Politik Kontrol Kinerja dan Respons Guru Sekolah Dasar terhadap Platform Merdeka Mengajar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jurnalsospol.v10i2.33120Keywords:
Guru, Kekuasaan Disipliner, Platform Merdeka Mengajar, Politik Kontrol Kinerja, Proses KerjaAbstract
Riset ini bertujuan menganalisa bagaimana PMM berfungsi sebagai politik kontrol kinerja dan bagaimana politik kontrol kinerja tersebut mendapat berbagai bentuk respons pada guru tingkat pendidikan Sekolah Dasar (SD). Dengan tujuan memperoleh peningkatan capaian hasil belajar siswa, guru telah menjadi subjek dari eksperimen kebijakan profesionalisasi yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah. Salah satunya melalui kebijakan penggunaan Platform Merdeka Mengajar (PMM) yang awal tahun 2024 ini mulai digunakan secara wajib di seluruh sekolah di Indonesia. Sebagai sebuah platform, PMM tidak hanya menjadi wadah yang menyediakan berbagai guru untuk meningkatkan kapasitas dan kompetensi seorang guru, tetapi juga menjadi alat kontrol yang membantu pemerintah memperoleh standar ideal guru melalui fitur-fiturnya yang mengintegrasikan seluruh kebutuhan, baik pedagogis maupun administratif. Melalui pendekatan studi kualitatif, peneliti mengumpulkan data melalui wawancara pada 12 guru SD dan 1 anggota Perhimpunan Pendidikan dan Guru (P2G). Hasilnya, riset ini menemukan: (1) PMM lahir untuk mengatasi kesulitan pemerintah memperoleh capacity to labor para guru; (2) PMM menjadi panoptikon digital yang digunakan untuk membentuk “standar ideal” guru; dan (3) guru yang kesulitan mencapai “standar ideal” tersebut cenderung melakukan “rule-breaking behavior”, sementara guru yang tidak kesulitan memiliki kecenderungan melakukan gamifikasi kerja.
Downloads
References
Adriany, V., & Saefullah, K. (2015). Deconstructing Human Capital Discourse in Early Childhood Education in Indonesia. In: Lightfoot-Rueda D & Peach R (eds). Global Perspective on Human Capital in Early Childhood Education. New York: Palgrave, pp. 159–182.
Aranditio, S. (2024). Guru Dijejali Beragam Aplikasi Pendidikan. Kompas ID. Retrieved from https://www.kompas.id/baca/humaniora/2024/01/29/guru-dijejali-beragam-aplikasi.
Ashenden, D. (1989). Chucking the Chooks: Restructuring the Education Industry. Education Australia, 7, 9–10.
Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan; Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2021). Kajian Akademik: Kurikulum untuk Pemulihan Pembelajaran.
Bourke, T., Lidstone, J., & Ryan, M. (2015). Schooling Teachers: Professionalism or disciplinary power? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(1), 84–100. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2013.839374
Chang MC, Shaeffer S, Al-Samarrai S, et al. (2014). Teacher Reform in Indonesia: The Role of Politics and Evidence in Policy Making. Washington. DC: The World Bank.
Connell, R. (1985). Teachers' Work. Sydney: Allen.
Dalrymple, R. (1998). Indonesia and the IMF: The Evolving Consequences of a Reforming Mission. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 52(3): 233–239.
Edwards, R. C. (1976). Individual Traits and Organizational Incentives: What Makes a “Good” Worker? The Journal of Human Resources, 11(1), 51–68. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/145073.
Formen, A., & Nuttall, J. (2014). Tensions between Discourses of Development, Religion, and Human Capital in Early Childhood Education Policy Texts: The Case of Indonesia. International Journal of Early Childhood, 46. 15–31. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-013-0097-y.
Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books.
Gellert, PK. (2005). The Shifting Natures of “Development”: Growth, Crisis, and Recovery in Indonesia’s Forests. World Development, 33(8): 1345–1364. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.03.004.
Graham, Treharne, & Nairn. (2017). Using Foucault's Theory of Disciplinary Power to Critically Examine the Construction of Gender in Secondary Schools. Soc Personal Psychol Compass, 11. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12302.
Joyce & Stuart. (2021). Chapter 7: Digitalised Management, Control and Resistance in Platform Work: a Labour Process Analysis. Political Science and Public Policy, pp. 158–184.
Kim, T. W. (2018). Gamification of Labour and the Charge of Exploitation. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(1), 27—39. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3304-6.
Lawn, M., & Ozga, J. (1981). The Educational Worker: A Re-assessment of Teachers. In M. Lawn & L. Barton (Eds.), Schools, Teachers and Teaching (pp. 45-64). London: Falmer Press.
Lokita. (2015). Teacher Certification Program in Indonesia: Problems and Recommendation for the Betterment of the Program. International Journal of English and Education, 4(2). Retrieved from doi: 10.13189/ujer.2020.080508.
Malone, K. (2007). The Bubble-Wrap Generation: Children Growing Up in Walled Gardens. Environmental Education Research, 13(4): 513–527. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620701581612.
Napitupulu, E. L. (2022). Platform Digital Bantu Guru Menerapkan Kurikulum Merdeka. Kompas ID. Retrieved from https://www.kompas.id/baca/dikbud/2022/02/13/dukung-kesiapan-guru-terapkan-kurikulum-merdeka.
Napitupulu, E. L. (2023). Saat Guru Memburu ”Centang Hijau”. Kompas ID. Retrieved from https://www.kompas.id/baca/humaniora/2023/11/24/kegelisahan-guru-saat-dikejar-kejar-harus-dapat-centang-hijau.
Napitupulu, E. L. (2024). Guru Diminta Tak Hanya Cari Sertifikat untuk Bukti Kinerja. Kompas ID. Retrieved from https://www.kompas.id/baca/humaniora/2024/01/19/kinerja-guru-dinilai-dari-praktik-pembelajaran.
Novinger, S. & O’Brien, L. (2003) Beyond ‘Boring, Meaningless Shit’ in the Academy: Early Childhood Teacher Educators Under the Regulatory Gaze. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 4(1), pp. 4-18. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2003.4.1.4.
Osgood, J. (2004). Time to Get down to Business?: The Responses of Early Years Practitioners to Entrepreneurial Approaches to Professionalism. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 2(1), pp. 5-24. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X0421001.
Osgood, J. (2006). Deconstructing Professionalism in Early Childhood Education: Resisting the Regulatory Gaze. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 7(1). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2006.
Ozga, J. (Ed.). (1988). Schoolwork: An Introduction to the Labour Process of Teaching. Milton Keynes: Open University Press. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/1392796.
Parente, R. (2009). Dismantling a Developmental State: Indonesia’s Historical Shift from Keynesianism to Neoliberalism. Master Thesis. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
Purnastuti, Salim, & Joarder. (2015). The Returns to Education in Indonesia: Post Reform Estimates. The Journal of Developing Areas, 49(3): 183–204. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/24737315.
Smyth, J. (2001). Chapter 1: A Labor Process Approach to Teachers’ Work. Counterpoints, 138, 3–18. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/42976405.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.
Yulindrasari & Adriany. (2023). “We are Not Labors; We are Teachers”: Indonesian Early Childhood Teachers’ Organizations as a Form of a Panopticon. Policy Futures in Education, 0(0), 1–14. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103231208854.
Yulindrasari & Ujianti. (2017). “Trapped in the Reform”: Kindergarten Teachers’ Experiences of Teacher Professionalisation in Buleleng, Indonesia. Policy Futures in Education, 16(1) 66–79. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210317736206.
Yulindrasari H (2014). Neoliberal Early Childhood Education Policy and Women’s Volunterism. In: The 2014 International Conference of Early Childhood Education “Negotiating Practices of Early Childhood Education” (ed V Adriany), Bandung, Indonesia, 18–19 November 2014, pp. 197–205. Bandung: Program Studi PG-PAUD Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Hanifah Dianti Maharani, Irwansyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
