starting point for an implementation where quantitative and qualitative data provide holistic insight.
Downloads
References
Abrori, F. M., Lavicza, Z., Tejera, M., & Andjić, B. (2023). Experts‵ perception on the usage of mathematical representations in biology comics. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 30(3), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1564/tme_v30.3.8
Adeoye, M. A., Wirawan, K. A. S. I., Pradnyani, M. S. S., & Septiarini, N. I. (2024). Revolutionizing education: unleashing the power of the ADDIE model for effective teaching and learning. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 13(1), 202–209. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v13i1.68624
Alimah, S., Anggraito, Y. U., Prasetyo, A. P. B., & Saptono, S. (2018). Meta-analysis of learning design on sciences to develop a teacher’s professionalism training model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1), 012203. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012203
Anjarwati, S., Darmayanti, R., & Khoirudin, M. (2023). Development of" Material Gaya" teaching materials based on creative science videos (CSV) for class VIII Junior High School Students. JEMS: Jurnal Edukasi Matematika Dan Sains, 11(1), 163–172. http://doi.org/10.25273/jems.v11i1.14347
Basu, R. (2018). Instructional design models: Benefits and challenges. UGC Approved Journal, 41(2249), 31–36. https://www.ugc.gov.in
Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1984). Educational research: An introduction. British Journal of Educational Studies, 32(3). https://philpapers.org/rec/BORERA-2
Boston, C. (2019). The concept of formative assessment. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 8(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.7275/kmcq-dj31
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach (Vol. 722). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004
Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
Crompton, H., Jones, M. V., Sendi, Y., Aizaz, M., Nako, K., Randall, R., & Weisel, E. (2024). Examining technology use within the ADDIE framework to develop professional training. European Journal of Training and Development, 48(3/4), 422–454. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-12-2022-0137
Dawadi, S., Shrestha, S., & Giri, R. A. (2021). Mixed-methods research: A discussion on its types, challenges, and criticisms. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 2(2), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.46809/jpse.v2i2.20
Deda, Y. N., & Disnawati, H. (2024). A decade of research design studies: A bibliometric analysis (2012-2022). Bulletin of Pedagogical Research, 4(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.51278/bpr.v4i1.1038
Dewi, P. Y. A., & Primayana, K. H. (2019). Effect of learning module with setting contextual teaching and learning to increase the understanding of concepts. International Journal of Education and Learning, 1(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v1i1.26
Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2005). The systematic design of instruction. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=671f411d07f151f589184da7d3dbad1d4630d63a
Fahrurrozi, M., & Mohzana, M. (2022). Adobe flash based learning media development in economic lessons. Jurnal EDUCATIO: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 8(2), 83–88. https://doi.org/10.29210/1202222432
Hafizhah, D., & Istyadji, M. (2022). The validity and practicalily of prezi learning media on the role of soil and soil organisms for life sustainability for junior high school students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(2), 481–488. https://doi.org/ 10.29303/jppipa.v8i2.1158
Hands, A. S. (2022). Integrating quantitative and qualitative data in mixed methods research: An illustration. The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 45(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjilsrcsib.v45i1.10645
Kemp, J. E., Morrison, G. R., & Ross, S. M. (1998). Designing Effective Instruction. Merrill. https://scholar.google.co.id/scholar?q=Kemp,+J.+E.,+Morrison,+G.+R.,+%26+Ross,+S.+M.+(1998).+Designing+Effective+Instruction.+Merrill.&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart
Kho, C. W., Sen, A., Tha, K. K., Selvaratnam, L., & Ton, S. H. (2014). Design guidelines for developing competency based e-learning module in professional education for biomedical sciences. INTED2014 Proceedings, 730–741. https://library.iated.org/view/KHO2014DES
Kristanto, A., Mariono, A., & Nuryati, D. W. (2018). Developing media module proposed to editor in editorial division. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 947(1), 012054. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012054/meta
Laeeque, B., & Akmal, A. (2017). Empirical Evidence of color on motivation toward learning. International Journal of Learning and Development, 7(2), 1–17. DOI:10.5296/ijld.v7i2.11044
Love, H. R., Fettig, A., & Steed, E. A. (2023). Putting the “mix” in mixed methods: How to integrate quantitative and qualitative research in early childhood specialeducation research. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 43(3), 174–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/02711214231199268
Luoto, J., Klette, K., & Blikstad-Balas, M. (2023). Possible biases in observation systems when applied across contexts: Conceptualizing, operationalizing, and sequencing instructional quality. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 35(1), 105–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-022-09394-y
Mehta, R., & Zhu, R. (Juliet). (2009). Blue or red? exploring the effect of color on cognitive task performances. Science, 323(5918), 1226–1229. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1169144
Mutlu, G. (2016). A qualitative analysis and comparison of the two contemporary models of instructional design. Online Submission, 13(3), 6154–6163. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED591893.pdf
Nurhasnah, N., Kasmita, W., Aswirna, P., & Abshary, F. I. (2020). Developing physics e-module using “construct 2” to support students’ independent learning skills. Thabiea: Journal of Natural Science Teaching, 3(2), 79–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/thabiea.v3i2.8048
Nurhayat, R., Suranto, S., Dwiningrum, S. I. A., Retnawati, H., & Herwin, H. (2023). The Effect of Innovative Learning on Student Achievement in Indonesia: A Meta-Analysis. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 13(3), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.03.17
Nurhikmah, H., Hakim, A., & Wahid, M. S. (2021). Interactive e-module development in multimedia learning. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(3), 2293–2300. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i3.863
Ozdilek, Z., & Robeck, E. (2009). Operational priorities of instructional designers analyzed within the steps of the Addie instructional design model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 2046–2050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.359
Peterson, C. (2003). Bringing ADDIE to life: Instructional design at its best. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12(3), 227–241. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/2074/
Putra, M. A. H., Supriatna, N., Wiyanarti, E., & Handy, M. R. N. (2021). The spirit of wasaka values (waja sampai kaputing) urang banjar in reducing moral degradation. Proceeding The 6th International Seminar on Social Studies and History Education (ISSHE), 99–106. https://repository.upi.edu/71544/14/
Rahardjanto, A., & Husamah, H. (2022). Publication trend of R&D in the journal of biological education in Indonesia (Sinta 2: 2017-2021): A Systematic Literature Review. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 10(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v10i1.4769
Rahmadi, I. F., & Lavicza, Z. (2021). Pedagogical innovations in elementary mathematics instructions: future learning and research directions. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences, 3(2), 360–378. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.110
Sarbaini, S., Nuryadin, N., Mukhyar, M., & Hanafi, U. (2012). Pedoman pendidikan karakter wasaka (waja sampai kaputing). Aswaja Pressindo. https://repo-dosen.ulm.ac.id//handle/123456789/8066 Show full item record
Schoonenboom, J. (2023). The fundamental difference between qualitative and quantitative data in mixed methods research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 24(1). http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/3986
Serrat, M. A., Dom, A. M., Buchanan, J. T., Williams, A. R., Efaw, M. L., & Richardson, L. L. (2014). Independent learning modules enhance student performance and understanding of anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education, 7(5), 406–416. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1438
Siedlecki, S. L. (2020). Understanding descriptive research designs and methods. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 34(1), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0000000000000493
Spatioti, A. G., Kazanidis, I., & Pange, J. (2022). A comparative study of the ADDIE instructional design model in distance education. Information, 13(9), 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13090402
Supriyadi, E., Suryadi, D., Turmudi, T., Prabawanto, S., Juandi, D., & Dahlan, J. A. (2023). Didactical design research: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 18(3), 153–160. https://jestec.taylors.edu.my
Suryani, L., Apriliyanti, D. L., & Rohmat, F. N. (2021). Developing teaching guidelines and learning module of speaking for general communication: students’ perception and needs. Acuity: Journal of English Language Pedagogy, Literature and Culture, 6(2), 84–94. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1305210
Thiagarajan, S. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook. Indiana University. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED090725
Uslima, U., Ertikanto, C., & Rosidin, U. (2018). Contextual learning module based on multiple representations: The influence on students’ concept understanding. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 3(1), 11–20. https://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/tadris/article/view/2534
Verhoef, M. J., & Casebeer, A. L. (1997). Broadening horizons: Integrating quantitative and qualitative research. The Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases, 8(2), 65. https://doi.org/10.1155/1997/349145
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Muhsinah Annisa, Dasim Budimansyah , Mupid Hidayat , Atiek Winarti , Fadhlan Muchlas Abrori
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Research and Development in Education agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in the Research and Development in Education, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to the automatic transfer of non-exclusive publishing rights to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
