Two sides of the same coin: Student justification for or against evolutionary theory

Pratchayapong Yasri, Thanakorn Maleesut

Abstract


Students accepting evolution are likely to rely on science as cognitive authority (i.e. science textbooks and science teachers). In contrast, those not accepting are likely to rely on religion as cognitive authority (i.e. religious texts and religious leaders).  A thematic analysis based on existing quantitative and qualitative studies has been carried out in order to propose a theoretical framework for a range of reasons contributing to students' acceptance and rejection of evolutionary theory. This article urges that instruction of evolution is more than the matter of delivering scientific contents. It also deals with personal worldviews influenced by different forms of cognitive authority. It is therefore important to put more emphasis on developing students’ learning skills to critically evaluate which source of information is scientifically appropriate, with full respect to religious belief of individuals.


Keywords


acceptance, evolution, cognitive authority, religion

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, R. D. (2007). Teaching the theory of evolution in social, intellectual, and pedagogical context. Science Education, 91(4), 664–677. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20204.

Bishop, B. A., & Anderson, C. W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 415–427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270503

Clores, M., & Limjap, A. (2006). Diversity of students' beliefs about biological evolution. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 26(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188790600607960

Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. The American Biology Teacher,, 35(3), 125–129. DOI: 10.2307/4444260

Donnelly, L., Kazempour, M., & Amirshokoohi, A. (2009). High school students' perceptions of evolution instruction: Acceptance and evolution learning experiences. Research in Science Education, 39, 643–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9097-6

Downie, J., & Barron, N. (2000). Evolution and religion: attitudes of Scottish first year biology and medical students to the teaching of evolutionary biology. Journal of Biological Education, 34(3), 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2000.9655704.

Eve, R., Losh, S., & Nzekwe, B. (2010). Lessons from the Social Psychology of Evolution Warfare: Good Science Alone is not enough. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 3(2), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-010-0232-2

Francis, L., & Greer, J. (1999). Attitudes towards creationism and evolutionary theory: the debate among secondary pupils attending Catholic and Protestant schools in Northern Ireland. Public Understanding of Science, 8(2), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/8/2/302

Francis, L., Gibson, H., & Fulljames, P. (1990). Attitude towards Christianity, Creationism, Scientism and Interest in Science among 11-15 Year Olds. British Journal of Religious Education, 13(1), 4–17.

Fulljames, P., Gibson, H., & Francis, L. (1991). Creationism, Scientism, Christianity and Science: A Study in Adolescent Attitudes. British Educational Research Journal, 17(2), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192910170208

Hokayem, H., & BouJaoude, S. (2008). College students' perceptions of the theory of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(4), 395–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20233

Kampourakis, K., & Zogza, V. (2007). Students’ preconceptions about evolution: How accurate is the characterization as “Lamarckian” when considering the history of evolutionary thought? Science & Education, 16, 393–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9019-9

Larson, E. J., & Witham, L. (1998). Leading scientists still reject God. Nature, 394(6691), 313–313. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/28481.pdf?origin=ppub

Lombrozo, T., Thanukos, A., & Weisberg, M. (2008). The Importance of Understanding the Nature of Science for Accepting Evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1(3), 290–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-008-0061-8

Martin, J. W. (2010). Compatibility of major US Christian denominations with evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 3(3), 420–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-010-0221-5

Martin-Hansen, L. (2008). First-Year College Students’ Conflict with Religion and Science. Science & Education, 17(4), 317–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9039-5

Özay Köse, E. (2010). Biology students “and teachers” religious beliefs and attitudes towards theory of evolution. Hacettepe Universitesi Journal of Education, 38, 189–200. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ893930

Passmore, C., & Stewart, J. (2002). A modeling approach to teaching evolutionary biology in high schools*. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10020

Rasoamampianina, V. A. (2012). How is encyclopaedia authority established? School of Education. Glasgow: University of Glasgow.

Rieh, S. Y., & Hilligoss, B. (2008). College students’ credibility judgments in the information-seeking process. In M. J. Metzger & A. J. Flanagin, Digital media, youth, and credibility-the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation series on digital media and learning (pp. 49–72). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Rutledge, M., & Sadler, K. (2007). Reliability of the measure of acceptance of the theory of evolution (MATE) instrument with university students. The American Biology Teacher,, 51, 275–280. https://doi.org/10.1662/0002-7685(2007)69[332:ROTMOA]2.0.CO;2

Smith, M. (2013). The Role of Authority in Science and Religion with Implications for Science Teaching and Learning. Science & Education, 22(3), 605–634.

Southcott, R., & Downie, J. R. (2012). Evolution and Religion: Attitudes of Scottish Bioscience Students to the Teaching of Evolutionary Biology. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 5(2), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-012-0419-9

Taber, K. S., Billingsley, B., Riga, F., & Newdick, H. (2011). Secondary students' responses to perceptions of the relationship between science and religion: Stances identified from an interview study. Science Education, 95(6), 1000–1025. DOI: 10.1002/sce.20459

Wiles, J. (2010). Overwhelming scientific confidence in evolution and its centrality in science education and the public disconnect. Science Education Review, 9(1), 18–27. Retrieved from www.sciencetheearth.com/uploads/2/4/6/5/24658156/2010_wiles_overwhelming_scientific_confidence_in_evolution_and_its.pdf.

Wilson, P. (1983). Second-hand knowledge: An inquiry into cognitive authority. London: Greenwood Press.

Winslow, M. W., Staver, J. R., & Scharmann, L. C. (2011). Evolution and personal religious belief: Christian university biology-related majors' search for reconciliation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(9), 1026–1049. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20417

Woods, C. S., & Scharmann, L. C. (2001). High school students’ perceptions of evolutionary theory. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 6(2).Retrieved from http://ejse.southwestern.edu/article/view/7676/5443.

Yasri, P., & Mancy, R. (2014). Understanding Student Approaches to Learning Evolution in the Context of their Perceptions of the Relationship between Science and Religion. International Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 24–45. https:// doi.org/10.1002/tea.21302

Yasri, P., Arthur, S., Smith, M. U., & Mancy, R. (2013). Relating Science and Religion: An Ontology of Taxonomies and Development of a Research Tool for Identifying Individual Views. Science & Education, 22(10), 2679–2707. DOI:10.1007/s11191-013-9623-4




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i1.5305

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia)

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

View JPBI Stats

JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) by Department of Biology Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Muhammadiyah Malang and collaborates with Asosiasi Lesson Study Indonesia (ALSI) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licensep-ISSN (Print) 2442-3750 | e-ISSN (Online) 2527-6204