The Maqāṣid Analysis on the Nafkah Iddah of Divorce Lawsuit in the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) Article 149 (b) and the Supreme Court Verdict Number 137/K/AG/2007
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/ulumuddin.v1i1.12866Keywords:
Nafkah iddah, divorce lawsuit, the Compilation of Islamic Law, the Supreme Court Verdict, maqāṣid al-sharī’ah, maqāṣidi approach.Abstract
This article examines the nafkah iddah of divorce lawsuit in the Islamic Law Compilation (KHI) Article 149 (b) and the verdict issued by the Supreme Court Number 137/K/AG/2007. It also analyses their legal basis based on the Jasser Auda’s maqāṣid al-sharī’ah approach concerning the preservation of life and treasure. The primariy objective of this article is to find the main differences between the KHI and the Verdict in determining the nafkah iddah of divorce suit. Although some scholars have concerned about the case of nafkah iddah, the Jasser Auda’s maqāṣid al-sharī’ah approach seems to be rare to be dealt with the case. Accordingly, the maqāṣidi approach will be mainly utilised in order to consider the effectiveness of both the KHI and the Verdict. This article finds that the KHI states that a wife who applies for a divorce is considered disloyal. As a consequence, she is undeserving of receiving nafkah iddah. The additional finding is that the Verdict decides that in the case of the divorce filled by the ex-wife, it brings a responsibility for the former husband to pay the nafkah iddah. From the perspective of maqāṣid al-sharī’ah, this article argues that the implementation of the Verdict gains better benefit rather than the KHI, because the legal basis evolved for the nafkah iddah of divorce suit is in line with the maqāṣid principles of the preservation of life and property. In the particular case, the principles tend to protect the ex-wife’s safety and welfare after the divorce.
Downloads
References
Abbasi, Zubair. “Judicial Ijtihād as a Tool for Legal Reform: Extending Women’s Right to Divorce under Islamic Law in Pakistan.” Journal of Islamic Law and Society 24, Issue 4 (2017): 384-411. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-00244P04.
Abdullah, M. Amin. “Bangunan Baru Epistemologi Keilmuan Studi Hukum Islam dalam Merespon Globalisasi.” Asy-Syir’ah 46, no. 2 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.14421/asy-syir'ah.2012.%25x.
Abdurrahman. Kompilasi Hukum Islam di Indonesia. Jakarta: Akademika Pressindo, 2015.
Asy-Sya’rawi, Muhammad Mutawalli. Suami Istri Berkarakter Surgawi. Jakarta: Al-Kautsar, 2007.
Auda, Jasser. Maqasid Al-Shari’ah As Philosophy of Islmic Law: A Systems Approach. London: The International Institute of Islamic Thought, 2007.
Auda, Jasser. Membumikan Hukum Islam Melalui Maqashid Syariah. Bandung: PT Mizan Pustaka, 2015.
Azzam and Abdul Wahhab Sayyed Hawwas. Fiqh Munakahat. Jakarta: Amzah, 2015.
Al-Dardiri, Ahmad ibn Muhammad. Al-Syarh al-Shaghir, Juz 2. n.c.: n.p., n.d.
Depdikbud, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1996.
Detik News, “Pemicu Utama Cerai secara Nasional Karena KDRT, Bukan WhatsApp,” Detik News, accessed on February 13, 2019 https://news.detik.com/berita/d-3671333/pemicu-utama-cerai-secara-nasional-karena-kdrt-bukan-whatsapp.
Al-Dimasyqi, Abi Abdillah Muhammad bin. Rahmat al-Ummah fi Ikhtilafi al-Aimmah. Beirut: Dar al-Khatabal-Ilmiyah, 1995.
Fanani and Badria Nur Lailina Ulfa. “Hak Ex Officio Hakim: Studi Kasus Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Sidoarjo No. 3513 Th. 2015.” Jurnal Tsaqafah 13, no. 2 (2017): 339-352. http://dx.doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v13i2.1091.
Fauzan, Muhammad. “Maqashid Nafkah iddah dan Perlindungan Perempuan.” Jurnal Hukum Islam 16, no. 1 (2016): 71-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/hi.v16i1.2684.
Halim, Wan Mohd Amjad Wan. “Application of Maqasid Syariah in The Act 355 Amandement Proposal (Criminal Jurisdiction): An Analysis Study,” Jurnal Intelek 13, no. 2 (2018): 47-56. https://jurnalintelek.uitm.edu.my/index.php/main/article /view/198.
Harahap, Yahya. Beberapa Permasalahan Hukum Acara pada Peradilan Agama. Jakarta: Al-Hikmah, 1975.
Harian Nasional, “Perceraian Meningkat,” Harian Nasional, accessed February 11, 2019 http://www.harnas.co/2016/04/18/perceraian-meningkat.
Huis, Stijn Cornelis Van. “Khul‘ over the Longue Durée: The Decline of Traditional Fiqh-Based Divorce Mechanisms in Indonesian Legal Practice,” Journal of Islamic Law and Society 26, Issue 1-2 (2019): 58-82. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-00254A05.
Hukum Online, “Melihat Tren Perceraian dan Dominasi Penyebabnya,” Hukum Online, accessed February 12, 2019, https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/ lt5b1fb923cb04f/melihat-tren-perceraian-dan-dominasi-penyebabnya.
Jaraba, Mahmoud. “The Practice of Khulʿ in Germany: Pragmatism versus Conservativism.” Journal of Islamic Law and Society 26, Issue 1-2 (2019): 83-110. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-02612A01.
Jauhar, Ahmad Al-Mursi Husain. Maqashid Syariah. Jakarta: Amzah, 2010.
Al-Kasani, Abu Bakar ibn Mas’ud. Al-Bada’i al-Shana’i’, Juz 4 (Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyah, 2010).
Kushidayati, Lina. “Legal Reasoning Perempuan dalam Perkara Gugat Cerai di Pengadilan Agama Kudus Tahun 2014.” Yudisia 6, no. 1 (2015): 141-159. http://journal.stainkudus.ac.id/index.php/Yudisia/article/download/1482/1360.
Lubis, Suhrawardi K. Etika Profesi Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 1994.
Maulida, Fadhilatul and Busyro, “Nafkah iddah Akibat Talak Ba`in dalam Perspektif Keadilan Gender (Analisis Terhadap Hukum Perkawinan Indonesia).” Al-Hurriyyah 3 no. 2 (2018): 113-130. 10.30983/alhurriyah.v3i2.720.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Penemuan Hukum Sebagai Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1996.
Mulyadi, Lilik. Hukum Acara Perdata Menurut Teori dan Praktek Peradilan Indonesia. Jakarta: Jembatan, 1999.
Nasir, A. Muh. Arfah Pattenreng and Baso Madiong. “Perceraian dan Akibat Hukumnya pada Masyarakat Kota Makassar.” Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law 4, no. 1 (2018).
Noh, Mohd Shahid Bin Mohd and Mohammad Taqiuddin Bin Mohamad. “The Justification of Maqasid Al-Shari’ah through the Doctrines of Usul Al-Fiqh and Qawa’id Al-Fiqhiyyah: A Study on Securitization Process.” Journal of Islamic, Social, Economics and Development 3, issue 12 (2018), 10-24.
Nurdin, Abidin. “Mut’ah and Iddah: Post-divorce Payment Practices in Aceh.” Leiden Studies in Islam and Society 8 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004386297_008.
Nurlaelawati, Euis. “Women’s Financial Rights After Divorce in Indonesia.” Leiden Studies in Islam and Society 8 (2018): 89-106. https://brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9789004386297/BP000009.xml.
Nuruddin and Azhari Akmal Tarigan. Hukum Perdata Islam di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana, 2004.
Qudamah, Muwaffiq al-Din ibn. Al-Mughni, Juz 11. Kuwait: Dar al-‘Alim al-Kutub, 1997.
Rahman, Arif. “Al-Dharuriyat Al-Khams Dalam Masyarakat Plural (Analisis Perbandingan Ulama tentang Makna Maslahat).” Jurnal Madzahibuna 1, no. 1 (2019).
Setia, Adi. “Freeing Maqasid and Maslaha From Surreptitious Utilitarianism.” Journal of Islamic Science 14, no. 2 (2016): 127-158.
The Indonesian Comission for Women, “The Fact Sheet and Key Points of the 2015 National Commission on Violence Against Women,” The National Commission on Violence Against Women, accessed February 13, 2019. https://www.komnasperempuan.go.id/read-news-lembar-fakta-dan-poin-kunci-catat-tahunan-komnas-perempuan-tahun-2019.
Wustha’, Muhammad Qiyamul, M. Roji Iskandar and Siska Lis Sulistianti. “Analisis Putusan Pemberian Nafkah iddah Pada Cerai Gugat (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Agama Jakarta Selatan no. 1542/Pdt.G/2014/PAJS),” Prosiding Hukum Keluarga Islam 5, no. 2 (2017): 61-67.
Al-Zuhaili, Wahbah. Al-Fiqh al-Islāmi wa Adillatuhu. Damaskus: Dar al-Fikr, 2010.
An interview with Muhammad Hilmy, in the Religious Court Office, Malang, June 5, 2018.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Ulumuddin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
