Improvement students’ activities and cognitive learning outcomes of Hasyim Asy’ari University through guided discovery learning

Authors

  • Nur Hayati Program Studi Pendidikan IPA, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Hasyim Asy’ari, Jombang, Jawa Timur
  • Ninda Ayu Berlianti Program Studi Pendidikan IPA, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Hasyim Asy’ari, Jombang, Jawa Timur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v2i3.3857

Keywords:

cognitive learning outcomes, guided discovery learning, students’ activities

Abstract

Learning science is not only related to the acquisition of knowledge but also a process of discovery. Based on learning observations, it was known that the activities and cognitive learning outcomes of Science Education department students, Faculty of Education, Hasyim Asy’ari University Jombang still low. Alternative learning that can be done to improve the activities and cognitive learning outcomes of students was guided discovery learning. This research was Classroom Action Research (PTK) with two cycles were carried out in the second semester of the 2015/2016 academic year. The research instruments were students’ activities assessment sheet, cognitive learning outcomes assessment sheet, learning observation sheet, and questionnaire responses of students to the learning process. Qualitative data were analyzed descriptively and quantitative data were analyzed by comparing the percentage students’ activities and cognitive learning outcomes in the cycle I and the cycle II. The result of this research were the percentage of students’ activities increased from 61,30% to 71,68%. Average of cognitive learning outcomes has increased from 73.68 to 80.04 and the percentage of cognitive achievement increased from 68.18% to 81.81%. The conclusion of this research was the guided discovery learning can improve the students activities and cognitive learning outcomes.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alfieri, P., & Naomi. (2011). Does

Discovery-based instruction enhance

learning. Journal of Education

Psychological, 103(1), 1-18.

Hamalik, O. (2003). Perencanaan

pembelajaran berdasarkan

pendekatan sistem. Bandung: Bumi

Aksara.

Kertamuda, F. (2008). Pengaruh motivasi

terhadap prestasi belajar. Jurnal

Psikologi, 21(1), 25-38.

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of

Bloom's taxonomy: An overview.

College of Education, 41(4),

Retrieved from http://www.unco.edu/

cetl/sir/stating_outcome/documents/K

rathwohl.pdf.

Nugroho, A. B. (2013). Meningkatkan hasil

belajar IPA melalui metode

pembelajaran discovery terbimbing

pada siswa kelas V SDN

Condongcatur Yogyakarta (Skripsi

tidak dipublikasikan). Yogyakarta:

Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Sardiman. (2007). Interaksi dan motivasi

belajar mengajar. Jakarta: Raja

Grafindo Persada.

Nur Hayati et. al., Peningkatan Aktivitas dan Hasil 214

Sudjana, N. 2005. Penilaian hasil proses

belajar mengajar. Badung: Remaja

Rosdakarya.

Suprihatin, Isnaeni, W., & Christijanti, W.

(2014). Aktivitas dan hasil belajar

siswa pada materi sistem pencernaan

dengan penerapan strategi

pembelajaran Discovery Learning.

Unnes Journal of Biology Education,

(3), 275-282.

Ulumi, D.F., Maridi, & Rinanto, Y. (2015).

pengaruh model pembelajaran Guided

Discovery Learning terhadap hasil

belajar biologi di SMA Negeri 2

Sukoharjo tahun pelajaran 2013/2014.

Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 7(2), 68-

Veermans, K. 2002. Intelligent support for

discovery learning. (Ph.D Thesis),

Twente: Twente University Press.

Downloads

Published

2017-02-09

Issue

Section

Instructional Model