Efektivitas Multi-bi Aid pada Greater Mekong Sub-region (GMS) Triangle Project

Authors

  • Devita Prinanda Prodi Ilmu Hubungan Internasional. Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik. GKB I Lt.6. Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Jl. Raya Tlogomas no. 246 Malang, telp. 0341 464318

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/sospol.v4i2.5910

Keywords:

Foreign Aid, GMS Triangle Project, Migration, Multi-bi Aid

Abstract

The existences of geographical factors, push factors and pull factors generated the intensity of migration in Greater Mekong Sub-Region (GMS). The region which consists of Cambodia, Lao PDR, Myanmar, Thailand, Vietnam, and part of China’s territory had various problems in the migration process.  A predominant problem of migration is rendered by the absence of law framework. Therefore, there were a practically illegal migrant and human trafficking. This research will explain the assistance to recover migration’s problems in GMS given by Australian Government (cooperated with ILO). The type of assistance is categorized as multi-bi aid which is the assistance given by the bilateral donor to a multilateral institution. The assistance was released in the form of a project named GMS Triangle Project with the aim of creating migrant protection in GMS. To analyze the implementation of that project, the author uses the concept of multi-bi aid and review effectiveness through the concept of aid effectiveness proposed by Paris Agreement including ownership, alignment, harmonisation, managing for a result, and Mutual Accountability. The result of this study describes how multi-bi aid methods are embodied in a form of project and effectiveness are different for each receiving state in GMS.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Buku

MMN & AMC. (2013). Migration in The Greater Mekong Subregion Resource Book. Chiang Mai: Mekong Migration Network & Asian Migrant Center.

Jurnal& Artikel

Gulrajani, N. (2014). Organizing for donor effectiveness: an analytical framework for improving aid effectiveness. Development Policy Review.

Gulrajani, N. (2016). Bilateral versus multilateral aid channels: Strategic choices for donors. ODI.

Reinsberg, B. (2015). The implications of multi-bi financing on multilateral agencies: The example of the World Bank. Center for Comparative and International Studies.

Reinsberg, B. (2017). five steps to smarter multi-bi aid, A new way forward for earmarked finance. Overseas Development Institute.

Laporan

Asian Development Bank. (2013). Facilitating Safe Labor Migration in The Greater Mekong Subregion. Philippines: Asian Development Bank.

DFAT. (2015). ILO Evaluation. Department of International Affair and Trade.

ILO. (2013). Evaluation Summary Tripartite Action to Protect Migrants within and from the GMS from Labour Exploitation (TRIANGLE) project. ILO.

ILO. (2013). GMS TRIANGLE: Working With Trade Unions to Protect Migrant Workers. ILO.

ILO. (2011). TRIANGLE Project Update: December 2011. ILO.

ILO. (2014). GMS TRIANGLE Project Update: April 2014. ILO.

ILO. (2014). GMS TRIANGLE Project Update: Juni 2014. ILO.

ILO. (2015). GMS Triangle Project Update: January 2015. ILO.

ILO. (2015). GMS TRIANGLE Project Update: October 2015. International Labour Organizations.

Website

ADB. (2018). Glossary Definition. Retrieved from Asia Bonds Online: https://asianbondsonline.adb.org/regional/guides/definition.php?term=Prakas diakses pada 1 Agustus 2018.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-26

How to Cite

Prinanda, D. (2018). Efektivitas Multi-bi Aid pada Greater Mekong Sub-region (GMS) Triangle Project. Sospol, 4(2), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.22219/sospol.v4i2.5910