Designing educational resources of the 21st-century skills instructional models and socio-scientific issues integration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/raden.v4i2.36596Keywords:
Educational resources, Instructional Models, socioscientific issuesAbstract
This research addresses the limited availability of reference books that comprehensively explain the syntax of the 21st-century learning and socio-scientific issues. It focuses on designing and developing educational resources that integrate the 21st-century skills instructional models with socio-scientific issues, utilizing the 4D (Define, Design, Develop, Disseminate) development model by Thiagarajan (1974). Conducted from March to September 2024 at an Islamic public university in Medan, Sumatera Utara, the subjects were Biology Education students currently enrolled in or who had completed the Biology Learning Strategies course. Data collection involved questionnaires and documentation studies. Initial analysis indicated that students struggled to understand the steps and processes of instructional models supporting the 21st-century skills and socio-scientific issues. To address these challenges, a comprehensive instructional book was developed, emphasizing the 21st-century skills, learning syntax, and socio-scientific issue integration. The book received validation from experts, including a biology learning strategies expert (98.3%), a 21st-century skills expert (100%), and a socio-scientific issues expert (91.7%), all within the highly valid category. It was also deemed highly practical by users, namely students (94.3%) and lecturers (93.7%). The findings underscore the necessity of enhancing learning resources in the course, highlighting the significance of socio-scientific issues in fostering 21st-century skills. This study contributes to advancing learning strategies and offers valuable resources for educators and students preparing for the demands of the 21st-century.
Downloads
References
Álvarez-García, O., Sureda-Negre, J., & Comas-Forgas, R. (2015). Environmental education in pre-service teacher training: A literature review of existing evidence. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 17(1), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1515/jtes-2015-0006
Amos, R., Knippels, M.-C., & Levinson, R. (2020). Socio-scientific inquiry-based learning: Possibilities and challenges for teacher education. In M. Evagorou, J. A. Nielsen, & J. Dillon (Eds.), Science Teacher Education for Responsible Citizenship (Vol. 52, pp. 41–61). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40229-7_4
Ardelia, N., & Juanengsih, N. (2021). Implementasi pembelajaran abad 21 pada mata pelajaran biologi di SMA Negeri kota Tangerang Selatan. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Biologi, 2(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.26740/jipb.v2n2.p1-11
Arends, R. (2012). Learning to teach (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Bonk, C., J., & Graham, C., R. (2006). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (2nd ed.). Pfeiffer.
Çam, A. (2023). Examination of training on pre-service science teachers’ views on socio-scientific issues and nature of science. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2023.13.1.13
Chang, J., & Park, J. (2020). Developing teacher professionalism for teaching socio-scientific issues: What and how should teachers learn? Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(2), 423–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09955-6
Chen, L., & Xiao, S. (2021). Perceptions, challenges and coping strategies of science teachers in teaching socioscientific issues: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 32, 100377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100377
Cofré, H., Cuevas, E., & Becerra, B. (2017). The relationship between biology teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and the understanding and acceptance of the theory of evolution. International Journal of Science Education, 39(16), 2243–2260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1373410
Dusturi, N., Nurohman, S., & Wilujeng, I. (2024). Socio-scientific issues (SSI) approach implementation in science learning to improve students’ critical thinking skills: Systematic literature review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(3), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i3.6012
Faisal, F., & Martin, S. N. (2022). Exploring Indonesian biology teachers’ perceptions and attitudes towards socio-scientific issues-based instruction. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 8(1), 256–291. https://doi.org/10.1163/23641177-bja10042
Hancock, T. S., Friedrichsen, P. J., Kinslow, A. T., & Sadler, T. D. (2019). Selecting Socio-scientific Issues for teaching: A grounded theory study of how science teachers collaboratively design SSI-Based curricula. Science & Education, 28(6–7), 639–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00065-x
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge.
Husniyyah, A. A., Erman, E., Purnomo, T., & Budiyanto, M. (2023). Scientific Literacy Improvement Using Socio-Scientific Issues Learning. IJORER: International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 4(4), 447–456. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v4i4.303
Indriani, T., & Jayanti, U. N. A. D. (2022). Interactive Socio-Scientific Inquiry: The effects on creative thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 23(3), 995–1005. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v23i3.pp995-1005
Jackson, W. M., Binding, M. K., Grindstaff, K., Hariani, M., & Koo, B. W. (2023). Addressing sustainability in the high school biology classroom through Socioscientific Issues. Sustainability, 15(7), 5766. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075766
Jayanti, U. N. A. D., & Adlini, M. N. (2023). Learning to teach: An investigation into pre-service biology teachers’ perceptions toward lesson study. International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies, 12(3), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-07-2022-0093
Jayanti, U. N. A. D., Adlini, M. N., & Khairuna, K. (2020). Profil keterampilan menyusun skenario pembelajaran mahasiswa calon guru biologi perguruan tinggi keagamaan. Jurnal Biolokus, 3(1), 265. https://doi.org/10.30821/biolokus.v3i1.720
Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2015). Models of Teaching (9th ed.) (9th Edition). Pearson.
Kara, Y. (2012). Pre-service biology teachers’ perceptions on the instruction of socio-scientific issues in the curriculum. European Journal of Teacher Education, 35(1), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2011.633999
Kurt, G., & Akoglu, K. (2023). Project-based learning in science education: A comprehensive literature review. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 19(3), e2311. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/13677
Laurillard, D. (2013). Teaching as a design science (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203125083
Mardhiyah, R. H., Aldriani, S. N. F., Chitta, F., & Zulfikar, M. R. (2021). Pentingnya keterampilan belajar di abad 21 sebagai tuntutan dalam pengembangan sumber daya manusia. Lectura: Jurnal Pendidikan, 12(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.31849/lectura.v12i1.5813
Martínez-Agüero, M., & Hernández, C. (2023, June 23). The evolution of teaching Evolution. International Conference on Education and New Developments. https://doi.org/10.36315/2023v2end021
Marzano, R. J. (2017). The New Art and Science of Teaching: More Than Fifty New Instructional Strategies for Academic Success. Solution Tree Press.
Mutanen, J., & Uitto, A. (2020). Make biology relevant again! Pre-service teachers’ views on the relevance of biology education. This paper was presented at the ERIDOB conference 2020. Journal of Biological Education, 54(2), 202–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2020.1739423
Mutasam, U., Ibrohim, & Susilo, H. (2021). The impact of science learning based on inquiry integrated with nature of science towards communication and collaboration skills. 030064. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043364
Nida, S., Rahayu, S., & Eilks, I. (2020). A survey of Indonesian science teachers’ experience and perceptions toward socio-scientific issues-based science education. Education Sciences, 10(2), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10020039
Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Institute for Human and Machine Cognition.: http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/ResearchPapers/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps.pdf
Nurhasnah, N., Festiyed, F., Asrizal, A., & Desnita, D. (2022). Project-based learning in science education: A meta-analysis study. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 23(1), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v23i1.pp198-206
P21. (2019). Framework for 21st century learning. partnership for 21st century learning. Partnership for 21st Century Learning. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED519462.pdf
Pedro, A., Piedade, J., Matos, J. F., & Pedro, N. (2019). Redesigning initial teacher’s education practices with learning scenarios. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 36(3), 266–283. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-11-2018-0131
Pursitasari, I. D., Alfitriyani, N., & Kurniasih, S. (2022). Enhancing students’ creative thinking skills through biotechnology module-based Socio-Scientific Issues. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(2), 939–948. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i2.1438
Rahayu, Y., Suhendar, S., & Ratnasari, J. (2020). Keterampilan argumentasi siswa pada materi sistem gerak SMA Negeri Kabupaten Sukabumi-Indonesia. BIODIK, 6(3), 312–318. https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v6i3.9802
Riduwan, R., & Akdon, A. (2010). Rumus dan data dalam analisis statistika. Alfabeta.
Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, V. D. (2012). Learning 21st-century skills requires 21st-century teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209400203
Sadler, T. D., Klosterman, M. L., & Topcu, M. S. (2011). Learning science content and Socio-scientific reasoning through classroom explorations of global climate change. In T. D. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific Issues in the Classroom (Vol. 39, pp. 45–77). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1159-4_4
Sadler, T. D., Romine, W. L., & Topçu, M. S. (2016). Learning science content through socio-scientific issues-based instruction: A multi-level assessment study. International Journal of Science Education, 38(10), 1622–1635. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1204481
Santoso, I. B., Waluyo, J., & Hariyadi, S. (2020). Effectiveness of science textbooks based on Socio-Scientific Issues in biotechnology materials to improve creative thinking ability. International Journal of Advanced Research, 08(04), 140–144. https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/10757
Shulman, L. S. (2005). The signature pedagogies of the professions of law, medicine, engineering, and the clergy: Potential lessons for the education of teachers. In Talk Delivered at the Math Science Partnerships (MSP) Workshop: “Teacher Education for Effective Teaching and Learning,” National Research Council’s Center for Education. https://mspnet-static.s3.amazonaws.com/Shulman_Signature_Pedagogies.pdf
Slavin, R. E. (2018). Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice (12th Edition). Pearson.
Suwono, H., Rofi’Ah, N. L., Saefi, M., & Fachrunnisa, R. (2021). Interactive socio-scientific inquiry for promoting scientific literacy, enhancing biological knowledge, and developing critical thinking. Journal of Biological Education, 57(5), 944–959. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.2006270
Tarigan, W. P. L., Sipahutar, H., & Harahap, F. (2021). The effect of interactive digital learning module on student’s learning activity and autonomy. Bioedukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 14(2), 196. https://doi.org/10.20961/bioedukasi-uns.v14i2.49366
Taşdelen, Ö., & Güven, T. (2023). Pre-service biology teachers’ perceptions of the concepts of ‘system’ and ‘biological system.’ Journal of Biological Education, 57(3), 495–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.1933129
Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children. National Center for Improvement Educational System.
Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. The Autodesk Foundation. https://tecfa.unige.ch/proj/eteach-net/Thomas_researchreview_PBL.pdf
Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. R. (2010). 21st century skills: Discussion paper. University of Twente. http://opite.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/61995295/White%20Paper%2021stCS_Final_ENG_def2.pdf
Wang, H.-H., Chen, H.-T., Lin, H., Huang, Y.-N., & Hong, Z.-R. (2017). Longitudinal study of a cooperation-driven, socio-scientific issue intervention on promoting students’ critical thinking and self-regulation in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 39(15), 2002–2026. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1357087
Yip, D. Y. (2001). Promoting the development of a conceptual change model of science instruction in prospective secondary biology teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 23(7), 755–770. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690010016067
Yoon, S. A., Chinn, C., Noushad, N., Richman, T., Hussain-Abidi, H., Hunkar, K., Cottone, A., Katz, J., Mitkus, E., & Wendel, D. (2023). Seven design principles for teaching complex socioscientific issues: The design of a complex systems agent-based disease epidemic model and the application of epistemic practices in high school biology. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1210153. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1210153
Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis theory, research, and practice. In Handbook of Research on Science Education, Volume II (1st Edition, p. 30). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203097267-39/socioscientific-issues-curriculum-emphasis-dana-zeidler
Zeidler, D. L., Herman, B. C., & Sadler, T. D. (2019). New directions in socioscientific issues research. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0008-7
Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173684
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Miza Nina Adlini, Ummi Nur Afinni Dwi Jayanti, Yassir Ni’ma Rangga Wiryawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Research and Development in Education agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in the Research and Development in Education, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to the automatic transfer of non-exclusive publishing rights to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
